A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

We describe the implantation of 4 epidural stimulation paddles directly above the dura mater over both the left and right frontopolar and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices. Placement was verified using postoperative computed tomography (CT) coregistered with presurgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Abstract

We describe the targeting, surgical technique, intraoperative testing, and postoperative programming strategy for the invasive neuromodulatory technique termed epidural prefrontal cortical stimulation (EpCS). While EpCS has been explored by several groups, the unique approach described here involves surgical placement of four epidural cortical stimulation paddles - two over the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and two over the frontopolar cortex (FPC). The safety and efficacy of this technique for treatment-resistant depression has been described previously by the authors. 5 subjects were implanted with EpCS (3 with major depression, 2 with bipolar affective disorder I, depressive type) and their depressive symptoms were followed for five years. Application of chronic electrical stimulation (10-15mA) across all four of these paddles produced a durable antidepressant response for 3 of 5 subjects at the five-year follow-up. This manuscript discusses the unique intraoperative testing strategy as well as the programming approaches employed in this study. We aim to give guidance into improving the effect size of this novel form of stimulation.

Introduction

Nonpharmacologic brain stimulation therapies have emerged as potentially promising treatments for a variety of illnesses, including depression1. Depression is a disabling psychiatric disorder of melancholia that not only affects an individual's daily life and social functioning2, but is a leading cause of premature mortality and disability worldwide3. Large clinical trials have shown that pharmacologic interventions have limited success in treating depression4. Roughly 41% of patients fail to respond to two adequate trials of pharmacologic treatment, which is the definition of treatment resistant depression (TRD)5,6.

It is for these patients that interventional psychiatric approaches have emerged1, though they vary widely in methodology, with some options being significantly more invasive than others7. Guiding these therapies is the emerging understanding of mood disorders as functions of anatomic interconnections within brain regions8. Depression is a model illness for studying cooperative brain stimulation treatments, as studies have suggested that the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is hypoactive while the right DLPFC is hyperactive9,10. The frontopolar cortex (FPC) is another region of interest due to its role in the mood regulatory circuit11 and is consistently found to have increased resting-state activity in patients suffering from depression12.

Research over the past decade has demonstrated the efficacy of epidural cortical stimulation (ECS)13,14 in managing intractable pain syndrome15,16,17,18, aiding in stroke recovery19, and improving Parkinson's disease and movement disorders20. These studies generally utilized chronic unilateral ECS of the primary motor cortex21. In addition, several cortical nodes including the anterior cingulate cortex, left temporoparietal junction, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex have been targeted for tinnitus22,23,24. A form of ECS, epidural prefrontal cortical stimulation (EpCS) has been utilized to treat depression. Like subdural prefrontal cortical stimulation25,26, EpCS provides constant stimulation to cortical network nodes of interest27,28,29. EpCS is safer than subdural cortical stimulation from the standpoint of seizure induction and hemorrhage risk13,30.

In this protocol, we describe the method of bilateral EpCS, a unique therapeutic approach for cooperative stimulation of multiple brain regions of interest28. The electrical device remains separated from the cortex by the arachnoid space, making it potentially safer than deep brain stimulation (DBS), where electrodes lie within brain tissue31. EpCS may therefore be preferred over more invasive stimulation techniques in patients at high risk for surgical complications, including intracranial hemorrhage32. We observed the efficacy, safety, and durability of chronic intermittent EpCS of the DLPFC and FPC over a five-year period in 5 patients28,33.

Protocol

These experiments were conducted at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) in compliance with an Investigational Device Exemption issued to Ziad Nahas and later transferred to Edward Baron Short under US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance. The MUSC Institutional Review Board approved the protocol.

1. Participants

  1. For each subject, conduct comprehensive assessment including detailed neuropsychological testing at baseline and repeatedly after implantation. Fuse the patient's brain MRI with a digital 3D Brodmann area map prior to surgery.
  2. Keep patients on stable medication regimens for a minimum of 4 weeks prior and for 5 months following surgery.
    1. Dose reductions are permitted if improvements are seen and the patient is able to maintain clinical benefit or decrease current or newly expressed side effects without worsening of symptoms. Increases in medication dose are advised against as higher doses of concurrent medications pose unknown combinatory risks.
  3. If patients are implanted with a vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy device, turn the device off for at least 6 months prior to, and 1 year following, their enrollment. The acute use of concurrent implantable neuromodulation techniques has not been explored and therefore we advise turning off prior implanted devices to avoid unknown synergistic negative effects, and to minimize safety risk to patient.
    NOTE: In the longer 5-year follow-up period, VNS stimulation parameters and medications may be changed in type or dose however ECT, TMS and DBS should not be provided. This is to conservatively minimize risk to the patient. Also, given the placement of the implant, we believe that the electrode may potentially be damaged by external magnetic or electrical stimulation targeting of nearby or underlying cortical areas. VNS is excluded from this list as it is implanted outside of the skull and its direct cortical effects are relayed polysynaptically rather than directly as in ECT, TMS, and DBS.
  4. A minimum 2-week recovery period follows implantation.

2. Surgical Planning and Procedure

  1. Perform the entire surgical procedure while using complete hemodynamic monitoring consisting of electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, end-tidal CO2, and non-invasive blood pressure monitoring.
  2. Phase 1
    1. Sedation
      1. Induce moderate sedation in the patient using intravenous fentanyl (50-250 micrograms) as well as a propofol infusion (25-100 micrograms/kg/min).
      2. Have the surgeon inject 2 cc of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine locally at the site of the burr hole and surgical headrest pin locations on the scalp to the periosteum. Mark the location for bicoronal incision and infiltrate the area with local anesthetic, about 5 ccs of an equal mixture of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and bupivacaine 0.5%.
      3. Orient the patient in a supine position on the operating table.
    2. Placement planning
      1. To maintain head stability and limit movement, use a skull clamp with surgical pins. Position the patient supine with the head elevated and neck slightly flexed. Determine the stereotactic placement of the 4 paddle leads using the 3D tagged MRI image and surface landmarks of the patient's head, previously imported into a neuronavigation system.
      2. Use the linear "look ahead" function to indicate the underlying cortical area of interest. Map targeted cortical areas using a pointer wand.
    3. Placement
      1. Sterilely drape the patient. Make a bicoronal incision behind the hairline using a scalpel (surgeon's preference). Peel the flap forward.
        1. Using a generic 4-mm spherical diamond drill bit, make two slit-shaped craniotomies, one over each frontal hemisphere, (each 3 cm by 0.5 cm) parallel and anterior to the coronal suture. Wax the bone edges.
      2. Insert the sterile paddle leads epidurally (the anatomical space between the dura and the inner table of the skull, known as the epidural space) over the desired areas.
    4. Placement verification
      1. Use the neuronavigation equipment and intraoperative fluoroscopy in conjunction to coregister and verify accurate lead placement. When the pointer wand coincides with the Brodmann map domain of interest on the computer screen and with the position and orientation of the electrode paddle on the plain X-rays in multiple planes, the placement is correct.
      2. Following these final adjustments, anchor the paddle leads to the edge of the craniectomy slit openings. Use "dog-bone" style plates and micro-screws to anchor the leads.
        1. At this point, note the tails of the paddle leads will exit the skull at a soft angle via grooves sunk in the posterior edge of the craniectomies; these grooves are created as part of the craniotomy to reduce wire tension. Secure the tails to the bone surface with "dog-bone" microplates and screws.
    5. Proceed to intraoperative testing.

3. Intraoperative Testing

  1. Lift the moderate propofol sedation by discontinuing the infusion. Begin testing once the patient regains full alertness34.
  2. Conduct patient masked, sham-controlled parametric testing of the bilateral anterior or midlateral leads.
    1. Connect all four leads to external stimulators. Turn on the external stimulators, apply stimulation at 0 V, 2 V, and 4-5 V at 60 Hz. Randomize the order, with "no simulation condition" (0 V) always occurring first and at a minimum once more during testing. Apply each train of stimulation for 3 min.
    2. During each 3 min train of stimulation, record the subject's subjective experience through responses to a series of 13 questions on a visual analogue scale (0 = extremely sad or depressed and 100 = extremely happy or great mood.
      1. Present the questions using a laptop. Phrase the questions along the lines of "I feel SAD," "I feel ANXIOUS," "I feel SETTLED emotionally," and "I feel ATTENTIVE to my surroundings."
      2. Allow the patient to express any perceived changes in mood, attention, or cognition if they so desire.
  3. Phase 2
    NOTE: The second phase of surgery immediately follows the above testing. Patients were placed under general endotracheal anesthesia to allow for the implantation of a pulse generator with 2 channels on each side in the chest wall, 2 cm inferior to the clavicle. The generators were connected individually to two ipsilateral leads using extension leads that were tunneled subcutaneously behind the ear, down the neck, and to the infraclavicular pockets. Right and left Channel 1s were connected to the ipsilateral anterior frontal pole. Right and left Channel 2s were connected to the ipsilateral lead over the mid-lateral prefrontal cortex. The final step of the intraoperative procedure involved testing the system's impedance and finally, turning it off. It was not re-activated until two to three weeks later.
    1. Perform this phase immediately after intraoperative testing.
    2. Discard lead extensions. Insert paddle tails under the parietal galea.
    3. Irrigate the bicoronal incision with bacitracin solution. Sprinkle the bone openings with vancomycin powder and fit with ribbons of sterile compressed sponge (e.g., gelfoam). Close the scalp with polyglactin (e.g., vicryl) and nylon sutures with inverted interrupted 2-0 polyglactin sutures to galea and running 3-0 nylon to skin. Place a sterile dressing over the area. Remove the drapes and head holder.
    4. Place the patient under general endotracheal anesthesia, as dictated by the patient's previous anesthesia history and comorbidities as well as the anesthesiologist's preference and expertise, for bilateral pulse generation implantation.
    5. Implantation of pulse generators
      1. Implant a pulse generator with 2 channels on each side in the chest wall, 2 cm inferior to the clavicle.
        1. Make skin incisions over the parietal scalp and below the clavicle on both sides to the depth of subcutaneous fat using a standard scalpel (or surgeon's preference). In this layer, pass a hollow tunneling rod between the parietal and infraclavicular incisions. Thread the individual extension cords for each paddle through the hollow lumen of the tunneling rod then remove the tunneling rod.
      2. Connect generators individually to two ipsilateral leads using the extension leads.
        1. Tunnel the leads subcutaneously behind the ear, down the neck, and to the infraclavicular pockets.
        2. Connect right and left Channel 1s to the ipsilateral anterior frontal pole.
        3. Connect right and left Channel 2s to the ipsilateral lead over the mid-lateral prefrontal cortex.
      3. Create subcutaneous pockets below the clavicles using blunt dissection.
    6. Connect and turn on the system using the associated clinician programmer device, per device instructions. Once active, select each lead individually and use the "Impedance" section to test contact impedance. Record values for future reference. Turn off the system. Do not reactivate until two to three weeks post-surgery.
    7. Close the incision using 3-0 interrupted polyglactin suture to fascia and running 4-0 nylon to skin. Apply sterile dressings over the area. Extubate the patient and take them to recovery.

4. Postoperative Inpatient Recovery

  1. Keep patients on an inpatient ward for at least 48 hours post-surgery for observation. Obtain a high resolution spiral CT scan without contrast (FOV=256 mm, slice thickness=1.5 mm, gap=0, number of slices=110, pitch (table-scan ratio = 2:1 and reconstruction scan slice increment = 2 mm)) to confirm lead placement and monitor for intracranial bleeding.
  2. Provide patients with opiate analgesics, which may be continued as needed on an outpatient basis.

5. Postoperative Testing and Stimulation Optimization Period

  1. Perform brief psychological screenings of patients approximately 2 to 3 weeks post-implantation
    1. Assess general cognitive functioning, including executive functioning and memory.
    2. Assess psychological (attention, mood and social relatedness) and biological (electroencephalogram) correlates. Use the information from these assessments to inform the optimal voltage settings for clinical follow-up; these will ultimately correspond to various stimulation parameters of the different leads.
  2. 20 min after these evaluations, activate the EpCS device for the first time after implantation. Determine the optimal voltage settings, and repeat neuropsychological testing 1 h following EpCS lead activation.
    1. Discharge patients with chronic and intermittent bilateral stimulation at the following settings: 130 Hz, 4.5-6.5 V, 210 µs, across all 4 paddles for each lead; these general settings are the authors' recommendations from previously published 5 year follow-up data33.
    2. To determine optimal voltage settings in the 4.5-6.5V range, assess previously determined psychological and biological correlates to best estimate the required voltage for each particular patient.
      NOTE: Further optimization will occur in the long-term follow-up phase.
  3. Set stimulation to 30 min on / 2.5 h off (from the hours of 8 AM to 10 PM). Set stimulation to "off" throughout the night.
    NOTE: These intermittent settings are strikingly different from most DBS or ECS protocols, which employ constant stimulation 24 hours per day. Patients receive an approximate total of 36,000 stimuli per day, as opposed to 345,600 had stimulation been continuous. Intermittent stimulation is chosen to attempt to optimize durable long-term change that does not relapse with cessation of treatment (i.e., when the battery expires).
  4. Stimulation optimization
    1. Perform optimization from weeks 2 to 4 post-implantation. Use data previously gathered from psychological and biological correlates (see step 5.1.2) to inform choices regarding parameter adjustment and interval selection. Ultimately, use active patient input to guide parameter changes during this time, particularly thoughts regarding what appears to help the most in alleviating depressive symptoms, increasing attention, or increasing energy.
  5. At the end of the 4th week, set stimulation parameters and hold constant for 17 weeks.

6. Chronic Stimulation Parameters

  1. During the follow-up period, change stimulation parameters over time to continue providing optimal therapy.
    1. Log the patient's frequency, intensity, and pulse width settings over time as well as corresponding psychological and biological correlates.
    2. As required by the patient's symptoms, increase/decrease voltage parameters by modest and equal increments during each follow-up session, such as 0.5V.
      NOTE: Changing stimulation frequency and/or pulse width is less likely to be necessary. The author's recommendations for these parameters are listed above and are based on studies of deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder35 and were altered during years 2-5 of therapy.
  2. During the follow-up period, see participants on a quarterly basis. If clinically indicated, see participants more frequently, such as weekly. In addition to a clinical assessment of their functioning and symptomatology, interrogate their current stimulation parameters and adjust as needed.
    1. To evaluate and adjust settings, place the extension of the programmer wand directly over an IPG (located 2 cm inferior to the clavicle) to interrogate ipsilateral paddles. Participants may leave their clothing on for programming.
    2. Select NAME OF MENU ITEM to bring up the device stimulation parameters; this includes information on battery charge and use, cycling, frequency, voltage, contact impedance, and therapeutic delivery.
      1. Using the "Therapeutic Delivery" section, one can measure the true level of current being delivered by each lead at that moment.
        NOTE: As impedance may vary between subjects and even between the contacts/leads of an individual subject, this approach allows a much more accurate assessment than simply looking at voltage alone.
      2. Because the neurostimulator does not allow for a constant current setting if more than one of the contacts is activated, use the therapy delivery to determine current delivery at a given voltage then monitor the impedance/current delivery at that set voltage over time.
        NOTE: Impedance generally varies less than 20-50 Ω over the course of a year in a given paddle lead. The optimized range of current in past participants has been 10-15 mA.
    3. Incorporate the clinical assessment and patient feedback, and make adjustments to the stimulation parameters as required. Reevaluate the effectiveness of these changes at the next clinical encounter.
      NOTE: As one increases therapeutic delivery current between 10-15 mA, participants may eventually experience a blunting of affect and cognition. By lowering the therapeutic delivery by.5-1 mA, participants can achieve a maximal antidepressant response without the blunting of affect or cognition. These settings may be representative of the optimal stimulation range that can be individualized to the participant. This inverted U-shaped curve has been observed in movement disorder DBS programming as well36.
  3. Use the following settings for years 2-5 of stimulation: chronic, bilateral stimulation to the left and right frontopolar cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex using a total of 4 paddle leads at 130 Hz, 4.5-6.5 V, 210 µs across all 4 paddles for each lead.
    NOTE: The change from an initial 60 Hz to 130 Hz represents a difference from another study using a single paddle27, and reflects a programming strategy more similar to DBS37. This change continued to reflect ideas of intermittency38.
  4. Continue to utilize cycling of the stimulation, including turning the stimulation off at night. Optimize the cycled stimulation on/off periods through a process of trial and error.
    NOTE: Subjects may receive continuous stimulation, however rapidly alternating on/off cycles (on 0.1 s, off 0.1-0.2 s) may prolong battery life while simulating continuous stimulation.
  5. Monitor batteries for depletion and replace as necessary.

Results

Sample Characteristics: A total of 6 patients were enrolled in this trial. 1 withdrew prior to EpCS implantation. A total of 5 patients (3 female, mean age=44.2 years, SD=9.4 years) received EpCS implantation and completed the trial through the 5-year follow-up period. Sample characteristics are summarized in Table 1. A total of 3 subjects had a diagnosis of MDD while the 2 remaining participants had a diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder I, depressive...

Discussion

In this manuscript, we describe the method of EpCS of the bilateral DLPFC and FPC for the treatment of TRD. This first iteration of bilateral EpCS of DLPFC and FPC resulted in a remission rate of 60% at five year follow-up, and 80% shortly thereafter, in a group of severely depressed patients33. Despite years of chronic stimulation of the FPC and DLPFC, no changes were noted in neuropsychiatric measures of cognition and this method was generally well tolerated by all participants.

Disclosures

The authors have no relevant disclosures including no competing financial interests or other conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The Stanford Clinical and Translational Science Award to Spectrum (NIH UL1 TR 001085) (NRW) and the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation (NRW).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
3T MRI ScannerSiemens
Computer workstation
Imaging softwareUniversity of South CarolineMRIcro; http://www.sph.sc.edu/comd/rorden/mricro.html
Electrocardiography
Pulse oximetry
End-tidal CO2
Non-invasive blood pressure monitoring
Fentanyl (50-250 micrograms)
Propofol infusion (25-100 micrograms/kg/min
2% lidocaine with epinephrine (2ccs)
Equal mixture of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and bupivacaine 0.5% (5ccs)
Skull clamp with surgical pinsIntegraTM, Plainsboro, New JerseyMayfield
Neuronavigation systemBrainLab, Westchester, IllinoisVectorVision
Paddle leads with extensionsMedtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MinnesotaResume
Pulse generater with 2 channelsMedtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MinnesotaSynergy
NeurostimulatorMedtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MinnesotaActiva PC/RC
Standard aesculap power-drill
Generic 4mm spherical diamond drill bit
Plates and microscrewsStryker, Kalamazoo, MichiganLeibinger "Dog-bone" style
Bacitracin solution
Vancomycin power
Gelfoam
2-0 vicryl sutures
3-0 nylon sutures
Sterile dressing materals
Endotracheal anesthesiaAs dictated by patient's history and anesthesiologist's preference
3-0 vicryl sutures
4-0 nylon sutures
High resolution spiral CT scan without contrast
Opiate analgesics
Programmer wandMedtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MinnesotaN'Vision Clinician Programmer

References

  1. Williams, N. R., et al. Interventional Psychiatry: Why Now?. J Clin Psychiatry. 75 (8), 895-897 (2014).
  2. Williams, N., Simpson, A. N., Simpson, K., Nahas, Z. Relapse rates with long-term antidepressant drug therapy: a meta-analysis. Hum Psychopharmacol. 24 (5), 401-408 (2009).
  3. Ferrari, A. J., et al. Burden of Depressive Disorders by Country, Sex, Age, and Year: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLOS Med. 10 (11), e1001547 (2013).
  4. Rush, A. J., et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 163 (11), 1905-1917 (2006).
  5. Berlim, M. T., Fleck, M. P., Turecki, G. Current trends in the assessment and somatic treatment of resistant/refractory major depression: An overview. Ann Med. 40 (2), 149-159 (2008).
  6. Howland, R. H. Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) Part 2: Study outcomes. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 46 (10), 21-24 (2008).
  7. Williams, N. R., et al. Role of functional imaging in the development and refinement of invasive neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders. World J Radiol. 6 (10), 756-778 (2014).
  8. Kober, H., et al. Functional grouping and cortical-subcortical interactions in emotion: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage. 42 (2), 998-1031 (2008).
  9. George, M. S., Ketter, T. A., Post, R. M. SPECT and PET imaging in mood disorders. J Clin Psychiatry. 54, 6-13 (1993).
  10. Grimm, S., et al. Imbalance between left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression is linked to negative emotional judgment: an fMRI study in severe major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 63 (4), 369-376 (2008).
  11. Sawaya, H., et al. Resting-state functional connectivity of antero-medial prefrontal cortex sub-regions in major depression and relationship to emotional intelligence. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 18 (6), (2015).
  12. Fitzgerald, P. B., Laird, A. R., Maller, J., Daskalakis, Z. J. A meta-analytic study of changes in brain activation in depression. Hum Brain Mapp. 29 (6), 683-695 (2008).
  13. Tronnier, V., Rasche, D. Epidural and subdural stimulation. Handb Clin Neurol. 116, 343-351 (2013).
  14. Lefaucheur, J. P. Principles of therapeutic use of transcranial and epidural cortical stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 119 (10), 2179-2184 (2008).
  15. Canavero, S., Bonicalzi, V. Therapeutic extradural cortical stimulation for central and neuropathic pain: a review. Clin J Pain. 18 (1), 48-55 (2002).
  16. Nguyen, J. P., et al. Treatment of deafferentation pain by chronic stimulation of the motor cortex: report of a series of 20 cases. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 68, 54-60 (1997).
  17. Nguyen, J. P., et al. Motor cortex stimulation in the treatment of central and neuropathic pain. Arch Med Res. 31 (3), 263-265 (2000).
  18. Tsubokawa, T., Katayama, Y., Yamamoto, T., Hirayama, T., Koyama, S. Chronic motor cortex stimulation for the treatment of central pain. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 52, 137-139 (1991).
  19. Brown, J. A., Lutsep, H. L., Weinand, M., Cramer, S. C. Motor cortex stimulation for the enhancement of recovery from stroke: a prospective, multicenter safety study. Neurosurgery. 58 (3), 464-473 (2006).
  20. Priori, A., Lefaucheur, J. P. Chronic epidural motor cortical stimulation for movement disorders. Lancet Neurol. 6 (3), 279-286 (2007).
  21. Lima, M. C., Fregni, F. Motor cortex stimulation for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Neurology. 70 (24), 2329-2337 (2008).
  22. De Ridder, D., et al. Burst stimulation of the auditory cortex: a new form of neurostimulation for noise-like tinnitus suppression. J Neurosurg. 112 (6), 1289-1294 (2010).
  23. De Ridder, D., et al. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrode implant for intractable tinnitus. World Neurosurg. 77 (5-6), 778-784 (2012).
  24. De Ridder, D., Joos, K., Vanneste, S. Anterior cingulate implants for tinnitus: report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg. 124 (4), 893-901 (2016).
  25. De Ridder, D., Leong, S. L., Manning, P., Vanneste, S., Glue, P. Anterior Cingulate Implant for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. World Neurosurg. , (2016).
  26. De Ridder, D., et al. Anterior Cingulate Implant for Alcohol Dependence: Case Report. Neurosurgery. 78 (6), E883-E893 (2016).
  27. Kopell, B. H., et al. Epidural cortical stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for refractory major depressive disorder. Neurosurgery. 69 (5), 1015-1029 (2011).
  28. Nahas, Z., et al. Bilateral epidural prefrontal cortical stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry. 67 (2), 101-109 (2010).
  29. Williams, N. R., et al. Five-Year Follow-Up of Bilateral Epidural Prefrontal Cortical Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression. Brain Stimul. , (2016).
  30. Henderson, J. M., Heit, G., Fisher, R. S. Recurrent seizures related to motor cortex stimulator programming. Neuromodulation. 13 (1), 37-43 (2010).
  31. Mayberg, H. S., et al. Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron. 45 (5), 651-660 (2005).
  32. Ben-Haim, S., Asaad, W. F., Gale, J. T., Eskandar, E. N. RISK FACTORS FOR HEMORRHAGE DURING MICROELECTRODE-GUIDED DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION AND THE INTRODUCTION OF AN IMPROVED MICROELECTRODE DESIGN. Neurosurgery. 64 (4), 754-762 (2009).
  33. Williams, N. R., et al. Five Year Follow-Up of Bilateral Epidural Prefrontal Cortical Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression. Brain Stimul. 9 (6), 897-904 (2016).
  34. Kraus, J. K., Pohle, T. Intraoperative test stimulation with a modified implantable pulse generator in deep brain stimulation. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 142 (5), 587-589 (2000).
  35. Greenberg, B. D., et al. Deep brain stimulation of the ventral internal capsule/ventral striatum for obsessive-compulsive disorder: worldwide experience. Mol Psychiatry. 15 (1), 64-79 (2010).
  36. Denys, D., Feenstra, M., Schuurman, R. . Deep Brain Stimulation: A New Frontier in Psychiatry. , (2012).
  37. Volkmann, J., Moro, E., Pahwa, R. Basic algorithms for the programming of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 21, S284-S289 (2006).
  38. Brocker, D. T., et al. Improved efficacy of temporally non-regular deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol. 239, 60-67 (2013).
  39. Sackeim, H. A. The definition and meaning of treatment-resistant depression. The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 62, 10-17 (2001).
  40. Endicott, J., Nee, J., Harrison, W., Blumenthal, R. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure. Psychopharmacol bulletin. 29 (2), 321-326 (1993).
  41. Fox, M. D., Buckner, R. L., White, M. P., Greicius, M. D., Pascual-Leone, A. Efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation targets for depression is related to intrinsic functional connectivity with the subgenual cingulate. Biol Psychiatry. 72 (7), 595-603 (2012).
  42. Herbsman, T., et al. More lateral and anterior prefrontal coil location is associated with better repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation antidepressant response. Biol Psychiatry. 66 (5), 509-515 (2009).
  43. Pathak, Y., et al. The role of electrode location and stimulation polarity in patient response to cortical stimulation for major depressive disorder. Brain stimul. 6 (3), 254-260 (2013).
  44. George, M. S., et al. Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder: a sham-controlled randomized trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 67 (5), 507-516 (2010).
  45. Williams, N. R., et al. Five-Year Follow-Up of Bilateral Epidural Prefrontal Cortical Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression. Brain Stim. 9 (6), 897-904 (2016).
  46. Winawer, J., Parvizi, J. Linking Electrical Stimulation of Human Primary Visual Cortex, Size of Affected Cortical Area, Neuronal Responses, and Subjective Experience. Neuron. 92 (6), 1213-1219 (2016).
  47. Bergfeld, I. O., et al. Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Anterior Limb of the Internal Capsule for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA psychiatry (Chicago, Ill). 73 (5), 456-464 (2016).
  48. Canavero, S. . Textbook of Cortical Brain Stimulation. , (2015).
  49. Herrington, T. M., Cheng, J. J., Eskandar, E. N. Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 115 (1), 19-38 (2016).
  50. Williams, N. R., et al. Five-Year Follow-Up of Bilateral Epidural Prefrontal Cortical Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression. Brain Stimul. 9 (6), 897-904 (2016).
  51. Camprodon, J. A., et al. Epidural Cortical Stimulation of the Left DLPFC Leads to Dose-Dependent Enhancement of Working Memory in Patients with MDD. Brain Stimul. 8 (2), 408 (2015).
  52. Williams, N. R., et al. Unilateral ultra-brief pulse electroconvulsive therapy for depression in Parkinson's disease. Acta neurologica Scandinavica. 135 (4), (2016).
  53. Therapy, A. P. A. T. F. o. E. The Practice of ECT: Recommendations for Treatment, Training and Privileging. Convulsive therapy. 6 (2), 85-120 (1990).
  54. Mogilner, A. Y., Rezai, A. R. Epidural motor cortex stimulation with functional imaging guidance. Neurosurg focus. 11 (3), e4 (2001).
  55. De Ridder, D., et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and extradural electrodes implanted on secondary auditory cortex for tinnitus suppression. J Neurosurg. 114 (4), 903-911 (2011).
  56. De Ridder, D., Joos, K., Vanneste, S. Anterior cingulate implants for tinnitus: report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg. 124 (4), 893-901 (2016).
  57. Baeken, C., et al. Accelerated HF-rTMS in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: Insights from subgenual anterior cingulate functional connectivity. World J Biol Psychiatry. 15 (4), 286-297 (2014).
  58. Baeken, C., et al. The Impact of Accelerated HF-rTMS on the Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Refractory Unipolar Major Depression: Insights From 18FDG PET Brain Imaging. Brain Stimul. 8 (4), 808-815 (2015).
  59. Riva-Posse, P., et al. Defining Critical White Matter Pathways Mediating Successful Subcallosal Cingulate Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression. Biol psychiatry. 76 (12), 963-969 (2014).
  60. Fox, M. D., Halko, M. A., Eldaief, M. C., Pascual-Leone, A. Measuring and manipulating brain connectivity with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Neuroimage. 62 (4), 2232-2243 (2012).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Deep brain stimulationtreatment resistant depressionepidural cortical stimulationepidural prefrontal cortical stimulationdorsolateral prefrontal cortexbrain stimulationinterventional psychiatry

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved