The sport of orienteering is emerging as an effective way to train both the body and brain as it combines physical activity with spatial navigation. The current manuscript offers a guide on how to implement the sport of orienteering in research.
The sport of orienteering combines physical activity with spatial navigation. Using only a map and a compass, the orienteer must locate a series of checkpoints over unfamiliar terrain using any navigational route they choose and while moving as quickly as possible. Although expert orienteers have superior spatial memory and navigational abilities, even a single session of orienteering can benefit cognition, suggesting that orienteering may be a promising way to train the brain. Research interventions involving orienteering may be especially beneficial for staving off Alzheimer's disease and related dementias that are afflicted by early impairments in wayfinding and spatial cognition. Though orienteering has gained traction in recent literature, certain barriers exist for researchers who are unfamiliar with the sport and wish to implement an intervention. Specifically, a lack of research-based resources for creating orienteering maps and courses may prevent those wishing to study orienteering from designing an intervention. Therefore, this report provides the fundamental information needed to develop orienteering maps and courses and how to implement orienteering interventions in a research setting.
Orienteering combines spatial navigation with exercise, predominantly in the form of running. The objective of the sport is to use a map and compass to navigate to numerous checkpoints across an unfamiliar area as quickly as possible1. Orienteers may choose any navigational route they wish to locate a series of checkpoints, called an orienteering course. Orienteering courses vary in navigational difficulty; the level of challenge is tailored to match the participant's skill level, ensuring an appropriate and engaging navigational experience.
The ability to locate checkpoints requires spatial processing and wayfinding skills, and orienteering experts of all ages report more efficient spatial strategies while navigating and better spatial processing than non-orienteering controls2,3,4. When novices engage in orienteering at a vigorous exercise intensity, even a single session can improve spatial memory and increase brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a growth factor that supports the optimal functioning of brain cells5. Orienteering at a moderate intensity can also improve memory but may require consistent training. Bao and colleagues observed improvements in spatial memory when beginners participated in moderate-intensity orienteering twice weekly for 12 weeks (i.e., 24 sessions)6.
Although running alone can enhance the structure and function of brain regions like the hippocampus, improving spatial7,8,9 and episodic memory10,11,12, research suggests these effects may be amplified when running is combined with cognitively challenging tasks13,14,15,16,17,18. Furthermore, orienteering often involves vigorous exercise with short breaks at the checkpoints, resembling high-intensity interval training (HIIT). This format of exercise has been shown to significantly boost cognitive function19, 20 and increase BDNF21,22,23 more effectively than continuous, moderate-intensity exercise. Vigorous exercise may be especially beneficial for cognition because it causes the accumulation of lactate that can act as a fuel source for the brain24 as well as an activator of BDNF to support cognitive function25,26,27, but there is limited research examining this pathway in humans28,29,30.
Multiple theories could explain why orienteering benefits cognition. For one, orienteering relies on processes similar to hunter-gatherer activities, and according to the Adaptive Capacity Model31, the brain and body may be more receptive to training activities with an evolutionary semblance. Moreover, orienteering requires spatial navigation, which has largely been engineered out of modern life due to the ubiquitous global positioning system (GPS) technology32, and so it may also be a case of "use it or lose it" 33.
Given the novelty and promise of orienteering to enhance human cognition, it is important to develop resources and establish guidelines that help researchers unfamiliar with the sport implement an orienteering intervention. Therefore, this current protocol aims to provide researchers with the necessary steps for developing orienteering maps, courses, and interventions within a research setting.
The data outlined in this manuscript are from a previous study that received ethical clearance from the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (#14560).
1. Choosing a location
2. Creating an orienteering map
NOTE: If an orienteering map does not exist for the chosen location, create one.
Figure 1: A sample orienteering base map using OpenOriententeeringMap. Buttons and map elements required to create simplified maps have been highlighted. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
3. Designing an orienteering course
NOTE: An orienteering course is a sequence of checkpoints that participants must locate in numerical order, choosing any route that the participants prefer. The course's physical and navigational difficulty can be adjusted by varying the distance covered and the placement of the checkpoints (see section 3.2). The course's difficulty varies based on the participant's experience and skill. The course length (in kilometers) is determined by the participant's skill level (i.e., in the same amount of time, advanced orienteers will be able to complete a longer than a beginner), the runnability of the chosen terrain, and the participant's fitness level. For novice orienteers in most terrains, assume an average moving pace of 7-10 min per kilometer and adjust the course distance accordingly.
Figure 2: A sample beginner-level orienteering course created in OpenOrienteeringMap. Descriptions of the control locations (clues) have been included with the map in this figure but may be printed as per step 3.2.1.8. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: A sample intermediate-level orienteering course created in OpenOrienteeringMap. Descriptions of the control locations (clues) have been included with the map in this figure but may be printed as per step 3.2.1.8. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: A sample advanced-level orienteering course created in OpenOrienteeringMap. Descriptions of the control locations (clues) have been included with the map in this figure but may be printed as per step 3.2.1.8. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
4. Implementing an orienteering intervention
NOTE: The methodology for implementing an orienteering intervention can vary depending on the participant's experience with orienteering, available materials, exercise parameters, and research variables of interest. The protocol below outlines the essential steps to implement an orienteering intervention in a research setting.
5. Implementing chronic orienteering interventions
Table 1. Sample 6-week chronic orienteering program progression. The table outlines a sample lesson plan for administering a chronic orienteering intervention over 6 weeks, with two orienteering sessions per week. The course difficulty level and the different skills, purposes, and objectives to be taught are outlined for each session. Please click here to download this Table.
6. Evaluating orienteering performance
Figure 5: AÂ sample analysis of GPS routes taken by orienteering participants using Google MyMaps. The image includes routes taken by multiple participants highlighted in different colors and can be used to visualize navigational abilities throughout the orienteering course as outlined in step 6.1.2. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Orienteering performance
Our previous work analyzed the navigational performance of 41 participants who engaged in orienteering5. For a comprehensive understanding of the study methodology, refer to Waddington et al.5.
In this study, 19 participants engaged in orienteering at a vigorous (running) intensity, while 22 performed it at a moderate orienteering (walking) intensity. Navigational performance was determined by calculating the ratio of the distance traveled by the participant to the most optimal route for the orienteering course. This analysis assumes that participants traveling farther than the most efficient route are making navigational errors, thereby extending their distance taken to complete the orienteering course. A ratio of 1 thus indicates that the participant completed the orienteering intervention course using the most efficient route without making any errors.
The most optimal route across the orienteering course was determined by an expert-level orienteer. This route was measured multiple times using a count-meter in both the forward and reverse directions by different researchers for a total of six measures. Using the average of these measures, the most efficient route of the orienteering intervention course was determined to be 1300 m.
The average distance taken to complete the orienteering course for participants orienteering at a vigorous exercise intensity was 1415.79 ± 162.25 m, and 1360 ± 149.83 m for those orienteering at a moderate intensity. In terms of the ratio of the distance traveled to the most optimal route, the average ratio for the vigorous intensity orienteering group was 1.09 ± 0.12 (range: 0.95-1.35) and 1.05 ± 0.12 (range: 0.96-1.48) for the moderate intensity orienteering group (Figure 6). These results reveal that participants orienting at either a vigorous or moderate-intensity traveled further than the optimal route, indicating the presence of navigational errors that are typical for novices and expected to improve with training. Comparing these values to the visualized route captured by the GPS sports watch, as in Figure 5, can further indicate navigational performance.
Figure 6: Navigational efficiency ratio at different orienteering exercise intensities. The figure illustrates the mean ± SD of the navigational efficiency ratio of participants completing an orienteering course at either a moderate or vigorous exercise intensity. The ratio was calculated as the distance traveled by the participant (as determined by a GPS sports watch) divided by the most optimal route length of 1300 m, and a value of 1 indicates that the course was completed without navigational errors. Data has previously been reported in Waddington et al.5. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Orienteering, which combines exercise with the cognitive challenge of navigation, offers a unique intervention with the potential to enhance cognitive functioning in domains highly impacted by age and dementia2,6. However, the absence of standardized protocols and a general lack of knowledge about orienteering undermines the clinical utility of this sport. This paper addresses these gaps and provides a detailed protocol for designing orienteering maps and materials for implementing orienteering in a research setting for those with minimal orienteering knowledge.
Although orienteering interventions will vary in terms of their location and course set-up, this protocol provides comprehensive resources, materials, websites, and programs to develop an orienteering intervention aimed at measuring its cognitive effects. This guide is intended for information and educational purposes only and is provided 'as is' without any warranties, expressed or implied. The authors disclaim any responsibility for the application of the methods described and any liability for any adverse outcomes or damages resulting from their use. Researchers using this guide to develop their own orienteering interventions are solely responsible for assessing the associated risks of their methodology, obtaining appropriate institutional approvals, and ensuring compliance with all relevant ethical guidelines and regulations.
Choosing the map type in step 2 depends on available time, resources, cartography skills, and participant skill level. Detailed orienteering maps created in programs such as OCAD or OpenOrienteeringMapper (step 2.2) are generally recommended as they can show a greater level of detail and elaborate elevation data that simplified maps made with OpenOrienteeringMap are not able to show. As expert-level orienteers report being able to efficiently process high-level spatial information while running2, detailed maps are recommended for such participants in order to match the complexity of map information available to their skills. However, creating detailed orienteering maps requires cartography knowledge and more time, which can be a barrier for researchers without previous orienteering knowledge, which may be a limitation to implementing an orienteering intervention. In such cases, simplified orienteering maps (step 2.1) can be made with OpenOrienteeringMap for all participant levels.
In step 3, it is important to sequentially add checkpoints in numerical order, starting from the start location and ending at the finish location. By doing so, the course-setter is better able to track the potential route options between checkpoints to alter the difficulty of the course effectively. For example, when setting a beginner-level course in sequential order, the course-setter can ensure that there is only one decision to be made by participants from one checkpoint to the next.
When teaching basic orienteering skills in step 4.4, some beginner-level participants may require more instruction than others to understand orienteering concepts. Research shows that individuals with no orienteering experience approach spatial navigation and processing differently and also have poorer spatial memory abilities than those with orienteering experience2,3. This highlights individual differences in spatial memory abilities and their impact on orienteering learning and performance. Therefore, modifying the protocol to include more elaborate and detailed orienteering instructions may be necessary to accommodate these differences.
Choosing orienteering locations that are relatively unfamiliar to participants is recommended because an individual's navigational tendencies can vary between unfamiliar and familiar terrains34. However, safety considerations and adaptations are crucial when implementing orienteering interventions, particularly in unfamiliar areas. A thorough risk assessment for all terrains used is advised before creating any orienteering course. Given that orienteering typically takes place outdoors and some courses require expansive space, not all locations, climates or weather conditions may be safe.
For safety purposes, participant's routes should be continuously tracked using a GPS sports watch or similar device and should be observed by a researcher (without interference) in order to monitor their time and location. When completing the orienteering intervention, as in step 4.5, it is critical that the GPS sports watch or MapRun application being used acquires a GPS signal and starts recording correctly in order to track the participant's route for the entirety of the course.
Additional safety considerations are recommended when participants are engaging in longer, advanced-level courses. This includes having a first-aid kit available, and emergency contact information of the participants. Participants may also be required to carry a communication device with them for emergency use only. As orienteering can be performed at high intensities, health assessments of all participants should be completed before engaging in orienteering to ensure they are physically capable of completing the orienteering course without undue risk. Finally, adequate hydration and nutrition should be available for the duration of the orienteering course and exercise parameters. By implementing these safety measures, the risk of accidents and emergencies can be significantly reduced. Researchers are reminded of their responsibility in assessing risk and obtaining necessary ethical approval for their unique intervention
In conclusion, as the field of orienteering research unfolds, this protocol provides information that researchers with minimal orienteering knowledge can use to design and implement orienteering interventions in a research environment. By using this protocol as a guide, future researchers will be able to create standardized orienteering maps and courses to study their desired outcomes.
We would like to thank the members of the NeuroFit Lab for their ongoing support as we begin to explore the effects of orienteering on brain health and function. This study was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada under grant RGPIN-2022-05298 (to J. J. H.).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Chest heart rate monitor strap | Polar Electro | https://www.polar.com/ | Or any other device capable of recording heart rate continuously and that can pair with the chosen watch. |
Clipboard | Staples | https://www.staples.com/clipboards | To record any in-field measures. |
Colour printer | HP Laser Colour Printer | https://www.hp.com/ | To print maps. |
Computer | Lenovo IdeaPad | https://www.lenovo.com/in/en/c/laptops/ideapad/ | Ensure the device chosen is capable of running your chosen orienteering map and course making software. |
GPS Sports watch | Polar Electro | https://www.polar.com/ | Or any other GPS watch with a sampling rate of 1–3 s. |
OCAD for Orienteering | OCAD | https://www.ocad.com/en/ | |
OpenOrienteeringMapper | Open orienteering | https://www.openorienteering.org/apps/mapper/ | |
Orienteering Compass (for more advanced orienteers) | Suunto Oy | https://www.suunto.com/en-in/News/Suunto-introduces-stable-and-fast-AIM-compasses-for-competitive-orienteers/ | Or any other compass model capable of orienting to Magnetic North and setting a bearing angle. |
Orienteering control marker OR pin flag OR flagging tape OR pylon | Silva-USA (orienteering control markers) OR Amazon.com | n/a | Choose an item to mark each checkpoint location that is most feasible for your intervention. |
Pen | Staples | https://www.staples.com | To record any in-field measures. |
Plastic paper sleeve | Staples | https://www.staples.com/sheet-protectors/ | To protect maps from weather. |
Smartphone capable of running the MapRun Application | Apple, iPhone 12 | https://www.apple.com/iphone/ | Required if using the MapRun application as per step step 4.2.2. |
Explore More Articles
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
ABOUT JoVE
Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved