JoVE Logo

Zaloguj się

Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.

W tym Artykule

  • Podsumowanie
  • Streszczenie
  • Protokół
  • Dyskusje
  • Ujawnienia
  • Podziękowania
  • Materiały
  • Odniesienia
  • Przedruki i uprawnienia

Podsumowanie

A tube formation assay is used to evaluate vascular activity of tumor cells.

Streszczenie

Over the past several decades, a tube formation assay using growth factor-reduced Matrigel has been typically employed to demonstrate the angiogenic activity of vascular endothelial cells in vitro1-5. However, recently growing evidence has shown that this assay is not limited to test vascular behavior for endothelial cells. Instead, it also has been used to test the ability of a number of tumor cells to develop a vascular phenotype6-8. This capability was consistent with their vasculogenic behavior identified in xenotransplanted animals, a process known as vasculogenic mimicry (VM)9. There is a multitude of evidence demonstrating that tumor cell-mediated VM plays a vital role in the tumor development, independent of endothelial cell angiogenesis6, 10-13. For example, tumor cells were found to participate in the blood perfused, vascular channel formation in tissue samples from melanoma and glioblastoma patients8, 10, 11. Here, we described this tubular network assay as a useful tool in evaluation of vasculogenic activity of tumor cells. We found that some tumor cell lines such as melanoma B16F1 cells, glioblastoma U87 cells, and breast cancer MDA-MB-435 cells are able to form vascular tubules; but some do not such as colon cancer HCT116 cells. Furthermore, this vascular phenotype is dependent on cell numbers plated on the Matrigel. Therefore, this assay may serve as powerful utility to screen the vascular potential of a variety of cell types including vascular cells, tumor cells as well as other cells.

Protokół

1. A Matrigel-Based Tube Formation Assay to Assess the Vasculogenic Activity of Tumor Cells

  1. Preparation of tumor cells and microvascular endothelial cells: brain tumor cells such as U87 cells, melanoma cells B16F1, breast cancer MDA-MB-435, and colon cells HCT116 were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin (all from Invitrogen). Endothelial cell line human microvascular endothelial cells (HMVECs) were cultured in EBM2 medium (Lonza) supplemented with 1 μg/ml hydrocortisone and 1 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, 10% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were washed with PBS three times and detached with 0.05% trypsin/EDTA (Invitrogen). After centrifugation with 2,000 rpm for 5 min, cell pellets were washed again with PBS. Then, the pelleted cells were counted with a hemocytometer.
  2. Matrigel preparation: An aliquot of growth factor-reduced Matrigel (BD Bioscience) was warmed up at room temperature. Before completely thawed, it was transferred onto ice and its liquid was kept on ice for at least 10 min. Then 50 μl of Matrigel was plated to 96-well plates at a horizontal level that allows the Matrigel to distribute evenly, and incubated for 30 min at 37°C.
  3. Tube formation: Cells (1-2 x 104) were re-suspended with serum-free DMEM for tumor cells or EBM-2 for endothelial cells, and loaded on the top of the Matrigel. If this assay was used for measuring effects of some agents on tubule development, these agents (stimulators or inhibitors) were added to the serum-free medium. Each conditional group contained 4-6 wells.
  4. Image and data analysis: Following incubation at 37°C overnight, each well was analyzed directly under a microscope. If tubules were needed for fixation, 100 μl of 10% formalin saline-based solution was gently added and ten min later, it was ready for analysis. Under a microscope with 10x phase contrast, tubules in each field were imaged and an average of tubules from 3-5 random fields in each well was counted.

2. Representative Results:

HMVECs were used as a positive control, as these tubules were developed from clear elongated cell bodies that connect to form polygon network. B16F1, U87, and MDA-MB-435 cells developed vascular tubules similar to those formed by HMVECs, but HCT116 cells did not (Figure 1). A cell dose-dependent tube formation was tested in U87 cells. As demonstrated in Figure 2, 10,000 cells formed discontinued tubules. Once the cells were doubled, a solid vascular network was comparable to those seen in HMVECs. In contrast, cells less than 5,000 failed to form a vascular phenotype.

figure-protocol-2775
Figure 1. Tube formation induced by HMVECs, U87, MDA-MB-435, and B16F1 cells, but not HCT116 cells. All the cells (2 x 104) were loaded on Matrigel and incubated overnight. Tubules were imaged using phase contrast. HMVECs were used as a positive control. A representative of 3-5 fields was shown. Bar: 100 μm.

figure-protocol-3232
Figure 2. U87 cell-induced tubules in a cell number-dependent manner. Different numbers of U87 cells as indicated in the corners were used for tube formation. HMVECs were used for a positive control. Bar: 100 mm.

Dyskusje

In order for this assay to succeed, the quality of Matrigel should be tested first. A small sample may be obtained from BD Bioscience to pre-run the assay using HMVECs. Different batch products may display dissimilar qualities in which some lots do not provide an optimal condition for tube formation. Second, any bubbles should be avoided when an aliquot of Matrigel is loaded in 96-well plates, because bubbles can disrupt tubule formation. If tiny bubbles are found in a well, the Matrigel can be immediately moved back to ...

Ujawnienia

No conflicts of interest declared.

Podziękowania

This work was supported by NCI R01 CA120659 (RS).

Materiały

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
DMEMInvitrogen11995
FBSInvitrogen16000-044
Growth factor-reduced MatrigelBD Biosciences47743-720
EBM2 kitLonza Inc.CC-3156
Nikon ECLIPSE TS100 microscopeNikon Instruments

Odniesienia

  1. Shao, R., Guo, X. Human microvascular endothelial cells immortalized with human telomerase catalytic protein: a model for the study of in vitro angiogenesis. Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications. 321, 788-794 (2004).
  2. Ribeiro, M. J. Hemostatic properties of the SV-40 transfected human microvascular endothelial cell line (HMEC-1). A representative in vitro model for microvascular endothelium. Thromb Res. 79, 153-1561 (1995).
  3. Ades, E. W. HMEC-1: establishment of an immortalized human microvascular endothelial cell line. J Invest Dermatol. 99, 683-690 (1992).
  4. Shao, R. Acquired expression of periostin by human breast cancers promotes tumor angiogenesis through up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 expression. Molecular & Cellular Biology. 24, 3992-4003 (2004).
  5. Shao, R. YKL-40, a secreted glycoprotein, promotes tumor angiogenesis. Oncogene. 28, 4456-4468 (2009).
  6. Basu, G. D. A novel role for cyclooxygenase-2 in regulating vascular channel formation by human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Research. 8, R69-R69 (2006).
  7. Scavelli, C. Vasculogenic mimicry by bone marrow macrophages in patients with multiple myeloma. Oncogene. 27, 663-674 (2008).
  8. El Hallani, S. A new alternative mechanism in glioblastoma vascularization: tubular vasculogenic mimicry. Brain. 133, 973-982 (2010).
  9. Maniotis, A. J. Vascular channel formation by human melanoma cells in vivo and in vitro: vasculogenic mimicry. American Journal of Pathology. 155, 739-752 (1999).
  10. Hendrix, M. J., Seftor, E. A., Hess, A. R., Seftor, R. E. Vasculogenic mimicry and tumour-cell plasticity: lessons from melanoma. Nature Reviews Cancer. 3, 411-421 (2003).
  11. Folberg, R. Tumor cell plasticity in uveal melanoma: microenvironment directed dampening of the invasive and metastatic genotype and phenotype accompanies the generation of vasculogenic mimicry patterns. American Journal of Pathology. 169, 1376-1389 (2006).
  12. Liu, C. Prostate-specific membrane antigen directed selective thrombotic infarction of tumors. Cancer Research. 62, 5470-5475 (2002).
  13. Sood, A. K. The clinical significance of tumor cell-lined vasculature in ovarian carcinoma: implications for anti-vasculogenic therapy. Cancer Biology & Therapy. 1, 661-664 (2002).
  14. Shirakawa, K. Hemodynamics in vasculogenic mimicry and angiogenesis of inflammatory breast cancer xenograft. Cancer Research. 62, 560-566 (2002).
  15. Ruf, W. Differential role of tissue factor pathway inhibitors 1 and 2 in melanoma vasculogenic mimicry. Cancer Research. 63, 5381-5389 (2003).
  16. Seftor, R. E. Cooperative interactions of laminin 5 gamma2 chain, matrix metalloproteinase-2, and membrane type-1-matrix/metalloproteinase are required for mimicry of embryonic vasculogenesis by aggressive melanoma. Cancer Research. 61, 6322-6327 (2001).
  17. Shirakawa, K. Vasculogenic mimicry and pseudo-comedo formation in breast cancer. International Journal of Cancer. 99, 821-828 (2002).

Przedruki i uprawnienia

Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE

Zapytaj o uprawnienia

Przeglądaj więcej artyków

Matrigel based Tube Formation AssayVasculogenic ActivityTumor CellsAngiogenic ActivityVascular Endothelial CellsVasculogenic MimicryXenotransplanted AnimalsTubular Network AssayMelanoma B16F1 CellsGlioblastoma U87 CellsBreast Cancer MDA MB 435 CellsColon Cancer HCT116 Cells

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Prywatność

Warunki Korzystania

Zasady

Badania

Edukacja

O JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone