JoVE Logo

Zaloguj się

Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.

W tym Artykule

  • Podsumowanie
  • Streszczenie
  • Wprowadzenie
  • Protokół
  • Wyniki
  • Dyskusje
  • Ujawnienia
  • Podziękowania
  • Materiały
  • Odniesienia
  • Przedruki i uprawnienia

Podsumowanie

Here, we present a protocol for a mosaic labeling technique that permits the visualization of neurons derived from a common progenitor cell in two distinct colors. This facilitates neural lineage analysis with the capability of birth-dating individual neurons and studying gene function in the same neurons of different individuals.

Streszczenie

Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) is a positive mosaic labeling system that has been widely applied in Drosophila neurobiological studies to depict intricate morphologies and to manipulate the function of genes in subsets of neurons within otherwise unmarked and unperturbed organisms. Genetic mosaics generated in the MARCM system are mediated through site-specific recombination between homologous chromosomes within dividing precursor cells to produce both marked (MARCM clones) and unmarked daughter cells during mitosis. An extension of the MARCM method, called twin-spot MARCM (tsMARCM), labels both of the twin cells derived from a common progenitor with two distinct colors. This technique was developed to enable the retrieval of useful information from both hemi-lineages. By comprehensively analyzing different pairs of tsMARCM clones, the tsMARCM system permits high-resolution neural lineage mapping to reveal the exact birth-order of the labeled neurons produced from common progenitor cells. Furthermore, the tsMARCM system also extends gene function studies by permitting the phenotypic analysis of identical neurons of different animals. Here, we describe how to apply the tsMARCM system to facilitate studies of neural development in Drosophila.

Wprowadzenie

The brain, comprised of a vast number and diverse types of neurons, endows animals with the ability to perceive, process, and respond to challenges from the external world. Neurons of the adult Drosophila central brain are derived from a limited number of neural stem cells, called neuroblasts (NBs), during development1,2. Most of the NBs participating in brain neurogenesis in Drosophila undergo asymmetric division to generate self-renewing NBs and ganglion mother cells (GMCs), and the GMCs then go through another round of division to produce two daughter cells that differentiate into neurons3 (Figure 1A). Because of the intricacy of neuronal morphology and the challenges associated with identifying specific neurons, a positive mosaic labeling technology, mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM), was invented to enable the visualization of a single neuron or a small subset of neurons out of the population of surrounding, unlabeled neurons4.

MARCM utilizes the flippase (FLP)/FLP recognition target (FRT) system to mediate site-specific recombination between homologous chromosomes within a dividing precursor cell carrying a heterozygous allele of a repressor gene, whose expression normally inhibits the expression of a reporter gene4. After the mitotic division, the recombinant chromosomes are segregated into twin cells, such that one cell contains homozygous alleles of the repressor gene and the other cell has no repressor gene-the expression of the reporter in that cell (and its descendants) is no longer blocked4. Three clonal patterns are usually found in a MARCM experiment when FLP is stochastically induced in NBs or GMCs: single-cell and two-cell-GMC clones, which depict neuronal morphology at single-cell resolution, and multi-cellular-NB clones, which reveal entire morphological patterns of neurons derived from a common NB (Figure 1B). The MARCM technique has been widely applied in Drosophila neurobiological studies, including in neuronal type identification for reconstructing brain-wide wiring networks, neural lineage analyses for disclosing the developmental history of neurons, phenotypic characterization of gene functions involved in cell fate specification, and neuronal morphogenesis and differentiation studies5,6,7,8,9,10. Because conventional MARCM only labels one of the two daughter cells (and lineages) after the induced mitotic recombination event, potentially useful information from the unmarked side is lost. This limitation precludes the application of the basic MARCM system to high-resolution analyses of many neural lineages that switch cell fates in fast tempo or to precision analyses of gene functions in identical neurons of different animals11,12.

Twin-spot MARCM (tsMARCM) is an advanced system that labels neurons derived from a common progenitor with two distinct colors, which enables the recovery of useful information from both sides of the twin cells, thus overcoming the limitation of the original MARCM system11 (Figure 2A-2C). In the tsMARCM system, two RNA interference (RNAi)-based suppressors are situated at trans-sites of homologous chromosomes within a precursor cell, and the expression of those suppressors independently inhibit the expression of their respective reporters (Figure 2B). Following site-specific mitotic recombination mediated through the FLP/FRT system, the two RNAi-based suppressors become segregated into twin cells to permit the expression of distinct reporters (Figure 2B). Two clonal patterns, single-cell associated with single-cell clones and two-cell-GMC associated with multi-cellular-NB clones, are typically seen in a tsMARCM experiment (Figure 2C). Information derived from one side of the twin cells can be utilized as the reference for the other side, enabling high-resolution neural lineage analyses, such as birth-dating the labeled neurons, and phenotypic analyses of identical neurons in different animals for the precise investigation of neural gene function11,12. Here, we present a step-by-step protocol describing how to conduct a tsMARCM experiment, which can be used by other laboratories to broaden their studies of neural development (as well as the development of other tissues, if applicable) in Drosophila.

Protokół

1. Build tsMARCM-ready Flies Using the Required Transgenes11,13

  1. Generate the original version of tsMARCM-ready flies from transgenes that are carried by individual flies11 (see Table 1). Conduct standard fly genetic crossing schemes, which have been described previously, by putting multiple transgenes in the same fly stocks13.
    1. In one parental line, assemble the transgenes of FRT40A, UAS-mCD8::GFP (the first reporter, mCD8::GFP; expression of the transgene is under the control of the upstream activation sequence promoter, which produces a membrane-tethered reporter of mouse cluster of differentiation 8 protein fused with green fluorescent protein), and UAS-rCD2RNAi (the suppressor that inhibits the expression of the second reporter; the RNAi against the expression of rat cluster of differentiation 2, rcd2) on the left arm of the 2nd chromosome. Place tissue-specific-GAL4 driver on the X or 3rd chromosome, if possible.
    2. In the other parental line, assemble the transgenes of FRT40A, UAS-rCD2::RFP (the second reporter, rCD2::RFP; the other membrane-tethered reporter consisting of rCD2 protein fused with red fluorescent protein), and UAS-GFPRNAi (the suppressor that inhibits the expression of mCD8::GFP; the RNAi against the expression of gfp) on the left arm of the 2nd chromosome. Place heat-shock (hs)-FLP or tissue-specific-FLP on the X or 3rd chromosome, if possible.
  2. Generate the new version of tsMARCM-ready flies from transgenes that are carried by individual flies14 (see Table 1). Conduct standard fly genetic crossing schemes, which have been described previously, by putting multiple transgenes in the same fly stocks13.
    1. In one parental line, assemble the transgenes of an FRT site and UAS-mCD8.GFP.UAS-rCD2i (a combined transgene of mCD8::GFP and the suppressor that inhibits the expression of rCD2::RFP) together in the same arm of the 2nd or 3rd chromosome (appropriate pairs of transgenes of FRT and UAS-mCD8.GFP.UAS-rCD2i are indicated in Table 1). Place tissue-specific-GAL4 driver on chromosomes other than the chromosome of the chosen FRT site, if possible.
    2. In the other parental line, assemble the transgenes of an FRT site and UAS-rCD2.RFP.UAS-GFPi (the other combined transgene of rCD2::RFP and the suppressor that inhibits the expression of mCD8::GFP) in the same arm of the 2nd or 3rd chromosome (appropriate pairs of transgenes of FRT and UAS-rCD2.RFP.UAS-GFPi are indicated in Table 1). Place hs-FLP or tissue-specific-FLP on chromosomes other than the chromosome of the chosen FRT site, if possible.

2. Cross tsMARCM-ready Flies to Generate tsMARCM Clones in Their Progeny

  1. Cross tsMARCM-ready flies together (e.g., put 10-15 male flies from step 1.1.1 or 1.2.1 and 20-30 virgin female flies from step 1.1.2 or 1.2.2 together) in a fly-food vial with fresh-made yeast paste on the wall of the vial.
  2. Maintain the crossed tsMARCM-ready flies at 25 °C for 2 days to enhance the chance of mating before collecting fertilized eggs.
  3. Frequently transfer the crossed tsMARCM-ready flies into freshly yeasted vials to avoid crowding (tap down the flies or use carbon dioxide to anesthetize the flies to facilitate the transfer; keep no more than 80-100 fertilized eggs in a 10 mL fly-food vial to avoid too many hatched larvae).
  4. Culture the tsMARCM animals (i.e., fertilized eggs; an example of the genotype of tsMARCM animals, as used in Figure 3, is hs-FLP[22],w/w; UAS-mCD8::GFP,UAS-rCD2RNAi,FRT40A,GAL4-GH146/UAS-rCD2::RFP,UAS-GFPRNAi,FRT40A; +; +) that have been laid in the serially transferred vials at 25 °C until they develop to the desired stages (e.g., embryos, larvae, or pupae).
  5. Place the transferred vials that contain tsMARCM animals at the same developmental stage to a 37 °C water bath for 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 min to determine the optimal time of heat-shock that induces the expression of FLP to generate the tsMARCM clones of interest. Skip this step if tissue-specific-FLP is being used in the tsMARCM experiment (hs-FLP is preferred for neural lineage analyses; the reasons for this preference have been described previously15).
    NOTE: Repeat step 2.5 using the optimal time of heat-shock in future tsMARCM experiments if more tsMARCM clones of interest are wanted; generally, more FLP expression is induced in hs-FLP[22] compared to hs-FLP[1] with the same heat-shock time.
  6. Culture the heat-shocked tsMARCM animals at 25 °C until they have reached the appropriate developmental stage, and then proceed to step 3.

3. Prepare, Stain, and Mount Fly Brains Containing tsMARCM Clones

  1. Prepare forceps-protection dishes. Mix part A (30 g) and part B (3 g) of the Silicone Elastomer Kit with activated charcoal (0.25 g). Pour the mixture into the appropriate dishes.
  2. Dissect larval, pupal, or adult brains out of the tsMARCM animals in 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) using forceps on a forceps-protection dish viewed through a dissection microscope. NOTE: A protocol for fly brain dissection has been described previously16.
  3. Fix the fly brains in a glass spot plate with 1x PBS containing 4% formaldehyde at room temperature for 20 min. Process the fly brains in this glass spot plate for the remainder of the steps.
  4. Rinse the fly brains three times with 1% PBT (1x PBS containing 1% Triton X-100) and wash them three times for 30 min each in 1% PBT (rinse: remove PBT and add new PBT quickly; wash: remove PBT, add new PBT, and incubate the fly brains in the new PBT using an orbital shaker).
  5. Incubate the fly brains with the mixture of primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C or for 4 h at room temperature. An example of the mixture of primary antibodies is rat anti-CD8 antibody (1:100), rabbit anti-DsRed antibody (1:800), and mouse anti-Bruchpilot (Brp) antibody (1:50) in 1% PBT containing 5% normal goat serum (NGS).
  6. Rinse the fly brains three times with 1% PBT, and then wash them three times for 30 min each with 1% PBT.
  7. Incubate the fly brains with the mixture of secondary antibodies overnight at 4 °C or for 4 h at room temperature. An example of the mixture of secondary antibodies is goat anti-rat IgG antibody conjugated with green-fluorescent dye (1:800), goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody conjugated with yellow-fluorescent dye (1:800), and goat anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated with far-red-fluorescent dye (1:800) in 1% PBT containing 5% NGS.
  8. Rinse the fly brains three times with 1% PBT, and then wash them three times for 30 min each with 1% PBT. Mount them on a micro slide with an anti-quenching reagent. Put a micro cover glass on the micro slide to cover and protect the fly brains. Seal the edges of the micro cover glass and micro slide using clear nail polish. Store these mounted and sealed fly brain specimens at 4 °C.

4. Take, Process, and Analyze Fluorescent Images of tsMARCM Clones

  1. Capture fluorescent images of tsMARCM clones from the samples created in step 3.8 using the confocal microscopy system of choice.
  2. Project stacks of tsMARCM confocal fluorescent images into two-dimensional, flattened images using the image processing software supplied with the confocal microscopy system of choice (see Figure 3B-3E, 3G-3J, 3L-3O, and 3Q-3T for examples of flattened confocal fluorescent images).
  3. Count the cell number of the multi-cellular-NB sides of the tsMARCM clones using an appropriate image processing software (e.g., the "Cell Counter" function in ImageJ17; see Figure 3E, 3J, 3O, and 3T for examples of the cell bodies of neurons).

Wyniki

The tsMARCM system has been used to facilitate neural lineage analyses and gene function studies by retrieving important information on neurons derived from common NBs. The system has been used to identify most (if not all) neuronal types, determine the cell number of each neuronal type, and ascertain the birth-order of these neurons11,12,18 (see the Discussion Section for detail...

Dyskusje

Critical Steps within the Protocol

Steps 1.1.1, 1.2.1, 2.3, 2.5, and 3.2 are critical for obtaining good tsMARCM results. Tissue-specific-GAL4 drivers that do not express GAL4 in neural progenitors are preferred for steps 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Avoid over-crowding the animals grown in the fly-food vials in step 2.3. Because the induction latency, the expression level of FLP upon heat-shock, and the average dividing time of neural progenitors (i.e., NBs and GMCs) are not known, it is b...

Ujawnienia

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Podziękowania

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 104-2311-B-001-034) and the Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan.

Materiały

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Carbon dioxide (CO2)Local vendorn.a.Anesthetize flies
CO2 padLocal vendorn.a.Sort, cross and transfer flies
10x PBS pH 7.4Uniregion Bio-Tech (or other vendors)PBS001Dissect, rinse, wash and immunostain fly brains
FormaldehydeSigma-Aldrich252549Fix fly brains
Triton X-100Sigma-AldrichT8787Rinse, wash and immunostain fly brains
Normal goatJackson ImmunoResearch 005-000-121Immunostain fly brains
serum
Rat anti-mouse CD8 antibodyInvitrogenMCD0800Immunostain fly brains
Rabbit anti-DsRed antibodyClonetech632496Immunostain fly brains
Mouse anti-Brp antibodyDevelopmental Studies Hybridoma Banknc82Immunostain fly brains
Goat anti-rat IgG antibody conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488InvitrogenA11006Immunostain fly brains
Goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody conjugated with Alexa Fluor 546InvitrogenA11035Immunostain fly brains
Goat anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated with Alexa Fluor 647InvitrogenA21236Immunostain fly brains
SlowFade gold antifade reagentMolecular ProbesS36936Mount fly brains and protect quenching of fluorescence 
PYREX 9 depression glass spot plateCorning7220-85Dissect, rinse, wash and immunostain fly brains
Sylgard 184 silicone elastomer kitWorld Precision InstrumentsSYLG184Make black Sylgard dishes to protect forceps during brain dissection
Activated charcoalSigma-Aldrich242276-250GMake black Sylgard dishes
Dumont #5 forcepsFine Science Tools11252-30Dissect and mount fly brains
Micro slideCorning2948-75x25Mount fly brains
Micro cover glass No. 1.5VWR International48366-205Mount fly brains
Nail polishLocal vendornot availableSeal micro cover glass on micro slides
Incubator Kansin InstrumentsLTI603culture flies at 25 °C
(or other vendors)
Water bathKansin InstrumentsWB212-B2Induce heat-shock in flies at 37 °C
(or other vendors)
Orbital shakerKansin InstrumentsOS701Wash and immunostain fly brains
(or other vendors)
Dissection microscopeLeicaEZ4Sort, cross and transfer flies; Dissect, rinse, wash and immunostain fly brains
Confocal microscopeZeiss (or other vendors)LSM 700 (or other models)Image tsMARCM clones
image-processing software 1
(e.g., Zeiss LSM image browser) 
Zeissnot availableProject stacks of confocal images
image-processing software 2
(e.g., ImageJ) 
not availablenot availableCount cell number of tsMARCM clones

Odniesienia

  1. Ito, M., Masuda, N., Shinomiya, K., Endo, K., Ito, K. Systematic analysis of neural projections reveals clonal composition of the Drosophila brain. Curr Biol. 23 (8), 644-655 (2013).
  2. Yu, H. H., et al. Clonal development and organization of the adult Drosophila central brain. Curr Biol. 23 (8), 633-643 (2013).
  3. Goodman, C. S., Doe, C. Q., Bate, M., Arias, A. M. . The Development of Drosophila melanogaster. , (1993).
  4. Lee, T., Luo, L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron. 22 (3), 451-461 (1999).
  5. Lee, T., Lee, A., Luo, L. Development of the Drosophila mushroom bodies: sequential generation of three distinct types of neurons from a neuroblast. Development. 126 (18), 4065-4076 (1999).
  6. Lee, T., Marticke, S., Sung, C., Robinow, S., Luo, L. Cell-autonomous requirement of the USP/EcR-B ecdysone receptor for mushroom body neuronal remodeling in Drosophila. Neuron. 28 (3), 807-818 (2000).
  7. Chiang, A. S., et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of brain-wide wiring networks in Drosophila at single-cell resolution. Curr Biol. 21 (1), 1-11 (2011).
  8. Jefferis, G. S., Marin, E. C., Stocker, R. F., Luo, L. Target neuron prespecification in the olfactory map of Drosophila. Nature. 414 (6860), 204-208 (2001).
  9. Hong, W., Luo, L. Genetic control of wiring specificity in the fly olfactory system. Genetics. 196 (1), 17-29 (2014).
  10. Zhu, S., et al. Gradients of the Drosophila Chinmo BTB-zinc finger protein govern neuronal temporal identity. Cell. 127 (2), 409-422 (2006).
  11. Yu, H. H., Chen, C. H., Shi, L., Huang, Y., Lee, T. Twin-spot MARCM to reveal the developmental origin and identity of neurons. Nat Neurosci. 12 (7), 947-953 (2009).
  12. Yu, H. H., et al. A complete developmental sequence of a Drosophila neuronal lineage as revealed by twin-spot MARCM. PLoS Biol. 8 (8), (2010).
  13. Greenspan, R. J. . Fly pushing : the theory and practice of Drosophila genetics. , (1997).
  14. Awasaki, T., et al. Making Drosophila lineage-restricted drivers via patterned recombination in neuroblasts. Nat Neurosci. 17 (4), 631-637 (2014).
  15. Lee, T. Generating mosaics for lineage analysis in flies. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 3 (1), 69-81 (2014).
  16. Wu, J. S., Luo, L. A protocol for dissecting Drosophila melanogaster brains for live imaging or immunostaining. Nat Protoc. 1 (4), 2110-2115 (2006).
  17. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 9 (7), 671-675 (2012).
  18. Lin, S., Kao, C. F., Yu, H. H., Huang, Y., Lee, T. Lineage analysis of Drosophila lateral antennal lobe neurons reveals notch-dependent binary temporal fate decisions. PLoS Biol. 10 (11), e1001425 (2012).
  19. Zhan, X. L., et al. Analysis of Dscam diversity in regulating axon guidance in Drosophila mushroom bodies. Neuron. 43 (5), 673-686 (2004).
  20. Griffin, R., et al. The twin spot generator for differential Drosophila lineage analysis. Nat Methods. 6 (8), 600-602 (2009).
  21. Potter, C. J., Tasic, B., Russler, E. V., Liang, L., Luo, L. The Q system: a repressible binary system for transgene expression, lineage tracing, and mosaic analysis. Cell. 141 (3), 536-548 (2010).
  22. Lai, S. L., Lee, T. Genetic mosaic with dual binary transcriptional systems in Drosophila. Nat Neurosci. 9 (5), 703-709 (2006).
  23. Kao, C. F., Yu, H. H., He, Y., Kao, J. C., Lee, T. Hierarchical deployment of factors regulating temporal fate in a diverse neuronal lineage of the Drosophila central brain. Neuron. 73 (4), 677-684 (2012).

Przedruki i uprawnienia

Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE

Zapytaj o uprawnienia

Przeglądaj więcej artyków

Cell Lineage AnalysisGene Function StudiesTwin spot MARCMNeuron ProgenitorsNeural DevelopmentFlippase ExpressionTwin spot MARCM ClonesBrain DissectionFormaldehyde FixationImmunostaining

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Prywatność

Warunki Korzystania

Zasady

Badania

Edukacja

O JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone