Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
The ex vivo organ culture allows investigation of biological processes in the context of the intact tissue architecture. Here, we introduce a method of ex vivo culture of the mouse colon, which can be used to study innate immunity and antimicrobial host defense in the intestine.
The intestine displays an architecture of repetitive crypt structures consisting of different types of epithelial cells, lamina propia containing immune cells, and stroma. All of these heterogeneous cells contribute to intestinal homeostasis and participate in antimicrobial host defense. Therefore, identifying a surrogate model for studying immune response and antimicrobial activity of the intestine in an in vitro setting is extremely challenging. In vitro studies using immortalized intestinal epithelial cell lines or even primary crypt organoid culture do not represent the exact physiology of normal intestine and its microenvironment. Here, we discuss a method of culturing mouse colon tissue in a culture dish and how this ex vivo organ culture system can be implemented in studies related to antimicrobial host defense responses. In representative experiments, we showed that colons in organ culture express antimicrobial peptides in response to exogenous IL-1β and IL-18. Further, the antimicrobial effector molecules produced by the colon tissues in the organ culture efficiently kill Escherichia coli in vitro. This approach, therefore, can be utilized to dissect the role of pathogen- and danger-associated molecular patterns and their cellular receptors in regulating intestinal innate immune responses and antimicrobial host defense responses.
The intestine represents a dynamic system that acts as a barrier for commensal microorganisms, fights against invading pathogens, and regulates the microbial composition1. The intestinal epithelial cells, consisting of enterocytes, goblet cells, Paneth cells and enteroendocrine cells, are the major cell populations that provide host defense responses against intestinal microbiota. The goblet cells produce mucins that create a demilitarized zone on the top of the epithelial layer2. The Paneth cells and enterocytes produce antimicrobial peptides, cytokines, and reactive oxygen and nitrogen species that constitute antimicrobial host defense responses and contribute to shaping the intestinal microbial composition3,4. In addition to epithelial cells, the immune cells including macrophages, dendritic cells, neutrophils, natural killer cells, lymphocytes, and innate lymphoid cells in the lamina propria and submucosa play a critical role in intestinal antimicrobial host defense responses by producing cytokines, chemokines, and other mediators5-7. In order to understand how the mucosal immune system regulates microbiota and provides protection against microbial infection, it is important to consider the complex interaction of the heterogeneous cell populations of the gut. However, an in vitro model that encompasses all of the features of the intestine is not available. Therefore, molecular studies on host-pathogen interaction in the intestine are highly challenging.
Over the past few years, several model systems that mimic aspects of the intestinal mucosa have been developed for investigating the pathophysiological processes involved in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and other gastrointestinal disorders8-14. Immortalized intestinal epithelial cell lines are often used to study epithelial cell specific responses. However, because of differential gene expression and function in immortalized cells, the data obtained from using those cells do not often match with those observed in in vivo studies. Intestinal crypt organoid culture has recently emerged as a potential tool for assessing the response of the intestinal epithelium to different stimuli13. In this system, crypt stem cells are allowed to grow and develop a 3D organoid structure. While the organoid culture system is very useful for studying many aspects of the intestinal epithelium, it does not mimic the complex interaction of immune cells, epithelial cells and microbial products. The ex vivo culture of the intestinal tissue offers a better representation of in vivo host defense responses. In this method, a part of the intestine is cultured in a cell culture plate with appropriate media allowing the different types of cell populations in the intestine to be metabolically active for at least 48 h. Thus, an ex vivo culture of the organ can be used to measure the expression of antimicrobial genes and the host defense responses of the intestine to a particular stimulus.
Investigators have been using the ex vivo organ culture system to study host defense responses against microbial infection in the intestine15-21. We recently adopted the organ culture system to study the role of the inflammasome in antimicrobial host defense responses in mouse colons22. The inflammasome is a molecular platform for the activation of caspase-1, which is required for the production of matured IL-1β and IL-18. We showed that IL-1β and IL-18 induce antimicrobial peptides which effectively kill commensal pathobionts such as E. coli. This observation was consistent with increased E. coli burden in inflammasome-defective mouse colons22. This system therefore can be used to study the role of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and other innate immune molecules in intestinal antimicrobial host defense responses as well as pathogenesis of intestinal disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colorectal cancer (CRC). There are more than 200 IBD susceptibility genes, and mutations in many of these genes are associated with altered microbial composition in the gut. It is of great clinical significance to determine the precise mechanism through which the IBD-susceptibility genes regulate gut microbiota. The overall goal of this method is to introduce a basic protocol of ex vivo colon organ culture and demonstrate how this culture method can be used to study antimicrobial host defense responses of the intestine.
All experiments described here were performed using 6-8 weeks old male wild-type (C57BL6/J) mice maintained in a specific pathogen free (SPF) facility at the Animal Resource Center (ARC), UT Southwestern Medical Center. All studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and were conducted in accordance with the IACUC guidelines and the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
1. Collection and Preparation of the Colon
2. Colon Organ Culture
3. E. coli Killing Assay
4. The Effect of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Factors on Colonic Antimicrobial Host Defense Responses
NOTE: The antimicrobial killing assay as described here can be adopted to examine the effect of pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and cytokines on bactericidal activity of organ culture supernatant. An example of such experiment using IL-1β and IL-18 is described below.
5. Measurement of the Expression of Antimicrobial Genes
A representative picture of colons in organ culture is shown in Figure 1. The colon pieces in the culture remain metabolically and physiologically active. They respond efficiently to exogenous stimuli added to the culture media. A schematic work flow of the preparation of the colon tissue for ex vivo culture and stimulation with exogenous stimuli, e.g. IL-1β and IL-18, is shown in Figure 2. The representative data in Figure ...
The intestinal epithelial cells are very sensitive in terms of their growth requirements and therefore difficult to culture. The epithelial cells isolated by EDTA treatment do not survive in conventional cell culture media such as DMEM8. Therefore, host-pathogen interaction studies using isolated crypt or primary epithelial cells are very challenging. Recently, Sato et al. described a crypt organoid culture system which is very promising and useful for studies related to intestinal pathophysiology...
The authors have no competing financial interests.
This work was supported by funding from Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America, (CCFA; 3711) Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT; RP160169), and UT Southwestern Medical Center given to M.H.Z.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Advanced DMEM/ F12 | Life Technologies | 12634-010 | |
Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline, modified, w/o Calcium chloride & Magnesium chloride | Sigma | 5634 | |
FBS, heat inactivated | Sigma | F4135 | |
Penicillin-Streptomycin | Life Technologies | 15070063 | |
Gentamicin solution | Sigma | G1272 | |
Mouse IL-1b recombinan | Reprokine | RKP10749 | |
Mouse IL-18 recombinant | Reprokine | RKP70380 | |
TRIzol Reagent | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 15596018 | |
Difco Luria-Bertani Broth | BD Bioscience | 244620 | |
BD Difco Dehydrated Culture Media: MacConkey Agar | Fisher Scientific | DF0075-17-1 | |
NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer | Thermo Scientific | Uded to measure RNA concentration | |
UV/Vis Spectrophotometer | BECKMAN | DU 530 | Used to determine E. coli count |
iScript RT Supermix, 100 rxns | Bio-Rad | 1708841 | |
iTaq Univer SYBR Green Supermix | Bio-Rad | 1725125 | |
Lysing Matrix S (1/8"), 2 ml Tube | MP Biomedicals | 116925500 | Used to homgenize colon organ for RNA isolation |
FastPrep-24 5G System | Bio-Rad | 116005500 | |
100 mm x 15 mm Petri Dish | Falcon | 5687 | |
Plate 6 well ps TC CS100, Cellstar, 6w, tc, F-bottom (Flat), w/lid, sterile | Cellstar | 5085 | |
100 μm cell strainer | Falcon | 5698 | |
Sorvall Legend Micro 21R Centrifuge | Thermo Fisher Scientific | ||
Sorvall ST40R Centrifuge | Thermo Fisher Scientific | ||
Forma Scientific orbital shaker | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone