Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
* Wspomniani autorzy wnieśli do projektu równy wkład.
Immunolabeling methods to analyze distinct populations of microtubules in the developing zebrafish brain are described here, which are broadly applicable to other tissues. The first protocol outlines an optimized method for immunolabeling stable and dynamic microtubules. The second protocol provides a method to image and quantify nascent microtubules specifically.
Microtubules (MTs) are dynamic and fragile structures that are challenging to image in vivo, particularly in vertebrate embryos. Immunolabeling methods are described here to analyze distinct populations of MTs in the developing neural tube of the zebrafish embryo. While the focus is on neural tissue, this methodology is broadly applicable to other tissues. The procedures are optimized for early to mid-somitogenesis-stage embryos (1 somite to 12 somites), however they can be adapted to a range of other stages with relatively minor adjustments. The first protocol provides a method to assess the spatial distribution of stable and dynamic MTs and perform a quantitative analysis of these populations with image-processing software. This approach complements existing tools to image microtubule dynamics and distribution in real-time, using transgenic lines or transient expression of tagged constructs. Indeed, such tools are very useful, however they do not readily distinguish between dynamic and stable MTs. The ability to image and analyze these distinct microtubule populations has important implications for understanding mechanisms underlying cell polarization and morphogenesis. The second protocol outlines a technique to analyze nascent MTs specifically. This is accomplished by capturing the de novo growth properties of MTs over time, following microtubule depolymerization with the drug nocodazole and a recovery period after drug washout. This technique has not yet been applied to the study of MTs in zebrafish embryos, but is a valuable assay for investigating the in vivo function of proteins implicated in microtubule assembly.
Microtubules (MTs) are polymers of α- and β-tubulin that assemble into linear protofilaments, several of which combine to form a hollow tube1,2. MTs are polarized structures, with fast-growing plus ends and slow-growing minus ends that are anchored at the centrosome or other microtubule-organizing center (MTOC)3. De novo MT formation is initiated by nucleation at the γ-tubulin ring complex (γ-TURC), which provides a template for MT assembly4. In any given cell, two populations of MTs can be distinguished that turn over at different rates. Dynamic MTs explore their cellular environment by switching between phases of growth and shrinkage in a process known as dynamic instability5. Unlike dynamic MTs, stable MTs are non-growing and have a longer half-life than dynamic MTs6.
Decades of research in cell biology has provided a sophisticated array of tools to study MT structure and function and resulted in a large body of knowledge on these cytoskeletal elements. For instance, MTs play a central role in the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity, which is attributable not only to their intrinsic polarity, but also to the differential subcellular distribution of stable versus dynamic MTs7,8. In contrast, far less is understood about MT architecture and function in more complex three-dimensional (3-D) environments, such as the vertebrate embryo, in part due to the challenge of imaging the MT cytoskeleton at high resolution. Despite this limitation, the recent generation of GFP-expressing transgenic lines that label MTs or transient expression of fluorescently-tagged MT markers has increased our understanding of the dynamic changes that MTs undergo and their cellular and developmental role in the zebrafish embryo. The entire MT network can be imaged in transgenic lines in which tubulin is either directly labeled9 or tubulin polymers are indirectly labeled using MT-associated proteins Doublecortin-like-kinase (Dclk) or Ensconsin (EMTB)10,11. Other lines (and constructs) have been generated that enable assessment of MT intrinsic polarity by specifically labeling MT plus ends or centrosome-anchored minus ends11,12,13,14. The power of these tools lies in the ability to study MT dynamics in live, developing organisms. Such studies have revealed, for example, the spatial and dynamic distribution of MTs in specific cell populations, the orientation of mitotic spindles in tissues undergoing morphogenesis (an indicator of the plane of cell division), the polarity of the MT polymer as it relates to processes such as cell elongation and migration, and MT growth rate determined by comet speed9,13,15. The limitation of these tools is that they do not readily discriminate between stable and dynamic MT populations.
Drawing from the rich cell biology literature, immunolabeling methods to image stable and dynamic MTs in the zebrafish embryo are described here, which are complementary to the use of transgenic lines. The widespread use of such immunolabeling methods in the zebrafish has been somewhat hampered by the difficulty in preserving MT integrity during the fixation procedure. Protocol 1 outlines an optimized method for immunolabeling total, dynamic, and stable MTs in cross sections of the developing zebrafish hindbrain. Furthermore, a straightforward method using commercially available software is described to quantify these MT populations. Stable MTs are distinguished from dynamic MTs based on several post-translational modifications of α-tubulin, such as acetylation and detyrosination, which accumulate on stable MTs over time16,17. In the zebrafish embryo, acetylation occurs on ciliary and axonal MTs but not on stable interphase MTs18, limiting the usefulness of this marker to a subset of stabilized MTs. In contrast, detyrosination appears to occur on all stable MTs in the zebrafish embryo18. This post-translational modification exposes the carboxy-terminal glutamic acid of α-tubulin (detyrosinated tubulin)18 and can be detected using anti-Glu-tubulin19. Although detyrosination occurs preferentially on stable MTs, experimental evidence indicates that this post-translational modification is a result of, rather than a cause of, MT stability16. The reciprocal MT population, composed of dynamic MTs, is distinguished using an antibody, anti-Tyr-tubulin, that specifically recognizes the tyrosinated form of α-tubulin19. Following immunolabeling with these markers and confocal imaging, the quantitative analysis of MTs (length, number, and relative abundance) can be performed in defined regions of the developing neural tube. A streamlined method is provided here for performing this analysis using 3-D image-processing software. This method can be applied to address questions regarding morphogenesis and the establishment or maturation of cell polarity20. Indeed, the elaboration of polarized arrays of stable MTs accompanies many developmental events, including photoreceptor morphogenesis21, epithelialization of cells in the developing neural tube18 and axon formation8.
Protocol 2 describes an in vivo adaptation of a cell biology assay to analyze MTs during their assembly phase (nucleation/anchorage and growth)22,23. Nascent MTs are nucleated at the centrosome and subsequently anchored to subdistal appendages of the mother centriole23. A method to analyze nascent MT regrowth following depolymerization is described. This protocol provides details on the nocodazole treatment to depolymerize MTs, the drug washout procedure and the post-treatment recovery period. MT re-growth is monitored at regular intervals post washout by immunolabeling with markers for total MTs (anti β-tubulin) alongside markers for the centrosome (anti γ-tubulin) and nucleus (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)), according to the general procedures described in Protocol 1. The MT depolymerization step of this protocol is essential as it enables assessment of de novo MT growth rather than extension of preexisting MTs. This technique is therefore distinct from other published procedures to measure MT growth rates (in absence of depolymerization) by using a plus tip marker such as end binding protein 3 fused to green fluorescent protein (EB3-GFP), as shown in Tran et al., 201211. Furthermore, this assay is particularly useful for analyzing embryos defective in de novo MT assembly, such as the previously reported NEDD1 mutants in which recruitment of γ-tubulin to the centrosome is impaired, resulting in incomplete neural tube formation and neuronal defects24.
Ethics Statement: The procedures described below follow the University of Maryland Baltimore County animal care guidelines.
1. Analysis of Stable and Dynamic MTs Using Immunolabeling (Protocol 1)
2. De Novo MT Assembly Assay (Protocol 2)
Analysis of stable and dynamic MTs using immunolabeling
In Protocol 1, the distribution of MT sub-populations during early (neural keel) and late (neural rod) stages of neural tube development is revealed, using Glu-tubulin and Tyr-tubulin as markers for stable and dynamic MTs, respectively. Dynamic MTs predominate in the hindbrain at the neural keel stage (4-5 somites) (Figure 2A-D). As the keel develo...
There are currently many methods for imaging MT dynamics in early zebrafish development, ranging from live imaging of tagged molecules to immunolabeling of fixed tissue11,12,13,14. Although MTs in a single cell can exist in either dynamic or stable states, epithelialization is a process in which MTs are progressively stabilized over time. Using markers for stable and dynamic MTs offers a way to...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The confocal microscope was purchased with funds from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), grant #DBI-0722569. The research was supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIGMS) grant #GM085290 and U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) grant #W81XWH-16-1-0466 awarded to R.M. Brewster. E. Vital was supported by a grant to UMBC from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute through the Pre-college and Undergraduate Science Education Program, grant #52008090. S.P. Brown was supported by a U.S. Department of Education GAANN Fellowship, a Meyerhoff Graduate Fellowship funded by NIH/NIGMS grant #GM055036, and a Research Assistantship funded by the U.S. DOD grant #W81XWH-16-1-0466.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Agarose | Used to treat petridishes. Prepare 1% agarose by heating a solution of 1 gram agarose per 100 ml 1X embryo medium in a microwave until polymerized. | ||
Kpipes | Sigma | P7643 | |
NaCl | Sigma | S7653 | |
Tris-HCl | Sigma | T3253-500G | |
KCl | Sigma | P9333-500G | |
CaCl2·2H2O | Sigma | C5080 | |
NP-40 | American Bioanalyticals | AB01424 | |
EGTA | Sigma | E3889-25G | |
MgCl2 | Sigma | M2670-500G | |
Bovine serum albumin (BSA) | Fisher | BP1605 | |
Triton-x | American Bioanalyticals | AB02025 | |
Anti-Fade mounting medium | Invitrogen | P10144 | |
Mouse anti-β-tubulin | Developmental studies Hybridoma Bank | E7 | 1/200 |
Rabbit anti-γ-tubulin | Genetex | GTX113286 | 1/500 |
Rabbit anti-α-tubulin | Genetex | GTX108784 | 1/1000* |
Rabbit anti-detyrosinated-tubulin | Millipore | AB3201 | 1/200-1/1000* Titrate antibody with first use of new lot. |
Rabbit anti-tyrosinated-tubulin | Millipore | ABT171 | 1/500 |
Mouse anti-centrin | Millipore | 04-1624 | 1/1000 |
Goat 488 anti-rabbit | Thermofisher | A11008 | 1/500 |
Goat 594 anti-rabbit | Thermofisher | A11012 | 1/500 |
Goat 594 anti-mouse | Thermofisher | A11005 | 1/500 |
Goat 488 anti-mouse | Thermofisher | A11001 | 1/500 |
Vibratome | Vibratome | 1500 | |
Forceps | World Precision Instruments | 555227F | |
100 mm petri dish | Cell treat | 229693 | |
35 mm petri dish | Cell treat | 229638 | |
50 ml falcon tube | Fisher | 14-432-22 | |
Woven nylon mesh 70 um | Amazon.com | B0043D1SZG | |
Micropipette | Gilson | F123602 | |
Glass pipette | Fisher | NC-999363-9 | |
Aquarium sealant | Amazon.com, by MarineLand | Silicone Sealer 1 oz (Tube) | |
Ring stand | Fisher | 14-675BO | |
Microbore PTFE Tubing, 0.022"ID | Cole-Parmer | WU-06417-21 | |
Modeling clay | Amazon.com | Sargent Art 22-4000 | Any wax or oil based non-toxic modeling clay will suffice |
Clamp | Fisher | 02-215-466 | |
60ml syringe | Fisher | 14-820-11 | |
Embryo medium (E3) | 34.8 g NaCl 1.6 g KCl 5.8 g CaCl2·2H2O 9.78 g MgCl2·6H2O To prepare a 60X stock, dissolve the ingredients in H2O, to a final volume of 2 L. Adjust the pH to 7.2 with NaOH. Autoclave. To prepare 1X medium, dilute 16.5 mL of the 60X stock to 1 L. | ||
Blocking Solution | 50 ml TBS-NP-40 2.5 ml normal goat serum 1 g BSA 625 µl Triton-X | ||
TBS-NP-40 (pH 7.6) | 155 mM NaCl 10 mM Tris HCl 0.1% NP-40 | ||
2x MAB (pH6.4) | 160 mM KPIPES 10 mM EGTA 2 mM MgCl2 | ||
Commercial 3-D Image processing Software | PerkinElmer | Volocity (V 6.2) | |
Dry block heater | VWR | 12621-108 | Used as a hot plate to melt agarose in Protocol 1. |
Dissecting Microscope | Leica | MZ12 | |
Confocal Microscope | Leica | SP5 | |
Flat embedding mold | emsdiasum.com | BEEM 70904-01 | |
Public domain image processing software | NIH | ImageJ (V 1.5) | |
* Success varies by lot number |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone