A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This protocol describes an efficient, non-surgical method for the orthotopic implantation of breast cancer patient-derived xenografts in mice. The technique involves enzymatic tumor dissociation followed by direct injection into the mammary fat pads, enabling high-throughput implantation. Comprehensive validation ensures model fidelity, facilitating rigorous studies across various breast cancer subtypes.

Abstract

Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) provide a clinically relevant method for recapitulating tumor-involved cell types and the tumor microenvironment, which is essential for advancing knowledge of breast cancer (BC). Additionally, PDX models enable the study of BC systemic effects, which is not possible using in vitro models. Traditional methods for implanting BC xenografts typically involve anesthesia and sterile surgical procedures, which are time-consuming, invasive, and limit the scalability of PDX models in BC research. This protocol describes a simple and scalable method for the orthotopic implantation of BC PDXs in mice. The immunodeficient mouse strain NOD.Cg-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) was used for PDX engraftment. Human BC samples obtained from IRB-consented patients were mechanically and enzymatically dissociated, then resuspended in a solution of basement membrane extract (BME) and RPMI 1640. Animals were restrained by scruffing, and depilatory cream was applied to remove hair from the fat pads at the fourth inguinal nipple, followed by injection. Approximately 2 million cells in a 100 µL suspension were bilaterally injected orthotopically into the mammary fat pads using a 26 G needle. Notably, no anesthetic was required, and the total procedure time was under 5 min, from cell preparation to injection. After a growth period of several months, tumors were excised and processed for authentication. Validation included receptor status assessment using immunohistochemistry with specific antibodies for traditional BC receptors (i.e., ER, PR, HER2). Tumor morphology was confirmed with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, which was interpreted by a pathologist. Genetic similarity to the patient sample was verified through bulk RNA sequencing and short tandem repeat (STR) analysis. This approach to PDX engraftment and validation supports the rigorous development of models and high-throughput tumor implantation, enabling well-powered studies across various BC subtypes.

Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is diagnosed in over 2 million women worldwide each year1. In order to advance the basic biological understanding of BC and successfully translate novel therapeutics to approved treatments, preclinical animal models that retain the defining features of patient tumors are necessary. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) have been demonstrated to recapitulate tumor heterogeneity with high fidelity when implanted orthotopically, including histopathology, receptor expression, and genetic aberrations2,3,4. Importantly, they also retain stromal cells that contribute to the microenvironment of the tumor, such as vasculature, immune cells, and cancer-associated fibroblasts. Albeit, they are gradually replaced by murine host stromal cells with passaging5. PDXs also enable the study of systemic complications resulting from tumor growth, such as fatigue6,7, which is not currently possible using in vitro models.

Successful BC PDX engraftment does, however, require an immunodeficient mouse strain, with the most commonly used strain being NSG (NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ). NSG mice are devoid of adaptive immunity and exhibit highly defective innate immunity8. BC PDX engraftment has been achieved in other immunodeficient strains, such as SCID/Beige (CB17.Cg-PrkdcscidLystbg-J/Crl), with similar engraftment rates4.

Traditional methods of implanting BC PDXs involve surgically implanting a tumor fragment into the mammary fat pad9, and this approach leads to successful engraftment at favorable rates. However, the need for sterile surgical procedures and anesthetic use makes it time-consuming, thus limiting the number of mice that can be implanted in a certain time window. Given PDXs' potential predictive benefits of drug responses in tumors and use in precision medicine10, having a simple and reproducible workflow for implanting PDXs homogeneously across mice is vital. This article demonstrates the dissociation of human breast tumors into a single cell suspension and subsequent orthotopic injection into mammary fat pads of immunodeficient mice.

Protocol

This protocol adheres to the guidelines established by the West Virginia University (WVU) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Female NOD.Cg-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice, aged 8 weeks or older and weighing approximately 25 g, were used for tumor cell injections. Breast cancer tumor tissue was procured at West Virginia University Cancer Institute (Morgantown, WV) and by the NCI Cooperative Human Tissue Network under approved WVU Institutional Review Board protocol and WVU Cancer Institute Protocol Review and Monitoring Committee. Informed written consent was obtained from the patients. All procedures were conducted under aseptic conditions within a Class II biological safety cabinet, following appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) protocols. The details of the animals, reagents, and equipment used in this study are provided in the Table of Materials.

1. High-throughput enzymatic dissociation of tumor tissue

  1. Thaw and combine enzymes H, R, and A from the human tumor dissociation kit in a sterile C-tube. Add 200 µL of enzyme H, 100 µL of enzyme R, and 25 µL of enzyme A. Bring the final volume to ~5 mL by adding 4.7 mL of sterile RPMI 1640 medium to the C-tube.
    NOTE: Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) can be used in place of RPMI 1640.
  2. Tumor fragments can be cut and frozen as described in existing protocols9. Transfer thawed tumor fragments and accompanying freezing medium onto one half of a sterile 100 mm culture dish. Using sterile forceps, transfer the tumor fragments to a sterile 5 mL microtube.
    NOTE: A sterile hypodermic needle may be used as an alternative to forceps. A 35 mm dish can be used in place of a 5 mL microtube.
  3. Wash the tumor fragments with 1-3 mL of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 1x). Manipulate the fragments in the solution using forceps to ensure thorough removal of the residual freezing medium.
  4. Transfer the washed fragments to a 2 mL microtube using forceps. Apply 1 mL of triple antibiotic (TAB) solution to the tumor fragments and incubate for 10 min at room temperature.
    NOTE: This step may be skipped if desired. 10x TAB stock can be made by dissolving 1% gentamicin, 1% clindamycin, and 0.5% polymyxin B sulfate in sterile 1x PBS. Dilute to 1x TAB solution in sterile 1x PBS.
  5. Using sterile forceps, transfer the disinfected fragments to a new 5 mL microtube. Perform a second wash with 1-3 mL of sterile PBS. Transfer the washed fragments to the dry half of the 100 mm culture dish from step 1.2.
  6. Using two sterile No. 10 scalpel blades, thoroughly mince the tumor tissue. Transfer the minced tumor fragments onto one blade and deposit them into the C-tube containing the prepared enzyme solution. Securely fasten the tube lid until a final click is felt.
  7. Invert the C-tube several times to ensure an even distribution of tumor fragments within the enzyme solution.
  8. Place the C-tube in the mechanical dissociator. Invert the tube and ensure all contents are submerged in the medium. The tube will be in an inverted position in the machine.
    1. Secure the tube in a slot with the indented part facing the operator. If applicable, place the heater around the tube.
  9. Select the 37C_h_TDK_3 program from the touchscreen interface. This program operates for 60 min at 37 °C. For softer tumors, 37C_h_TDK_1 or 2 can be used.
    NOTE: For the greatest efficiency, it is recommended that the mice be prepared for injection during this dissociation period by applying depilatory cream to the injection sites.
  10. Upon completion of the dissociation program, inspect the tube contents. No visible tumor fragments should remain.
    NOTE: If fragments are present, additional dissociation time may be required. In such cases, run the program for an additional 20-30 min.
  11. Once adequate dissociation is achieved, centrifuge the C-tube at 200 x g for 5-8 min at 4 °C to pellet dissociated cells. Carefully remove the supernatant using vacuum aspiration or a pipette.
  12. Resuspend the cell pellet in 5-10 mL of fresh RPMI medium. Transfer the cell suspension to a 15 mL conical tube for easier manipulation. Centrifuge the cell suspension at 200 x g for 5-8 min at 4 °C. Carefully aspirate the supernatant.
    NOTE: This step may be omitted if the cell pellet is small. In such cases, the cells are resuspended directly in the desired volume of media and then combined with basement membrane extract (Matrigel) to minimize cell loss.
  13. Resuspend the cell pellet in a volume of RPMI 1640, equivalent to half the desired final injection volume. RPMI 1640 and Matrigel will be combined in a 1:1 v/v ratio, with a final injection volume of 100 µL per injection site.
    NOTE: For bilateral injection in 4 mice, the total required volume is 800 µL. Therefore, resuspend the cells in at least 400 µL of RPMI 1640. To account for potential volume loss, adding an additional 20% to the final volume is advisable, maintaining the 1:1 v/v ratio. Alternatively, DMEM or 1x PBS can be used in place of RPMI 1640.
  14. Count the resuspended cells using a hemocytometer or automated method. Dilute as needed to achieve the desired concentration for injection. A starting point of approximately 1-2 million cells per injection site is suggested.
  15. In a 2 mL round-bottom microcentrifuge tube, combine the desired amount of diluted cell suspension in RPMI with an equal volume of Matrigel. Gently mix the suspension by repeated pipetting to ensure homogeneity.
    NOTE: Following the previous step, add 400 µL of diluted cell suspension to 400 µL of Matrigel. Consider the number of injection needles to be used and factor in associated volume losses. Keep Matrigel on ice at all times. Do not thaw it until cells are resuspended, as it will solidify quickly. Recommended to maintain small aliquots (e.g., 120 µL) for quick thawing and combination in 2 mL tube.
  16. Maintain the cell suspension on ice until ready for injection.

2. Orthotopic inguinal mammary fat pad injection of dissociated PDX

  1. Determine the mass of each mouse using a calibrated balance. Apply a thin layer of depilatory cream to the target injection site(s). Using a sterile cotton swab, massage the cream in alternating clockwise and counterclockwise motions to facilitate rapid fur removal.
    1. Remove excess fur and depilatory cream using a sterile saline-soaked gauze sponge. Ensure complete hair removal at the injection area.
      NOTE: Do not exceed 60 s of depilatory cream exposure to prevent skin irritation. Mice can be shaved prior to the application of depilatory cream to further minimize exposure time. This step can be performed during tumor dissociation to optimize time efficiency and minimize the duration of cell suspension storage on ice.
  2. Conduct a thorough visual inspection of each mouse to assess fitness for injection. Evaluate for any signs of pain, distress, illness, or other contraindications.
  3. Using a 1 mL syringe without an attached needle, gently aspirate the cell suspension up and down to ensure homogeneity. Attach a 26 G needle to the 1 mL syringe and withdraw the desired injection volume. Eliminate any air bubbles from the syringe by gentle tapping or flicking.
    NOTE: It is recommended not to exceed 600 µL per syringe to facilitate single-handed injection.
  4. Place the prepared syringe horizontally on top of the ice container, with the needle oriented away from the operator. Position the ice container and needle on the same side as the operator's dominant hand or preferred injection hand. Remove the mouse from its housing and disinfect the injection area using an alcohol cleansing pad.
  5. Securely restrain the mouse by grasping the dorsal skin firmly at the nape and back. Ensure sufficient immobilization to clearly expose the mammary fat pads. The inguinal mammary fat pad spans from the nipple to the top of the hip. It can be observed as soft, pinkish tissue in the described area underneath the skin.
    NOTE: An assistant operator may use flat-sided forceps to pinch and elevate the skin containing the fat pad. This technique helps ensure that the operator performing the injection successfully targets the fat pad.
  6. Place the mouse in a supine position. Insert the needle (bevel up) at a 45-degree angle, pointing toward the hip approximately 0.5-1 cm caudal to the fat pad, adjusting for needle length.
    1. Advance the needle into the fat pad. In a controlled manner, inject the desired volume of cell suspension. Efficient injection speed will help minimize animal agitation from prolonged restraint.
      NOTE: To minimize animal distress, the maximal duration of continual manual restraint should not exceed 30 s. If the restraint duration exceeds 30 s, the animal should be released into the cage to recover before a second attempt.
  7. Post-injection, rotate the needle 180 degrees (bevel down). Maintain needle position briefly before slow withdrawal to minimize cell loss from the injection site. If any bleeding occurs, apply standard gauze or hemostatic gauze as necessary.
  8. Repeat steps 2.6 and 2.7 for the contralateral fat pad if bilateral injections are required. For multiple animals, repeat steps 2.2-2.7 as needed.

3. Follow up procedures

  1. Dispose of all sharps in designated sharps containers. Dispose of all other contents in proper waste containers.
  2. If bleeding occurs during injection, monitor mice for at least 1 h afterward to ensure hemostasis.
  3. Monitor body mass on a weekly basis. Assess tumor volume once growth becomes palpable.

Results

This study outlines an efficient and non-surgical approach for the orthotopic implantation of patient-derived breast cancer xenografts in mice. Breast tumor tissue was dissociated using human-specific enzymes and mechanical agitation, resuspended in a 1:1 v/v ratio of Matrigel: RPMI 1640, and injected orthotopically into the inguinal mammary fat pads of NSG mice (Figure 1 and Figure 2). To ensure the fidelity of ...

Discussion

This article presents an efficient, high-throughput method for orthotopically implanting BC PDXs into the inguinal mammary fat pads of immunodeficient mice. This optimized workflow enables the single researcher to implant PDXs into dozens of mice per day, supporting large-scale and adequately powered studies. The capacity to simultaneously dissociate and implant multiple unique PDXs also enables precision oncology approaches. Beyond time efficiency, the dissociation of the tumors creates a homogenous suspension of cell t...

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the generous contributions of the patients who provided tumor samples for the development of PDXs. Emidio Pistilli acknowledges the significant prior contributions of Hannah Wilson, MD/PhD. This research was supported by the following organizations: National Institutes of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) under award number R01AR079445 (Pistilli); the WVU Genomics Core Facility (U54GM104942); the WVU Animal Model and Imaging Facility (P20GM121322, U54GM104942, P20GM144230, P30GM103488); National Institutes of General Medical Sciences under award number P20GM121322 (Lockman). Figure 1 was created with BioRender.com.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
1 mL tuberculin syringeBD305945sterile
1x phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4Gibco10010023sterile
2.0 mL round-bottom microcentrifuge tubeEppendorf0030123620sterile
26 G needle, ½ in.BD305111sterile
5.0 mL microtubeEppendorf0030119401sterile
8+ week old NSG (NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ) miceThe Jackson Laboratory#005557
Alcohol prep padsFisher Scientific22-363-750sterile
Basement membrane extract (Matrigel)Cultrex3632-005-02
Cotton-tipped applicators, 6 in.Fisher Scientific22-029-553sterile
Curved Forceps with Medium Non-serrated Tips, 152 mmElectron Microscopy Sciences50-365-845sterile
Depilatory creamNair
gentleMACS C TubesMiltenyi Biotec130-093-237
gentleMACS Octo dissociator with heatersMiltenyi Biotec130-096-427
No. 10 scalpel bladesFisher Scientific12-000-162sterile
Non-woven gauze sponges, 4x4 inchFisher Scientific22-028-558sterile
RPMI 1640 1x + L-GlutamineGibco11875093sterile
Tumor dissociation kit, humanMiltenyi Biotec130-095-929

References

  1. Sung, H., et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 3 (3), 209-249 (2021).
  2. Hidalgo, M., et al. Patient-derived xenograft models: an emerging platform for translational cancer research. Cancer Discov. 4 (9), 998-1013 (2014).
  3. DeRose, Y. S., et al. Tumor grafts derived from women with breast cancer authentically reflect tumor pathology, growth, metastasis and disease outcomes. Nat Med. 17 (11), 1514-1520 (2011).
  4. Zhang, X., et al. A renewable tissue resource of phenotypically stable, biologically and ethnically diverse, patient-derived human breast cancer xenograft models. Cancer Res. 73 (15), 4885-4897 (2013).
  5. Yoshida, G. J. Applications of patient-derived tumor xenograft models and tumor organoids. J Hematol Oncol. 13 (1), 1-16 (2020).
  6. Wilson, H. E., et al. Human breast cancer xenograft model implicates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signaling as driver of cancer-induced muscle fatigue. Clin Cancer Res. 25 (7), 2336-2347 (2019).
  7. Wilson, H. E., et al. Skeletal muscle reprogramming by breast cancer regardless of treatment history or tumor molecular subtype. NPJ Breast Cancer. 6 (1), 18 (2020).
  8. Shultz, L. D., et al. Human lymphoid and myeloid cell development in NOD/LtSz-scid IL2Rγnull mice engrafted with mobilized human hemopoietic stem cells. J Immunol. 174 (10), 6477-6489 (2005).
  9. DeRose, Y. S., et al. Patient-derived models of human breast cancer: Protocols for in vitro and in vivo applications in tumor biology and translational medicine. Curr Protoc Pharmacol. 14, Unit14.23 (2013).
  10. Whittle, J. R., Lewis, M. T., Lindeman, G. J., Visvader, J. E. Patient-derived xenograft models of breast cancer and their predictive power. Breast Cancer Res. 17 (1), 17 (2015).
  11. Fleming, J. M., Miller, T. C., Meyer, M. J., Ginsburg, E., Vonderhaar, B. K. Local regulation of human breast xenograft models. J Cell Physiol. 224 (3), 795-806 (2010).
  12. Okano, M., et al. Orthotopic implantation achieves better engraftment and faster growth than subcutaneous implantation in breast cancer patient-derived xenografts. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 25 (1), 27-36 (2020).
  13. Ryu, A. H., Eckalbar, W. L., Kreimer, A., Yosef, N., Ahituv, N. Use antibiotics in cell culture with caution: Genome-wide identification of antibiotic-induced changes in gene expression and regulation. Sci Rep. 1 (1), 7533 (2017).
  14. Amens, J. N., Bahçecioglu, G., Zorlutuna, P. Immune system effects on breast cancer. Cell Mol Bioeng. 14 (4), 279-292 (2021).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Patient derived XenograftsBreast CancerBC ModelsOrthotopic ImplantationImmunodeficient MiceNSG Mouse StrainTumor MicroenvironmentScalabilityReceptor Status AssessmentImmunohistochemistryGenetic SimilarityRNA SequencingSTR AnalysisTumor MorphologyHigh throughput Implantation

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved