cervical spinal hemisection and diaphragm muscle electromyographic (emg) monitoring in rats

Standardized Evaluation of DIAm EMG Post-C2SH in Rats to Minimize Variability

There are more than 300,000 individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) in the United States, approximately half of whom have cervical injuries1. These injuries result in significant loss of well-being and place a financial strain on individuals, their families, and the healthcare system. Fortunately, the majority of SCIs are incomplete&#8212;providing the potential for strengthening of spared pathways1. This neuroplasticity may allow recovery of at least some function, including DIAm activity, which is important for ventilatory and non-ventilatory behaviors. Thus, promoting neuroplasticity is a promising avenue of research to help individuals with SCI2.
Rodent models of SCI have the potential to contribute substantially to the discovery of treatments to improve human health. One of the classic models of SCI used to study neuroplasticity is a unilateral transection (hemisection) of the spinal cord at C2 (C2SH), which leaves the contralateral side intact3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. The effect of C2SH on phrenic output and the importance of spared contralateral pathways was first revealed over a hundred years ago by Porter12, whose seminal article laid the foundation for modern-day studies of respiratory neuroplasticity. The C2SH model interrupts descending inputs from the rostral ventral respiratory group (rVRG) in the medulla, which contains premotor neurons responsible for transmitting the output of respiratory rhythm generation14. These rVRG premotor neurons also transmit excitatory neural drive to phrenic motor neurons (Figure 1). Several investigators have taken different approaches to the C2SH model10,11,15,16, which may partly explain some of the variability in recovery across studies. Briefly, approaches vary in terms of sparing the dorsal funiculi, performing a complete hemisection, or performing a lateral partial transection that does not completely interrupt descending inputs from the ipsilateral rVRG. Generally, C2SH models are particularly useful for studying respiratory neuroplasticity due to the rates of spontaneous recovery of eupneic iDIAm electromyographic (EMG) activity over time, which can be improved by several factors, including neurotrophic signaling17,18,19,20,21. However, an initial loss of function&#8212;defined as the silencing of eupneic iDIAm EMG activity&#8212;must be first established before recovery can be clearly classified. This validation of inactivity at the time of C2SH is not done in several studies3,4,6,7,11,22,23.
Histological assessments of the excised spinal cord only provide evidence of damage to the appropriate location of ipsilateral excitatory bulbospinal pathways innervating phrenic motor neurons in the spinal cord, but histology does not substitute for physiological evidence (e.g., DIAm EMG). Furthermore, histological assessments are performed in ex vivo at terminal time points (often several weeks to months post-injury) and thus do not provide &#34;real-time&#34; information. Some investigators have noted that the magnitude of the lesion relates to the amount of functional deficit or lack thereof5,24,25,26. It is important to note that the validity of such claims is likely highly dependent on how &#34;function&#34; is classified (i.e., what the functional tasks are and how they are quantified), and the variability across studies highlights the difficulty of producing functionally identical lesions across animals. Indeed, investigators have emphasized that the relationship between the extent of injury and limb muscle locomotor function (quantified by the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) score24) is not linear27,28. In previous studies, we have found no relationship between the extent of the C2SH and the extent of recovery of eupneic iDIAm EMG activity post-injury10,29,30,31, although other investigators have reported a relationship between ventilatory function and the extent of white matter sparing5. Thus, in the case of the C2SH model, an approach for functional validation of iDIAm inactivity at the time of the surgery and preferably early in the time course of chronic spinal cord injury experiments is both beneficial and necessary.
The present article underscores the use of DIAm EMG for real-time confirmation of the initial loss of DIAm EMG during breathing after the C2SH as well as subsequent confirmatory assessments at 3 days (Day 3) after the injury18,21,31,32,33. In earlier work with the C2SH model, repeated laparotomies were performed to record DIAm EMG10,13,30,34. However, more recent work has used chronic EMG electrodes, which allow the recording of EMG in anesthetized and awake rats. Additionally, chronic electrodes reduce the risk of pneumothorax and don&#39;t require repeated laparotomies, which can cause inhibition of the DIAm35,36. Although versions of the C2SH model have been used by many investigators, confirmation of the silencing of iDIAm activity was not made at the time of surgery3,4,6,7,11,22,23. Without such a confirmation of inactivity, it is difficult to know what portion of subsequent recovery to attribute to the neuroplasticity of ipsilateral versus contralateral pathways, which may have differential impacts. This is an important consideration because the inspiratory neural drive from the rVRG to phrenic motoneurons is primarily ipsilateral, with a loss of about 50% of excitatory glutamatergic inputs to phrenic motor neurons after C2SH33. However, there are remaining inspiratory excitatory inputs from the contralateral rVRG that decussate below the site of the lesion to innervate ipsilateral phrenic motor neurons and can be strengthened via neuroplasticity to promote functional recovery. By removing the predominant ipsilateral excitatory input to phrenic motor neurons, eupneic iDIAm EMG activity is lost (at least under anesthesia), while the activity of the cDIAm continues and is even enhanced. The loss of iDIAm EMG activity during breathing is thus a measure of a successful C2SH (Figure 2).
Some level of iDIAm EMG activity is present as early as 1-4 days following C2SH in awake animals23,37. Additionally, in decerebrate animals, iDIAm activity is present within minutes to hours after upper cervical hemisection and is suppressed by anesthesia38. Additionally, the success of the C2SH is validated by confirming the absence of iDIAm EMG activity during breathing (eupnea) in anesthetized rats on Day 3 post-injury. Confocal imaging studies confirmed the loss of glutamatergic synaptic inputs on phrenic motor neurons during this initial stage of injury37. At Day 3 post-injury, if there is any residual eupneic iDIAm EMG activity, this is interpreted as evidence of incomplete removal of ipsilateral descending inspiratory drive from the rVRG. The present article is divided into three sections: (1) chronic DIAm EMG recordings, (2) C2SH, and (3) EMG data acquisition in awake and anesthetized animals. This protocol describes a rigorous, reproducible, and reliable C2SH model of cSCI in rats, which is an excellent platform for studying respiratory neuroplasticity, compensatory cDIAm activity, and therapeutic strategies and pharmaceuticals.

Author Spotlight: Neuromotor Control and Recovery of Diaphragm Function Following Cervical Spinal Hemisection in Rats

Assessing Functional Recovery of Eupneic Diaphragm Activity Following Unilateral Cervical Spinal Cord Hemisection in Rats

Our research focuses on neuromotor control of the diaphragm muscle during breathing. Phrenic motor neurons innervating diaphragm muscle fibers receive descending excitatory input from the brainstem, which is primarily ipsilateral and therefore disrupted by upper cervical spinal cord hemisection or C2SH. Following C2SH, there is spontaneous recovery of ipsilateral diaphragm activity reflecting neuroplasticity.A major development is demonstrating a role of brain-derived neurotropic factor or BDNF signaling through its high affinity TrkB receptor in the recovery of diaphragm activity following C2SH. A second development is the use of machine learning approaches to facilitate high throughput analyses of diaphragm activity during numerous respiratory cycles. The lack of reliable, unbiased high throughput techniques to evaluate basic elements of diaphragm neuromotor control is a challenge in defining recovery of function.This becomes especially important when you're dealing with recordings from animals that are not anesthetized. Our cervical spinal hemisection intentionally leaves the ipsilateral dorsal funiculus intact, minimizing limb muscle deficits, but still causing loss of diaphragm activity. This protocol emphasizes validation of the loss of diaphragm activity at the time of surgery, thereby establishing a clear starting point for recovery of diaphragm muscle function.Further exploring the role of BDNF TrkB signaling in neuroplasticity and recovery of diaphragm neuromotor control after cervical spinal cord injury.

Cervical Spinal Hemisection and Diaphragm Muscle Electromyographic (EMG) Monitoring in Rats

To begin, arrange the sterile surgical equipment on a surgical platform. Approximately 72 hours after the diaphragm muscle electromyographic, or EMG, electrode implantation, weigh the rat. Prior to anesthetizing the rat, place the rat in a Bowman-style cage.Carefully connect the wires, exiting the rat dorsum to a preamplifier to record bilateral diaphragm muscle EMG. Next, place the anesthetized rat in a prone position. Shave the hair from the neck at about the ear level, and down to the scapulae.Connect the exposed electrode wires from the rat's back to the amplifier. Disinfect the skin alternating with 4%chlorhexidine gluconate and isopropyl alcohol three times. Cover the rat with sterile surgical covers, except for the upper dorsum.Using a scalpel, make a four centimeter rostrocaudal incision. Retract the skin and cut the The acromiotrapezius muscle. Then dissect the rhomboid muscle to expose the spinalis muscles.Under a surgical microscope, remove the spinalis from C1 to C3.Then use rongeur to carefully perform a laminectomy at C2 without damaging major arteries or nerves. Cut and remove the dura mater at C2.While monitoring diaphragm muscle EMG, insert the angle dissecting knife just below the point where the dorsal root enters the spinal cord, and section all the way to the midpoint of the ventral surface. Then record the eupneic ipsilateral diaphragm EMG activity on the anesthetized rat with C2 spinal hemisection performed.Suture the spinal cord muscles with 3-0 sutures, and then close the skin incision. To maintain hydration, subcutaneously inject one milliliter of saline per 50 grams of animal mass. Place the rat in a clean cage with a heating pad for recovery.Set the high band-pass filter of the preamplifier to 100 hertz, and the low-pass filter to 1000 hertz. After collecting one to two minutes of left and right hemidiaphragm EMG eupneic recording, save the date in an appropriate format for further analyses. A successful example of C2 spinal hemisection showed the absence of eupneic ipsilateral diaphragm EMG activity under anesthesia on day three post-injury.Diaphragm muscle EMG activity under awake conditions showed a reduction in eupneic ipsilateral diaphragm compared to the pre-injury baseline. The contralateral diaphragm muscle EMG activity increased in both anesthetized and awake conditions.

cervical-spinal-hemisection-diaphragm-muscle-electromyographic-emg

Research

JoVE Journal

Neuroscience

35 visualizações. Para começar, organize o equipamento cirúrgico estéril em uma plataforma cirúrgica. Aproximadamente 72 horas após o implante do eletrodo eletromiográfico do músculo diafragma, ou EMG, pesar o rato. Antes de anestesiar o rato, coloque-o em uma gaiola estilo Bowman.Conecte cuidadosamente os fios, saindo do dorso do rato a um pré-amplificador para registrar a EMG bilateral do músculo diafragma. Em seguida, coloque o rato anestesiado em decúbito ...