A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
This protocol demonstrates the combination of imaging and electrophysiology to reliably detect spreading depolarizations in adult mice following a mild traumatic brain injury.
Spreading Depolarizations (SDs) are massive events in the brain that often go undetected due to their slow propagation through gray matter. Because SD detection can be elusive, it is optimally confirmed using multiple methods. This protocol describes methods for combining imaging and electrophysiology to detect SDs in a manner that most laboratories can reliably and easily adopt. SDs occur following traumatic brain injuries, stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhages, ischemia, and migraine aura. Historically, SDs have been recorded using DC amplifiers, which can resolve the slow extracellular shift and the depression in high-frequency activity. However, DC amplifiers are nearly impossible to use for chronic in vivo recordings. This protocol employs a common AC amplifier for in vivo electrophysiology recordings to confirm high-frequency depression, along with non-invasive imaging necessary to detect the propagating wave of SD. These methods can be reliably adopted and/or modified for most experimental approaches to confirm the presence or absence of SDs following brain injury.
Spreading depolarizations (SDs) are associated with various neurological conditions, including traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhages, ischemia, and migraine aura1. SDs have been implicated in the progression of tissue damage in strokes and TBIs2. The exact mechanism underlying tissue loss progression remains unclear3,4. However, SDs occur when the metabolic demands of neurons are not met with sufficient oxygen and glucose, as the function of the ATP-dependent sodium-potassium pump becomes inadequate to maintain ion gradients. To understand the role of SDs in tissue loss, precise techniques are needed to measure and study them, which is crucial for advancing scientific knowledge. SDs are significant neurological events that can often go undetected due to experimental design and/or instrumentation limitations.
The role of spreading depolarizations (SDs) in injury progression is currently being elucidated, but their role in mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) remains unclear. Recent studies using the techniques described in this manuscript have shown that SDs are initiated in closed-skull mTBI mouse models, even when there is no overt tissue damage or bleeding5,6. These studies suggest that SDs may contribute to acute neurological impairments and neuroinflammation. Additionally, the presence of mTBI-induced SDs has been closely associated with acute behavioral deficits6,7. Therefore, it is likely that SDs are initiated in all TBI models, but their role remains difficult to ascertain without confirmation. Confirming the presence of SDs is crucial for accurately assessing the outcomes of mTBIs.
Spreading depolarizations (SDs) are identified by a significant drop in extracellular potential, known as the "DC shift," and by a depression of high-frequency activity8. The "DC shift" typically takes seconds to resolve (~10 s)9. To capture the "DC shift," a DC amplifier and silver wire electrodes are required. However, in vivo electrophysiology is usually performed with AC amplifiers, which are designed to filter out low-frequency events to reduce motion artifacts. Unfortunately, this low-frequency filtering also removes the "DC shift." Additionally, silver is toxic and unsuitable for chronic recordings. Commonly used AC amplifiers can detect the depression of high-frequency activity, but without the accompanying "DC shift," confirming the presence of an SD is challenging.
Spreading depolarizations (SDs) can also be detected using various imaging techniques. Most commonly, SDs are imaged with laser speckle contrast imaging, which measures cerebral blood flow through the intact skull10. SDs significantly influence cerebral vasculature and blood flow. In most species other than mice, SDs induce a propagating wave of hyperperfusion that travels with the leading edge of the SD11. SDs can also be imaged using calcium or glutamate fluorescent indicators12, though this requires loading tissue with dyes or genetically encoded fluorescent indicators12,13. Interestingly, SDs can be observed by the naked eye due to intrinsic optical signals (iOS) associated with the SD14. iOS are complex signals composed of autofluorescent molecules like NAD(P)H and FADH15,16, tissue swelling17, and potential changes in cerebral blood flow. Despite their complexity, iOS signals are reliable and can be captured in wild-type mice18. This protocol describes the method for imaging iOS because this technique can be implemented in any lab without the need for specialized viruses or transgenic animals.
The overall goal of this method is to experimentally confirm the presence or absence of a spreading depolarization (SD) following a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) using simultaneous imaging and electrophysiology. In vivo electrophysiology, facilitated by advanced amplifiers, is a commonly used technique. However, these amplifiers are unable to detect the characteristic "DC shift." Therefore, imaging techniques, as described in this protocol, are employed to confidently confirm the presence or absence of SDs. The advantage of combining imaging and electrophysiology is that imaging can detect the propagation of the SD, while electrophysiology can identify the associated high-frequency depression.
Overall, this method is suitable for investigating the presence of spreading depolarizations (SDs) following a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Its application could enhance understanding of cortical network function after TBI and SDs. This protocol can be adapted from a closed skull impact model to other models, such as controlled cortical impact, fluid percussion, or weight drop. Implementing this protocol across multiple laboratories could elucidate the role of SDs across varying TBI severities. Any established TBI model can be used, followed by the iOS imaging and electrophysiology procedures described in this protocol.
All procedures were performed in accordance with the Institute's Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of New Mexico. C57BL/6J mice were obtained from a commercial source. Equal numbers of male and female mice were used within the age range of 8-14 weeks. All mice weighed approximately 20 g. Details of the animals, reagents, and equipment used in this study are listed in the Table of Materials. Supplementary File 1 contains the list of abbreviations.
1. Preparing the skull for imaging and electrophysiology
2. Detecting spreading depolarizations with intrinsic optical signal (iOS) imaging and AC- electrophysiology
3. iOS image visualization and quantification
4. Electrophysiology analysis
NOTE: It is recommended that the expertise of the Buzsaki lab and their MATLAB-generated code be heavily utilized for visualizing and analyzing electrophysiology data. The analysis will require downloading MATLAB with an institutional activation code and the Buzsaki lab "Buzcode" zip file via GitHub (https://github.com/buzsakilab/buzcode).
Figure 1 illustrates a graphical representation of the experimental setup. The recording skull screws are positioned in the primary visual cortex, with one skull screw electrode placed in the cerebellar vermis as a ground electrode. The skull screws and gold pins are secured to the skull using cyanoacrylate glue and dental cement. It is crucial to limit the dental cement to the caudal part of the skull to leave space for impact and imaging. The impact location, centered at midline and a...
Spreading depolarizations are crucial in various disease models, including traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, and migraine1. Accurate detection of SDs is essential for understanding their role in acute behavioral deficits and/or the activation of the neuroimmune system following mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs)23,24. To mitigate the risk of missing SDs when using a single method, a multi-method approach is necessary for effective v...
None.
This work was supported by NIGMS P20GM109089 and Department of Defense PR200891 grants.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
#00-90 x .118 Machine Screw | US Micro Screw | 00.90-118-M-SS-P, Amazon | |
0.8 mm diameter drill bit | PCB Drill Bit | WYTP21, Amazon | |
16-A Headstage | Intan | C3335 | |
2.1 mm Burrs micro drill bit | Fine Science Tools | 19007-21 | |
AC amplifier | Intan | RHD recording system | |
C57BL/6J mice | Jackson Laboratory | Jax#000664 | |
CCD camera | Mightex | TCE-1304-U | |
Extension lens | Zeikos | ZE-ETN | |
Ethiqa XR (slow release Buprenorphine) | Midwest Veterinary Supply | Product Number 267.10000.3 | |
Gold connector pin (female) | A-M Systems | 520100 | |
Gold connector pin (male) | A-M Systems | 520200 | |
ImageJ2/Fiji | Image J | NA | |
Impactor One | Leica | 39463930 | |
LED panel board | Supon | L122t | |
MATLAB | MathWorks | Institutional or individual activation code | |
Medical grade cyanoacrylate glue | MasterBond | MB287 | |
Micro-Manager Camera Software | Image J | NA | |
Nail drill/polisher | Makartt Nail Drill Electric Nail File | JD700 | |
Omnetic connectors | Omnetics | A79014-001 | |
RHX Data Acquisition Software | Intan | NA | |
Stainless Steel uncoated wire (0.005") | A-M Systems | 792800 | |
Stereotaxic Frame | Kopf Intruments | 1923-B | |
Teets 'cold cure' dental cement | A-M systems | 525000, 526000 | |
XLR camera lens | Nikon | NIKKOR 50 mm f/1.8-16 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved