JoVE Logo
Faculty Resource Center
Authors
Librarians
High Schools
About

Sign In

Abstract

Biochemistry

Cryomilled哺乳動物細胞からのタンパク質複合体の親和性のキャプチャ

Published: December 9th, 2016

DOI:

10.3791/54518

1Laboratory of Cellular and Structural Biology, The Rockefeller University, 2Institute for Systems Genetics, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine

ERRATUM NOTICE

Important: There has been an erratum issued for this article. Read more …

親和性捕捉は、さらなる研究のために内因性のタンパク質複合体を単離するための有効な手法です。抗体と組み合わせて使用​​すると、この技術は、しばしば、免疫沈降法とも呼ばれます。親和性捕捉は、ベンチスケールで、高スループットの状況で適用することができます。タンパク質の質量分析法と組み合わせると、親和性捕捉は、インタラクトーム解析の主力であることが証明されました。関連する多くの工程を実行するために、潜在的に多くの方法がありますが、次のプロトコルは、私たちに好まメソッドを実装します。 2つの機能は独特である。親和性媒体として、細胞抽出物、および抗体結合常磁性ビーズを製造するためcryomilled細胞粉末の使用。多くの場合、我々は、多くの従来の親和性捕捉の実践で得られたものよりも優れた結果を得ました。低温ミリングは、細胞破壊の他の形態に関連した多くの問題を回避します。 denatを回避しながら、それは、材料の効率的な破壊を提供します加熱または発泡に関連付けられレーションの問題。これは、巨大分子解離を軽減、抽出のポイントにネイティブのタンパク質濃度の上昇を保持します。これは有害な酵素活性を制限し、抽出されたタンパク質は、溶液中で費やす時間を短縮し、それは、親和性媒体によるタンパク質の非特異的吸着を減少させることができます。ミクロンスケールの磁気アフィニティー媒体はますます伝統的なagarose-とセファロースベースのメディアを交換し、最後の数年間で、より一般的になってきました。磁気媒体の主な利点は、典型的には、低い非特異的タンパク質吸着を含みます。いかなるサイズ排除限界ない結合タンパク質複合体は、ビーズ表面上ではなく、細孔内で発生するからです。および操作の容易さと磁石を使用して処理します。

Erratum

Erratum: Protein Complex Affinity Capture from Cryomilled Mammalian Cells

A correction was made to: Protein Complex Affinity Capture from Cryomilled Mammalian Cells. The References section has been updated from:

  1. Cristea, I. M., & Chait, B. T. Conjugation of magnetic beads for immunopurification of protein complexes. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2011 (5) (2011).
  2. Rosenberg, I. M. Electrophoretic Techniques. Protein Analysis and Purification. (4), 63–117 (2005).
  3. Ornstein, L. Disc Electrophoresis. I. Background and Theory. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 121 (A2), 321–349 (1964).
  4. Davis, B. J. Disc Electrophoresis. II. Method and Application to Human Serum Proteins. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 121, 404–427 (1964).
  5. Laemmli, U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 227 (5259), 680–685 (1970).
  6. Shevchenko, A., Tomas, H., Havlis, J., Olsen, J. V., & Mann, M. In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nature protocols. 1 (6), 2856–2860 (2006).
  7. DeGrasse, J. A., Kalkum, M., Krutchinsky, A.N., Padovan, J. C., & Zhang, W. MALDI Sample Preparation. rockefeller.edu at <http://prowl.rockefeller.edu/protocols/in-gel-digestion.html> (2006).
  8. Lubas, M., Christensen, M. S., et al. Interaction profiling identifies the human nuclear exosome targeting complex. Mol Cell. 43 (4), 624–637 (2011).
  9. Tackett, A. J., DeGrasse, J. A., Sekedat, M. D., Oeffinger, M., Rout, M. P., & Chait, B. T. I-DIRT, a general method for distinguishing between specific and nonspecific protein interactions. J Proteome Res. 4 (5), 1752–1756 (2005).
  10. Wang, X., & Huang, L. Identifying dynamic interactors of protein complexes by quantitative mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics. 7 (1), 46–57 (2008).
  11. Trinkle-Mulcahy, L., Boulon, S., et al. Identifying specific protein interaction partners using quantitative mass spectrometry and bead proteomes. J Cell Biol. 183 (2), 223–239 (2008).
  12. Boulon, S., Ahmad, Y., et al. Establishment of a protein frequency library and its application in the reliable identification of specific protein interaction partners. Mol Cell Proteomics. 9 (5), 861–879 (2010).
  13. Armean, I. M., Lilley, K. S., & Trotter, M. W. B. Popular computational methods to assess multiprotein complexes derived from label-free affinity purification and mass spectrometry (AP-MS) experiments. Mol Cell Proteomics. 12 (1), 1–13 (2013).
  14. Mellacheruvu, D., Wright, Z., et al. The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat Methods. (2013).
  15. Cheeseman, I. M., & Desai, A. A combined approach for the localization and tandem affinity purification of protein complexes from metazoans. Sci. STKE 2005 (266), pl1 (2005).
  16. Goldberg, S. Mechanical/physical methods of cell disruption and tissue homogenization. Methods in Molecular Biology. 424 (Chapter 1), 3–22 (2008).
  17. Grabski, A. C. Advances in preparation of biological extracts for protein purification. Methods in Enzymology. 463 (C), 285–303 (2009).
  18. Dhabaria, A., Cifani, P., Reed, C., Steen, H., & Kentsis, A. A High-Efficiency Cellular Extraction System for Biological Proteomics. J Proteome Res. 14 (8), 3403–3408 (2015).
  19. Glatter, T., Ahrné, E., & Schmidt, A. Comparison of Different Sample Preparation Protocols Reveals Lysis Buffer-Specific Extraction Biases in Gram-Negative Bacteria and Human Cells. J Proteome Res. 15 (2), 679 (2016).
  20. Zhao, Q.-Q., Yamada, S., & Jimbo, G. The Mechanism and Grinding Limit of Planetary Ball Milling. KONA. 7, 29–36 (1989).
  21. Sheng-Yong, L., Qiong-Jing, M., Zheng, P., Xiao-Dong, L., & Jian-Hua, Y. Simulation of ball motion and energy transfer in a planetary ball mill. Chinese Phys. B 21 (7), 078201 (2012).
  22. Fulton, A. B. How crowded is the cytoplasm? Cell. 30 (2), 345–347 (1982).
  23. Ellis, R. J. Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated. Trends Biochem Sci. 26 (10), 597–604 (2001).
  24. Kalkum, M. Using the Retsch MM301 Ball Mill for Cryogenic Disruption of Yeast Cells. 2 City of Hope, (2003).
  25. Staley, J. Making Whole Cell Extract of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells using the Retsch MM301 Ball Mill. Retsch GmbH: (2005).
  26. Bell, A. W., Nilsson, T., Kearney, R. E., & Bergeron, J. J. M. The protein microscope: Incorporating mass spectrometry into cell biology. Nat Methods. 4 (10), 783–784 (2007).
  27. Zhao, X., Li, G., & Liang, S. Several affinity tags commonly used in chromatographic purification. J Anal Methods Chem. 2013 (1), 581093–8 (2013).
  28. Waugh, D. S. An overview of enzymatic reagents for the removal of affinity tags. 80 (2), 283–293 (2011).
  29. Williams, R. J., & Lyman, C. M. A neutral buffered standard for hydrogen ion work and accurate titrations which can be prepared in one minute. J Am Chem Soc. 54 (5), 1911–1912 (1932).
  30. Johnson, M. Detergents: Triton X-100, Tween-20, and More. labome.com. 3 (163) (2013).
  31. Deppert, W. R., & Lukaĉin, R. Buffers and Additives. Journal of Chromatography Library. 61 (C), 839–862 (1999).
  32. Ugwu, S. O., & Apte, S. P. The Effect of Buffers on Protein Conformational Stability. Pharmaceutical Technology. 28 (3), 86–108 (2004).
  33. Linke, D. Detergents: an overview. Methods in Enzymology. 463 (34), 603–617 (2009).
  34. Zhang, J. Protein-Protein Interactions in Salt Solutions. Protein-Protein Interactions Computational and Experimental Tools. (18), 359–376 (2012).

to:

  1. Ball Mills - Guidelines for sample amount and ball charge. 1–3at <http://www.retsch.com/products/milling/ball-mills/planetary-ball-mill-pm-100/information-downloads/> Retsch GmbH (2014).
  2. Cristea, I. M., & Chait, B. T. Conjugation of magnetic beads for immunopurification of protein complexes. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2011 (5) (2011).
  3. Rosenberg, I. M. Electrophoretic Techniques. Protein Analysis and Purification. (4), 63–117 (2005).
  4. Ornstein, L. Disc Electrophoresis. I. Background and Theory. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 121 (A2), 321–349 (1964).
  5. Davis, B. J. Disc Electrophoresis. II. Method and Application to Human Serum Proteins. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 121, 404–427 (1964).
  6. Laemmli, U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 227 (5259), 680–685 (1970).
  7. Shevchenko, A., Tomas, H., Havlis, J., Olsen, J. V., & Mann, M. In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nature protocols. 1 (6), 2856–2860 (2006).
  8. DeGrasse, J. A., Kalkum, M., Krutchinsky, A.N., Padovan, J. C., & Zhang, W. MALDI Sample Preparation. rockefeller.edu at <http://prowl.rockefeller.edu/protocols/in-gel-digestion.html> (2006).
  9. Lubas, M., Christensen, M. S., et al. Interaction profiling identifies the human nuclear exosome targeting complex. Mol Cell. 43 (4), 624–637 (2011).
  10. Tackett, A. J., DeGrasse, J. A., Sekedat, M. D., Oeffinger, M., Rout, M. P., & Chait, B. T. I-DIRT, a general method for distinguishing between specific and nonspecific protein interactions. J Proteome Res. 4 (5), 1752–1756 (2005).
  11. Wang, X., & Huang, L. Identifying dynamic interactors of protein complexes by quantitative mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics. 7 (1), 46–57 (2008).
  12. Trinkle-Mulcahy, L., Boulon, S., et al. Identifying specific protein interaction partners using quantitative mass spectrometry and bead proteomes. J Cell Biol. 183 (2), 223–239 (2008).
  13. Boulon, S., Ahmad, Y., et al. Establishment of a protein frequency library and its application in the reliable identification of specific protein interaction partners. Mol Cell Proteomics. 9 (5), 861–879 (2010).
  14. Armean, I. M., Lilley, K. S., & Trotter, M. W. B. Popular computational methods to assess multiprotein complexes derived from label-free affinity purification and mass spectrometry (AP-MS) experiments. Mol Cell Proteomics. 12 (1), 1–13 (2013).
  15. Mellacheruvu, D., Wright, Z., et al. The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat Methods. (2013).
  16. Cheeseman, I. M., & Desai, A. A combined approach for the localization and tandem affinity purification of protein complexes from metazoans. Sci. STKE 2005 (266), pl1 (2005).
  17. Deppert, W. R., & Lukaĉin, R. Buffers and Additives. Journal of Chromatography Library. 61 (C), 839–862 (1999).
  18. Ugwu, S. O., & Apte, S. P. The Effect of Buffers on Protein Conformational Stability. Pharmaceutical Technology. 28 (3), 86–108 (2004).
  19. Linke, D. Detergents: an overview. Methods in Enzymology. 463 (34), 603–617 (2009).
  20. Zhang, J. Protein-Protein Interactions in Salt Solutions. Protein-Protein Interactions Computational and Experimental Tools. (18), 359–376 (2012).
  21. Goldberg, S. Mechanical/physical methods of cell disruption and tissue homogenization. Methods in Molecular Biology. 424 (Chapter 1), 3–22 (2008).
  22. Grabski, A. C. Advances in preparation of biological extracts for protein purification. Methods in Enzymology. 463 (C), 285–303 (2009).
  23. Dhabaria, A., Cifani, P., Reed, C., Steen, H., & Kentsis, A. A High-Efficiency Cellular Extraction System for Biological Proteomics. J Proteome Res. 14 (8), 3403–3408 (2015).
  24. Glatter, T., Ahrné, E., & Schmidt, A. Comparison of Different Sample Preparation Protocols Reveals Lysis Buffer-Specific Extraction Biases in Gram-Negative Bacteria and Human Cells. J Proteome Res. 15 (2), 679 (2016).
  25. Zhao, Q.-Q., Yamada, S., & Jimbo, G. The Mechanism and Grinding Limit of Planetary Ball Milling. KONA. 7, 29–36 (1989).
  26. Sheng-Yong, L., Qiong-Jing, M., Zheng, P., Xiao-Dong, L., & Jian-Hua, Y. Simulation of ball motion and energy transfer in a planetary ball mill. Chinese Phys. B 21 (7), 078201 (2012).
  27. Fulton, A. B. How crowded is the cytoplasm? Cell. 30 (2), 345–347 (1982).
  28. Ellis, R. J. Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated. Trends Biochem Sci. 26 (10), 597–604 (2001).
  29. Kalkum, M. Using the Retsch MM301 Ball Mill for Cryogenic Disruption of Yeast Cells. 2 City of Hope, (2003).
  30. Staley, J. Making Whole Cell Extract of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells using the Retsch MM301 Ball Mill. Retsch GmbH: (2005).
  31. Bell, A. W., Nilsson, T., Kearney, R. E., & Bergeron, J. J. M. The protein microscope: Incorporating mass spectrometry into cell biology. Nat Methods. 4 (10), 783–784 (2007).
  32. Zhao, X., Li, G., & Liang, S. Several affinity tags commonly used in chromatographic purification. J Anal Methods Chem. 2013 (1), 581093–8 (2013).
  33. Waugh, D. S. An overview of enzymatic reagents for the removal of affinity tags. 80 (2), 283–293 (2011).

Explore More Videos

118 IP

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Contact Us

Recommend to library

JoVE NEWSLETTERS

Research

Education

Authors

Librarians

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved