A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
This is a protocol to model the size spectrum (scaling relationship between individual mass and population density) for combined fish and invertebrate data from wadable streams and rivers. Methods include: field techniques to collect quantitative fish and invertebrate samples; lab methods to standardize the field data; and statistical data analysis.
The size spectrum is an inverse, allometric scaling relationship between average body mass (M) and the density (D) of individuals within an ecological community or food web. Importantly, the size spectrum assumes that individual size, rather than species’ behavioral or life history characteristics, is the primary determinant of abundance within an ecosystem. Thus, unlike traditional allometric relationships that focus on species-level data (e.g., mean species’ body size vs. population density), size spectra analyses are ‘ataxic’ – individual specimens are identified only by their size, without consideration of taxonomic identity. Size spectra models are efficient representations of traditional, complex food webs and can be used in descriptive as well as predictive contexts (e.g., predicting responses of large consumers to changes in basal resources). Empirical studies from diverse aquatic ecosystems have also reported moderate to high levels of similarity in size spectra slopes, suggesting that common processes may regulate the abundances of small and large organisms in very different settings. This is a protocol to model the community-level size spectrum in wadable streams. The protocol consists of three main steps. First, collect quantitative benthic fish and invertebrate samples that can be used to estimate local densities. Second, standardize the fish and invertebrate data by converting all individuals to ataxic units (i.e., individuals identified by size, irrespective of taxonomic identity), and summing individuals within log2 size bins. Third, use linear regression to model the relationship between ataxic M and D estimates. Detailed instructions are provided herein to complete each of these steps, including custom software to facilitate D estimation and size spectra modeling.
Body size scaling relationships, such as the positive association between body mass and metabolic rate, are well-known at the individual organism level and are now being studied at higher levels of organization1,2,3. These allometric relationships are most often power-law functions of the form Y = aMb, where Y is the variable of interest (e.g., metabolism, abundance, or home range size), M is the body mass of a single or average individual, b is a scaling coefficient, and a is a constant. For statistical convenience, Y and M data are often log-transformed prior to analysis then modeled with linear equations of the form log (Y) = log (a) + b log (M), where b and log (a) become the linear model slope and intercept, respectively.
The size spectrum is a type of allometric relationship that predicts density (D, the number of individuals per unit area) or biomass (B, the summed mass of individuals per unit area) as a function of M (See Section 4 for additional information on the use of ‘normalized’ D or B estimates.) Like other scaling relationships between M and D or between M and B, the size spectrum plays a central role in basic and applied ecology. At the population-level, biologists often interpret negative D M relationships as evidence of density-dependent survival or as models of ecosystem carrying capacity (i.e., the ‘self-thinning rule’)4,5. At the community-level, B
M relationships can be used to study system-level effects of anthropogenic perturbations, such as size-selective fishing6,7. Allometric scaling of D and B with M are also central to recent efforts to unite population, community, and ecosystem ecology2,8,9.
One particularly important characteristic of the size spectrum is the fact that it is entirely ataxic9,10. This point is easy to miss when comparing scatterplots of D M or B
M data but the distinction between taxic and ataxic models is a critical one. In taxic models, a single M value is used to represent the average body mass of every individual of a given species or taxa11. In ataxic models, all individuals within a data set are partitioned among a series of body size intervals or M bins, regardless of their taxonomic identity12. The latter, ataxic approach is advantageous in aquatic ecosystems where many taxa exhibit indeterminate growth and experience one or more ontogenetic shifts in feeding behavior; in these instances, a single species-level M average will obscure the fact that a species can fill different functional roles throughout its life history9,13,14.
Here, we present a complete protocol to quantify the size spectrum within wadable streams and rivers. The protocol begins with field sampling methods to collect the necessary fish and benthic macroinvertebrate data. Fish will be collected through a ‘three-pass depletion’ sampling process. Abundance will then be estimated from the depletion data with the Zippin method15. In depletion sampling, individual fishes within a closed study reach (i.e., individuals can neither enter nor leave the enclosed reach) are removed from the reach through three successive samples. Thus, the number of remaining fishes will be progressively depleted. From this depletion trend, total abundance within the study reach can be estimated then converted to D (in fish per m2), using the known surface area of the study reach. Benthic macroinvertebrates will be collected with standard fixed-area samplers, then identified and measured in the laboratory.
Next, the combined fish and macroinvertebrate data will be partitioned among size bins. Traditionally, the octave or log2 scale (i.e., doubling intervals) has been used to set size bin boundaries16. Once a list of size bins has been established, partitioning of individual benthic macroinvertebrates among their respective size bins is straightforward because invertebrates are directly enumerated as numbers of individuals per unit area. However, estimating fish abundances within size bins is more abstract because these estimates are inferred from the depletion data. Detailed instructions are therefore provided to estimate fish abundance within size bins, irrespective of taxonomic identity, from depletion sample data.
Finally, linear regression will be used to model the size spectrum. This protocol is fully compatible with the original, general method of Kerr and Dickie16 and identical to the methods used by McGarvey and Kirk, 201817 in a study of fish and invertebrate size spectra in West Virginia streams. By using this protocol, investigators can insure that their results are directly comparable with other studies that build upon Kerr and Dickie16, thereby accelerating a broad and robust understanding of body size scaling relationships in freshwater ecosystems and the mechanisms that drive them.
All methods described here have been approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Virginia Commonwealth University.
1. Collection and processing of fish samples
2. Collection and processing of benthic macroinvertebrate samples
3. Estimation of fish and benthic macroinvertebrate densities within log2 size bins
An animation demonstrating how to format the fish and invertebrate data for use in size spectra analysis is available at http://bit.ly/SizeSpectraDensities.
4. Modeling the benthic macroinvertebrate and fish size spectrum
Exemplar results, including original field data, are presented for Slaunch Fork, West Virginia, a small stream in southern West Virginia. Additional size spectra model results are also presented for two other streams in the same region: Camp Creek and Cabin Creek, West Virginia. These are the three study sites included in McGarvey and Kirk17, but data presented here are from new samples collected in May 2015. A fully worked, manual example of the size spectra modeling process is included for the S...
This ataxic size spectra protocol can be used to quantify and model size structure within communities of stream fishes and invertebrates. Previous size spectra studies in stream ecosystems have ranged from basic descriptive research39,40 to comparisons along a longitudinal river profile41 and among distinct biogeographic regions42. Seasonal comparisons have been performed43,
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Funding for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation (grant DEB-1553111) and the Eppley Foundation for Scientific Research. This manuscript is VCU Rice Rivers Center contribution #89.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Chest waders | Multiple options | n/a | Personal protective equipment for use during electrofishing. Do NOT use 'breatheable' waders as electrical current will pass through them. |
Rubber lineman's gloves | Multiple options | n/a | Personal protective equipment for use during electrofishing. |
Dip nets with fiberglass poles | Multiple options | n/a | Used to capture stunned fishes during electrofishing. |
Backpack electrofishing unit | Smith-Root; Halltech; Midwest Lake Management; Aqua Shock Solutions | www.smith-root.com; www.halltechaquatic.com; https://midwestlake.com; https://aquashocksolutions.com/ | Backpack electrofishers are currently manufactured and distributed by four independent companies in North America. Prices and warranty/technical support are the most important factors in choosing a vendor. |
Block nets/seines (×2) | Duluth Nets | https://duluthfishnets.com/ | Necessary length will depend on stream width. 3/8 inch mesh is recommended. |
Cam-action utility straps with 1 inch nylon webbing (×4) | Multiple options | n/a | Used to secure/anchor block nets. Available at auto supply, hardware, and department stores. |
Large tent stakes (×4) | Multiple options | n/a | Used to secure/anchor block nets. Available at camping and department stores. |
5 gallon plastic buckets (×5) | Multiple options | n/a | Used to hold and transport fish during electrofishing. Available at hardware and paint supply stores. |
10-20 gallon totes (×3) | Multiple options | n/a | Used as livewells, sedation tanks, and recovery bins for captured fishes. Available at hardware and department stores. |
Battery powered 'bait bucket' aeration pumps | Cabelas | IK-019008 | Used to aerate fish holding bins during field processing. |
Fish anesthesia (Tricaine-S) | Syndel | www.syndel.com | Used to sedate fishes for field processing. Tricaine-S is regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. |
Folding camp table and chairs | Cabelas | IK-518976; IK-552777 | Used to process fish samples. |
Pop-up canopy | Multiple options | n/a | Used as necessary for sun and rain protection. |
Fish measuring board | Wildco | 3-118-E40 | Used to measure fish lengths. |
Battery powered field scale with weighing dish | Multiple options | n/a | Used to weigh fishes. Must weigh be accurate to 0.1 or 0.01 grams. |
Clear plastic wind/rain baffle | Multiple options | n/a | Used to shield scale in rainy or windy conditions. Must be large enough to cover the scale and a weighing dish. |
White plastic or enamel examination trays | Multiple options | n/a | Trays are essential for examining fishes in the field. |
Stainless steel forceps | Multiple options | n/a | Forceps are helpful when examining small fishes and in transfering invertebrates to specimen jars. |
Hand magnifiers | Multiple options | n/a | Magnification is often helpful when identifying fish specimens in the field. |
Fish identification keys | n/a | n/a | Laminated keys that are custom prepared for specific locations are most effective. |
Datasheets printed on waterproof paper | Rite in the Rain | n/a | Waterproof paper is essential when working with aquatic specimens. |
Retractable fiberglass field tapes | Lufkin | n/a | Used to measure stream channel dimensions. |
Surber sampler or Hess sampler | Wildco | 3-12-D56; 3-16-C52 | Either of these fixed-area benthic samplers will work well in shallow streams with gravel or pebble substrate. |
70% ethanol or isopropyl alcohol | Multiple options | n/a | Used as invertebrate preservative. |
Widemouth invertebrate specimen jars (20-32 oz.) | U.S. Plastic Corp. | 67712 | Any widemouth plastic jars will work but these particular jars are durable and inexpensive. |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionExplore More Articles
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved