A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
The genome is organized in the nuclear space into different structures that can be revealed through chromosome conformation capture technologies. The in-nucleus Hi-C method provides a genome-wide collection of chromatin interactions in Drosophila cell lines, which generates contact maps that can be explored at megabase resolution at restriction fragment level.
The genome is organized into topologically associating domains (TADs) delimited by boundaries that isolate interactions between domains. In Drosophila, the mechanisms underlying TAD formation and boundaries are still under investigation. The application of the in-nucleus Hi-C method described here helped to dissect the function of architectural protein (AP)-binding sites at TAD boundaries isolating the Notch gene. Genetic modification of domain boundaries that cause loss of APs results in TAD fusion, transcriptional defects, and long-range topological alterations. These results provided evidence demonstrating the contribution of genetic elements to domain boundary formation and gene expression control in Drosophila. Here, the in-nucleus Hi-C method has been described in detail, which provides important checkpoints to assess the quality of the experiment along with the protocol. Also shown are the required numbers of sequencing reads and valid Hi-C pairs to analyze genomic interactions at different genomic scales. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genetic editing of regulatory elements and high-resolution profiling of genomic interactions using this in-nucleus Hi-C protocol could be a powerful combination for the investigation of the structural function of genetic elements.
In eukaryotes, the genome is partitioned into chromosomes that occupy specific territories in the nuclear space during interphase1. The chromatin forming the chromosomes can be divided into two main states: one of accessible chromatin that is transcriptionally permissive, and the other of compact chromatin that is transcriptionally repressive. These chromatin states segregate and rarely mix in the nuclear space, forming two distinct compartments in the nucleus2. At the sub-megabase scale, boundaries separate domains of high-frequency chromatin interactions, called TADs, that mark chromosomal organization3,4,5. In mammals, TAD boundaries are occupied by cohesin and CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF)6,7,8. The cohesin complex extrudes chromatin and halts at CTCF-binding sites that are disposed in a convergent orientation in the genomic sequence to form stable chromatin loops9,10,13,14. Genetic disruption of the CTCF DNA-binding site at the boundaries or reduction in CTCF and cohesin protein abundance results in abnormal interactions between regulatory elements, loss of TAD formation, and gene expression deregulation9,10,11,13,14.
In Drosophila, the boundaries between TADs are occupied by several APs, including boundary element-associated factor 32 kDa (BEAF-32), Motif 1 binding protein (M1BP), centrosomal protein 190 (CP190), suppressor of hairy-wing (SuHW), and CTCF, and are enriched in active histone modifications and Polymerase II16,17,18. It has been suggested that in Drosophila, TADs appear as a consequence of transcription13,17,19, and the exact role of independent APs in boundary formation and insulation properties is still under investigation. Thus, whether domains in Drosophila are a sole consequence of the aggregation of regions of similar transcriptional states or whether APs, including CTCF, contribute to boundary formation remains to be fully characterized. Exploration of genomic contacts at high resolution has been possible through the development of chromosome conformation capture technologies coupled with next-generation sequencing. The Hi-C protocol was first described with the ligation step performed "in solution"2 in an attempt to avoid spurious ligation products between chromatin fragments. However, several studies pointed to the realization that the useful signal in the data came from ligation products formed at partially lysed nuclei that were not in solution20,21.
The protocol was then modified to perform the ligation inside the nucleus as part of the single-cell Hi-C experiment22. The in-nucleus Hi-C protocol was subsequently incorporated into cell population Hi-C to yield a more consistent coverage over the full range of genomic distances and produce data with less technical noise23,24. The protocol, described in detail here, is based on the population in-nucleus Hi-C protocol23,24 and was used to investigate the consequences of genetically removing DNA-binding motifs for CTCF and M1BP from a domain boundary at the Notch gene locus in Drosophila25. The results show that altering the DNA-binding motifs for APs at the boundary has drastic consequences for Notch domain formation, larger topological defects in the regions surrounding the Notch locus, and gene expression deregulation. This indicates that genetic elements at domain boundaries are important for the maintenance of genome topology and gene expression in Drosophila25.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
1. Fixation
2. Lysis
3. Enzymatic digestion
4. Biotinylation of DNA ends
5. Ligation
6. Crosslink reversal and DNA purification
7. Assess Hi-C template quality
8. Sonication
9. Biotin removal/end repair
NOTE: The steps shown below are adjusted for 5 µg of Hi-C DNA.
10. Size selection
11. Biotin pulldown/A-tailing/adapter ligation
NOTE: Perform the washes by resuspending the magnetic beads by vortexing, rotate the samples for 3 min on a rotating wheel, and then briefly spin down the sample and place it on the magnetic stand. Allow the beads to stick to the magnet, discard the supernatant, and proceed with the following wash step. Perform the washes at 55 °C on a thermo-block with rotation instead of the rotating wheel.
12. PCR amplification
Reaction Recipe | |
Hi-C beads | 2.5 µL |
10 µM PE PCR primer 1 (Table of Materials) | 0.75 µL |
10 µM PE PCR primer 2 (Table of Materials) | 0.75 µL |
10 mM dNTP | 0.6 µL |
5x reaction buffer | 5 µL |
DNA polymerase | 0.3 µL |
ddH2O | 14.65 µL |
Total | 25 µL |
Cycles | Temperature | Time |
1 | 98 °C | 30 s |
n cycles | 98 °C | 10 s |
65 °C | 30 s | |
72 °C | 30 s | |
1 | 72 °C | 7 min |
13. Final PCR amplification
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Described below are the results of a successful Hi-C protocol (see a summary of the Hi-C protocol workflow in Figure 1A). There are several quality control checkpoints during the in-nucleus Hi-C experiment. Sample aliquots were collected before (UD) and after (D) the chromatin restriction step as well as after ligation (L). Crosslinks were reversed, and DNA was purified and run on an agarose gel. A smear of 200-1000 bp was observed when restriction with Mbo I was successful (
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The in-nucleus Hi-C method presented here has allowed detailed exploration of Drosophila genome topology at high resolution, providing a view of genomic interactions at different genomic scales, from chromatin loops between regulatory elements such as promoters and enhancers to TADs and large compartment identification25. The same technology has also been efficiently applied to mammalian tissues with some modifications33. For example, when processing a tissue instead of a s...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors declare no competing interests.
This work was supported by UNAM Technology Innovation and Research Support Program (PAPIIT) grant number IN207319 and the Science and Technology National Council (CONACyT-FORDECyT) grant number 303068. A.E.-L. is a master's student supported by the Science and Technology National Council (CONACyT) CVU number 968128.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
16% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde solution | Agar Scientific | R1026 | |
Biotin-14-dATP | Invitrogen | CA1524-016 | |
ClaI enzyme | NEB | R0197S | |
COVARIS Ultrasonicator | Covaris | LE220-M220 | |
Cut Smart | NEB | B72002S | |
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) 1x | Life Technologies | 41965-039 | |
Dynabeads MyOne Streptabidin C1 | Invitrogen | 65002 | |
Fetal bovine serum (FBS) sterile filtered | Sigma | F9665 | |
Klenow Dna PolI large fragment | NEB | M0210L | |
Klenow exo(-) | NEB | M0210S | |
Ligation Buffer | NEB | B020S | |
MboI enzyme | NEB | R0147M | |
NP40-Igepal | SIGMA | CA-420 | Non-ionic surfactant for addition in lysis buffer |
PE adapter 1.0 | Illumina | 5'-P-GATCGGAAGAGCGGTTCAGCAG GAATGCCGAG-3' | |
PE adapter 2.0 | Illumina | 5'-ACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCT CTTCCGATCT-3' | |
PE PCR primer 1.0 | Illumina | 5'-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGAT CTACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACG CTCTTCCGATCT-3' | |
PE PCR primer 2.0 | Illumina | 5'-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAG ATCGGTCTCGGCATTCCTGCTGA ACCGCTCTTCCGATCT-3' | |
Phenol: Chloroform:Isoamyl Alcohol 25:24:1 | SIGMA | P2069 | |
Primer 1 (known interaction, Figure 2A) | Sigma | 5'-TCGCGGTAATTTTGCGTTTGA-3' | |
Primer 2 (known interactions, Figure 2A) | Sigma | 5'-CCTCCCTGCCAAAACGTTTT-3' | |
Protease inhibitor cocktail tablet | Roche | 4693132001 | |
Proteinase K | Roche | 3115879001 | |
Qubit | ThermoFisher | Q33327 | |
RNAse | Roche | 10109142001 | |
SPRI Beads | Beckman | B23318 | |
T4 DNA ligase | Invitrogen | 15224-025 | |
T4 DNA polymerase | NEB | M0203S | |
T4 polynucleotide kinase (PNK) | NEB | M0201L | |
TaqPhusion | NEB | M0530S | DNA polymerase |
Triton X-100 | Non-ionic surfactant for quenching of SDS |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved