A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This study presents a low-cost and easy-to-implement "real world" high-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocol for scientific research and discusses its efficiency for cardiorespiratory fitness.

Abstract

High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) has emerged as an interesting time-efficient approach to increase exercise adherence and improve health. However, few studies have tested the efficiency of HIIT protocols in a "real world" setting, e.g., HIIT protocols designed for outdoor spaces without specialized equipment. This study presents a "real world" training protocol, named "beep training", and compares the efficiency of a HIIT regiment versus a traditional long-duration Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) regiment using this beep training protocol on VO2 max of overweight untrained men. Twenty-two subjects performed outdoor running with MICT (n = 11) or HIIT (n = 11). Cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed before and after training protocols using a metabolic analyzer. Both training protocols were performed 3 days a week for 8 weeks using the Beep Test results. The MICT group performed the exercise program at 60%-75% of the maximum speed of the 20 m shuttle test (Vmax) and with a progression of the distance of 3,500-5,000 m. The HIIT group performed the interval exercise with 7-10 bouts of 200 m at 85%-100% of the maximum speed of the 20 m shuttle test (Vmax), interspersed with 1 min of passive recovery. Although the HIIT group presented a significantly lower training volume than the MICT group (p < 0.05) after 8 weeks of beep training, HIIT was superior to MICT in improving VO2 max (MICT: ~4.1%; HIIT: ~7.3%; p < 0.05). The "real world" HIIT regiment based on beep training protocol is a time-efficient, low-cost, and easy-to-implement protocol for overweight untrained men.

Introduction

Robust evidence has shown that High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) induces similar or even superior positive physiological adaptations than a traditional long-duration Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT)1,2,3. A HIIT session is composed of short bouts of high-intensity exercise interspersed with low-intensity exercise (active recovery) or rest (passive recovery). While a daily session with a MICT protocol lasts 30 to 60 min, on average, a daily session with HIIT may take half the time or less from a MICT session. Then, considering that sedentary individuals have indicated lack of time as the main barrier to engaging in a regular physical exercise program4, HIIT may be an interesting time-efficient approach to increase exercise adherence and improve health5.

However, despite the growing evidence pointing out the health benefits of HIIT, most studies have designed HIIT protocols for well-controlled laboratory environments using high-cost specialized equipment, such as treadmills and cycle ergometers. In the last 5 years, some studies have emphasized the importance of new studies confirming the health benefits of HIIT using exercise protocols for the real world, e.g., HIIT protocols performed in outdoor spaces without specialized equipment6. However, the difficulty in designing well-controlled studies to test HIIT protocols in non-laboratory environments has been the main challenge for researchers in this field.

In response to this challenge, a real-world HIIT protocol was developed here for scientific research and its efficiency in cardiorespiratory fitness was tested. A training protocol was developed using the shuttle test proposed by Leger et al.7 (named as Beep Training), and the effects of HIIT and MICT regiments based on this Beep training on VO2 max were compared in overweight untrained men. Briefly, although the duration of daily sessions with HIIT was almost half of the duration of MICT protocol, the Beep Training with HIIT was superior to the Beep Training with MICT in increasing VO2 max. Thus, Beep training with HIIT is a time-efficient and feasible approach to improve cardiorespiratory fitness in apparently healthy overweight/obese individuals. Moreover, general people may easily practice the beep training protocol as it is a low-cost and easy-to-implement physical training in a real-world scenario.

Protocol

This study was approved by the Federal University of the Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys Ethics and Research Committee. All participants were informed of the study objectives and experimental procedures of the study and signed a written informed consent form before their participation.

1. Experimental design

  1. Select individuals who meet the inclusion criteria: nonsmoking healthy individuals aged between 30 and 50 years with body mass index (BMI) of ≥25 kg·m-2 and maximum oxygen consumption lesser than 50 mL O2·kg-1·min-1 and engage them in regular physical exercise practices no more than 2 days a week for the past 3 months.
  2. Apply the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PARq)8 to stratify signs or symptoms of cardiovascular disease, metabolic, or any other condition that impedes physical exercise practice.
  3. Pair the participants firstly by BMI and secondly by maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max), and randomly divide them into one of the two groups, the Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training group (MICT; n = 11) and the High-Intensity Interval Training group (HIIT; n = 11).
  4. Perform the MICT or HIIT protocol (Figure 1).
  5. Record the VO2 max before and after the exercise training protocols.

2. VO2 max test (Ramp protocol)

  1. Familiarize the participants with the treadmill and the mouthpiece used on the metabolic analyzer for at least 24 h before testing.
  2. Calibrate the metabolic analyzer according to the manufacturers' recommendations.
  3. Use a heart rate monitor to measure the participants' heart rate.
  4. Place the non-rebreathing unilateral mouthpiece on the patient ensuring to cover the participant's mouth and nose completely.
  5. Use the subject's physical activity level to program the speed and degree of maximal metabolic equivalent (MET) increments9.
  6. Turn on the treadmill, select the Ramp protocol, and enter the subject's physical activity level (i.e., estimated maximal MET).
  7. Press ON to start the Ramp protocol, which starts with a warm-up of 3 min at 5 km/h.
    NOTE: The ramp protocol estimates the progression of the test according to the informed subject's physical activity level and calculates an exercise test duration between 8 and 12 min.
  8. Record heart rate (HR) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) using the Borg scale 6-20 every min of the test.
  9. Consider that VO2 max is achieved when all the following criteria are met: respiratory exchange rate (RER) greater than 1.10; HR greater than 95% of the maximum HR predicted for the age (220-age); and RPE equal to or greater than 18.
  10. Return the treadmill speed to 5 km/h (warm-up value) and remain on the treadmill for an additional 3 min.
  11. Turn off the treadmill and remove the mouthpiece from the participant.

3. Beep test (Leger et al.7)

  1. Choose a flat surface that allows placing two cones with 20 m of the distance between them.
  2. Orient participants to run 20 m (marked by cones) within a predetermined period signaled by a beep sound produced by a specific software developed for this test.
  3. Adjust the sound equipment connected to the computer with the software.
  4. Familiarize the participants with the test.
  5. Start the test.
    NOTE: The Beep Test software automatically reduces the timing of the beep sound so that the running speed increases by 0.5 km/h for every stage of the test.
  6. End the test when the volunteer can no longer complete the 20 m run within the time stipulated by the beep sound.

4. Training protocols

NOTE: Table 1 summarizes the progression of the exercise protocols (MICT and HIIT) during the 8 weeks of training.

  1. MICT protocol
    1. Orient each participant to maintain the running speed during the exercise sessions according to the GPS from the heart rate monitor.
    2. Instruct the participants to complete a 5 min warm-up by performing dynamic stretches and walking before each exercise session.
    3. Put on a heart rate (HR) monitor equipped with GPS tracking before each exercise session.
    4. Start the exercise session.
    5. Instruct the participants to maintain correct speed and distance by periodically checking the clock's speed and distance on the heart rate monitor.
    6. Train the participants for 2 weeks, three times a week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday), once a day at 60% of the individual maximum speed achieved during the 20 m test (Vmax), covering a distance of 3,500 m per session in the first week and 4,000 m per session in the second week.
    7. Train the participants for 4 weeks, three times a week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday), once a day at 65% of Vmax, covering a distance of 4,000 m per session in the third week, 4,500 m per session in the fourth and fifth week, and 5,000 m per session in the sixth week.
    8. Train the participants for 1 week, three times a week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday), once a day at 70% of Vmax, covering a distance of 5,000 m per session in the seventh week.
    9. Train the participants for 1 week, three times a week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday), once a day at 75% of Vmax, covering a distance of 5,000 m per session in the eighth week.
    10. Train the participants at 70% of Vmax, covering a daily distance of 5,000 m in the seventh week.
    11. Train the participants at 75% of Vmax, covering a daily distance of 5,000 m in the eighth week.
    12. Train the MICT group either in the morning or afternoon.
    13. Transfer the data recorded by the HR monitor to a computer after each exercise session to verify if the prescribed distance and running speed were reached.
    14. Exclude the participants who do not complete all the training sessions in the week.
    15. Analyze the data to ensure that each participant performs the respective training regimen according to the prescribed distance and speed.
  2. HIIT protocol
    1. Calculate the time interval between beep sounds every 20 m according to the Vmax% prescribed for each exercise session.
    2. Open the Sound Forge PRO software.
    3. Enter the information such as how many seconds the beep sound must shoot, how many times the shoots must occur to complete each exercise sprint, and the interval period between the sprints (corresponding to passive recovery).
    4. Download the individual sound files in MP3 format.
    5. Send the beep sound file to the cell phone of each participant.
    6. Mark a lane with cones every 20 m.
    7. Instruct the participant to follow the command of the beep sounds (by listening to them through headphones), guiding the exact moment when each subject must reach the cone (placed every 20 m away).
    8. Instruct the participants to complete a 5 min warm-up by performing dynamic stretches and walking before each exercise session.
    9. Put on a heart rate (HR) monitor equipped with GPS tracking before each exercise session.
    10. Start the exercise session.
    11. Train the participants with seven sprints (first week) and eight sprints (second week) of 200 m at 85% of Vmax, interspersed by 1 min of passive recovery between sprints.
    12. Train the participants with eight sprints (third week), nine sprints (fourth and fifth week), and 10 sprints (sixth week) of 200 m at 90% of Vmax, interspersed by 1 min of passive recovery.
    13. Train the participants with 10 sprints (seventh week) of 200 m at 95% of Vmax interspersed by 1 min of passive recovery.
    14. Train the participants with 10 sprints (eighth week) of 200 m at 100% of Vmax interspersed by 1 min of passive recovery.
    15. Train the HIIT group once a day, three times a week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) in the morning or afternoon.
    16. Transfer the data recorded by the HR monitor to a computer after each exercise session.
    17. Exclude the participants who do not complete all the training sessions in the week.
    18. Analyze the data to ensure that each participant performs the respective training regimen according to the prescribed distance and speed.

5. Statistical analysis

  1. Express all data as mean ± standard deviation.
  2. Check the normality of data using the Shapiro-Wilk test.
  3. Analyze the data using one or two-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test; set the significance level at 5%.

Results

Table 1 shows data of distance, speed, rest time, session duration, and mean heart rate from HIIT and MICT groups. During the 8 weeks of beep training, running distance and duration were higher in MICT than in the HIIT group (p < 0.05), while running velocity and heart rate were higher in HIIT than in the MICT group (p < 0.05). These data confirm the main differences between MICT and HIIT protocols, i.e., while MICT is characterized by long-duration moderate-intensity continuous exercises, HIIT i...

Discussion

HIIT has become a time-efficient alternative to the traditional MICT. This studypresents a low-cost, easy-to-implement HIIT protocol for a real-world setting. Most studies have proven the health benefits of HIIT using laboratory-based HIIT protocols6,10, and, recently, few studies have investigated the effects of real-world HIIT protocols in overweight untrained individuals10,14.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the Centro Integrado de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Saúde, (CIPq-Saúde) from the Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) for providing equipment and technical support for experiments. Thanks to the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) (finance codes APQ-00214-21, APQ-00583-21, APQ-00938-18, APQ-03855-16, APQ-01728-18), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (finance code 438498/2018-6), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) (Finance code 001) for providing financial support.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Beep Test software BitworksN/Aversion 2.0
Exercise Physiology Measurement & Analysis SystemADI INSTRUMENTPL3508B80PowerLab 8/35 and LabChart Pro software (which includes the Metabolic Module for calculating metabolic parameters such as VCO2, VO2, respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and minute ventilation)
Bio Amp
Gas Analyzer
Gas Mixing Chamber
Spirometer
Thermistor Pod
Exercise Physiology Accessory Kit
GraphPad SoftwareGraphPad PrismN/Aversion 7.00
Heart Rate monitorPolarN/ARS800 Running Computer: The running computer displays and records your heartrate and other exercise data during exercise. 2. Polar WearLink W.I.N.D. transmitter: The transmitter sends the heart rate signal to the running computer. The transmitterconsists of a connector and a strap.
Sound Forge PRO softwareSound ForgeN/Aversion 14.00
TreadmillIMBRASPORTN/ASpeed from 0 to 24 km/h.
Elevation from 0 to 26%.
Weight capacity for users up to 220 kg.
4 hp motor (220 v).
Automatic lubrication system.
With Safety Key and Emergency Stop Button.
Runs 14 preset protocols: Bruce, Modified Bruce, mini Bruce, Naughton Ellestad, Balke, Balke-Ware, Astrand, Cooper, Kattus, Male Mader, Female Mader, Stanford and Modified Stanford.
Run RAMP PROTOCOL.

References

  1. Gibala, M. J., Little, J. P., Macdonald, M. J., Hawley, J. A. Physiological adaptations to low-volume, high-intensity interval training in health and disease. The Journal of Physiology. 590 (5), 1077-1084 (2012).
  2. Gist, N. H., Fedewa, M. V., Dishman, R. K., Cureton, K. J. Sprint interval training on aerobic capacity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. 44 (2), 269-279 (2014).
  3. Gillen, J. B., Gibala, M. J. Is high-intensity interval training a time-efficient exercise strategy to improve health and fitness. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 39 (3), 409-412 (2014).
  4. Fowles, J. R., O'Brien, M. W., Solmundson, K., Oh, P. I., Shields, C. A. Exercise is Medicine Canada physical activity counselling and exercise prescription training improves counselling, prescription, and referral practices among physicians across Canada. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 43 (5), 535-539 (2018).
  5. Batacan, R. B., Duncan, M. J., Dalbo, V. J., Tucker, P. S., Fenning, A. S. Effects of high-intensity interval training on cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 51 (6), 494-503 (2017).
  6. Gray, S. R., Ferguson, C., Birch, K., Forrest, L. J., Gill, J. M. High-intensity interval training: key data needed to bridge the gap from laboratory to public health policy. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 50 (20), 1231-1232 (2016).
  7. Leger, L. A., Mercier, D., Gadoury, C., Lambert, J. The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. Journal of Sports Sciences. 6 (2), 93-101 (1988).
  8. Olds, T., Tomkinson, G., Léger, L., Cazorla, G. Worldwide variation in the performance of children and adolescents: an analysis of 109 studies of the 20-m shuttle run test in 37 countries. Journal of Sports Sciences. 24 (10), 1025-1038 (2006).
  9. Ainsworth, B. E., et al. Compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 43 (8), 1575-1581 (2011).
  10. Roy, M., et al. HIIT in the real world: outcomes from a 12-month intervention in overweight adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 50 (9), 1818-1826 (2018).
  11. Medina-Mirapeix, F., Escolar-Reina, P., Gascon-Canovas, J. J., Montilla-Herrador, J., Collins, S. M. Personal characteristics influencing patients' adherence to home exercise during chronic pain: a qualitative study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 41 (5), 347-352 (2009).
  12. Medina-Mirapeix, F., et al. Predictive factors of adherence to frequency and duration components in home exercise programs for neck and low back pain: an observational study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 10 (1), 1-9 (2009).
  13. Palazzo, C., et al. Barriers to home-based exercise program adherence with chronic low back pain: Patient expectations regarding new technologies. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 59 (2), 107-113 (2016).
  14. Lunt, H., et al. High intensity interval training in a real world setting: a randomized controlled feasibility study in overweight inactive adults, measuring change in maximal oxygen uptake. PloS One. 9 (1), 83256 (2014).
  15. Jung, M. E., et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and accelerometer-determined physical activity following one year of free-living high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training: a randomized trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 17 (1), 1-10 (2020).
  16. Taylor, J. L., et al. Guidelines for the delivery and monitoring of high intensity interval training in clinical populations. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. 62 (2), 140-146 (2019).
  17. Grip, F., et al. HIIT is superior than MICT on cardiometabolic health during training and detraining. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 121 (1), 159-172 (2021).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

High intensity Interval TrainingCardiorespiratory FitnessBeep Training ProtocolCardiometabolic DiseasesDiabetes PreventionHypertension TreatmentObesity ManagementExercise ProtocolMetabolic AnalyzerHeart Rate MonitoringPerceived ExertionBorg ScaleMaximal Oxygen UptakeTreadmill Testing

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved