A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This study presents an application of the modified bilateral scrotal flap for the reconstruction of penile skin shortages and scar contractures.

Abstract

Skin shortages and scar contractures are common complications following penile trauma and tumor surgery, resulting in significant pain and erectile dysfunction. Currently, skin grafts and scrotal flaps are widely used to reconstruct skin shortages. However, various limitations still exist; for instance, the skin graft may cause severe scarring in patients, and the traditional scrotal flap usually requires a two-stage procedure due to the large skin defect.

To treat the shortage of foreskin, a modified bilateral scrotal pedicled flap is used. In this procedure, flaps located on each side of the midline of the scrotum, which was pedicled from the anterior scrotal artery, are harvested. Subsequently, these bilateral scrotal flaps, like a butterfly, can successfully cover the foreskin defect. In this study, seven patients underwent this procedure, and satisfactory outcomes were obtained. Only two patients developed necrosis in some small areas of the flaps, which were recovered after wound care. Postoperative penile length significantly increased compared to the preoperative status in both flaccid and erectile states. We believe that modified bilateral scrotal flaps are a simple and effective solution to penile skin shortages and scar contractures.

Introduction

Penile skin shortages often occur as a consequence of infections, trauma, burning, and surgical excision, owing to benign or malignant penile skin diseases1,2. Reconstructive surgery is a major treatment option for this disease with the ultimate goal of preserving cosmetic appearance as well as normal function by providing redundant skin envelopes to preserve the physiological girth and length expansion during erection and sexual intercourse2,3. For most surgeons, however, reconstructive surgery remains a challenge.

Currently, various techniques can be used to treat penile skin defects, such as split-thickness skin grafting (STSG), scrotal flaps, and/or pedicle flaps2,3,4,5,6,7. All these techniques have reported satisfactory outcomes with different advantages. For most patients with genital skin loss, STSG is a viable treatment that provides a fast-resurfacing solution with enough skin8. However, the contraction and poor expansive ability of survival grafts sometimes lead to poor postoperative satisfaction. Accordingly, flaps are a better choice because they can provide reliable circulation, sufficient size, good flexibility, and subcutaneous tissues for the penile shaft9,10,11. Among the various flaps, the scrotal flap is a viable treatment option for patients whose scrotum is not damaged, because it is closer to the penis and easier to harvest. Moreover, the scrotal anterior flap has a dual blood supply system, which means that it contains a good vascular supply and has a low incidence of necrosis12,13. However, conventional surgery using the scrotal flap is a two-stage procedure in which the nude penile shaft is buried beneath the flap in the first stage, and reconstruction is performed in the second stage14. It is a secure but time-exhaustive procedure, and patients suffer much more physical and psychological damage in this multi-stage surgery.

To resolve these problems, we modified the two-stage scrotal flap technique into a single-stage procedure using a bilateral scrotal skin pedicle flap for penile skin reconstruction. Here, we describe this technique, which makes the treatment simpler and more efficient.

Protocol

The study was approved by the local Medical Ethics Committee of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital in China. All the studies were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association, and written consent was obtained from all patients.

1. Preparations for the surgery

  1. Evaluate patients through a detailed history assessment and a physical examination, comprising of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, scrotal size measurement, and assessment of the severity of the scar (Figure 1A).
  2. Ensure that the preoperative anesthesia risk assessment of the patient has been performed by an anesthesiologist.
  3. Ask the patient to shower and wash the skin of the surgical region daily.
  4. On the day of the operation, administer intravenously antibiotics containing cefuroxime sodium (1.5 g) in 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution, 30 min preoperatively.
  5. After general anesthesia, place the patient in the lithotomic position for optimal exposure of the surgical area.
  6. For adequate disinfection, continuously disinfect the skin of the surgical area with an iodophor and coverwith surgical drapes.

2. Performing the operation

  1. Remove the scar tissue and skin around the penis until it is released (Figure 1B). Perform coagulation of bleeding vessels with monopolar electrocoagulation.
  2. Place a catheter through the urethra for urine drainage and urethral protection intraoperatively.
  3. Measure the size of the penile skin defect when the penis is completely stretched (Figure 1C). The flaccid stretched penile status is regarded as approximate to the length of the erect penis15.
  4. Design the bilateral scrotal skin flap according to the length and circumference of the foreskin defect. Make an incision longitudinally along the midscrotal line with a length just half of the circumference of the penis.
  5. Subsequently, divide the scrotal skin into two parts (Figure 1D). Make a transverse incision across the scrotum to form two long flaps on either side of the midscrotal line with a length equal to that of the stretched penis (Figure 1E).
  6. Harvest the flaps along the tunica vaginalis by blunt dissection, and carefully preserve as much of the superficial dartos of the flap as possible.
  7. Rotate each flap approximately 90°, with the base of the flap as the center to cover the corpus cavernosum (Figure 1F). Ensure that the base of the flaps is wider, and the flap is trapezoidal.
  8. Close the wound using drainage at the bottom of the scrotum. Fix the drainage at the scrotal skin using a silk 2-0 suture.
  9. Layer the subcutaneous tissue and scrotal skin off with 3-0 absorbable polyglactin sutures (Figure 1G,H). Fix the penis upward with an elastic bandage at an angle of approximately 45° horizontally.

3. Postoperative care

  1. Postoperatively, administer an intravenous antibiotic containing 1.5 g of cefuroxime sodium in 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution every 12 h for 3 days.
  2. Remove the drainage tube and change the dressing on postoperative day (POD) 3. After two dressing changes on POD 3 and 5, discharge the patient on POD 5.
  3. Ask the patients to perform postoperative disinfection with iodophor by themselves every 2 days to prevent postoperative infection of the incision.

4. Follow-up study

  1. Ask the patients to attend follow-up examinations on POD 7, 14, and 30. During the follow-ups, assess postoperative outcomes, including postoperative IIEF-5 score and any complications that might have developed.

Results

Using the protocol described above, seven patients underwent the modified bilateral scrotal pedicled flap surgery. The median age, duration of disease, and length of the flap were 32 years (23-53 years), 7 months (3-12 months), and 12 cm (10-13 cm), respectively. Of these seven patients, only two developed necrosis in some small areas of the flaps but recovered after wound care. The necrosis of flaps is mainly caused by bad preservation of the superficial dartos and vascular supply. The length of the flap is not a contri...

Discussion

Extensive loss of penile skin is troublesome and harmful to individuals16. The goal of reconstruction is to achieve a good aesthetic appearance of the penis and restore the extensibility of the foreskin. In most situations, STSG is preferred to cover the defect3,5. However, postoperative scarring and edema of the survival grafts sometimes result in unsatisfactory feedback. There have been reports of multi-stage operations, including the em...

Disclosures

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patient who kindly contributed and shared his disease experience for this article. The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Project of biobank from Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (YBKB202119), Medical Research Foundation of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (20Y11904300), Cross-disciplinary Research Fund of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (JYJC201912) and Clinical Research Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (202040437).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
10Fr Suction drain (1)Guanzhou Wellead Medical Co.
18Fr silicone urethral catheter (1)Guanzhou Wellead Medical Co.
3-layered compress 30 cm x 45 cm (10)According to surgeon's preference175260
Allis forceps 16cmB.BraunEA092R
Allis forceps 20cmB.BraunEA095R
Bard-Parker scalpel number 3 (1)Jinzhong Medical Instruments
Bard-Parker scalpel number 4 (1)Jinzhong Medical Instruments
Debakey forceps 16 cm (6)Strong Medical Instruments
Debakey forceps 20 cm (2)Strong Medical Instruments
Debakey needle driver 18 cm (1)B.Braun Medical InstrumentsBM035R
Electrocauter blade 15 cm (1)Hutong Medical InstrumentsCO 150i
Halsted-Mosquito (8)Jinzhong Medical Instruments
Jones scissor 18 cm (1)Strong Medical Instruments
Mayo-Hegar needle driver 20 cm (1)B.Braun Medical InstrumentsBM022R
Mayo-Stille scissor 17 cm (1)Strong Medical Instruments
Monopolar electrocauter Valleylab  (1)MedtronicE2100
Nylexogrip 10cm x 4.5m (1)Urgo1641486
Scalpel blade number 15 (1)Jinzhong Medical Instruments
Scalpel blade number 24 (1)Jinzhong Medical Instruments
Sterile drapes (4)Medline
Sterile gloves (3 pairs)medicom-china
Sterile gown (3)According to surgeon's preferenceNA
Surgical compress 10 cm x 10 cm (10)According to surgeon's preference232088
Surgical forceps 14 cm (2)Jinzhong Medical Instruments
Urgostrapping 8 cm x 2.5 m (1)Urgo696037
Vacuum flask 250 mL (1)Guanzhou Wellead Medical Co.
Vicryl 3-0 wire (6)EthiconVCP316H
Vicryl 5-0 wire (2)EthiconVCP433H
Vicryl Rapide 3-0  wire (2)EthiconVF2260

References

  1. Garaffa, G., Raheem, A. A., Ralph, D. J. An update on penile reconstruction. Asian Journal of Andrology. 13 (3), 391-394 (2011).
  2. Guo, L., et al. Utilities of scrotal flap for reconstruction of penile skin defects after severe burn injury. International of Urology and Nephrology. 49 (9), 1593-1603 (2017).
  3. Ziylan, O., et al. A practical approach for the correction of iatrogenic penile skin loss in children: Scrotal embedding technique. Turkish Journal of Urology. 41 (4), 235-238 (2015).
  4. Chertin, B., et al. Fenestrated sheet split-thickness skin grafting for reconstruction of penile skin loss in pediatric population. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 51 (8), 1362-1365 (2016).
  5. Black, P. C., Friedrich, J. B., Engrav, L. H., Wessells, H. Meshed unexpanded split-thickness skin grafting for reconstruction of penile skin loss. The Journal of Urology. 172 (3), 976-979 (2004).
  6. Zucchi, A., et al. Iatrogenic trapped penis in adults: new, simple 2-stage repair. The Journal of Urology. 183 (3), 1060-1064 (2010).
  7. Vaca, E. E., Mundinger, G. S., Zelken, J. A., Erdag, G., Manahan, M. A. Surgical excision of multiple penile syringomas with scrotal flap reconstruction. Eplasty. 14, 21 (2014).
  8. Maguiña, P., Palmieri, T. L., Greenhalgh, D. G. Split thickness skin grafting for recreation of the scrotum following Fournier's gangrene. Burns. 29 (8), 857-862 (2003).
  9. Fakin, R., et al. Reconstruction of penile shaft defects following silicone injection by bipedicled anterior scrotal flap. The Journal of Urology. 197 (4), 1166-1170 (2017).
  10. Ratner, D. Skin grafting. From here to there. Dermatologic Clinics. 16 (1), 75-90 (1998).
  11. Muranyi, M., Varga, D., Kiss, Z., Flasko, T. A new modified bipedicle scrotal skin flap technique for the reconstruction of penile skin in patients with paraffin-induced sclerosing lipogranuloma of the penis. The Journal of Urology. 208 (1), 171-178 (2022).
  12. Zhao, Y. Q., Zhang, J., Yu, M. S., Long, D. C. Functional restoration of penis with partial defect by scrotal skin flap. The Journal of Urology. 182 (5), 2358-2361 (2009).
  13. Mendez-Fernandez, M. A., Hollan, C., Frank, D. H., Fisher, J. C. The scrotal myocutaneous flap. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 78 (5), 676-678 (1986).
  14. Yachia, D. Penile injuries. Text Atlas of Penile Surgery. 12, 136-138 (2007).
  15. Veale, D., Miles, S., Bramley, S., Muir, G., Hodsoll, J. Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men. BJU International. 115 (6), 978-986 (2015).
  16. Paraskevas, K. I., Anagnostou, D., Bouris, C. An extensive traumatic degloving lesion of the penis. A case report and review of the literature. International of Urology and Nephrology. 35 (4), 523-527 (2003).
  17. Goodwin, W. E., Thelen, H. M. Plastic reconstruction of penile skin; implantation of the penis into the scrotum. Journal of the American Medical Association. 144 (5), 384 (1950).
  18. Yao, H., et al. Reconstruction of major scrotal defects by anterolateral thigh flap. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics. 70 (2), 1331-1335 (2014).
  19. Giraldo, F., Mora, M. J., Solano, A., Gonzalez, C., Smith-Fernandez, V. Male perineogenital anatomy and clinical applications in genital reconstructions and male-to-female sex reassignment surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 109 (4), 1301-1310 (2002).
  20. Ching, W. C., Liao, H. T., Ulusal, B. G., Chen, C. T., Lin, C. H. Salvage of a complicated penis replantation using bipedicled scrotal flap following a prolonged ischaemia time. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 63 (8), 639-643 (2010).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Modified Bilateral Scrotal FlapPenile Skin DefectSkin ShortagesScar ContracturesPenile TraumaTumor SurgerySkin GraftsReconstructionForeskin DefectAnterior Scrotal ArterySurgical OutcomesNecrosisPostoperative Penile LengthEffective Solution

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved