Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Representative Results
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Virus concentration from environmental water and wastewater samples is a challenging task, carried out primarily for the identification and quantification of viruses. While several virus concentration methods have been developed and tested, we demonstrate here the effectiveness of ultrafiltration and skimmed milk flocculation for RNA viruses with different sample types.

Abstract

Water and wastewater-based epidemiology have emerged as alternative methods to monitor and predict the course of outbreaks in communities. The recovery of microbial fractions, including viruses, bacteria, and microeukaryotes from wastewater and environmental water samples is one of the challenging steps in these approaches. In this study, we focused on the recovery efficiency of sequential ultrafiltration and skimmed milk flocculation (SMF) methods using Armored RNA as a test virus, which is also used as a control by some other studies. Prefiltration with 0.45 µm and 0.2 µm membrane disc filters were applied to eliminate solid particles before ultrafiltration to prevent the clogging of ultrafiltration devices. Test samples, processed with the sequential ultrafiltration method, were centrifuged at two different speeds. An increased speed resulted in lower recovery and positivity rates of Armored RNA. On the other hand, SMF resulted in relatively consistent recovery and positivity rates of Armored RNA. Additional tests conducted with environmental water samples demonstrated the utility of SMF to concentrate other microbial fractions. The partitioning of viruses into solid particles might have an impact on the overall recovery rates, considering the prefiltration step applied before the ultrafiltration of wastewater samples. SMF with prefiltration performed better when applied to environmental water samples due to lower solid concentrations in the samples and thus lower partitioning rates to solids. In the present study, the idea of using a sequential ultrafiltration method arose from the necessity to decrease the final volume of the viral concentrates during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the supply of the commonly used ultrafiltration devices was limited, and there was a need for the development of alternative viral concentration methods.

Introduction

Determining the effective concentration of microorganisms in surface and wastewater samples for microbial community analysis and epidemiology studies, is one of the important steps for monitoring and predicting the course of outbreaks in communities1,2. The COVID-19 pandemic, unfolded the importance of improving concentration methods. COVID-19 emerged in late 2019 and, as of March 2023, still poses a threat to human health, social life, and the economy. Effective surveillance and control strategies to alleviate the impacts of COVID-19 outbreaks in communities have become an important research topic, ....

Protocol

1. Comparison of serial ultrafiltration and skimmed milk flocculation to concentrate viruses in wastewater samples

  1. Sample preparation
    1. Collect 2 L of 24 h flow-proportional composite raw (influent) wastewater samples. Samples were collected from the three major wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Winnipeg, Canada, during the summer and fall of 2020 (Table 1).
    2. Transport the samples to the laboratory in light-proof bottles in an icebox and process them .......

Representative Results

Evaluation of viral RNA concentration methods
All six samples processed with UF-3k x g were positive and resulted in a 13.38% ± 8.14% recovery (Figure 1). Only one sample was positive when the samples were processed with UF-7.5k x g. All samples processed with SMF were positive and resulted in a 15.27% ± 2.65% recovery (Figure 1). The average recovery rates of UF-3K x g and SMF were significantly and co.......

Discussion

One of the critical steps in this study is the elimination of solid particles by applying a prefiltration step with 0.2 µm and 0.45 µm membrane filters. Considering the partitioning of viruses into solid particles, especially enveloped viruses, prefiltration can cause a significant loss in viral recovery30. While a prefiltration step for ultrafiltration methods is almost always necessary for environmental and wastewater samples to prevent ultrafiltration devices from clogging, prefiltrat.......

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NSERC Alliance Covid-19 Grant (Award No. 431401363, 2020-2021, Drs. Yuan and Uyaguari-Díaz). MUD would like to thank the University Research Grants Program (Award No. 325201). Both JF and JZA are supported by the Visual and Automated Disease Analytics (VADA) graduate training program. KY and JF both received fellowships from the Mitacs Accelerate program. MUD and his laboratory members (KY, JF, JZA) are supported by NSERC-DG (RGPIN-2022-04508) and the Research Manitoba New Investigator Operating grant (No 5385). Special thanks to the City of Winnipeg, Manitoba. This research was conducted at the University of Manitoba. We would like to ....

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer with a pH 7.5Alfa AesarJ62041APFisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA
0.2 μm 47-mm Supor-200 membrane disc filtersVWR66234Pall Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI
0.45 μm 47-mm Supor-200 membrane disc filtersVWR60043Pall Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI
4X TaqMan Fast Virus 1-Step Master MixThermo Fisher Scientific4444432Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA
Armored RNA Quant IPC-1 Processing ControlAsuragen49650Asuragen, Austin, TX, USA
Brand A, Jumbosep Centrifugal Device, 30-kDaPall OD030C65Pall Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI
Brand B, Microsep Advance Centrifugal Device, 30-kDaPallMCP010C46Pall Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI
Centrifuge tubes (50 ml) Nalgene3119-0050PKThermo Fisher Scientific
DNAse IInvitrogen18047019Thermo Fisher Scientific
Dyna Mag-2Invitrogen12027Thermo Fisher Scientific
GWV High Capacity Groundwater Sampling Capsules - 0.45 µmPall12179Pall Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI
Hydrochloric acid, 1N standard solutionThermo Fisher ScientificAC124210025Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA
MagMAX Microbiome Ultra Nucleic Acid Isolation KitApplied biosystemsA42358Thermo Fisher Scientific
Nuclease free waterPromegaP1197Promega Corporation, Fitchburg, WI, USA
Peristaltic pumpMasterflex, Cole-Parmer instrument7553-20Thermo Fisher Scientific
pH meter Denver instrumentRK-59503-25Cole-Parmer. This product has been discontinued
Phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol 25:24:1Invitrogen15593031Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA
Primers and probe setsIDTIntegrated DNA Technologies, Inc., Coralville, IA, USA
Qiagen All-prep DNA/RNA power microbiome kitQiagenQiagen Sciences, Inc., Germantown, MD, USA
QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR SystemThermo Fisher ScientificA34322Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA
Qubit 1X dsDNA High Sensitivity (HS) assay kitInvitrogenQ33231Thermo Fisher Scientific
Qubit 4 Fluorometer, with WiFiInvitrogenQ33238Thermo Fisher Scientific
Qubit RNA High Sensitivity (HS) assay kitInvitrogenQ32855Thermo Fisher Scientific
RNAse AInvitrogenEN0531Thermo Fisher Scientific
RNeasy PowerMicrobiome KitQiagen26000-50Qiagen Sciences, Inc., Germantown, MD, USA
Skim milk powderDifco (BD Life Sciences)DF0032173Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA
Sodium phosphate bufferAlfa AesarAlfa Aesar, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Synthetic seawaterVWR RC8363-1RICCA chemical company
Synthetic single-stranded DNA gBlockIDTIntegrated DNA Technologies, Inc., Coralville, IA, USA
VacuCap 90 Vacuum Filtration Devices - 0.1 µm, 90 mm, gamma-irradiatedPall4621Pall Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI
VacuCap 90 Vacuum Filtration Devices - 0.2 µm, 90 mm, gamma-irradiatedPall4622Pall Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI
β-mercaptoethanolGibco21985023Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA

References

  1. Kumblathan, T., Liu, Y., Uppal, G. K., Hrudey, S. E., Lix, X. F. Wastewater-based epidemiology for community monitoring of SARS-CoV-2: progress and challenges. ACS Environmental Au. 1, 18-31 (2021).
  2. Lu, D., Huang, Z., Luo, J., Zhang, X., Sha, S.

Explore More Articles

Virus ConcentrationWastewater EpidemiologySkimmed Milk FlocculationUltrafiltrationMetagenomicsPCRWastewater SamplesArmored RNAPH AdjustmentCentrifugation

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved