A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Redo foregut surgery is associated with increased patient morbidity and presents a technical challenge for the surgeon. We describe our approach and considerations when performing a redo hiatal hernia repair to provide a guide for other surgeons and improve patient outcomes.
Foregut surgical techniques have advanced significantly over the years and have become increasingly popular. However, new challenges and technical considerations have arisen when dealing with reoperation for complications or surgical failure. This study focuses on the technical considerations and approach when dealing with reoperative foregut surgery, particularly redo hiatal hernia repair. We describe our approach starting from the preoperative workup to the procedural steps of the surgery. The present study describes the main steps for robotic reoperative hiatal hernia repair in a patient who had previously undergone laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with Nissen fundoplication but did not present a recurrence of reflux and dysphagia symptoms. The patient is positioned supine with arms out and a footboard for steep Trendelenburg. We place six trocars, including an assistant port and a liver retractor port, to facilitate visualization and retraction. After docking the robot, we use a combination of electrocautery and sharp dissection to free the hernia sac and reduce the hiatal hernia. The previous fundoplication is then taken down carefully and the esophagus is mobilized through a transhiatal approach with a combination of blunt and sharp dissection until at least 3 cm of intra-abdominal esophageal length is achieved, after which a leak test is performed. We then perform a crural repair to reapproximate the hiatus with two posterior stitches and one anterior stitch. Lastly, a redo Nissen fundoplication is performed over a bougie, and endoscopy is used to confirm a loose stack-of-coin appearance. By emphasizing the crucial steps of redo hiatal hernia repair, including preoperative evaluation, our goal is to provide an approach for the foregut surgeon to maximize patient outcomes.
Over the past century, improvements in the understanding and diagnosis of foregut disorders have led to the evolution of better procedures and surgical approaches. This innovation brings new challenges related to complications and reoperation for the foregut surgeon. Surgical reinterventions are particularly challenging from a technical perspective due to multiple factors, including dense adhesions, scarring, obliteration of tissue planes, and altered anatomy1,2,3,4,5. These redo foregut surgeries have....
The protocol and methods described here were approved and followed the ethical guidelines of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Minnesota. Described here is a reoperative hiatal hernia repair and takedown of a previous Nissen fundoplication in a 73-year-old woman. The patient presented to the clinic with a history of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and a fundoplication 5 years ago at an outside hospital for epigastric pain and fullness after meals. She also complained of significant reflux and dy.......
The patient had an uneventful postoperative course. She slowly advanced to a full liquid diet over a period of 3 days and was then discharged on a liquid diet with instructions to advance to a soft diet after 1 week.
By virtue of being a quaternary referral center and a major university hospital, we frequently manage patients needing reoperative foregut surgery. Our data from the last 5 years with 43 patients undergoing reoperative hiatal hernia repairs showed a mean length of stay of 7 days a.......
Reoperative foregut surgery is technically challenging but can be performed safely with a well-planned and thoughtful surgical approach. A thorough preoperative evaluation is essential to determine the etiology of symptoms and to guide diagnostic adjuncts. It is of utmost importance to determine the correct diagnosis prior to reintervention in order to determine the proper surgery and approach. For example, in patients undergoing redo anti-reflux surgery (ARS) after Nissan fundoplication, one should understand .......
We would like to acknowledge the Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery and the Department of Surgery at the University of Minnesota for helping us proceed with this study.
....Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Bravo calibration-free reflux testing system | Medtronic | FGS-0635 | Wireless esophageal pH testing system |
Cadiere forceps | IS | 470049 | Used as a grasper |
da Vinci Surgeon Console | IS | SS999 | Used to control surgical robot |
da Vinci Vision Cart | IS | VS999 | Houses advanced vision and energy technologies to provide communication across the platform components |
da Vinci Xi | IS | K131861 | The surgical robot |
da Vinci Xi Endoscope with Camera, 8 mm, 30° | IS | 470027 | The camera for the da Vinci robot |
Lapro-Flex Articulating Retractors | Mediflex | 91682 | Used as liver retractor |
Large needle driver | IS | 470006 | Used as a needle driver |
Maloney Tapered Esophageal Bougie, 56 Fr | Pilling | 507956 | Esophageal bougie for hiatal repair |
Maloney Tapered Esophageal Bougie, 58 Fr | Pilling | 507958 | Esophageal bougie for wrap creation |
Mega SutureCut needle driver | IS | 470309 | Used as a needle driver |
Monolithic FlexArm Plus | Mediflex | 99045-QC | Used to hold liver retractor to OR bed |
Round tip scissors | IS | 470007 | Used for cutting |
Shiley Hi-Lo oral/nasal endotracheal tube cuffed, 8.0 mm | Covidien | 86113 | Endotracheal tube for intubation |
SynchroSeal | IS | 480440 | Used for dissecting, vessel sealing, and dividing |
Tip-Up fenestrated grasper | IS | 470347 | Used as a grasper |
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
ABOUT JoVE
Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved