A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Intrafemoral injections allow for the engraftment of a small number of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), by placing the cells directly in the bone marrow cavity. Here we describe an experimental protocol of intrafemoral injection of human HSPCs into immunodeficient mice.

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are defined by their lifelong ability to produce all blood cell types. This is operationally tested by transplanting cell populations containing HSCs into syngeneic or immunocompromised mice. The size and multilineage composition of the graft is then measured over time, usually by flow cytometry. Classically, a population containing HSCs is injected into the circulation of the animal, after which the HSCs home to the bone marrow, where they lodge and begin blood production. Alternatively, HSCs and/or progenitor cells (HSPCs) can be placed directly in the bone marrow cavity.

This paper describes a protocol for intrafemoral injection of human HSPCs into immunodeficient mice. In short, preconditioned mice are anesthetized, and a small hole is drilled through the knee into the femur using a needle. Using a smaller insulin needle, cells are then injected directly into the same conduit created by the first needle. This method of transplantation can be applied in varied experimental designs, using either mouse or human cells as donor cells. It has been most widely used for xenotransplantation, because in this context, it is thought to provide improved engraftment over intravenous injections, therefore improving statistical power and reducing the number of mice to be used.

Introduction

Blood has one of the highest regeneration rates in the human body, producing 1 × 1012 cells per day in the adult human bone marrow1. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) guarantee blood production over the lifespan by the process of hematopoiesis and are defined by their capacity to produce all blood cell types (multipotentiality) while maintaining themselves (self-renewal). Historically, the gold standard for testing the function of an HSC has always relied on transplantation, testing the ability of a donor population to reconstitute all blood lineages of a mouse long-term (commonly defined as a minimum of 20 weeks)2. A large body of functional work spanning several decades has demonstrated that the HSC compartment is heterogeneous in both lineage output and long-term reconstitution. The toolkit to study hematopoiesis has expanded considerably over the years, with many new techniques, including in vitro single-cell functional assays, single-cell -omics approaches, and lineage tracing3. The latter have conclusively demonstrated that the contributions of HSC and multipotent progenitors largely differ in native hematopoiesis and under the stress imposed by transplantation. All these techniques complement transplantation assays, which remain important to assess the long-term repopulation capacity of HSCs. In the context of the study of human hematopoiesis, xenotransplantation provides the only method to experimentally assess self-renewal in a whole-organism setting.

Xenotransplantation of HSCs is commonly performed using intravenous injection of cells into immunocompromised mice. However, HSCs are rare4 and access to human samples containing HSCs is limited. In 2003, the group of John Dick adapted a protocol for bone marrow aspiration and intrafemorally injected non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD-SCID) mice with LinCD34+ umbilical cord blood (CB) cells5. To our knowledge, there has been no reported formal comparison of intravenous versus intrafemoral injections in long-term and serial transplantation outcomes. However, compared directly with intravenous injections, intrafemoral injections provide larger graft sizes with the same number of transplanted cells6, at least in the short term. In addition, engraftment can be detected with many fewer hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) transplanted. This is thought to be because intrafemoral delivery bypasses the need for HSCs to home to the bone marrow, which in the xenograft context is limiting due to a lack of cross-species reactivity for a number of receptors and cytokines. Via the use of intrafemoral injections, Notta and colleagues were the first to transplant single human HSCs7, though extra considerations need to be taken, as described in their methods. Intrafemoral delivery of HSPCs also has limitations. The injection itself disrupts and destroys part of the bone marrow, and therefore is not indicated for studies of the crosstalk between HSCs and their bone marrow microenvironment. Additionally, the maximum number of cells is limited by the volume of that bone cavity and that may be too few for some applications. As with every technique, its application in a specific experiment needs to be weighed up based on the benefits/disadvantages and the question being asked. In the context of xenotransplantation, if the aim of the experiment is to test the engraftment of a low number of human HSPCs with no assessment of microenvironment, intrafemoral delivery is usually preferred over intravenous injection.

Protocol

All animal research presented here adheres to the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Amendment Regulations 2012 and was performed after ethical review and approval by the University of Cambridge Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body (AWERB). Female NOD.Cg-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice, aged between 12 and 16 weeks (~21-30 g), bred in-house and maintained in a Specific-Pathogen-Free animal facility, were used for intrafemoral injections. De-identified CB samples were collected from healthy donors after informed consent by the Cambridge Blood and Stem Cell Biobank (CBSB) in accordance with regulated procedures approved by the Cambridgeshire Local Research Ethics Committee (18/EE/0199). 

1. Preparation of the mouse

  1. Before irradiation, notch the ears of the mice for identification and weigh them for baseline weight.
  2. Twenty-four hours before transplantation of the cells, sub-lethally irradiate the mice with 2.4 Gy radiation.

2. Preparation of cells

NOTE: For these injections, cells can be used from fresh or frozen samples. Specific subpopulations of cells can be sorted by flow cytometry. Alternatively, cells can be cultured in the desired conditions before transplantation. For the experiments shown, we are using frozen CB CD34+ cells.

  1. Thaw the cells in a 50 mL tube by the dropwise addition of 10x the cell's volume of prewarmed IMDM + 50% fetal bovine serum (FBS) + 0.1 mg/mL DNase while agitating the tube manually. Centrifuge the cells at 500 × g for 5 min.
  2. Resuspend the cells in 20-40 µL (ideally 25 µL) of PBS + Penicillin-Streptomycin (10 U/mL or 0.1%) per mouse. If possible, allow extra cells for a dead volume when taking up the cells into the syringe for injections. Store the cells on ice until injections. The maximum number of cells per injection is 4 million cells.

3. Preparation for intrafemoral injection in the animal facility

  1. Prepare the following three needles required for this procedure:
    1. Prepare a 3 mL syringe with a 27 G 1/2" needle.
    2. Prepare a 0.5 mL Insulin Syringe with 29 G x 12.7 mm needle containing the cell suspension.
    3. Prepare a 1 mL Insulin Syringe with 29 G x 0.5" needle with 0.1 mg/kg buprenorphine (100 µL).
  2. Anesthetize the mice in an anesthetic box (through the inhalation of isoflurane 2% (v/v) and oxygen 2 L/min). Transfer the mouse to a nose cone and confirm its readiness for the procedure by toe pinch. Apply ophthalmic ointment to the eyes to prevent dryness.
    NOTE: This procedure is carried out in a containment level 2 biosafety hood and sterile conditions are used.

4. Intrafemoral injection

  1. Lay the mouse on its back and have its hind leg flexed. Secure the hind leg using the non-dominant hand by placing the thumb on the foot, the middle finger on the hip, and the index finger on the outside of the femur.
  2. Gently shave or pluck the hair from around the kneecap and use an alcohol swab to wipe down the area.
  3. Use the 3 mL syringe with a 27 G 1/2" needle and aim for the top inner corner of the kneecap to gently drill a hole through the skin towards the femur. Although the needle may be rotated back and forth at first, only use a clockwise motion once into the bone, until the whole needle is in the bone.
    NOTE: The goal of this step is to generate a conduit for cell delivery. (Optional) To check if the needle is correctly in the bone, release the leg and rotate the syringe side to side; if it is correctly in the bone, the whole leg should move with the rotation. Resecure the leg using the non-dominant hand by placing the thumb on the foot, the middle finger on the hip, and the index finger on the outside of the femur, before continuing. If incorrectly inserted, the needle will likely be in the muscle or tendon, the leg will not rotate with the syringe, and you may feel the needle under the skin.
  4. Remove the needle using an anticlockwise rotation until it is halfway out. At this point, use an alcohol swab to wipe around the needle (there may be a small drop of blood) and then continue to turn the needle anticlockwise and remove the needle.
  5. Insert the 0.5 mL insulin syringe containing the cells in the femoral shaft via the same conduit. Once the needle is in, make a note of feeling a scratch indicating the correct location. At this point, release the grip on the leg, but be careful not to remove the needle from the leg. Then, gently, inject the 25 µL of cell suspension into the femur and remove the needle.
    ​NOTE: The 'scratch' described is like hitting a rough surface and if the needle feels it has gone in smoothly with no rough feeling, it is not in the correct place. Most users understand this clearly once they are successful in their practice.

5. Post injection care

  1. Inject the mouse subcutaneously with Buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg, 100 µL) before returning it to its cage and monitoring for recovery from the anesthetic.
    NOTE: The mouse is not to be left unattended until it has regained sufficient consciousness to maintain sternal recumbency and is not returned to the company of other animals until fully recovered. Mice are unlikely to show any adverse effects to the intrafemoral injection; however, intrafemoral injection may result in reduced activity and pain in the operated area.
  2. Assess swelling of the hock, pain, and mobility following the procedure.
    NOTE: Mice should regain normal limb mobility within 24 h of injection.

6. Analyzing the data

  1. Euthanize the mice by cervical dislocation or any approved method post injection at any time e.g., 24-48 h for homing experiments, 4-12 weeks for short-term HSC activity, >18 weeks for long-term engraftment. If analysis of peripheral blood (PB) is planned, bleed the mice before sacrifice by any authorized method, yielding ideally 50-100 μL of blood (no more than 10% of total volume). Remove rear leg bones and spleen according to standard dissection protocols.
  2. For bone marrow:
    1. Keep the injected femur (IF) and the non-injected bones (rear leg tibias and non-injected femurs, termed BM) separate. Flush the bones using 1 mL of IMDM + 5% FBS and a 36 G x ¾" needle and centrifuge for 5 min at 500 × g.
    2. Resuspend the pellet in 500 μL of PBS + 3% FBS and then transfer 50 μL to a well of a 96 round-bottom plate for staining.
    3. Freeze any remaining bone marrow and store it in liquid nitrogen for further ex vivo or secondary in vivo experiments.
  3. For the PB:
    1. Wash out the collection tube with 100 μL of PBS + 3% FBS, transfer the blood to a 5 mL FACS tube, and make up the volume to 2.5 mL with PBS + 3% FBS.
    2. Carefully pipette 1 mL of Pancoll into the bottom of the FACS tubes and centrifuge for 25 min at 500 × g with the brake off.
    3. Collect the buffy coat layer, transfer it to 1.5 mL tubes, and top up to 1.5 mL with PBS + 3% FBS. Centrifuge for 5 min at 500 × g.
    4. Resuspend the pellet in 50 μL of PBS + 3% FBS and transfer to a well of a 96 round-bottom plate for staining.
  4. For the spleen:
    1. Place the spleen in a cell strainer placed on a 50 mL tube and crush with the plunger from a 3 mL syringe.
    2. One milliliter at a time, add 5 mL of IMDM + 5% FBS to wash the cells through. Take 50 μL to a well of a 96 round-bottom plate for staining.
  5. Prepare an antibody mastermix; here is an example for 10 samples:
    1. Aliquot 550 μL of PBS + 3% FBS (50 μL/sample + 10% extra) in a 1.5 or 2 mL tube.
    2. Add individual antibodies so that their final concentration is 2x based on their titration (e.g., for an antibody titrated 1:100, add 11 μL).
      NOTE: Choose an antibody panel that assesses potential differentiation across all blood lineages of interest, for example, CD19/FITC, GlyA/PE, CD45/PECy5, CD14/PECy7, CD33/APC, CD19/Alexa 700, CD45/BV510, and CD3/APCCy7.
  6. Staining: add 50 μL of antibody mastermix to each of the wells of the 96 round-bottom plate containing the samples to stain. Stain for 20 min at room temperature, add 100 μL of PBS + 3% FBS to wash the cells, and centrifuge for 5 min at 500 × g. Remove the supernatant.
  7. Resuspend the pellet in 200 μL of PBS + 3% FBS and pass each sample through a FACS tube with a cell strainer cap. To bone marrow and spleen samples, add a further 200 μL of PBS + 3% FBS.
  8. Flow cytometry controls: Make single-stain controls using compensation beads by adding 100 μL of PBS, 1 drop of positive beads, 1 drop of negative beads, and 1 μL of the antibody to a FACS tube. Leave for 5 min at room temperature and then add 300 μL of PBS. Take 50 μL of unstained bone marrow cells made up to 400 μL with PBS + 3% FBS as an unstained control.
  9. Analyze the samples by flow cytometry.
    1. Run single-stain controls and unstained for compensation as advised for the cytometer used. Set up gating as in Figure 3A.
    2. For PB, run all cells and for bone marrow and spleen, run a minimum of 50,000 events per sample depending on human engraftment levels.

Results

The engraftment of the intrafemorally injected cells can be assessed at any time point from 24 h onwards depending on the experimental design. At the end time point, IF, BM, PB, and spleens may be collected. These can be processed, and the level of engraftment assessed via flow cytometry. To robustly call human engraftment even at low levels, we stained with two distinct antibodies against human CD45 (clone HI30 and clone 2D1). Only cells positive for both antibodies (CD45++) were considered of human origin. T...

Discussion

Intrafemoral injections are a useful tool in xenotransplantation when only a small number of HSPCs are available, providing improved engraftment compared to intravenous injections. However, the technique requires dexterity and training. When practicing, we would recommend using fresh cadavers of the correct weight range (see below) and injecting a colored dye (such as trypan blue) so that upon dissection, it is clear if the injection went into the femur and was restricted to it (no dye should be observed in the muscles)....

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the group of Dr John Dick for previous work on this method, and Monica Doedens for training. We are grateful to the Cambridge Blood and Stem Cell Biobank (CBSB), specifically Dr. Joanna Baxter and the team of CBSB nurses who consented and collected cord blood samples; our sample donors; the University Biomedical Service, specifically Nicolas Lumley and staff at The Anne McLaren Building for maintenance of our mice strains and support of our in vivo experiments; Shaaezmeen Basheer for editing of the manuscript.

E.L. is funded by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (107630/Z/15/A). L.M. is supported by Sofinter - HR Welfare Program. This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust (203151/Z/16/Z, 203151/A/16/Z, 215116/Z/18/Z) and the UKRI Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17230). For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
0.5 mL Insulin Syringe with 29 G x 12.7 mm NeedleBD324892
1 mL Insulin Syringe with 29 G x 0.5" NeedleBD324827
1.5 mL tubeFisherbrand509-GRD-PFB
3 mL syringe HENKE SASS WOLF GMBH4020.000V0
5 mL Round Bottom Polystyrene Test Tube with Cell Strainer Cap 12 x 75 mmFalcon352235FACS tube
5 mL Round Bottom Polystyrene Test Tube with Snap Cap 12 x 75 mmFalcon352058FACS tube
27 G 1/2" needle BD 300635
40 µm cell strainer for 50 mL tubeGreiner Bio-one542040
50 mL tubeSarstedt Ltd62.547.254
96 well round-bottom plate Falcon351177
Alcohol SwabVITREX MEDICAL A/S520213
BD LSR Fortessa X-20 Cell Analyzer BDflow cytometer
BuphrenorphineAnimalcareXVD190
CD14/PECy7 (Clone M5E2)biolegend301814Used at 1 in 1000
CD19/Alexa 700 (Clone HIB19)biolegend302226Used at 1 in 300
CD19/FITC (Clone HIB19)biolegend302206Used at 1 in 200
CD3/APCCy7 (Clone HIT3a)biolegend300318Used at 1 in 100
CD33/APC (Clone P67.6)BD345800Used at 1 in 200
CD45/BV510 (Clone HI30)biolegend304036Used at 1 in 500
CD45/PECy5 (Clone 2D1)biolegend368526Used at 1 in 300
CompBeads Anti-Mouse Ig, κ/Negative Control Compensation Particles SetBD552843
Dnase 1Worthington BiochemicalLS002139
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)PAN-BiotechP40-37500
Glycophorin A (GlyA)/PE (Clone GA-R2)BD340947Used at 1 in 1000
Iscove Modified Dulbecco Media (IMDM)PAN-BiotechP04-20250
Isoflurane (IsoFlo 100% w/w Inhalation Vapor, liquid)Zoetis115095
Microvette 300 Lithium heparin LH, 300 µLSarstedt Ltd20.1309Mouse blood collection tube
NOD.Cg-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice Charles River 
Pancoll human, Density: 1.077 g/mLPAN-BiotechP04-60500
Penicillin-Streptomycin Gibco15140122
Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS)Gibco14190169

References

  1. Dancey, J. T., Deubelbeiss, K. A., Harker, L. A., Finch, C. A. Neutrophil kinetics in man. J Clin Invest. 58 (3), 705-715 (1976).
  2. Purton, L. E., Scadden, D. T. Limiting factors in murine hematopoietic stem cell assays. Cell Stem Cell. 1 (3), 263-270 (2007).
  3. Laurenti, E., Göttgens, B. From haematopoietic stem cells to complex differentiation landscapes. Nature. 553 (7689), 418-426 (2018).
  4. Cosgrove, J., Hustin, L. S. P., de Boer, R. J., Perié, L. Hematopoiesis in numbers. Trends Immunol. 42 (12), 1100-1112 (2021).
  5. Mazurier, F., Doedens, M., Gan, O. I., Dick, J. E. Rapid myeloerythroid repopulation after intrafemoral transplantation of NOD-SCID mice reveals a new class of human stem cells. Nat Med. 9 (7), 959-963 (2003).
  6. McKenzie, J. L., Gan, O. I., Doedens, M., Dick, J. E. Human short-term repopulating stem cells are efficiently detected following intrafemoral transplantation into NOD/SCID recipients depleted of CD122+ cells. Blood. 106 (4), 1259-1261 (2005).
  7. Notta, F., et al. Isolation of single human hematopoietic stem cells capable of long-term multilineage engraftment. Science. 333 (6039), 218-221 (2011).
  8. Belluschi, S., et al. Myelo-lymphoid lineage restriction occurs in the human haematopoietic stem cell compartment before lymphoid-primed multipotent progenitors. Nat Commun. 9 (1), 4100 (2018).
  9. McDermott, S. P., Eppert, K., Lechman, E. R., Doedens, M., Dick, J. E. Comparison of human cord blood engraftment between immunocompromised mouse strains. Blood. 116 (2), 193-200 (2010).
  10. Billerbeck, E., et al. Development of human CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in human stem cell factor-, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-, and interleukin-3-expressing NOD-SCID IL2Rγ(null) humanized mice. Blood. 117 (11), 3076-3086 (2011).
  11. Rongvaux, A., et al. Development and function of human innate immune cells in a humanized mouse model. Nat Biotechnol. 32 (4), 364-372 (2014).
  12. McIntosh, B. E., et al. Nonirradiated NOD,B6.SCID Il2rγ−/− KitW41/W41 (NBSGW) Mice support multilineage engraftment of human hematopoietic cells. Stem Cell Reports. 4 (2), 171-180 (2015).
  13. Notta, F., Doulatov, S., Dick, J. E. Engraftment of human hematopoietic stem cells is more efficient in female NOD/SCID/IL-2Rgc-null recipients. Blood. 115 (18), 3704-3707 (2010).
  14. Futrega, K., Lott, W. B., Doran, M. R. Direct bone marrow HSC transplantation enhances local engraftment at the expense of systemic engraftment in NSG mice. Sci Rep. 6, 23886 (2016).
  15. Mende, N., et al. Unique molecular and functional features of extramedullary hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell reservoirs in humans. Blood. 139 (23), 3387-3401 (2022).
  16. Medyouf, H., et al. Myelodysplastic cells in patients reprogram mesenchymal stromal cells to establish a transplantable stem cell niche disease unit. Cell Stem Cell. 14 (6), 824-837 (2014).
  17. Eppert, K., et al. Stem cell gene expression programs influence clinical outcome in human leukemia. Nat Med. 17 (9), 1086-1093 (2011).
  18. Sanchez, P. V., et al. A robust xenotransplantation model for acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 23 (11), 2109-2117 (2009).
  19. Li, J., Chen, H., Zhao, S., Wen, D., Bi, L. Patient-derived intrafemoral orthotopic xenografts of peripheral blood or bone marrow from acute myeloid and acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: clinical characterization, methodology, and validation. Clin Exp Med. 23 (4), 1293-1306 (2023).
  20. Dobson, S. M., et al. Relapse-fated latent diagnosis subclones in acute B lineage leukemia are drug tolerant and possess distinct metabolic programs. Cancer Discov. 10 (4), 568-587 (2020).
  21. Marktel, S., et al. Intrabone hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy for adult and pediatric patients affected by transfusion-dependent ß-thalassemia. Nat Med. 25 (2), 234-241 (2019).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Intrafemoral InjectionHematopoietic Stem CellsStem Progenitor CellsImmunocompromised MiceHealthy HematopoiesisEngraftmentTransplantation ExperimentsFlow CytometryBone MarrowAge related DiseaseXenotransplantationCell PopulationsBlood ProductionExperimental Designs

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved