Method Article
The protocol describes single nucleotide polymorphisms-sensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization (SNP-FISH) method to distinguish ribosomal RNA transcripts derived from the X or Y chromosome ribosomal DNA locus in Drosophila melanogaster.
In order to ensure sufficient ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is transcribed for ribosome function, genomes contain hundreds of tandem duplications of the sequences that encode rRNAs, composing regions called ribosomal DNA (rDNA) loci. Many organisms' genomes contain more than one rDNA locus distributed across different chromosomes, and rRNA may be transcribed from multiple rDNA loci or only a single locus. Changes in rRNA transcription sources often indicate ribosomal distress. However, the homogeneity of rRNA obstructs distinguishing if rRNA is transcribed from multiple or a single rDNA locus. Here, we describe a method that uses single nucleotide polymorphism-sensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization (SNP-FISH) to distinguish rRNA transcription between Drosophila melanogaster rDNA loci on the X and Y chromosomes. This method leverages locus-specific rRNA variants to enable easy detection of the source of rRNA transcription with single-cell resolution. This assay can be applied to any Drosophila cell type and may be adapted for use in other systems.
The 18S, 5.8S, and 28S ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) required for ribosome function are co-transcribed in a single cistron called the 45S pre-rRNA. The three rRNAs are separated within the 45S pre-rRNA by two internal transcribed spacer sequences (ITS) and flanked by external transcribed spacer sequences (ETS) at the 5' and 3' end. All of these spacer sequences are removed from the 45S pre-rRNA for the mature rRNAs to be incorporated into ribosomes (see1). In order to meet the high demand for rRNA production needed to support ribosome activity, all Eukaryotic genomes contain hundreds of copies of the 45S sequence. These copies are clustered together in tandem repeats, forming genomic regions called ribosomal DNA (rDNA) loci. Most Eukaryotic genomes contain multiple rDNA loci spread across separate chromosomes (see2). The high redundancy of 45S copies means there are typically many more 45S copies than necessary for transcription, and the majority of 45S copies are transcriptionally silent and buried in heterochromatin3. Transcriptional activity is not uniform across rDNA loci, and variation in rDNA locus transcription is widely observed across organisms4,5,6, indicating that 45S transcription is differentially regulated at individual rDNA loci. Locus-wide rDNA silencing has been observed in plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates7,8,9,10, suggesting that locus-wide rDNA silencing is a major mechanism for regulating rRNA dosage11. rRNA transcription is a key regulatory step in ribosome production, and changes to rRNA transcription that modulate translational activity are an important feature of both normal differentiation and disease conditions12. Changes in rDNA locus transcription are also associated with reductions in total rDNA copy number13. Thus, altered locus-specific rDNA transcription may be an important indicator of disrupted cellular physiology.
While locus-specific silencing appears to be a major source of rRNA transcriptional regulation, the mechanisms that establish this silencing and direct which rDNA loci are transcriptionally active are largely unknown. The homogeneity of rDNA sequences makes it difficult to assess individual rDNA locus transcription, preventing widespread analysis of locus-specific rDNA transcriptional activity. This challenge may be possible to overcome by taking advantage of the structural and single nucleotide sequence variation between rDNA copies within the same genome4,5,6,13. Some of these variants may be shared among most or all copies in an individual locus, creating unique rDNA locus haplotypes of multiple variants that distinguish an rDNA locus. Indeed, recent mapping of rDNA variants to specific loci by the telomere-to-telomere consortium revealed locus-specific shared rDNA variants in the human genome14. Such rDNA locus maps may enable the identification of locus-specific transcription from sequencing datasets; however, the availability of these maps currently remains limited and are not easy to produce. Since rDNA loci only reside on the sex chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster (one locus on each X and Y chromosome)15, the Y chromosome rDNA locus is absent from XX females. This natural isolation from the Y chromosome locus means single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variants between the X and Y rDNA loci can be easily identified in short-read sequencing as any variants that are present in males (XY) but absent from females (XX). Previously identified SNPs can be rapidly tested in ungenotyped Drosophila strains through simple PCR and Sanger sequencing of DNA from males and females. Furthermore, the availability of Drosophila strains with an X chromosome that has no rDNA locus16 means individual X and Y rDNA loci can be individually isolated for even more precise rDNA SNP characterization. This easy identification of SNP variants between the Drosophila rDNA loci makes it possible to determine unique X and Y rDNA loci SNP haplotypes13. X chromosome rDNA loci are also typically completely silent in Drosophila males, but both X chromosome loci are transcribed in females10,17, making Drosophila a useful system to study locus-wide rDNA silencing.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful tool to visualize the presence of specific RNA or DNA sequences within the individual cells of a tissue. FISH labels target RNA or DNA sequences through antisense oligonucleotide probes conjugated to fluorophores. FISH probes are typically required to be ~20 nucleotides long in order to provide stable enough target binding to be visualized but probes this long can also easily bind to non-target sequences that differ by only a single nucleotide (Figure 1A). Conversely, probes short enough to confer single-nucleotide specificity do not bind stably enough for visualization. To balance specificity and stability, SNP-sensitive FISH (SNP-FISH) combines a ~26 nucleotide long antisense fluorescent probe with a non-fluorescent sense mask oligonucleotide that binds to all but the 5' end of the probe18. This mask leaves only the 10 most 5' nucleotides of the probe single-stranded and available for target binding (Figure 1B). This short single-stranded portion of the probe confers specificity to the target but prevents cross-reactivity with RNAs that have even a single mismatch with these 10 nucleotides (Figure 1B). Once the 5' end of the probe binds its target, passive strand displacement strips the mask from the probe, allowing the 3' region to bind the target and creating stable target labeling (Figure 1B)18. Therefore, SNP-FISH can differentially visualize RNAs that differ by a single SNP by using a pair of probes that have different fluorophores that each complement a different SNP but share a common mask (Figure 1C). Although this method only recruits a single fluorophore-conjugated probe to the target SNP, pooling multiple probe-mask sets to several SNPs within a shared rDNA haplotype can be used to amplify the SNP-sensitive detection of a single rRNA (Figure 1D). Furthermore, because rRNA is so abundantly transcribed, rRNA transcripts can be easily visualized in FISH experiments using a small number of fluorescent labels per RNA. This low requirement for fluorophore per RNA means that SNP-FISH can visualize rRNAs from a specific locus with only a few unique SNPs. This method can easily detect locus-specific rRNA transcription in a variety of Drosophila tissues and developmental stages17. It is particularly effective in Drosophila male germline stem cells, which change between exclusive Y-rDNA transcription and co-expression of X- and Y-chromosome rDNA loci during aging13. Here, we provide an SNP-FISH protocol to visualize distinct X and Y rRNA transcripts in the Drosophila testis to achieve the overall goal of assessing locus-specific rRNA silencing. This method uses four SNPs previously characterized between the rDNA loci on the X and Y chromosomes of the common y1w1 laboratory Drosophila strain (Figure 1D).
1. Preparation of buffers and reagents
NOTE: RNase-free technique is to be used throughout steps 1, 3, and 4, and certified RNase-free reagents should be used.
2. Sample genotyping for X- and Y-specific rRNA SNPs
Primer name | Sequence | Expected Amplicon Size |
18S SNP F | GACTACCATGGTTGCAACGG | 652 bp |
18S SNP R | TTCACCTCTCGCGTCGTAAT | |
ITS1 SNP F | CTTGCGTGTTACGGTTGTTTC | 955 bp |
ITS1 SNP R | ACAGCATGGACTGCGATATG | |
28S SNP F | ATGCGTAGAAGTGTTTGGCG | 598 bp |
28S SNP R | GCCGACTTCCCTTACCTACA |
Table 1: Primer sequences for sequencing rDNA SNPs. Primer pairs to amplify rDNA regions that contain previously characterized SNPs in the 18S, ITS1, and 28S rDNA regions. Primer oligonucleotide sequence and expected PCR amplicon size are listed.
Haplotype | SNP Position | Sequence | ||
X rDNA | 18S | 1603-ATACTTGTATTTTTTCATATG-1625 | ||
ITS1-1 | 2873-CGTTAATAAATATTTGTAATT-2895 | |||
ITS1-2 | 3115-GAAAATCGAAGAAACAAAATT-3137 | |||
28S | 5932-AACAAAAATGCCTAACTATAT-5954 | |||
Y rDNA | 18S | 1603-ATACTTGTATCTTTTCATATG-1624 | ||
ITS1-1 | 2873-CGTTAATAAACATTTGTAATT-2895 | |||
ITS1-2 | 3115-GAAAATCGAAAAAACAAAATT-3137 | |||
28S | 5932-AACAAAAATGGCTAACTATAT-5954 |
Table 2: Expected rDNA haplotypes. Expected SNPs at X and Y chromosome rDNA loci in the y1w1 Drosophila strain. SNP indicated in bold and underlined. Position listed based on consensus 45S rRNA sequence (Supplementary file 1).
3. Testis dissection, fixation, and permeabilization
4. SNP-sensitive ribosomal RNA FISH
SNP Position | Oligonucleotide | Sequence | 3’ conjugated Fluorophore | |
18S | X SNP probe | AAAAAATACAAGTATTTAATCACATA | Alexa 488 | |
Y SNP probe | AAAAGATACAAGTATTTAATCACATA | Alexa 647 | ||
Mask | TATGTGATTAAATACT | |||
ITS1-1 | X SNP probe | AAATATTTATTAACGGTAAGGATATT | Alexa 488 | |
Y SNP probe | AAATGTTTATTAACGGTAAGGATATT | Alexa 647 | ||
Mask | AATATCCTTACCGTTA | |||
ITS1-2 | X SNP probe | GTTTCTTCGATTTTCATGTTCGAAAC | Alexa 488 | |
Y SNP probe | GTTTTTTCGATTTTCATGTTCGAAAC | Alexa 647 | ||
Mask | GTTTCGAACATGAAAA | |||
28S | X SNP probe | TTAGGCATTTTTGTTTTACTTGAAAA | Alexa 488 | |
Y SNP probe | TTAGCCATTTTTGTTTTACTTGAAAA | Alexa 647 | ||
Mask | TTTTCAAGTAAAACAA |
Table 3: Probe and mask sequences for rDNA SNP-FISH. SNP positions are highlighted in bold. The probe portion that binds to mask oligonucleotide is underlined. Examples of suitable 3' conjugated fluorophores are listed, but any compatible fluorophores can be used.
5. Preparation of samples for imaging
Sequencing results from SNP genotyping are expected to detect SNP differences between the X and Y rDNA loci. These SNPs are detected by directly assessing the SNP positions in sequencing chromatograms (Figure 2). Sequencing of female samples is expected to have a single sequencing signal at the SNP position, indicating SNP homozygosity between the two X chromosomes (Figure 2A). Male sample sequencing results are expected to have a double peak at the SNP position (Figure 2B). Based on the X chromosome genotype determined from female sample sequencing, the non-X variant is inferred to be a Y chromosome rDNA SNP (i.e., X = T, Y = C for the 18S SNP sequencing in Figure 2). Alternatively, a single sequencing peak at a SNP position in the male sample would indicate homozygosity between male and female rDNA loci at that SNP position, and that position would not be usable for rRNA SNP-FISH.
Following the protocol for SNP FISH, samples can be visualized by mounting on slides and placed under a sealed cover slip, followed by confocal microscopy. Using the probes listed in Table 3, the Y-derived rRNA signal is detected by Alexa Fluor 647 emission and the X-derived rRNA signal is detected by Alexa Fluor 488 emission. rRNA signals are expected to be observed in the nucleolus, which can be identified as the DAPI-poor hole in the nucleus (Figure 3A). The nucleolus is particularly easy to identify in germ cells due to their large nucleus and nucleolus (Figure 3A). The faint signal can typically also be found in the cytoplasm (Figure 3), but this is a non-specific signal that can also be detected in samples without rRNA containing a complementary SNP (i.e., Y signal in cells lacking Y rDNA or X signal in cells lacking X rDNA; Figure 3B-C). Furthermore, artificial co-labeling of X and Y rRNA can sometimes be detected in the somatic hub, even in samples lacking either X or Y rDNA loci (Figure 3B-C, yellow arrows). Thus, only nuclear signals should be used to assess locus-specific transcription. Most cells, particularly somatic cells, are expected to only have a Y rRNA signal, indicating that rRNA is exclusively transcribed from the Y rDNA locus (Figure 3A, yellow dotted circle, and red arrow)10,17. However, co-expression of X and Y rRNA is often detected in germ cells, particularly germline stem cells13 (Figure 3A, white dotted circles). X and Y rRNA signals in co-expressing cells can be adjacent and form a single nucleolus (Figure 3A top cell) or can be separate, forming two nucleoli (Figure 3A bottom cell).The examples in Figure 3 are provided from rDNA SNP-FISH using probe sets targeting only two SNPs (the two ITS1 SNPs), demonstrating only two SNPs are necessary for rDNA SNP-FISH. However, more robust signals are observed when using probes targeting all four SNPs13.
Negative controls are an important inclusion for this assay to confirm that probes do not cross-react with the wrong SNP target, especially when first troubleshooting the method. X chromosome negative controls include any condition that lacks X chromosome rDNA, such as males harboring an X chromosome with an rDNA deletion. The X chromosome negative controls are expected to only detect Y rRNA signal and no X rRNA (Figure 3B). Y chromosome negative controls include any condition that lacks Y chromosome rDNA. Some examples of these conditions are any XX female tissues, tissue from males lacking a Y chromosome, or males harboring a Y chromosome with an rDNA deletion15. The Y chromosome negative controls are expected to only detect X rRNA signal and have no detectable Y rRNA signal (Figure 3C). Note that these controls are not only important to determine probe specificity, but also to determine any signal background or artifacts. Any novel probes or assay conditions that provide specificity in such controls can be accurately used to detect locus-specific rDNA transcription.
Different genetic, developmental, or environmental conditions may alter the likelihood that rDNA is exclusively transcribed from the Y-chromosome rDNA locus13,17. The frequency of rDNA transcription from a single locus or multiple loci can be quantified and directly compared between samples. In order to quantitatively compare differences in rDNA locus transcription, each cell must be individually categorized as Y-dominant, Co-dominant, or X-dominant. Cells are only categorized as Y- and X-dominant if only that respective signal is detected. Any cell with both Y and X rRNA signals is considered co-dominant, even if one signal is much weaker than the other. Thus, cells containing very strong X and Y signals are qualitatively considered the same as cells with strong Y and weak X or strong X and weak Y signals. The total percentage of all cells across all samples in each category can be compared between samples by chi-squared test. While this assay works well to qualitatively determine if a particular rDNA locus is transcribed or not, we have not observed consistent evaluations between samples when directly quantifying the fluorescence intensity of individual SNP-FISH signals. Thus, we do not recommend making quantitative assessments of FISH signal intensity between samples or the relative intensity of X and Y rDNA signals within a single cell. The source of this inconsistency in fluorescence intensity is unclear, though it may be due to the inefficient binding of masked probes that do not bind to all of the target rRNAs.
Figure 1: Diagram of SNP-FISH method. (A) Traditional FISH antisense oligonucleotide probes cross-react with non-target RNAs that differ by only one nucleotide. (B) The SNP-FISH method uses complementary mask oligonucleotide bound to the 3' region of the oligonucleotide probe. The mask leaves only 10 nucleotides free to bind to the target sequence. An unmasked probe region does not stably bind to non-target sequences that differ by one or more nucleotides. Mask dissociates from probe after probe binds to target, allowing stable binding between probe and target. (C) Differently labeled paired SNP probes combined with a common mask specifically bind targets that differ by a single nucleotide without cross-reacting. (D) Multiple probes can be pooled together to specifically label distinct rRNA haplotypes. Four SNP differences have been characterized between X and Y rDNA loci in the y1w1 Drosophila melanogaster strain. One SNP in the 18S rRNA, one in the 28S rRNA, and two in the ITS1 portion of the pre-rRNA. X and Y-specific rRNA haplotypes used for SNP-FISH are displayed. Probes targeting the X rDNA variant at the four rRNA SNPs are conjugated to a common fluorophore (green), and probes targeting the Y rDNA variants are conjugated to a different fluorophore (magenta). A common mask is used for each SNP (four total). SNP-specific probe binding at each SNP position on the rRNA can specifically label rRNA from the X and Y rDNA loci with up to four FISH oligonucleotide probes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Examples of homozygous and heterozygous rDNA SNP sequencing results. Example sequencing chromatograms from 18S SNP sequencing of DNA from (A) female and (B) male samples. 18S SNP position indicated by an asterisk (*). The single thymine (T) signal for the SNP position in the female sample indicates a thymine at the SNP position in the X chromosome rDNA locus. The double signal at the SNP position split between thymine and cytosine (C) in the male sample indicates a cytosine at the SNP position in the Y chromosome rDNA locus (inferred by knowing thymine is at the X chromosome locus). Sequencing results were viewed using ApE – a plasmid editor software19. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Examples of SNP-FISH results in the Drosophila testis using only two SNP-FISH probe sets. SNP FISH examples in the testis of animals with (A)both X and Y rDNA,(B) only Y rDNA, or (C) only X rDNA. These examples only used probe sets labeling the two ITS1 rRNA SNPs, demonstrating that rRNA SNP FISH works with as little as two target SNPs. Germ cells are identified by their large round nucleus, and somatic cells by their smaller and less round nucleus. Germline stem cells are identified by their position directly next to the somatic hub, marked by an asterisk (*). Germ cells that transcribe rDNA from both the X and Y rDNA loci are identified by both X and Y nuclear FISH signals (White dotted circles, A-A''). Germ cells that transcribe DNA from only the Y rDNA locus only have a Y nuclear FISH signal (Yellow dotted circle). Y-only expressing somatic cells are marked with a red arrow. Artificial co-labeling of X and Y rDNA loci can be observed in the somatic hub (yellow arrow). The scale bar is 10 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary File 1: rRNA sequence of X chromosome locus. Please click here to download this File.
Here, we describe a method to use SNP-FISH to distinguish 45S rRNA transcripts derived from the X and Y chromosome rDNA loci in Drosophila melanogaster tissues. The most critical step in this protocol is the accurate genotyping of 45S SNPs to be used as SNP-FISH targets. We provide primers and protocol to genotype four known Drosophila 45S SNPs, but other sequencing methods may reveal novel SNPs that could alternatively be used for the assay. Any SNP positions found to be identical between X and Y chromosome rDNA loci (i.e., there is a single sequencing peak in male DNA samples) cannot be used for SNP FISH. Some SNP positions may be found to be heterogeneous within a single rDNA locus (i.e., sequencing results do not give a single SNP variant for XX samples or only a very minor second sequencing peak in XY samples). SNPs that are heterogenous within a single rDNA locus are also not suitable for this assay since one of the variants would be shared between the two rDNA loci, making transcription from a single locus or multiple loci indistinguishable. Furthermore, due to female sperm storage20, DNA isolated from mated females may contain Y chromosome rDNA. Thus, it is critical that unmated females are used for XX sequencing analysis. Importantly, this method requires at least two chromosome-specific SNPs to enable at least two locus-specific probes to bind each rRNA molecule for detection, limiting its application to rDNA loci with at least two distinguishing SNPs between them. The availability of more SNPs allows for more probes to bind each rRNA and can provide greater signal effectiveness. Interestingly, this method only labels rRNA in the nucleolus, despite two probe pairs targeting SNPs in the 18S and 28S rRNAs which are exported to the cytoplasm (rRNA containing the two ITS1 target sites only exists in the nucleolus). The lack of cytoplasmic FISH signal suggests two non-exclusive possibilities: 1) the 18S and 28S probes alone are insufficient to detect cytoplasmic rRNA, perhaps because rRNA is more dispersed throughout the cytoplasm than in the nucleolus, or 2) there is lower probe binding efficiency to rRNAs integrated into the mature ribosomal subunits than to the unprocessed 45S rRNA. Additional SNPs within the 18S and 28S rRNAs may enable SNP-sensitive FISH detection of cytoplasmic rRNAs.
Other methods to assess locus-specific rRNA transcription include rRNA sequencing approaches that differentiate the expression of rRNA variants that are assigned to specific loci6. Similarly, qPCR can differentially assess the expression of rRNA variants that are distinct enough to enable unique detection5,21, though it is unclear if the silencing of these variants represents the silencing of an entire rDNA locus. While these methods can be effective in quantifying the expression of specific rRNA variants, they cannot be done with single-cell resolution. The heterogeneity of X chromosome rDNA silencing in Drosophila tissues suggests that there is strong cell-to-cell variation in rDNA locus transcription17 and highlights the need for techniques that can account for this variability. Imaging features associated with active transcription at rDNA loci, such as the H3.3 histone variant10 or the Pol I transcription factor UBF22, have been used to identify locus-specific rRNA transcription with single-cell resolution. However, both of these methods require the condensed chromosomes of mitotic cells in order to distinguish transcription occurring at any particular rDNA locus. In Drosophila cells, rDNA loci at the X and Y chromosomes may be identified by chromosome shape10, but identification of transcriptionally active rDNA loci in human cells also requires co-staining with chromosome-specific labels22. The SNP-FISH method does not require either chromosome-specific co-labeling or labeling of transcriptional markers and can be assessed in any cell cycle stage or post-mitotic cells, providing flexibility for use in diverse tissues and experimental conditions.
This rRNA SNP-FISH method may be modified for use with other SNPs that distinguish between Drosophila rRNAs or potentially be applied to SNPs that distinguish between rDNA loci in other organisms. Applying this method to organisms with more than two rDNA loci will require a locus to have a unique rDNA variant haplotype containing at least two SNPs that are not present on any other rDNA locus and that are shared between all 45S copies at that locus. This requirement means the method will only be able to specify transcription from one specific locus compared to all others (i.e., rRNA SNPs from locus 1 compared to SNPs shared by loci 2 and 3). However, if each rDNA locus has a compatible haplotype, multiple experiments could be combined to individually assess the transcription of each locus one at a time. The relatively low stringency of the hybridization temperature (37 °C) used in this protocol allows for strong probe binding, particularly given the short, unmasked portion of the probe, though hybridization at higher temperatures (50-75 °C) has been shown to enhance the signal of some FISH probes23. Higher hybridization temperatures may enhance mask strand displacement and increase probe binding, but too high temperatures may destabilize probe-mask binding and lose SNP-specificity. For this reason, we do not expect SNP-FISH to specifically label DNA because the temperatures needed to melt double-stranded DNA targets to enable probe binding would also destabilize probe-mask binding and eliminate SNP-sensitive target specificity. Still, optimization of hybridization temperature for new rRNA SNP probes may increase the signal, particularly when only two SNP sites are available. Loss of X chromosome rDNA silencing is associated with rDNA copy number reduction in Drosophila13, so the development of SNP-FISH assays to characterize locus-specific rRNA transcription in other systems may serve as a useful tool to evaluate the integrity of rDNA and ribosome function. Furthermore, this method has been modified for use with a deletion variant in Drosophila, and this single structural rRNA variant was suitable for detection (perhaps due to greater target binding affinity without a probe mask)17. The use of structural rRNA variants potentially combined with SNP variants broadens the potential for application in other systems. Since the mechanisms that regulate rDNA locus transcription remain largely unclear, the flexibility and potential adaptability of rRNA SNP-FISH to other systems make it a powerful tool for future studies to investigate rRNA transcription.
The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
We thank the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center, Kyoto Drosophila Stock Center, and FlyBase for their resources. This work was supported by start-up funds provided by the Stony Brook University Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology and the Renaissance School of Medicine (JON).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
PTC Tempo 96 Thermal Cycler | Bio Rad | 12015382 | Any thermal cycler can be used |
0.2 mL 8 strip flatcap PCR tubes | VWR | 89133-912 | Any compatable tubes can be used |
1 kb DNA ladder | NEB | N3232S | To use when checking sequencing PCR amplicon size by gel electrophoresis |
1.5 mL graduated microcentrifuge tubes | USA Scientific | 1615-5510 | Any certified RNase free tube will do |
2 mM dNTP Mix | ThermoFisher Scientific | R0241 | |
50x TAE Buffer | Bio Rad | 1610743 | Used for gel electrophoresis. Any TAE buffer can be used. |
5M NaCl | Any NaCl can be used or prepared from any source | ||
Agarose | VWR | 97064-250 | Any Agarose can be used |
ApE - A plasmid Editor software | N/A | N/A | https://jorgensen.biology.utah.edu/wayned/ape/ |
Clear nail polish | Any nail polish from any retailer can be used | ||
Cover glass, No. 1 Thickness | Thomas Scientific | 6672A38 | |
Deionized Formamide | Fisher Scientific | NC9569627 | |
Dextran Sulfate Sodium | Sigma Aldrich | D8906-10G | |
DreamTaq Green PCR Master Mix | ThermoFisher Scientific | K1081 | |
Dumont #5 forceps | Fine Science Tools | 11252-20 | Used for dissecting samples |
EDTA (0.5M), Ph 8.0 | ThermoFisher Scientific | R1021 | Any comparable product can be used |
Ethanol | VWR | 89125-172 | Any 200 proof Ethanol can be used. Used for dilution to 70% ethanol for permeabilization and cleaning for Rnase-free conditions |
Ethidium Bromide | ThermoFisher Scientific | 15585011 | |
Horizontal Mini Gel Electrophoresis System | Fisher Scientific | 14-955-170 | Any gel electrophoresis system can be used |
Kimwipes | Fisher Scientific | 06-666 | |
Micro-Test Staining Dish | Electron Microscopy Sciences | 71564 | Used for dissecting samples |
Nutating shaker | Sigma Aldrich | BMSB3D1020 | Any nutating shaker can be used |
Parafilm | USA Scientific | 3023-4526 | |
Phosphate-Buffered Saline (10X) pH 7.4, RNase-free | Life Technologies | AM9624 | |
Pierce 16% Formaldehyde (w/v), Methanol-free | Life Technologies | 28908 | |
Precision General Purpose Water Bath | Life Technologies | TSGP02 | Any water bath can be used |
QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit | Qiagen | 28704 | Any gel extraction kit can be used |
Recombinant Proteinase K Solution (20 mg/mL) | Invitrogen | AM2546 | Any comparable product can be used |
Rnase-free UltraPure BSA | ThermoFisher Scientific | AM2618 | |
S. cerevisiae tRNA | Sigma Aldrich | R8759 | |
SSC (20X), RNase-free | Fisher Scientific | AM9763 | |
Triton-X 100 | Life Technologies | A16046.AE | |
UltaPure 1M Tris-HCl Buffer, pH 7.5 | ThermoFisher Scientific | 15567027 | Any comparable product can be used |
UltraPure DNase/RNase-Free Distilled Water | Life Technologies | 10977023 | |
Vanadyl ribonucleoside complex | NEB | S1402S | |
VECTASHIELD mounting media with DAPI | Vector Laboratories | H-1200-10 | |
VWR Superfrost Microscope Slide | VWR | 48311-601 | |
y[1]w[1] Drosophila melanogaster line | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | 1495 | |
Zeiss LSM 980 confocal microscope | Zeiss microscopy | Any confocal microscope with compatable emission and detection can be used | |
Zeiss Stemi 2000-C Stereo Microscope and light source | Microscope Central | 455053 | Any steromicroscope can be used |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved