l2 word learning protocol to study gesture production

Protocol for Assessing Gestures Under Communication Challenges

Co-speech gestures (heretofore, gestures) - meaningful hand movements produced concurrently with speech - contribute to interpersonal communication by conveying information complementing verbal content1. According to the most widely used taxonomy2,3, gestures can be divided into three categories: representational gestures, which convey referents via their form and motion (e.g., flapping the hands back and forth together to convey flying); beat gestures, which convey emphasis via simple punctate movements (e.g., moving the dominant hand downward slightly in conjunction with each word in the phrase &#34;right now&#34;); and deictic gestures, which draw attention to the presence or absence of an entity via pointing (e.g., swinging the thumb backward to indicate something behind oneself). Representational gestures can be further divided into two additional categories: iconic gestures, which convey concrete referents (e.g., a bird), and metaphorical gestures, which convey metaphorical referents (e.g., ecstasy). Because gesture and speech arise from the same conceptual content, they are closely related in meaning4,5. By serving as an iconic visual medium for communication, gestures can help compensate when challenges in spoken language comprehension arise6, whether due to individual factors such as limited proficiency in the language spoken7,8 or environmental factors such as difficulty in hearing speech9,10. Thus, gestures are integral to understanding interpersonal communication in face-to-face and virtual contexts, providing insight into how speakers and listeners convey and comprehend information multimodally.
Several structured interactive tasks have been developed to measure how gesture affects interpersonal communication. These tasks include interviews, in which participants respond to questions by describing their personal experiences11,12; image description, in which a static image is presented to participants to describe13,14; puzzle solving, in which participants describe how to solve a puzzle by spatially orienting components correctly15,16; direction provision, in which participants are instructed to give directions to a location unfamiliar to listeners17,18,19; and narrative retelling, in which participants view a cartoon depicting a sequence of events and subsequently recount them20,21,22. Many of the tasks employed in the studies cited above incorporate spatial content and action, which gesture conveys with particular efficacy15,23,24,25. In the tasks for the studies cited above, participants typically produce gestures in conjunction with language, and information conveyed via gesture and its relationship to concurrently produced language is assessed. Alternatively, participants may view a recording of someone gesturing (or not gesturing) and producing language when completing one of these tasks, after which participants&#39; comprehension is assessed. All of these tasks may be conducted virtually as well as face-to-face, enabling data collection from a wide range of participants and comparison across modalities.
The impact of gestures on interpersonal communication has been implemented with a wide range of participants. Of particular interest have been populations with communication challenges, including young children26,27,28,29,30, second language (L2) users8,31,32,33, individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD)20,21,22,34, individuals with specific language impairment35,36,37, individuals with aphasia12,38, individuals with brain injury39, and individuals who stutter40,41. This work has revealed that, while many of these populations can utilize gestures to facilitate communication, some, such as individuals with autism spectrum disorder, may encounter difficulty leveraging gestures to communicate effectively. The findings suggest that this may be due to the extent to which these populations take audience design and environmental cues into consideration, highlighting the practical implications of these explanations for the impact of gestures on communication.
A key feature providing insight into the impact of gestures on interpersonal communication is interlocutor visibility. A question of great importance in the field of gesture research is the extent to which participants gesture for their own benefit, indicating the offloading of cognitive operations onto the body, vs. the benefit of their interlocutors, indicating the use of gesture to communicate. This question has been investigated by examining the impact of interlocutor (non-)visibility on gesture production in face-to-face contexts via the use of an opaque partition26,42, as well as in telephone contexts13 and virtual contexts43. Overall, the results of this work indicate that, although speakers gesture for their own benefit, they produce more representational gestures when communicating with visible than non-visible interlocutors, whereas beat gesture production is similar regardless of interlocutor visibility. Thus, they suggest that representational gesture facilitates communication across a variety of contexts, suggesting that speakers take the perspective of their interlocutors into account and modify their gesture production accordingly. Although previous research examining the effect of interlocutor visibility has been instrumental in providing insight into the contributions of gesture to interpersonal communication, it has focused on English as a first language (L1) in typically developing populations, so it is unclear whether the findings can be extended to populations with communication challenges. Two such populations are L2 learners, who may struggle to communicate via speech in the target language, and children with ASD, whose verbal and nonverbal communication are abnormal. Furthermore, little research has examined the impact of interlocutor visibility on gesture production in virtual contexts, which allow the effect of the interlocutor&#39;s visibility on the participant to be disentangled from the effect of the participant&#39;s visibility to the interlocutor, so the replicability of findings from these contexts is currently unclear. Finally, some research has focused on the impact of interlocutor visibility on the production of specific types of gestures, so it is unclear whether the production of other types of gestures is similarly affected by interlocutor visibility.
The protocols described below manipulate interlocutor visibility to examine gesture production in challenging circumstances: L2 word learning and narrative retelling by individuals with ASD. The L2 word learning protocol bridges research examining the impact of observing gestures on L2 word learning with research examining the contribution of gestures to communication via an interactive word learning paradigm. In this paradigm, participants unfamiliar with the target language learn words in it and then teach these words to other participants unfamiliar with the target language, permitting the impact of interlocutor visibility on gesture production to be examined in the earliest stages of L2 acquisition in a conversational context. The cartoon retelling paradigm employs a widely used narrative retelling task in which differences in gesture production have been observed when interlocutor visibility is manipulated with a new population: adolescents with ASD. This population is of interest because language development, including gesture production, is mature by adolescence, and ASD entails difficulty with verbal and nonverbal communication, including gestures, as well as a lack of sensitivity to the communicative needs of interlocutors. Together, these protocols provide insight into the extent to which gesture production is dependent on - and, conversely, can compensate for - speech when interpersonal communication is challenging.
Based on findings demonstrating how listener visibility affects gesture production by L1 English speakers13,26,42,43, it was hypothesized that participants would produce more overall gestures and more representational gestures when discussing L2 words with a visible than a non-visible interlocutor. Based on findings demonstrating abnormalities in gesture production&#160;in ASD20,44, it was hypothesized that adolescents with ASD would produce fewer overall gestures as well as fewer representational and deictic gestures than typically developing (TD) adolescents. Moreover, based on findings showing that ASD entails difficulty with perspective taking45, it was hypothesized that gesture production by adolescents with ASD would not differ significantly in the presence of visible and non-visible interlocutors. Finally, an interaction between diagnosis and visibility was predicted, such that gesture production would not differ by visibility for adolescents with ASD but that it would for TD adolescents.

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication  

Examining Gesture Production in the Presence of Communication Challenges

My research examines the cognitive and neural mechanisms of the body's impact on communication via hand gesture and sign language. A major focus of my work is how the relationship between gesture and speech differs in typical and atypical language development and processing. In vivo neuroscience techniques such as electroencephalography or EEG, functional magnetic resonance imaging or fMRI, and functional near infrared spectroscopy or fNIRS have been instrumental in revealing the neural mechanisms of hand gesture and sign language.In addition, eye tracking provides insight into real-time processing of hand gesture and sign language. My work was the first to show that observing hand gestures conveying pitch contours helps speakers of atonal languages, such as English, learn lexical tone and tonal languages such as Mandarin. I'm currently using EEG and fNIRS to investigate the neural signatures of this effect.This protocol provides a means to investigate gesture production in the presence of communication challenges. I've used it successfully to investigate gesture production in second language learners and individuals with autism spectrum disorders in in-person settings, and I plan to expand it to additional populations and virtual settings. My findings provide insight into how observing and producing hand gestures can facilitate language acquisition and processing.Moreover, they're helping to reveal potential biomarkers of language atypicalities as well as treatment efficacy.

L2 Word Learning Protocol to Study Gesture Production

To begin, recruit paired participants and use a coin toss to assign roles. One is the speaker, and the other is the interlocutor. Place a table microphone between the speaker and interlocutor for audio recording.Also place a video camera at a 90-degree angle to the side, ensuring it remains hidden from the participants. Ensure both the speaker and interlocutor are within the view of the video camera and the computer screen remains out of the frame to maintain condition blindness. Use a computer to present an L2 word from the target language orally to the speaker via earphones and visually in one of two formats, either with a representational gesture video of an L1 speaker or as text only.After a 500-millisecond pause, display the L1 translation of the L2 word to the speaker for 2, 000 milliseconds. Prompt the speaker to teach the L2 word and its meaning to the interlocutor using speech or gesture. Instruct the speaker to press a button when ready to proceed.Present the next L2 word and continue until all 20 L2 words are covered. Present each L2 word as text, and prompt them to say its L1 translation, or skip the word if they do not recall its translation. The study examined the impact of visibility on gesture production and communication.It was found that primary speakers made more gestures when interlocutors were visible with significant increases in representational and deictic gestures. No significant difference was noted for beat gestures for the primary speakers. Interlocutors also gestured more when visible to primary speakers, but without statistical significance.

l2-word-learning-protocol-to-study-gesture-production

Research

JoVE Journal

Behavior

52 Görüntüleme. Başlamak için, eşleştirilmiş katılımcıları işe alın ve rolleri atamak için yazı tura atın. Biri konuşmacı, diğeri muhataptır. Ses kaydı için hoparlör ile muhatap arasına bir masa mikrofonu yerleştirin.Ayrıca, katılımcılardan gizli kalmasını sağlamak için yana 90 derecelik bir açıyla bir video kamera yerleştirin. Durum körlüğünü korumak için hem konuşmacının hem de muhatabın video kameranın görüş alanı i?...