Name: Generating the Transcriptional Regulation View of a Transcriptome Dataset
Uploaded: 2024-03-01T13:50:00
Description: Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Generating the Transcriptional Regulation View of a Transcriptome Dataset at JoVE.com

generating the transcriptional regulation view of a transcriptome dataset

GAT Framework for Identifying Dark Biomarkers in Transcriptomes

Transcriptome consists of the expressions of all the genes in a sample and may be profiled by high-throughput technologies like microarray and RNA-seq1. The expression levels of one gene in a dataset are called a transcriptomic feature, and the differential representation of a transcriptomic feature between the phenotype and control groups defines this gene as a biomarker of this phenotype2,3. Transcriptomic biomarkers have been extensively utilized in the investigations of disease diagnosis4, biological mechanism5, and survival analysis6,7, etc.
Gene activity patterns in the healthy tissues carry crucial information about the lives8,9. These patterns offer invaluable insights and act as ideal references for understanding the complex developmental trajectories of benign disorders10,11 and lethal diseases12. Genes interact with each other, and transcriptomes represent the final expression levels after their complicated interactions. Such patterns are formulated as transcriptional regulation network13 and metabolism network14, etc. The expressions of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) can be transcriptionally regulated by transcription factors (TFs) and long intergenic non-coding RNAs (lincRNAs)15,16,17. Conventional differential expression analysis ignored such complex gene interactions with the assumption of inter-feature independence18,19.
Recent advancements in graph neural networks (GNNs) demonstrate extraordinary potential in extracting important information from OMIC-based data for cancer studies20, e.g., identifying co-expression modules21. The innate capacity of GNNs renders them ideal for modeling the intricate relationships and dependencies among genes22,23.
Biomedical studies often focus on accurately predicting a phenotype against the control group. Such tasks are commonly formulated as binary classifications24,25,26. Here, the two class labels are typically encoded as 1 and 0, true and false, or even positive and negative27.
This study aimed to provide an easy-to-use protocol for generating the transcriptional regulation (mqTrans) view of a transcriptome dataset based on the pre-trained graph-attention network (GAT) reference model. The multitask GAT framework from a previously published work26 was used to transform transcriptomic features to the mqTrans features. A large dataset of healthy transcriptomes from the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC) Xena platform28 was used to pre-train the reference model (HealthModel), which quantitatively measured the transcription regulations from the regulatory factors (TFs and lincRNAs) to the target mRNAs. The generated mqTrans view could be used to build prediction models and detect dark biomarkers. This protocol utilizes the colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) patient dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database29 as an illustrative example. In this context, patients in stages I or II are categorized as negative samples, while those in stages III or IV are considered positive samples. The distributions of dark and traditional biomarkers across the 26 TCGA cancer types are also compared.
Description of the HealthModel pipeline 
The methodology employed in this protocol is based on the previously published framework26, as outlined in Figure 1. To commence, users are required to prepare the input dataset, feed it into the proposed HealthModel pipeline, and obtain mqTrans features. Detailed data preparation instructions are provided in section 2 of the protocol section. Subsequently, users have the option to combine mqTrans features with the original transcriptomic features or proceed with the generated mqTrans features only. The produced dataset is then subjected to a feature selection process, with users having the flexibility to choose their preferred value for k in k-fold cross-validation for classification. The primary evaluation metric utilized in this protocol is accuracy.
HealthModel26 categorizes the transcriptomic features into three distinct groups: TF (Transcription Factor), lincRNA (long intergenic non-coding RNA), and mRNA (messenger RNA). The TF features are defined based on the annotations available in the Human Protein Atlas30,31. This work utilizes the annotations of lincRNAs from the GTEx dataset32. Genes belonging to the third-level pathways in the KEGG database33 are considered as mRNA features. It is worth noting that if an mRNA feature exhibits regulatory roles for a target gene as documented in the TRRUST database34, it is reclassified into the TF class.
This protocol also manually generates the two example files for the gene IDs of regulatory factors (regulatory_geneIDs.csv) and target mRNA (target_geneIDs.csv). The pairwise distance matrix among the regulatory features (TFs and lincRNAs) is calculated by the Pearson correlation coefficients and clustered by the popular tool weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA)36 (adjacent_matrix.csv). Users can directly utilize the HealthModel pipeline together with these example configuration files to generate the mqTrans view of a transcriptomic dataset.
Technical details of HealthModel 
HealthModel represents the intricate relationships among TFs and lincRNAs as a graph, with the input features serving as the vertices denoted by V and an inter-vertex edge matrix designated as E. Each sample is characterized by K regulatory features, symbolized as VK&#215;1. Specifically, the dataset encompassed 425 TFs and 375 lincRNAs, resulting in a sample dimensionality of K = 425 + 375 = 800. To establish the edge matrix E, this work employed the popular tool WGCNA35. The pairwise weight linking two vertices represented as <img alt="Equation 1" src="/files/ftp_upload/66030/66030eq01.jpg" style="margin: auto;" /> and <img alt="Equation 2" src="/files/ftp_upload/66030/66030eq02.jpg" style="margin: auto;" />, is determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient. The gene regulatory network exhibits a scale-free topology36, characterized by the presence of hub genes with pivotal functional roles. We compute the correlation between two features or vertices, <img alt="Equation 1" src="/files/ftp_upload/66030/66030eq01.jpg" style="margin: auto;" /> and <img alt="Equation 2" src="/files/ftp_upload/66030/66030eq02.jpg" style="margin: auto;" />, using the topological overlap measure (TOM) as follows:
<img alt="Equation 3" src="/files/ftp_upload/66030/66030eq03.jpg" style="margin: auto;" />&#160; &#160; &#160;(1)
<img alt="Equation 4" src="/files/ftp_upload/66030/66030eq04.jpg" style="margin: auto;" />&#160; &#160; &#160;(2)
The soft threshold&#160;&#946; is calculated using the &#39;pickSoft Threshold&#39; function from the WGCNA package. The power exponential function aij is applied, where <img alt="Equation 5" src="/files/ftp_upload/66030/66030eq05.jpg" style="margin: auto;" />&#160;represents a gene excluding i&#160;and j, and <img alt="Equation 6" src="/files/ftp_upload/66030/66030eq06.jpg" style="margin: auto;" /> represents the vertex connectivity. WGCNA clusters the expression profiles of the transcriptomic features into multiple modules using a commonly employed dissimilarity measure (<img alt="Equation 7" src="/files/ftp_upload/66030/66030eq07.jpg" style="margin: auto;" />37.
The HealthModel framework was originally designed as a multitask learning architecture26. This protocol only utilizes the model pre-training task for the construction of the transcriptomic mqTrans view. The user may choose to further refine the pre-trained HealthModel under the multitask graph attention network with additional task-specific transcriptomic samples.
Technical details of feature selection and classification 
The feature selection pool implements eleven feature selection (FS) algorithms. Among them, three are filter-based FS algorithms: selecting K best features using the Maximal Information Coefficient (SK_mic), selecting K features based on the FPR of MIC (SK_fpr), and selecting K features with the highest false discovery rate of MIC (SK_fdr). Additionally, three tree-based FS algorithms assess individual features using a decision tree with the Gini index (DT_gini), adaptive boosted decision trees (AdaBoost), and random forest (RF_fs). The pool also incorporates two wrapper methods: Recursive feature elimination with the linear support vector classifier (RFE_SVC) and recursive feature elimination with the logistic regression classifier (RFE_LR). Finally, two embedding algorithms are included: linear SVC classifier with the top-ranked L1 feature importance values (lSVC_L1) and logistic regression classifier with the top-ranked L1 feature importance values (LR_L1).
The classifier pool employs seven different classifiers to build classification models. These classifiers comprise linear support vector machine (SVC), Gaussian Na&#239;ve Bayes (GNB), logistic regression classifier (LR), k-nearest neighbor, with k set to 5 by default (KNN), XGBoost, random forest (RF), and decision tree (DT).
The random split of the dataset into the train: test subsets can be set in the command line. The demonstrated example uses the ratio of train: test = 8: 2.

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Generating the Transcriptional Regulation View of Transcriptomic Features for Prediction Task and Dark Biomarker Detection on Small Datasets

Our research focuses on the intergenetic interactions on disease. We found that many genes have complex, intertwined relationships with each other. By exploring these relationships, we aim in making more precise diagnosis in disease treatment and management.We found that many dark biomarkers which traditional, conventional methods ignored, unsupported by many medical literatures. This indicates that approach can further assist biologists in reducing time cycle for biomarker screening. The biggest challenge during the experiment was addressing the issue of small sample sizes of different disease types.To overcome this difficulty, we collected as many healthy samples as possible to train a reference model, which we called health model.

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Generating the Transcriptional Regulation View of a Transcriptome Dataset at JoVE.com