dna-membrane fixation and probe hybridisation for leptospira detection in water samples

Dot-Blot Assay for Detection of Leptospira DNA in Water Samples

Leptospirosis in humans mainly originates from environmental sources1,2. The presence of Leptospira in lakes, rivers, and streams is an indicator of leptospirosis transmission among wildlife, and domestic and production animals that may eventually come into contact with these bodies of water1,3,4. Furthermore, Leptospira has been identified in non-natural sources, including sewage, stagnant and tap water5,6.
Leptospira is a worldwide distributed bacteria7,8, and the role of the environment in its preservation and transmission has been well recognized. Leptospira can survive in drinking water under variable pH and minerals9, and in natural bodies of water1. It can also survive for long periods in distilled water10, and under constant pH (7.8), it may survive up to 152 days11. Moreover, Leptospira may interact in bacterial consortiums to survive harsh conditions12,13.&#160;It may be part of biofilms in freshwater with Azospirillum and Sphingomonas and is even capable of growing and enduring temperatures exceeding 49 &#176;C14,15. It can also multiply in waterlogged soil and remain viable for up to 379 days16, preserving its ability to cause the disease for as long as a year17,18. However, little is known about the ecology within water bodies and how it is distributed within them.
Since its discovery, the study of the genus Leptospira was based on serological tests. It was not until the current century that molecular techniques became more prevalent in the study of this spirochaete. The dot-blot has been scarcely used for its identification using (1) an isotopic probe based on the 16S rRNA and on an inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR)19,20, (2) as a nanogold based immunoassay for human leptospirosis applied to urine21, or (3) as an antibody-based assay for bovine urine samples22. The technique fell in disuse because it was originally based on isotopic probes. However, it is a well-known technique that, coupled with PCR, yields enhanced results, and it is considered safe due to the use of non-isotopic probes. PCR plays a crucial role in the enrichment of the Leptospira DNA by amplifying a specific DNA fragment that may be found in trace amounts in a sample. During each PCR cycle, the amount of the targeted DNA fragment is doubled in the reaction. At the end of the reaction, the amplicon has been multiplied by a factor of more than a million23. The product amplified by PCR, often not visible in agarose electrophoresis, becomes visible through specific hybridization with a DIG-labeled probe in the dot-blot24,25,26.
The dot-blot technique is simple, robust, and suitable for numerous samples, making it accessible to laboratories with limited resources. It has been employed in a variety of bacteria studies, including (1) oral bacteria27, (2) other sample types such as food and feces28, and (3) the identification of unculturable bacteria29, often in agreement with other molecular techniques. Among the advantages offered by the dot-blot technique are: (1) The membrane has a high binding capacity, capable of binding over 200 &#956;g/cm2 of nucleic acids and up to 400 &#956;g/cm2; (2) Dot-blot results can be visually interpreted without requiring special equipment, and (3) they can be conveniently stored for years at room temperature (RT).
The genus Leptospira has been classified into pathogenic, intermediate, and saprophytic clades30,31. The distinction among these clades can be achieved based on specific genes such as lipL41, lipL32, and the 16S&#160;rRNA. LipL32 is present in the pathogenic clades and exhibits high sensitivity in various serological and molecular tools, whereas it is absent in saprophyte species21. The housekeeping gene lipL41 is&#160;known for its stable expression and used in molecular techniques32, while the 16S&#160;rRNA gene is utilized for their classification.
This methodology can be applied to large volumes of water once they have been concentrated by centrifugation. It allows the assessment of various points and depths within a water body to detect the presence of leptospiral DNA and the clade to which it belongs. This tool is valuable for both ecological and general screening purposes and can also be employed to detect other non-culturable bacteria that may be present in water.
Additionally, PCR and dot-blot assays are technically and economically affordable to a wide range of laboratories, even those lacking sophisticated or expensive equipment. This study aims to apply the digoxigenin-based dot-blot for the identification of the three Leptospira clades in water samples collected from natural bodies of water.
Bacterial strains 
Twelve Leptospira serovars (Autumnalis, Bataviae, Bratislava, Canicola, Celledoni, Grippothyphosa, Hardjoprajitno, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Pomona, Pyrogenes, Tarassovi, and Wolffi) were included in this study. These serovars are part of the collection at the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, National Autonomous University of Mexico,&#160;and they are currently used in the microagglutination test (MAT).
All Leptospira serovars were cultured in EMJH, and their DNA was extracted using a commercial DNA extraction kit (see Table of Materials). A genomic DNA mix of the twelve serovars was used as a positive control for the Leptospira pathogenic clade. As a positive control of the Leptospira intermediate clade, genomic DNA from Leptospira fainei serovar Hurstbridge strain BUT6 was included, and as a positive control for the Leptospira saprophyte clade, genomic DNA of Leptospira biflexa serovar Patoc strain Patoc I, was also included.
Negative controls consisted of an empty plasmid, DNA from non-related bacteria (Ureaplasma urealyticum, Staphylococcus aureus, Brucella abortus, Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella boydii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Escherichia coli), and PCR-grade water, which served as non-template control.
Water samples 
Twelve trial grab samples were collected using a stratified-haphazard sampling method from the Cuemanco Biological and Aquaculture Research Center (CIBAC) (19&#176; 16&#39; 54&#34; N 99&#176; 6&#39; 11&#34; W). These samples were obtained at three depths: superficial, 10, and 30 cm (Figure 1A, B). The water collection procedures did not impact any endangered or protected species. Each sample was collected in a sterile 15 mL microcentrifuge tube. To collect the sample, each tube was gently submerged in the water, filled at the selected depth, and then sealed. The samples were maintained at 22 &#176;C and promptly transported to the laboratory for processing.
Each sample was concentrated by centrifugation in sterile 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes at 8000 x g for 20 min at room temperature. This step was repeated until all the samples were concentrated into one tube, which was then used for DNA extraction (Figure 1C).
<img alt="Figure 1" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/65435/65435fig01v2.jpg" /> 
Figure 1: Concentration of water samples by centrifugation. (A) Water sampling ponds, and (B) Natural streams. (C) Centrifugation-based water sample processing in repeated steps as many times as needed (n). <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/65435/65435fig01largev2.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
DNA extraction 
Total DNA was isolated using a commercial Genomic DNA kit according to the manufacturer&#39;s instructions (see Table of Materials). DNA extractions were eluted in 20 &#181;L of elution buffer, and DNA concentration was determined by a UV Spectrophotometer at 260-280 nm, and stored at 4 &#176;C until use.
PCR amplification 
The PCR targets were the 16S rRNA, lipL41, and lipL32 genes, which identify DNA from the genus Leptospira and allow the distinction among the three clades: pathogenic, saprophytic, and intermediate. Both primers and probe designs were based on the previous works by Ahmed et al., Azali et al., Bourhy et al., Weiss et al., and Branger et al.33,34,35,36,37. The sequence of each probe, primer, and amplified fragment are described in Table 1, and their alignment with reference sequences are provided in Supplementary File 1, Supplementary File 2, Supplementary File 3, Supplementary File 4, and Supplementary File 5. The PCR reagents and thermocycling conditions are described in the protocol section.
Amplification products were visualized by electrophoretic separation on a 1% agarose gel in TAE (40 mM Tris base, 20 mM Acetic acid, and 1 mM EDTA; pH 8.3), at 60 V for 45 min with ethidium-bromide detection, as shown in Supplementary Figure 1. Genomic DNA obtained from each serovar was used with concentrations ranging from 6 x 106 to 1 x 104 genomic equivalent copies (GEq) in each PCR reaction, based on the genome size of L. interrogans (4, 691, 184 bp)38 for pathogenic Leptospira, the genome size of L. biflexa (3, 956, 088 bp)39 for saprophytic Leptospira, and the genome size of L. fainei serovar Hurstbridge strain BUT6 (4, 267, 324 bp) with accession number AKWZ00000000.2.
The sensitivity of the probes was assessed with DNA from each pathogenic serovar, L. biflexa serovar Patoc strain Patoc I, and L. fainei serovar Hurstbridge strain BUT6 in each experiment. To assess the specificity of the PCR and dot-blot hybridization assay, DNA from non-related bacteria was included.
Table 1: PCR primers and probes to amplify products for identifying the pathogenic, saprophyte, and intermediate clades of Leptospira. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/65435/TABLE_1_ 7th_PR_ EMCC.xlsx" target="_blank">Please click here to download this Table.</a>
Dot-blot hybridization assay 
The technique is called dot-blot because the holes in which the DNA sample is placed have a dot shape, and when they are sucked to be fixed in place by vacuum suction, they acquire this shape. This technique was developed by Kafatos et al.40. The technique allows the semi-quantification of Leptospira in each PCR-positive sample. The protocol consists of a denaturation with NaOH 0.4 M at room temperature, samples with Leptospira DNA from 30 ng to 0.05 ng, corresponding to 6 x 106 to 1 x 104 leptospires, are blotted onto a nylon membrane with a 96-well dot-blot apparatus. After immobilization, the DNA is bound to the membrane by exposure to 120 mJ UV light. Each DNA probe is conjugated with digoxigenin-11 dUTP by a terminal transferase catalysis step at the 3&#39; end (Digoxigenin is a plant steroid obtained from Digitalis purpurea, used&#160;as a reporter41). Following the stringent hybridization of the labeled DNA probe (50 pmol) at the specific temperature onto the target DNA, the DNA hybrids are visualized by the chemiluminescence reaction with the anti-digoxigenin alkaline phosphatase antibody covalently conjugated with its substrate CSPD. The luminescence is captured by exposure to an X-ray film (Figure 2).
<img alt="Figure 2" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/65435/65435fig02v2.jpg" /> 
Figure 2: Steps of the procedure for the PCR-dot-blot assay. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/65435/65435fig02largev2.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>

Author Spotlight: Leptospira DNA Detection in Water for Environmental Analysis and Disease Surveillance

Polymerase Chain Reaction and Dot-Blot Hybridization for Leptospira Detection in Water Samples

This protocol is designed to identify the presence of Leptospira DNA in water samples. The dot-blot technique is utilized for this purpose, which enables accurate detection and analysis of the DNA. The dot-blot is an easy and versatile non-isotopic technique and may help to answer key questions about the environmental distribution of Leptospira.This method has the potential to assess huge water bodies and aid in disease surveillance.

DNA-Membrane Fixation and Probe Hybridisation for Leptospira Detection in Water Samples

Research

JoVE Journal

Biology

The dot-blot is a simple, fast, sensitive, and versatile technique that enables the identification of minimal quantities of DNA specifically targeted by ...

Amplification of Leptospira DNA and its Transfer on the Membrane Using a Dot-Blot Apparatus

Visualization of the DNA Hybrids Using Chemiluminescence for Leptospira Detection in Water Samples