Name: modified single-loop reconstruction for pancreaticoduodenectomy
Uploaded: 2019-09-28T12:30:00
Description: Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Modified Single-Loop Reconstruction for Pancreaticoduodenectomy at JoVE.com

Não é aplicável.

Este protocolo centra-se na fase da reconstrução do paládio usando mSLR e segue as directrizes do Comitê de éticas do Ruhr-Universidade Bochum, Germany.
Nota: pacientes com tumor ressecável da cabeça pancreática, região papilar ou pancreatite Calcificante crônica refratária grave foram submetidos à DP. Resectability estava presente se o tumor tivesse menos de 50% de contato com as artérias peripancreáticas e não infiltram-se na veia porta ou na veia mesentérica superior. As met...

<ol>
	<li>Cameron, J. L., He, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Two+thousand+consecutive+pancreaticoduodenectomies.">Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.</a> Journal of American College of Surgeons. 220 (4), 530-536 (2015).</li><li>Keck, T., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Pancreatogastrostomy+Versus+Pancreatojejunostomy+for+RECOnstruction+After+PANCreatoduodenectomy+(RECOPANC,+DRKS+00000767):+Perioperative+and+Long-term+Results+of+a+Multicenter+Randomized+Controlled+Trial.">Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction After PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): Perioperative and Long-term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.</a> Annals of Surgery. 263 (3), 440-449 (2016).</li><li>Deng, L. H., Xiong, J. J., Xia, Q. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Isolated+Roux-en-Y+pancreaticojejunostomy+versus+conventional+pancreaticojejunostomy+after+pancreaticoduodenectomy:+a+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis.">Isolated Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</a> Journal of Evidence Based Medicine. 10 (1), 37-45 (2017).</li><li>Klaiber, U., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Meta-analysis+of+complication+rates+for+single-loop+versus+dual-loop+(Roux-en-Y)+with+isolated+pancreaticojejunostomy+reconstruction+after+pancreaticoduodenectomy.">Meta-analysis of complication rates for single-loop versus dual-loop (Roux-en-Y) with isolated pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy.</a> British Journal of Surgery. 102 (4), 331-340 (2015).</li><li>Eshmuminov, D., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Systematic+review+and+meta-analysis+of+postoperative+pancreatic+fistula+rates+using+the+updated+2016+International+Study+Group+Pancreatic+Fistula+definition+in+patients+undergoing+pancreatic+resection+with+soft+and+hard+pancreatic+texture.">Systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative pancreatic fistula rates using the updated 2016 International Study Group Pancreatic Fistula definition in patients undergoing pancreatic resection with soft and hard pancreatic texture.</a> HPB (Oxford). 20 (11), 992-1003 (2018).</li><li>Ke, S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+prospective,+randomized+trial+of+Roux-en-Y+reconstruction+with+isolated+pancreatic+drainage+versus+conventional+loop+reconstruction+after+pancreaticoduodenectomy.">A prospective, randomized trial of Roux-en-Y reconstruction with isolated pancreatic drainage versus conventional loop reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy.</a> Surgery. 153 (6), 743-752 (2013).</li><li>El Nakeeb, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Isolated+Roux+loop+pancreaticojejunostomy+versus+pancreaticogastrostomy+after+pancreaticoduodenectomy:+a+prospective+randomized+study.">Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study.</a> HPB (Oxford). 16 (8), 713-722 (2014).</li><li>Tani, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Randomized+clinical+trial+of+isolated+Roux-en-Y+versus+conventional+reconstruction+after+pancreaticoduodenectomy.">Randomized clinical trial of isolated Roux-en-Y versus conventional reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy.</a> British Journal of Surgery. 101 (9), 1084-1091 (2014).</li><li>Machado, M. C., da Cunha, J. E., Bacchella, T., Bove, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+modified+technique+for+the+reconstruction+of+the+alimentary+tract+after+pancreatoduodenectomy.">A modified technique for the reconstruction of the alimentary tract after pancreatoduodenectomy.</a> Surgery Gynecology Obstetrics. 143 (2), 271-272 (1976).</li><li>Aghalarov, I., Herzog, T., Uhl, W., Belyaev, O. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+modified+single-loop+reconstruction+after+pancreaticoduodenectomy+reduces+severity+of+postoperative+pancreatic+fistula+in+high-risk+patients.">A modified single-loop reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces severity of postoperative pancreatic fistula in high-risk patients.</a> HPB (Oxford). 20 (7), 676-683 (2018).</li><li>Marangoni, G., Morris-Stiff, G., Deshmukh, S., Hakeem, A., Smith, A. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+modern+approach+to+teaching+pancreatic+surgery:+stepwise+pancreatoduodenectomy+for+trainees.">A modern approach to teaching pancreatic surgery: stepwise pancreatoduodenectomy for trainees.</a> Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 16 (8), 1597-1604 (2012).</li><li>. Pyloruserhaltende Duodenohemipankreatektomie nach Traverso-Longmire mit T-Drainage (pp-Whipple) Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.webop.de/Allgemein-und-Viszeralchirurgie/Pankreas-und-Milz/Pyloruserhaltende-Duodenohemipankreatektomie-nach-Traverso-Longmire-mit-T-Drainage-pp-Whipple">https://www.webop.de/Allgemein-und-Viszeralchirurgie/Pankreas-und-Milz/Pyloruserhaltende-Duodenohemipankreatektomie-nach-Traverso-Longmire-mit-T-Drainage-pp-Whipple</a> (2019)</li><li>Machado, M. C., Machado, M. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Systematic+use+of+isolated+pancreatic+anastomosis+after+pancreatoduodenectomy:+Five+years+of+experience+with+zero+mortality.">Systematic use of isolated pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: Five years of experience with zero mortality.</a> European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 42 (10), 1584-1590 (2016).</li><li>Pescio, G., Cariati, E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+new+reconstructive+method+after+pancreaticoduodenectomy:+the+triple+Roux+on+a+"P"+loop.+Rationale+and+radionuclide+scanning+evaluation.">A new reconstructive method after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the triple Roux on a "P" loop. Rationale and radionuclide scanning evaluation.</a> HPB Surgery. 9 (4), 223-227 (1996).</li><li>Kingsnorth, A. N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Safety+and+function+of+isolated+Roux+loop+pancreaticojejunostomy+after+Whipple's+pancreaticoduodenectomy.">Safety and function of isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy after Whipple's pancreaticoduodenectomy.</a> Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 76 (3), 175-179 (1994).</li><li>Jester, A. L., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+Impact+of+Hepaticojejunostomy+Leaks+After+Pancreatoduodenectomy:+a+Devastating+Source+of+Morbidity+and+Mortality.">The Impact of Hepaticojejunostomy Leaks After Pancreatoduodenectomy: a Devastating Source of Morbidity and Mortality.</a> Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 21 (6), 1017-1024 (2017).</li><li>Funovics, J. M., Zoch, G., Wenzl, E., Schulz, F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Progress+in+reconstruction+after+resection+of+the+head+of+the+pancreas.">Progress in reconstruction after resection of the head of the pancreas.</a> Surgery Gynecology Obstetrics. 164 (6), 545-548 (1987).</li><li>Jover, J. M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Results+of+defunctionalized+jejunal+loop+after+pancreaticoduodenectomy.">Results of defunctionalized jejunal loop after pancreaticoduodenectomy.</a> Cirurgia Espanola. 80 (6), 373-377 (2006).</li><li>Albertson, D. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Pancreaticoduodenectomy+with+reconstruction+by+Roux-en-Y+pancreaticojejunostomy:+no+operative+mortality+in+a+series+of+25+cases.">Pancreaticoduodenectomy with reconstruction by Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy: no operative mortality in a series of 25 cases.</a> The Southern Medical Journal. 87 (2), 197-201 (1994).</li></ol>

Até o momento, a POPF contribui significativamente para a morbidade pós-operatória após a DP1.
Uma mistura de bile e suco pancreático pode levar à ativação mútua de ambas as secreções, aumentando seus efeitos adversos sobre o PJ ou o HJ9,13,14,15,16. A atividade citotóxica da fosfolipase A2 ativad...

A pancreaticoduodenectomia (DP) é considerada um procedimento cirúrgico sofisticado. Embora a mortalidade tenha diminuído nas últimas décadas, a morbidade ainda permanece alta1. A complicação mais frequente e temida é a fístula pancreática pós-operatória (popf), que ocorre em mais de 20% das operações2,3,4,5. POPF pode conduzir às complicações subseqüentes tais como a hemorragia do postpancreatectomy, o esvaziamento gastric atrasado, o abcesso intraabdominal e o sepsis. O aumento dos custos hospitalares, a permanência hospitalar prolongada e o atraso no início da quimioterapia em pacientes oncológicos têm um impacto socioeconômico dramático2,3,4.
As aproximações cirúrgicas diferentes foram introduzidas nas últimas décadas para diminuir a freqüência e a severidade de POPF. Uma delas é a reconstrução do duplo-laço (DLR) com os laços isolados de Roux-en-Y para as anastomoses biliares e pancreatic. O suco pancreatic de separação da bilis é pensado para diminuir os efeitos prejudiciais de secreções mutuamente ativados no pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). Os resultados na literatura têm sido encorajadores6,7,8. Noentanto, otempo operatório é significativamente prolongado com DLR4,9.
Nós apresentamos aqui a técnica da reconstrução modificada do único-laço (mSLR) durante o paládio para separar o secretion pancreatic da bilis comparado à reconstrução convencional do único-laço (SLR, Figura 1). Neste método, um único laço pequeno-intestino longo é usado para a construção do hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) e do PJ. Uma anastomose lado a lado entre o membro aferente e eferente do HJ facilita o fluxo isolado de secreções biliares e pancreáticas. Os primeiros resultados promissores confirmando diminuição da mortalidade e morbidade em pacientes com doadores de alto risco foram relatados pelo nosso grupo em 201810.
Este método reduz a severidade de POPF separando o líquido pancreatic e a bilis sem prolongar a duração da cirurgia comparada significativamente à reconstrução do dobro-laço.

<table>
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Alexis O XXL</td>
			<td>Applied medical</td>
			<td>C8405</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Bauchtuch Gr&#252;n 10x90</td>
			<td>Nobatrast</td>
			<td>603219</td>
			<td>abdominal compress</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Bauchtuch Gr&#252;n 45x45</td>
			<td>Nobatrast</td>
			<td>607544</td>
			<td>abdominal compress</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>GIA 60mm-3.8mm</td>
			<td>Covidien/Medtronic</td>
			<td>GIA6038S</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>GIA Loading Unit</td>
			<td>Covidien/Medtronic</td>
			<td>GIA6038L</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>OP-Flex Yankauer</td>
			<td>Unomedical</td>
			<td>34094182</td>
			<td>suction device</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Pr&#228;pariertupfer-Set</td>
			<td>Fuhrmann</td>
			<td>32019</td>
			<td>sterile swab</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Schlinggazetupfer 30x40</td>
			<td>Fuhrmann</td>
			<td>32016</td>
			<td>sterile swab</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Telescopic Smoke Pencil</td>
			<td>LiNA Medical</td>
			<td>SHK-TSP-CL</td>
			<td>electro cautery</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Thermocover ECO</td>
			<td>PEMAX</td>
			<td>TC43-75EC2</td>
			<td>bowel cover</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Whipple-Set</td>
			<td>M&#246;lnlycke</td>
			<td>97016042-00</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4"></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Drainages:</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Drainagebeutel</td>
			<td>Coloplast</td>
			<td>?</td>
			<td>drainagebag</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Silikon-Kapillardrainage</td>
			<td>AsidBonz</td>
			<td>551012</td>
			<td>capillary drainage</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Trichteransatz f&#252;r T-Rohr</td>
			<td>R&#252;sch</td>
			<td>333169-000025</td>
			<td>2,5 mm</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>T-Rohr nach Kehr</td>
			<td>R&#252;sch</td>
			<td>423600-000025</td>
			<td>t-tube 2,5 mm</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4"></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Sutures:</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Ethiloop 2mm 2x45cm</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>EH387</td>
			<td>loop</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Mersilene 0 FSL</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>EH7637</td>
			<td>fixation of the drainage</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>PDS 1 CT</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>PDP9234</td>
			<td>suturing of the fascia</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Vicryl 2-0 , 6x45cm</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>VCP1226</td>
			<td>for ligature</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Vicryl 2-0 SHplus, 8x70</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>VCP7850</td>
			<td>for ligature</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Vicryl 3-0 MH-1plus</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>VCP245</td>
			<td>subcutaneous suture</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4"></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Pancreatic anastomoses:</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Prolene 5-0 c1</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>8890</td>
			<td>6 x</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>PDS 5.0 RB-1plus</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>X1153</td>
			<td>2 x Multipack</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Prolene 4-0 RB-1</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>8871</td>
			<td>2 x holding sutures</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4"></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Hepaticojejunostomy:</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Prolene 5-0 c1</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>8890</td>
			<td>2 x holding sutures</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>PDS 5-0 c1</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>PDP1013</td>
			<td>7 x</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>PDS 6-0 c1</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>PDP1012</td>
			<td>1 x mucosa fixation sutures</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4"></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Gastrojejunostomy:</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>PDS 4-0 SH-1 plus</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>X1154</td>
			<td>1 x Multipack</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4"></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">Jejuno-Jejunostomy</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Ligasure</td>
			<td>Covidien</td>
			<td>LS1520</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>PDS 5-0 RB-1 plus</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>X1153</td>
			<td>1 x Multipack</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Prolene 2-0 SH</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>8833</td>
			<td>Vessel-suture, etc.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Prolene 3-0 SH</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>8832</td>
			<td>Cystic duct, cystic artery</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Prolene 4-0 RB-1</td>
			<td>Ethicon</td>
			<td>8871</td>
			<td>2 mal suturing of the slit in the meso</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

modified single-loop reconstruction for pancreaticoduodenectomy

A reconstrução modificada do único-laço em pancreaticoduodenectomy separa o secretion pancreatic da bilis. É realizado em casos de restos pancreáticos de alto risco para reduzir a severidade das fístulas pancreáticas pós-operatórias e, além disso, a morbidade pós-operatória global. Esta técnica da reconstrução é caracterizada por um laço jejunal extra-longo para a construção do pancreaticojejunostomy e do hepaticojejunostomy. A distância mais longa entre estas anastomoses e um jejuno-jejunostomy adicional entre o membro aferente e eferent do hepaticojejunostomy separam os líquidos e impedem o refluxo da bilis para o pancreaticojejunostomy. Assim, as secreções não podem ativar-se e agravar um escapamento anastomotic existente. Nós observamos uma taxa reduzida de fístula pancreatic postoperative severas após a reconstrução modificada do único-laço comparada à reconstrução simples convencional do laço. A técnica é fácil de executar, seguro, e menos demorado do que uma reconstrução tradicional do dobro-laço.

Todos os pacientes submetidos à DP foram submetidos a uma investigação do tecido pancreático para avaliar a indicação de mSLR. Os restos pancreatic de alto risco (isto é, o tecido pancreatic macio e um duto pancreatic principal minúsculo) foram reconstruídos usando um único laço modificado sempre que possível.
Nós identificamos 50 pacientes com o tecido pancreatic do risco elevado e um duto pancreatic principal pequeno. Todos eles foram submetidos a mSLR. A média de idade foi de ...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Modified Single-Loop Reconstruction for Pancreaticoduodenectomy at JoVE.com

Modified Single-Loop Reconstruction for Pancreaticoduodenectomy

A técnica da reconstrução modificada do único-laço que segue o pancreaticoduodenectomy separa o secretion pancreatic da bilis, assim reduzindo a severidade de POPF sem prolongar a duração da cirurgia.

Reconstrução de loop único modificada para Pancreaticoduodenectomia

Modified single-loop reconstruction in pancreaticoduodenectomy separates pancreatic secretion from bile. It is performed in cases of high-risk pancreatic ...

A separação da secreção pancreática da bile diminui os efeitos prejudiciais das secreções mutuamente ativadas na pancreaticoduodenostomia. Isso reduz a gravidade, mas não a incidência, da fístula pancreática pós-operatória. A reconstrução de um ciclo único é uma técnica de reconstrução frequentemente realizada na pancreaticoduodenectomia.A reconstrução de loop duplo foi introduzida pela primeira vez em 1976. Percebe a teoria da separação do fluido pancreático e da bile. No entanto, este procedimento é significativamente mais demorado do que a reconstrução convencional de um único ciclo.A reconstrução modificada de um único laço visa separar o fluido pancreático da bile com um membro jejunal longo e uma anastomose jejunal adicional entre o membro aferente e eferente da hepaticojejunostomia. Esta imagem demonstra a fase final de reconstrução de uma pancreaticoduodenectomia com uma reconstrução modificada de um único laço. As flechas verdes demonstram a pancreaticojejunostomia, a hepaticojejunostomia, e a jejunojejunostomia.O membro jejunal extra longo pode ser visto claramente nesta imagem. O protocolo de estudo deste estudo envolvendo cirurgia humana só foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética da Universidade ruhr de Bochum. O consentimento informado por escrito foi obtido de todos os pacientes.Esta é a preparação de um patch de ligamento teres. Ele será enrolado em torno da artéria hepática após a conclusão da anastomose para reduzir o risco de hemorragia de erosão em casos de vazamentos anastomóticos. Inicie a fase de reconstrução com a imobilização de um laço jejunal longo e móvel.Ressesse os primeiros 10 polegadas do jejunum para fornecer comprimento suficiente da mesenteria. Repositar a alça jejunal no quadrante abdominal superior direito. Realize uma pancreaticojejunostomia intersite-para-mucosa de duas camadas.Use suturas de polidioxina interrompidas 5-0 para a camada externa e suturas de polipropileno 5-0 interrompidas para a camada interna. Stents ou selantes não são necessários. Esta sequência mostra a sutura da camada interna da pancreaticojejunostomia com uma sutura de polipropileno interrompida 5-0.Coloque as suturas próximas umas das outras para evitar uma insuficiência da anastomose. Não coloquem as suturas muito perto uma da outra para evitar a necrose do tecido sutura. Aqui vemos a construção da camada externa da pancreaticojejunostomia com uma sutura de polidioxina interrompida 5-0.As suturas estão preparadas como demonstrado nesta sequência. Mais uma vez, não coloquem as suturas muito perto uma da outra. Esta é a camada dupla acabada na pancreaticojejunostomia do ducto à mucosa.Construa a parede externa da jejunojejunostomia antes de construir a hepaticojejunostomia. Isso facilita a construção da hepaticojejunostomia. Agora podemos ver claramente como o membro jejunal longo vai ser colocado.O laço jejunal entre hepaticojejunostomia e pancreaticojejunostomia mede de 25 a 35 centímetros em vez de 10 centímetros. Isso cria distância entre a anastomose para desvio das secreções. Facilita ainda a construção de uma jejunojejunostomia adicional entre o membro aferente e eferente da hepaticojejunostomia.Realize uma sutura de polidioxina interrompida de camada única 5-0 para a hepaticojejunostomia. Divida os dutos biliares comuns de parede fina e minúsculos com um tubo T. Comece a hepaticojejunostomia com quatro suturas de fixação de mucosa.Duas suturas de polipropileno 5-0 facilitam a construção da hepaticojejunostomia. Comece a construção da hepaticojejunostomia com um Roux-en-Y usando suturas de polidioxanona interrompidas 5-0. Prepare os nós cirúrgicos, mas não os amarre no início.Os nós cirúrgicos preparados são amarrados posteriormente para permitir uma tensão igual em cada sutura. Aqui podemos ver claramente o membro jejunal extra longo para uma reconstrução modificada de um único laço. Aqui vemos a construção da parede anterior da hepaticojejunostomia.A jejenojejunostomia é uma anastomose jejunal de 1,5 centímetros de medição de duas camadas realizada com uma sutura de polidioxanona 5-0. Construa a anastomose no ponto mais baixo entre o membro eferente e aferente da hepaticojejunostomia. Construa essa anastomose da pancreaticojejunostomia e da hepaticojejunostomia porque são mais sofisticadas.Use cautery monopolar para abrir o jejunum para construção de jejunojejunostomia. Realize uma sutura contínua com uma sutura de polidioxanona 5-0 para a camada interna da parede traseira da jejunojejunostomia. A sutura contínua permite a distribuição igual da tensão na anastomose.Aqui vemos a construção da camada interna da parede anterior da anastomose. Esta é a construção da camada externa da parede anterior. Aqui vemos a pancreaticojejunostomia, a jejunojejunostomia, e a hepaticojejunostomia ao fundo.Feche a lacuna no mesocólon após a transposição do membro jejunal para evitar hérnia interna. Todos os pacientes com um tecido pancreático macio e um pequeno ducto pancreático principal foram submetidos à reconstrução modificada de um único laço sempre que possível. A mobilização do membro jejunal longo geralmente não era problema.Em casos raros, a mobilização foi limitada devido à obesidade visceral extrema ou aderências graves devido ao histórico cirúrgico passado. Pacientes pequenos vêm junto com espaço naturalmente menor no abdômen superior, impedindo a preparação também. A reconstrução contínua em dupla camada da jejunojejunostomia foi realizada sem dificuldades em todos os pacientes.Nenhuma insuficiência anastomótica ocorreu no pós-operatório. Este método reduz a incidência de fístula pancreática pós-operatória grave em todos os pacientes com remanescentes pancreáticos de alto risco. O número de hemorragias e reoperações pós-ecreatectomia foi significativamente menor com a reconstrução modificada de um único laço.Em comparação com a reconstrução de loop duplo, este procedimento é significativamente menos exigente tecnicamente e menos demorado. A reconstrução modificada de ciclo único é uma técnica simples para separar a secreção pancreática da bile para redução da morbidade pós-operatória. É seguro e menos demorado do que a reconstrução de loop duplo.

modified-single-loop-reconstruction-for-pancreaticoduodenectomy

Research

JoVE Journal

Medicine

Modified Technique for Coronary Artery Ligation in Mice

Myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the most important causes of mortality in humans1-3. In order to improve morbidity and mortality in patients with MI we need better knowledge about pathophysiology of myocardial ischemia. This knowledge may be valuable to define new therapeutic targets for innovative cardiovascular therapies4. Experimental MI model in mice is an increasingly popular small-animal model in preclinical research in which MI is induced by means of permanent or temporary ligation of left coronary artery (LCA)5. In this video, we describe the step-by-step method of how to induce experimental MI in mice.
The animal is first anesthetized with 2% isoflurane. The unconscious mouse is then intubated and connected to a ventilator for artificial ventilation. The left chest is shaved and 1.5 cm incision along mid-axillary line is made in the skin. The left pectoralis major muscle is bluntly dissociated until the ribs are exposed. The muscle layers are pulled aside and fixed with an eyelid-retractor. After these preparations, left thoracotomy is performed between the third and fourth ribs in order to visualize the anterior surface of the heart and left lung. The proximal segment of LCA artery is then ligated with a 7-0 ethilon suture which typically induces an infarct size ~40% of left ventricle. At the end, the chest is closed and the animals receive postoperative analgesia (Temgesic, 0.3 mg/50 ml, ip). The animals are kept in a warm cage until spontaneous recovery.

The surgical procedure used to induce experimental myocardial infarction in mice begins with left thoracotomy between the third and the fourth ribs in order to visualize the anterior surface of the heart and left lung. The left coronary artery is ligated, the chest is closed and the mouse is allowed to recover spontaneously.

Técnica modificada para ligação da artéria coronária em ratos

Myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the most important causes of mortality in humans1-3. In order to improve morbidity and mortality in patients with MI ...

Medicina

A Modified Method for Heterotopic Mouse Heart Transplantion

Mice are often used as heart transplant donors and recipients in studies of transplant immunology due to the wide range of transgenic mice and reagents available. A difficulty is presented due to the small size of the animal and the considerable technical challenges of the microsurgery involved in heart transplantation. In particular, a high rate of technical failure early after transplantation may result from recipient death and post-operative complications such as hind limb paralysis or a non-beating heart. Here, the complete technique for heterotopic mouse heart transplantation is demonstrated, involving harvesting the donor heart and its subsequent implantation into a recipient mouse. The donor heart is harvested immediately following in situ perfusion with cold heparinized saline and transection of the ascending aorta and pulmonary artery. The recipient operation involves preparation of the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava (IVC), followed by end-to-side anastomosis of the donor aorta with the recipient aorta using a single running 10-0 microsuture and a similar anastomosis of the donor pulmonary artery with the recipient IVC. Following the operation the animal is injected with 0.6 ml normal saline subcutaneously and allowed to recover on a 37&#160;&#176;C heating pad. The results from 227 mouse heart transplants are summarized with a success rate at 48 hr of 86.8%. Of the 13.2% failures within 48 hr, 5 (2.2%) experienced hind limb paralysis, 10 (4.4%) had a non-beating heart due to graft ischemic injury and/or thrombosis, while 15 (6.6%) died within 48 hr.

A technique is demonstrated for the microsurgical procedure for heterotopic transplantation of hearts in mice, including simplified methods for donor harvesting and recipient vessel anastomosis.

Um método modificado para heterotópico Rato coração transplante

Mice are often used as heart transplant donors and recipients in studies of transplant immunology due to the wide range of transgenic mice and reagents ...

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) is now being evaluated as a preparative technique for maxillofacial surgery. Because this technique is expensive and available in only limited areas of the world, we developed a novel CAD/CAM surgical guide using an in-house approach. By using the CAD software, the maxillary resection area and cutting planes and the fibular cutting planes and angles are determined. Once the resection area is decided, the necessary faces are extracted using a Boolean modifier. These superficial faces are united to fit the surface of the bones and thickened to stabilize the solids. Not only the cutting guides for the fibula and maxilla but also the location arrangement of the transferred bone segments is defined by thickening the superficial faces. The CAD design is recorded as .stl files and three-dimensionally (3-D) printed as actual surgical guides. To check the accuracy of the guides, model surgery using 3-D-printed facial and fibular models is performed. These methods may be used to assist surgeons where commercial guides are not available.

Methods for designing a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) surgical guide are shown. Cutting planes are separated, united, and thickened to easily visualize the necessary bone transfer. These designs can be three-dimensional printed and checked for accuracy.

Concepção CAD/CAM guias cirúrgicos para reconstrução maxilar usando uma abordagem In-house

Computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) is now being evaluated as a preparative technique for maxillofacial surgery. Because this ...

Porcine As a Training Module for Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction

Live models that resemble surgical conditions of humans are needed for training free-flap harvesting and anastomosis. Animal models for training purposes have been available for years in many surgical fields. We used the female (because they are easy to handle for the procedure) Yorkshire pigs for the head and neck reconstruction by harvesting the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator or the superior epigastric artery perforator flap. The anastomosis site (neck skin defect or tracheal wall defect) was prepared via the dissection of the common carotid artery and the internal jugular vein, in which 3.5&#215; loupe magnification was used for anastomosis as we use on human cases in real life. This procedure demonstrates a new training method using a reliable learning model and provides a detailed anatomy in a live scenario. We focused on the ischemia time, harvesting, vessel anastomosis, and designing the flap to fit the defect site. This model improves tissue handling and with the use of proper instruments can be repeated many times so that the surgeon is fully confident before starting the surgery on humans.

Here we present a protocol for the use of the pig superior epigastric artery perforator flap as a learning module for head and neck microvascular reconstruction.

Suínos como um módulo de treinamento para reconstrução Microvascular, cabeça e pescoço

Live models that resemble surgical conditions of humans are needed for training free-flap harvesting and anastomosis. Animal models for training purposes ...

A Training and Testing System for Performing Vascular Reconstruction In Vitro

Manual vascular reconstruction training is essential for a beginner surgeon. However, an optimal training system for vascular reconstruction in vitro has yet to be developed. In this study, we introduce an in vitro training and testing system using a magnetic anchoring technique with which a trainee can practice manual vascular reconstruction individually. Additionally, this system can also be used to test the quality of the reconstruction. The described system includes a vascular reconstruction training machine, magnetic tractors, and a magnetic suture puller. In this manuscript, we detail an end-to-end vein anastomosis using porcine right and left iliac veins. To identify the potential damage caused by a magnetic suture puller on the suture, we created three groups with six segments of 4-0 polypropylene sutures each: a control group with no intervention on the polypropylene suture, a group in which the polypropylene suture is manually pulled with sterile gloves 20x, and a magnetic puller group in which the magnetic puller pulled the polypropylene suture 20x. These groups were tested by light microscopy and breaking strength tests, and the effect of reconstruction was assessed. In the light microscopy test, the control group was less likely to be damaged (p &#60; 0.05) and the number of damaged points of the manual group and magnetic puller group were similar (p &#62; 0.05). The results of the breaking strength test were compared across groups and no significant difference was observed (p &#62; 0.05). The end-to-end anastomosis of the porcine iliac veins was successfully performed using this training system, and the reconstructed veins could undergo 2.0 kPa perfusion pressure. Using this training and testing system the trainee can practice manual vascular reconstruction in vitro individually with the aid of magnetic tractors and a magnetic suture puller, and the quality of the reconstruction can be tested.

Here we present a training and testing system where a trainee can complete manual vascular reconstruction in vitro individually using a magnetic anchoring technique. The system can also be used to test the quality of reconstruction.

Um sistema de treinamento e teste para a realização de reconstrução vascular in vitro

Manual vascular reconstruction training is essential for a beginner surgeon. However, an optimal training system for vascular reconstruction in vitro has ...

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Since its first report in 2003, robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) has gained popularity among pancreatic surgeons. Inherent advantages of the robotic platform, including three-dimensional vision, wristed instruments, and improved ergonomics, allow the surgeon to recapitulate the principles of open pancreatoduodenectomy allowing safe oncologic dissection, hemostasis, and meticulous reconstruction. Over the course of the past decade, significant strides have been achieved in outlining the safety, feasibility, and learning curve of the robotic Whipple. When performed by high volume pancreatic surgeons experienced in RPD, recent comparative effectiveness studies show potential advantages compared to the open technique, including reductions in hospital stay and morbidity. National data also show reductions in conversion rates compared to its laparoscopic counterpart. Although long-term oncologic data are still needed, short-term oncologic surrogates of margin resection and lymph node harvest suggest no compromise in oncologic outcomes. As pancreatic surgeons increasingly integrate robotics into their practice, proficiency-based training and credentialing will be necessary for the safe application and dissemination of RPD. Here, we provide the detailed steps of a robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.&#160;

The following manuscript details a stepwise approach to the robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Detalhe técnico para o robô ajudado Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Since its first report in 2003, robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) has gained popularity among pancreatic surgeons. Inherent advantages of the robotic ...

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Valid comparisons of postoperative accuracy results in computer-assisted reconstruction of the mandible are difficult due to heterogeneity in imaging modalities, mandibular defect classification, and evaluation methodologies between studies. This guideline uses a step-by-step approach guiding the process of imaging, classification of mandibular defects and volume assessment of three-dimensional (3D) models, after which a legitimized quantitative accuracy evaluation method can be performed between the postoperative clinical situation and the preoperative virtual plan. The condyles and the vertical and horizontal corners of the mandible are used as bony landmarks to define virtual lines in the computer-assisted surgery (CAS) software. Between these lines the axial, coronal, and both sagittal mandibular angles are calculated on both pre- and postoperative 3D models of the (neo)mandible and subsequently the deviations are calculated. By superimposing the postoperative 3D model to the preoperative virtually planned 3D model, which is fixed to the XYZ axis, the deviation between pre- and postoperative virtually planned dental implant positions can be calculated. This protocol continues and specifies an earlier publication of this evaluation guideline.

Here, we propose a practical, feasible and reproducible evaluation guideline for computer-assisted reconstruction of the mandible in order to create uniformity between studies regarding postoperative accuracy evaluation. This protocol continues and specifies an earlier publication of this evaluation guideline.

Uma diretriz de avaliação pós-operatória para a reconstrução assistida por computador da Mandíbula

Valid comparisons of postoperative accuracy results in computer-assisted reconstruction of the mandible are difficult due to heterogeneity in imaging ...

Therapy Interventions for Upper Limb Amputees Undergoing Selective Nerve Transfers

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) improves the biological control interface for myoelectric prostheses after above-elbow amputation. Selective activation of muscle units is made possible by surgically re-routing nerves, yielding a high number of independent myoelectric control signals. However, this intervention requires careful patient selection and specific rehabilitation therapy. Here a rehabilitation protocol is presented for high-level upper limb amputees undergoing TMR, based on an expert Delphi study. Interventions before surgery include detailed patient assessment and general measures for pain control, muscle endurance and strength, balance, and range of motion of the remaining joints. After surgery, additional therapeutic interventions focus on edema control and scar treatment and the selective activation of cortical areas responsible for upper limb control. Following successful&#160;reinnervation of target muscles, surface electromyographic (sEMG) biofeedback is used to train the activation of the novel muscular units. Later on, a table-top prosthesis may provide the first experience of prosthetic control. After fitting the actual prosthesis, training includes repetitive drills without objects, object manipulation, and finally, activities of daily living. Ultimately, regular patient appointments and functional assessments allow tracking prosthetic function and enabling early interventions if malfunctioning.

This work presents a protocol to enhance prosthetic function after selective nerve transfer surgery. Rehabilitation interventions include patient information and selection, support of wound healing, cortical re-activation of sensory-motor areas of the upper limb, training of selective muscle activation, prosthetic handling in daily life, and regular follow-up assessments.

Intervenções terapêuticas para amputados de membros superiores submetidos a transferências seletivas de nervos

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) improves the biological control interface for myoelectric prostheses after above-elbow amputation. Selective ...

Management of the Uncinate Process in No-Touch Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) is a demanding abdominal operation that necessitates meticulous surgical skills and teamwork. The management of the pancreatic uncinate process is one of the most important and difficult processes in LPD because of its deep anatomical location and difficult exposure. Complete resection of the uncinate process and mesopancreas has become the cornerstone of LPD. In particular, it is even more difficult to avoid positive surgical margins and incomplete lymph node dissection when the tumor is located in the uncinate process. No-touch LPD, which is an ideal oncological operation process fitting the "tumor-free" principle, has been reported by our group previously. This article introduces the management of the uncinate process in no-touch LPD. Based on the multi-angle arterial approach, in this protocol, the median-anterior and left-posterior approaches to the SMA are used to correctly deal with the important vascular structure, the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA), in order to ensure the safe and complete excision of the uncinate process and mesopancreas. For the achievement of the no-touch isolation technique in LPD, the pancreatic head and the blood supply to the duodenal region must be severed at the very early stage of the operation; after that, the tumor can be isolated intact, resection can be performed in situ, and finally, the tissue can be removed en bloc. This paper aims to show the distinctive ways to manage the uncinate process in no-touch LPD and investigate the viability and safety of this approach. Moreover, the technique may increase the R0 resection rate.

Complete resection of the uncinate process and mesopancreas is one of the most important and difficult processes in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD). This article presents a method for managing the uncinate process in no-touch LPD using the median-anterior and left-posterior approaches to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA).

Tratamento do processo uncinado na duodenopancreatectomia laparoscópica sem toque

Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) is a demanding abdominal operation that necessitates meticulous surgical skills and teamwork. The management of ...

Digital Model for Horizontal 3D Reconstruction of Pulmonary Nodules

To reconstruct the three-dimensional digital model of the pulmonary nodules, implement the Three-Dimensional Lung Horizon Function in the MATLAB workspace. Then open the Graphical User Interface, or GUI, to check the horizontal three-dimensional model. Drag the scroll bar on the GUI with the mouse to observe the continuous three-dimensional lung structure, allowing for the clear visualization of various types of pulmonary nodules and their relative spatial relationships with the lung tissue.Use the Zoom function to observe the local features of the lesions and relevant three-dimensional structural output pictures. To measure the size of the nodules, use the Mark Pixel Coordinates button to calculate the distance between two points. The default color bar, jet colormap, displays values from low to high in a blue to red range.To reset the GUI, right click the color bar and select the standard gray colormap. If the filter window is not satisfactory, use the left mouse button to adjust the window level by dragging up and down in the middle of the figure. Drag left and right to adjust the window width to display the accurate filtering range on the color bar.The continuous three-dimensional reconstruction resulted in the axial view of the pulmonary nodules and the relationship between the nodules and the surrounding lung tissue.