A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Prostate biopsy is the gold standard diagnostic method for prostate cancer. Cognitive fusion-guided prostate biopsy, which combines transrectal ultrasound with pre-measured MRI parameters, improves biopsy accuracy and enhances the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Abstract

Traditional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy has limited sensitivity and specificity, particularly for detecting early-stage prostate cancer, due to a lack of precise lesion targeting. An improved cognitive fusion-guided prostate biopsy method has been developed to enhance lesion targeting by integrating three parameters of prostate multiparametric MR (mpMRI) images into TRUS images. Prostate mpMRI measurement is initially performed to obtain three key parameters: the rotation angle (α), the distance from the rectal wall (X), and the distance from the prostate apex (Y). These parameters are then cognitively applied in real-time, TRUS-guided prostate needle biopsy to detect target lesions. This improved transperineal cognitive fusion biopsy method enhances diagnostic accuracy, improves reproducibility, and reduces reliance on operator experience. Clinical application in 423 patients demonstrated a prostate cancer detection rate of 73.5%, with 62.9% classified as clinically significant cancers. Compared with equipment-intensive methods such as MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy, this approach is cost-effective, practical, and well-suited for broader clinical adoption. Additionally, the method's flexibility supports integration with other imaging techniques, such as 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, further improving detection rates for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Introduction

Prostate cancer is a major global health concern, with an estimated 1,466,680 new cases and 396,792 deaths reported worldwide in 2022. Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death among men1. By 2040, the number of new prostate cancer cases is projected to rise to 2.9 million, with deaths expected to reach 700,0002. Early diagnosis and standardized treatment are crucial for improving survival rates in patients with prostate cancer, and prostate biopsy remains the gold standard for early diagnosis.

Since 1968, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has bee....

Protocol

This study involving human participants was conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion in the study. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were carefully defined to ensure participant safety and the suitability of the procedure.

1. Patient selection

  1. Set the following inclusion criteria for patient selection: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 10 ng/mL; presence of a suspicious prostate nodule detected by digital rectal examination (DRE), irrespective of PSA level; suspicious lesions id....

Results

In this case, the cognitive fusion-guided prostate biopsy accurately identified a clinically significant prostate cancer lesion. This lesion was indicated by MRI in the left apex of the prostate with a maximum diameter of approximately 6 mm and a PI-RADS score of 4, suggesting a high likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer.

The pathologic diagnosis of this biopsy lesion was prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma with the following details (Figure 5):

Discussion

MRI-guided biopsy (MRI-GB) is a cornerstone of targeted prostate biopsy and includes MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB), MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy (FUS-TB), and cognitive fusion biopsy (COG-TB). MRI-TB achieves high diagnostic accuracy through real-time MR imaging, with an overall cancer detection rate of 80% and a clinically significant cancer detection rate of 55%9. However, its high cost and operational complexity limit its widespread use. FUS-TB combines MRI precision with real-time u.......

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Joint Project of Chongqing Health Commission and Science and Technology Bureau (2025MSXM046 to JY. D.), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82470420 to J.L.), and the Program for Outstanding Medical Academic Leader of Chongqing (YXLJ202406 to J.L.).

....

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
5% Povidone-Iodine SolutionChengdu Yong'an Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.H51022885For disinfection of the surgical area
10% Neutral Buffered Formalin FixativeGuangzhou Vigrass Biotechnology Co., Ltd.24010506For fixing biopsy tissue
AccuCARE Transperineal SolutionsCIVCO Medical Instruments Co., Inc620-119For supporting the probe
Injection syringe (20 mL)Shandong weigao group medical polymer Co., LTD 20211001For local anesthesia
LidocaineHubei Tiansheng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.H42021839Diluted with saline to 1% for local anesthesia
MRI 3.0TPhilipsIngeniaFor prostate examination
RadiAnt DICOM ViewerMedixantV2024.1For reading prostate MRI, outlining lesions, measuring distances, and angles
Single-use Biopsy Needle MC1820Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.REHU3231For needle biopsy sampling
Single-use Sterile Needle 0.7 x 80 TWLBZhejiang Kangdeli Medical Devices Co., Ltd.C20230923For local anesthesia
Sodium chloride injectionSouthwest pharmaceutical Co., LTDH50021610For diluting lidocaine
UltrasoundBK Medicalbk3000-01For guiding prostate biopsy

References

  1. Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 74 (3), 229-263 (2024).
  2. James, N. D. et al. The Lancet Commission on prostate cancer: planning for the surge in cases. Lancet. 403 (10437), 1683-1722 (2024).
  3. Jansen, H., Gallee, M. P., Schröder, F. H. Analysis of sonographic pattern in prostatic cancer: comparison of longitudinal and transversal transrectal ultrasound with subsequent radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol. 18 (3), 174-178 (1990).
  4. Heijmink, S. W. T. P....

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Cognitive FusionProstate BiopsyMultiparametric MRITransrectal UltrasoundLesion TargetingDiagnostic AccuracyClinical ApplicationCancer Detection RateClinically Significant CancersCost effective MethodsImaging IntegrationMRI ultrasound Fusion BiopsyHigh risk Prostate Cancer

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved