Method Article
This protocol presents the methods for creating, attaching, and tracking harmonic radar tags for insects.
Using tracking devices to follow animal movements has long been a standard approach for studying the behavior and ecology of vertebrates. Until relatively recently, these tracking methods have been unavailable to entomologists due to the prohibitively large size and mass of the tracking devices that must be attached. Technologies applied to insect tracking include radio telemetry, Bluetooth, RFID, and harmonic radar. Among these, radio telemetry is the most used method to track larger insects. It offers a longer detection range and unique signals for each tracked insect but requires expensive tags that have limited shelf and field life and are heavy, generally at least 150 milligrams. By contrast, harmonic radar tags, first used in 1986, are lighter by at least an order of magnitude, inexpensive, and have detection ranges that allow field tracking of many smaller insects. Here, we demonstrate the use of an off-the-shelf transceiver marketed for backcountry rescue. Together, inexpensive tags and off-the-shelf transceivers make this insect-tracking technique highly accessible to entomologists studying insect behavior and ecology. In this article, we will touch on creating tags, attaching tags to insects, tracking these tagged insects, and present some representative tracking results.
Employing tracking devices to study the movements of vertebrates has long been a standard approach for collecting data related to the behavior and ecology of larger animals such as mammals, birds, and fish, with tracking primarily utilizing radio telemetry and GPS tracking1. However, until relatively recently, these tracking methods have been unavailable to entomologists due to the prohibitively large size and mass of the tracking devices that must be attached2. Technologies applied to insect tracking include radio telemetry, Bluetooth, RFID, and harmonic radar2,3. Of these, radio telemetry is by far the most used method to track larger insects2. It offers a longer detection range and unique signals for each tracked insect. This method, however, requires expensive tags that have limited shelf and field life and are heavy, generally at least 150 mg. Bluetooth is the least developed technique currently, with smaller tags than radio telemetry but a shorter range as well3. RFID tags can be very small in size and are quite inexpensive but have the shortest range (often only a few mm)4. Insect tagging with RFID tags has most commonly been used to study bee workers entering and leaving the hive5. By contrast, harmonic radar tags are lighter by at least an order of magnitude than radio telemetry tags, inexpensive, and have detection ranges that allow field tracking of much smaller insects6 (Figure 1).
Harmonic radar uses a transceiver that emits a signal that energizes the tag carried by the insect and receives the frequency-doubled return signal sent by the tag7,8,9 (Figure 2). While a number of studies have described the use of harmonic radar tags with medium-sized insects6,10,11,12,13, there is no proper demonstration of how to fabricate a tag. In this article, we provide step-by-step instructions on how to fabricate two different sizes of harmonic radar tags, each constructed from a Schottky diode and nitinol wire. Smaller tags are lighter and work better for smaller insects6, while the larger tags have a greater range and can be accommodated by larger insects11. The nitinol wire is a critical design component because this wire is flexible, thereby letting the tagged insect move relatively freely. It also returns quickly to a straight orientation, allowing maximum signal return6,10,11. We also demonstrate the use of an off-the-shelf transceiver (see 'Obtaining signals' section below) marketed for backcountry rescue7,9,14. Together, inexpensive tags and off-the-shelf transceivers make this insect-tracking technique highly accessible to entomologists studying insect behavior and ecology. In this article, we touch on making tags, attaching tags to insects, tracking these tagged insects, and provide some representative tracking results.
1. Preparation
2. Large tag
NOTE: This section presents the assembly of large tags. It is important to have two wires of the correct antenna length (8.25 cm to match the transceiver frequency) for the large tags.
3. Small tag
NOTE: This section presents the assembly of small tags.
4. Large tag attachment - Queensland longhorn beetle (QLB)
5. Small tags attachment - tephritid fruit flies
6. Obtaining signals
Detection range and tag size are probably the two most important features of insect tracking tags. Here, we present representative results for the maximum detection range of the large and small tags fabricated in this article. Maximum detection ranges were determined by securing the tags longitudinally to a thick wooden dowel (~1.5 m) with double-sided tape. The maximum distance that tag signals could be detected was then determined by moving the transceiver away from the tag until no signal was audible. Ten tags of each size were tested in an open field. The maximum detection distance for the larger tags is roughly four times that of the smaller tags (Table 1). Misalignment of the tag and transceiver, along with vegetation interference, often reduces the detection range under field conditions. In our experience, we assume a detection distance of ~10 m for larger tags and ~5 m for small tags when working in tree field crops.
Finally, we would like to share the results from a representative tracking study with Queensland longhorn beetle (QLB). The aim of this study was to investigate the movement ecology of QLB, as little is known about where adult beetles spend time in the environment. As the beetles are cryptic, it is quite difficult to locate them in the environment without a tracking technique such as HR. This study was conducted in a stand of kukui trees (Aleurites moluccana) on the Big Island of Hawaii. Multiple beetles were tagged and released during the course of this study. Beetles were then located using the tracking techniques demonstrated earlier in this article. An example of the path taken by one beetle over the course of 10 days can be seen in Figure 4. Note that the beetle was tracked to multiple locations, including high in kukui trees and to dead leaves. This was an important finding of this study. As QLB can be highly cryptic, farmers have often asked about where the beetles were "hiding" around the trees. By tracking individual QLB, we were able to determine that beetles were often concealed in dry leaves, making them difficult to detect. This study offers important new insights into where QLB adults are spending time both during the day and movement during the night.
Figure 1: Comparison of devices commonly used to track insects. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Harmonic radar works by sending a signal at one frequency (blue) and then receiving the returned (frequency doubled) signal (red). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Signal strength is related to the orientation of the tag and transceiver. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Representative results from tracking a single Queensland longhorn beetle in kukui trees. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Large tags | Small tags |
64 ± 1 m | 12 ± 1 m |
Table 1: Maximum detection distances (mean ± SE, m) for insect harmonic radar tags (N = 10).
In this protocol, we describe and demonstrate how to fabricate two sizes of harmonic radar tags. In addition, we have shown how to attach these tags to insects using UV-cured adhesives and demonstrated transceiver signal strength. This protocol has been refined to allow for the streamlined fabrication of many low-cost HR tags with minimal specialized laboratory equipment. Additionally, the protocol should be accessible to researchers with experience manipulating objects under a dissecting microscope. We recommend that persons attempting to make tags begin with larger tags to develop skills in manipulating the diodes and applying the conductive adhesives. These skills can be difficult at first, but we have found from experience (teaching over 20 people) that the learning curve allows people to progress relatively quickly to making smaller tags with speed and reproducibility.
While the fabrication of two tag sizes was shown, we have also made tags with an intermediate-sized diode6, using both the smaller and larger diameter nitinol wire. Different applications, such as insect size and required detection range, influence the choice of diode and wire sizes.
The tag design used in this protocol is simpler than others used to track insects15,16,17,18. A commonly used design is to have a loop in the antenna, thereby creating a DC short across the diode18,19. Tags with loops in their antennas are usually mounted vertically on the thorax as opposed to longitudinally, as shown in this protocol. Vertical orientation potentially allows better alignment of tag and transceiver while the insect is in flight (as insects generally do not fly upside-down or with their legs toward the side). However, vertical tag orientation moves the center of the tag mass away from the insect's center of mass, thereby potentially having a greater influence on balance and flight ability.
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
We would like to thank Kate Fairbanks and James Snyder (Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services), Nicholas Manoukis (USDA-ARS-PBARC), James Yoder (Eastern Mennonite University), and Stefano De Faveri (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries) for reviewing this protocol.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Large assembly jig | https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:6784793 | ||
Large wire jig | https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:6784784 | ||
Nitinol Wire (Small) | Fort Wayne Metals (Fort Wayne, IN, USA) | 17822174 | |
RECCO R9 Handheld Detector | RECCO AB (Lidingo··, Sweden) | Frequencies of operation: Europe, 866.9 MHz (transmitting),1733.8 MHz (receiving); US, 902.85 MHz (transmitting), 1805.7 MHz (receiving) | |
RF Schottky Diode (Small) | MACOM Technology Solutions (Lowell, MA, USA) | MA4E2501L-1290 | Puchased via Richardson RFPD |
Schottky Diode (Large) | RECCO AB (Lidingo··, Sweden) | ||
Silver Conductive Epoxy Adhesive | MG Chemicals | 12642-14 (Amazon: 8331D) | Puchased via Amazon |
Small assembly jig | https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:6784791 | ||
Small wire jig | https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:6784775 | ||
Super-Elastic Nitinol Wire (Large) | McMaster-Carr (Brookpark, Ohio, USA) | 8320K31 | 0.003" Diameter x 30 Feet Long |
Ted Pella Inc Silver Conductive Epoxy | Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) | NC9959045 | |
UV Adhesive | Bondic (Niagara Falls, NY, USA) | Purchased via Amazon and/or Bondic online (notaglue.com) |
请求许可使用此 JoVE 文章的文本或图形
请求许可This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
版权所属 © 2025 MyJoVE 公司版权所有,本公司不涉及任何医疗业务和医疗服务。