Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Representative Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This study describes a method for producing chondrocytic spheroids by aggregating cells into spheroids under low-adhesion conditions using gravity, followed by culturing the resulting spheroids in mini-bioreactors.

Abstract

Cartilage repair in chronic joint diseases demands advanced cell-based therapies to regenerate damaged tissues effectively. This protocol provides a step-by-step method for differentiating induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into chondrocyte-based spheroids, supporting tissue engineering and cell therapy applications. The differentiation process is carefully structured to promote chondrogenic lineage commitment, beginning with iPSCs cultured in specific media that sequentially guide cells through critical stages of differentiation. Initially, iPSCs are expanded to reach optimal confluency before induction toward chondrogenic lineage using a series of defined media changes. By day 10, cells are transitioned to a chondrogenesis-promoting medium that enhances the formation of chondrocyte-like cells expressing key markers of mature chondrocytes. Further aggregation in 96-well agarose-coated plates leads to the formation of three-dimensional spheroids, which are then cultured in custom mini-bioreactors designed to simulate a microenvironment that encourages extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition. By enabling scalable production of chondrocyte spheroids that mimic native cartilage characteristics, this approach offers a promising, reproducible solution for developing cell-based treatments for cartilage defects, providing broad utility for clinical and research applications in musculoskeletal regenerative medicine.

Introduction

The prevalence of joint disease leads to significant economic burdens due to the increasing number of disabled patients and the costs associated with their care. Hyaline cartilage is a connective avascular tissue with limited regenerative potential1. Prolonged use of certain non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids, and chemotherapy or radiotherapy can further diminish cartilage's regenerative capacity, nearly eliminating its ability to heal2. This makes it challenging to obtain autologous cartilage cells for cellular therapy.

The technology of three-dimensional (3D)....

Protocol

​The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the LOPUKHIN FRCC PCM (protocol No. 2019/02 of April 9, 2019). All donor samples were obtained in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and/or their legal guardians.

NOTE: Maintain sterile technique throughout the protocol. Warm all culture media and solutions to 37 °C before applying them to cells or spheroids. Cultivate cells in a CO2

Representative Results

The outlined protocol is illustrated in Figure 1. This methodology employs two distinct culture media to drive the differentiation of iPSCs into chondrocyte spheroids over a minimum duration of 1 month (Figure 2). The differentiation process is initiated when iPSCs achieve 75%-90% confluency (Figure 1B). Early indicators of chondrogenic differentiation emerge around days 9-10 of cultivation in medium.......

Discussion

iPSCs represent a transformative tool in regenerative medicine, offering the potential to generate patient-specific chondrocytes for cartilage repair. Current protocols leverage directed differentiation through mesodermal pathways, with key signaling molecules like TGF-β and BMP-2 promoting chondrocytic lineage commitment. These methods aim to replicate embryonic cartilage development, enabling the production of extracellular matrix components such as collagen type II and aggrecan, essential for functional cartilage.......

Disclosures

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The research was supported with allocation #22-15-00250 by the Russian Science Foundation.

....

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
0.05% Trypsin solutionThermo Fisher Scientific25300-062
0.25% Trypsin solutionThermo Fisher Scientific25200-072
Advanced DMEM/F12 Eagle's mediumThermo Fisher Scientific12634028
Aggrecan Monoclonal AntibodyInvitrogenAHP0022Host: Mouse; Dilution: 1/500
Ascorbic acidSigmaA454450 μg/mL
B-27 supplementThermo Fisher Scientific175040441x or 2%
Beta-mercaptoethanolServa2862590 mM
BMP2Miltenyi biotec130-110-92210 ng/mL
Chir 99021Miltenyi biotec130-103-92610 μM
COL1A1 (E6A8E) Monoclonal antibodyCellSignalling39952Host: Rabbit; Dilution: 1/800
COL2A1 (M2139) Monoclonal antibodySanta Cruzsc-52658Host: Mouse; Dilution: 1/50
Collagenase type II solution PanEcoP011-20.01%
DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole)Sigma-AldrichD9542-5MG1 μg/mL
DMEM medium w/o glutaminePanEcoС420п
Fetal bovine serum Thermo Fisher Scientific1027010610%
Hanks' solution PanEcoР020п
Hybris 8 mediumPanEcoС780Е/Ф780
Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium solutionPanEcoФ0651x solution has the following concentrations: Insulin: 10 µg/mL; Transferrin: 5.5 µg/mL; Selenium 5 ng/mL
L-alanyl-L-glutamine Thermo Fisher Scientific350500382 mM
Matrigel MatrixBD354277300 μg/mL
Penicillin-Streptomycin solutionPanEcoА063п100 U/mL
Retinoic acidMiltenyi biotec130-117-33910 nM
Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632Miltenyi biotec130-103-922 10 mM
Secondary Antibody Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed, Alexa Fluor 555Thermo Fisher Scientific A21422Host: Goat; Dilution: 1/500
Secondary Antibody Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed, Alexa Fluor Plus 555Thermo Fisher Scientific А32732Host: Goat; Dilution: 1/500
Sox9 (D8G8H) Monoclonal antibodyCellSignalling82630Host: Rb; Dilution: 1/400
TeSR-1 mediumSTEMCELL technologies85850
TGF-β1 Miltenyi biotec130-095-06710 ng/mL

References

  1. Cieza, A., Causey, K., Kamenov, K., Hanson, S. W., Chatterji, S., Vos, T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 396, e10267 (2021).
  2. Hua, C., Buttgereit, F., Combe, B.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Bioengineeringchondrocytesspheroidsinduced pluripotency stem cells iPSCsdifferentiationtissue engineeringarticular cartilagechondrogenesis

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved