detection-endotoxin-nano-formulations-using-limulus-amoebocyte-lysate

Detection of Endotoxin in Nano-formulations Using Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) Assays

When present in pharmaceutical products, a Gram-negative bacterial cell wall component endotoxin (often also called lipopolysaccharide) can cause ...

Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by National Cancer Institute

Infusion reactions (IRs) are common immune-mediated side effects in patients treated with a variety of drug products, including, but not limited to, nanotechnology formulations. The mechanism of IRs is not fully understood. One of the best studied mechanisms of IRs to nanomedicines is the complement activation. However, it is largely unknown why some patients develop reactions to nanomedicines while others do not, and why some nanoparticles are more reactogenic than others. One of the theories is that the pre-existing anti-polyethylene glycol (PEG) antibodies initiate the complement activation and IRs in patients. In this study, we investigated this hypothesis in the case of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil), which, when used in a clinical setting, is known to induce IRs; referred to as complement activation-related pseudoallergy (CARPA) in sensitive individuals. We conducted the study in vitro using plasma derived from C57BL/6 mice and twenty human donor volunteers. We used mouse plasma to test a library of well-characterized mouse monoclonal antibodies with different specificity and affinity to PEG as it relates to the complement activation by Doxil. We determined the levels of pre-existing polyclonal antibodies that bind to PEG, methoxy-PEG, and PEGylated liposomes in human plasma, and we also assessed complement activation by Doxil and concentrations of complement inhibitory factors H and I in these human plasma specimens. The affinity, specificity, and other characteristics of the human polyclonal antibodies are not known at this time. Our data demonstrate that under in vitro conditions, some anti-PEG antibodies contribute to the complement activation by Doxil. Such contribution, however, needs to be considered in the context of other factors, including, but not limited to, antibody class, type, clonality, epitope specificity, affinity, and titer. In addition, our data contribute to the knowledge base used to understand and improve nanomedicine safety.

Understanding the Role of Anti-PEG Antibodies in the Complement Activation by Doxil in Vitro.

Nanotechnology provides many solutions to improve conventional drug delivery and has a unique niche in the areas related to the specific targeting of the immune system, such as immunotherapies and vaccines. Preclinical studies in this field rely heavily on the combination of in vitro and in vivo methods to assess the safety and efficacy of nanotechnology platforms, nanoparticle-formulated drugs, and vaccines. While certain types of toxicities can be evaluated in vitro and good in vitro-in vivo correlation has been demonstrated for such tests, animal studies are still needed to address complex biological questions and, therefore, provide a unique contribution to establishing nanoparticle safety and efficacy profiles. The genetic, metabolic, mechanistic, and phenotypic diversity of currently available animal models often complicates both the animal choice and the interpretation of the results. This review summarizes current knowledge about differences in the immune system function and immunological responses of animals commonly used in preclinical studies of nanomaterials. We discuss challenges, highlight current gaps, and propose recommendations for animal model selection to streamline preclinical analysis of nanotechnology formulations.

Animal models for analysis of immunological responses to nanomaterials: Challenges and considerations.

Infusion reactions (IRs) are complex, immune-mediated side effects that mainly occur within minutes to hours of receiving a therapeutic dose of intravenously administered pharmaceutical products. These products are diverse and include both traditional pharmaceuticals (for example biological agents and small molecules) and new ones (for example nanotechnology-based products). Although IRs are not unique to nanomedicines, they represent a hurdle for the translation of nanotechnology-based drug products. This Perspective offers a big picture of the pharmaceutical field and examines current understanding of mechanisms responsible for IRs to nanomedicines. We outline outstanding questions, review currently available experimental evidence to provide some answers and highlight the gaps. We review advantages and limitations of the in vitro tests and animal models used for studying IRs to nanomedicines. Finally, we propose a roadmap to improve current understanding, and we recommend a strategy for overcoming the problem.

Marina A. Dobrovolskaia

Nanotechnology Characterization Lab.,
Cancer Research Technology Program,
Nanotechnology Characterization Lab., Cancer Research Technology Program

Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by National Cancer Institute

Detection of Endotoxin in Nano-formulations Using Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) Assays

Marina A. Dobrovolskaia

.css-o250i3{font-size:18px;font-family:Open Sans,sans-serif;line-height:21.6px;}Nanotechnology Characterization Lab.,Cancer Research Technology Program,Nanotechnology Characterization Lab., Cancer Research Technology Program

Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by National Cancer Institute

Detection of Endotoxin in Nano-formulations Using Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) Assays

Nanotechnology Characterization Lab.,
Cancer Research Technology Program,
Nanotechnology Characterization Lab., Cancer Research Technology Program