an-unbiased-approach-of-sampling-tem-sections-in-neuroscience

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

Investigations of the ultrastructural features of neurons and their synapses are only possible with electron microscopy. Especially for comparative ...

Medical University of Graz

The maintenance of gastrointestinal mucosal integrity depends on the rapid alarm of protective mechanisms in the face of pending injury. To this end, the gastric mucosa is innervated by intrinsic sensory neurons and two populations of extrinsic sensory neurons: vagal and spinal afferents. Extrinsic afferent neurons constitute an emergency system that is called into operation when the gastrointestinal mucosa is endangered by noxious chemicals. The function of these chemoceptive afferents can selectively be manipulated and explored with the use of capsaicin which acts via a cation channel termed TRPV1. Many of the homeostatic actions of spinal afferents are brought about by transmitter release from their peripheral endings. When stimulated by noxious chemicals, these afferents enhance gastrointestinal blood flow and activate hyperaemia-dependent and hyperaemia-independent mechanisms of protection and repair. In the rodent foregut these local regulatory roles of sensory neurons are mediated by calcitonin gene-related peptide and nitric oxide. The pathophysiological potential of the neural emergency system is best portrayed by the gastric hyperaemic response to acid back-diffusion, which is governed by spinal afferent nerve fibres. This mechanism limits damage to the surface of the mucosa and creates favourable conditions for rapid restitution and healing of the wounded mucosa. Other extrinsic afferent neurons, particularly in the vagus nerve, subserve gastrointestinal homeostasis by signalling noxious events in the foregut to the central nervous system and eliciting autonomic, emotional-affective and neuroendocrine reactions. Under conditions of inflammation and injury, chemoceptive afferents are sensitized to peripheral stimuli and in this functional state contribute to the hyperalgesia associated with functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. Thus, if GI pain is to be treated by sensory neuron-directed drugs it needs to be considered that these drugs do not inhibit nociception at the expense of GI mucosal vulnerability.

Efferent-like roles of afferent neurons in the gut: Blood flow regulation and tissue protection.

Gastrointestinal motility disturbances in critically ill patients are frequent in the ICU setting, causing considerable discomfort and are associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. This review focuses on the pathophysiological basis of intestinal motility, the major patterns of pathological motility alterations, the impact on patient outcome, and current therapeutic options.

Intestinal motility disturbances in intensive care patients pathogenesis and clinical impact.

Luminal acidity is a physiological challenge in the foregut, and acidosis can occur throughout the gastrointestinal tract as a result of inflammation or ischemia. These conditions are surveyed by an elaborate network of acid-governed mechanisms to maintain homeostasis. Deviations from physiological values of extracellular pH are monitored by multiple acid sensors expressed by epithelial cells and sensory neurons. Acid-sensing ion channels are activated by moderate acidification, whereas transient receptor potential ion channels of the vanilloid subtype are gated by severe acidosis. Some ionotropic purinoceptor ion channels and two-pore domain background K(+) channels are also sensitive to alterations of extracellular pH.

Taste receptors in the gastrointestinal tract. V. Acid sensing in the gastrointestinal tract.

Microbial metabolites are known to affect immune system, brain, and behavior via activation of pattern recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). Unlike the effect of the TLR4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS), the role of other TLR agonists in immune-brain communication is insufficiently understood. We therefore hypothesized that the TLR2 agonist lipoteichoic acid (LTA) causes immune activation in the periphery and brain, stimulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and has an adverse effect on blood-brain barrier (BBB) and emotional behavior. Since LTA preparations may be contaminated by LPS, an extract of LTA (LTA), purified LTA (LTA), and pure LPS (LPS) were compared with each other in their effects on molecular and behavioral parameters 3h after intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection to male C57BL/6N mice. The LTA (20mg/kg) induced anxiety-related behavior in the open field test, enhanced the circulating levels of particular cytokines and the cerebral expression of cytokine mRNA, and blunted the cerebral expression of tight junction protein mRNA. A dose of LPS matching the amount of endotoxin/LPS contaminating the LTA reproduced several of the molecular and behavioral effects of LTA. LTA (20mg/kg) increased plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 and interferon-γ, and enhanced the transcription of TNF-α, interleukin-1β and other cytokines in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex. These neuroinflammatory effects of LTA were associated with transcriptional down-regulation of tight junction-associated proteins (claudin 5, occludin) in the brain. LTA also enhanced circulating corticosterone, but failed to alter locomotor and anxiety-related behavior in the open field test. These data disclose that TLR2 agonism by LTA causes peripheral immune activation and initiates neuroinflammatory processes in the brain that are associated with down-regulation of BBB components and activation of the HPA axis, although emotional behavior (anxiety) is not affected. The results obtained with an LTA preparation contaminated with LPS hint at a facilitatory interaction between TLR2 and TLR4, the adverse impact of which on long-term neuroinflammation, disruption of the BBB and mental health warrants further analysis.

Diverse action of lipoteichoic acid and lipopolysaccharide on neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier disruption, and anxiety in mice.

The gut microbiota and the brain interact with each other through multiple bidirectional signaling pathways in which neuropeptides and neuroactive peptide messengers play potentially important mediator roles. Currently, six particular modes of a neuropeptide link are emerging. (i) Neuropeptides and neurotransmitters contribute to the mutual microbiota-host interaction. (ii) The synthesis of neuroactive peptides is influenced by microbial control of the availability of amino acids. (iii) The activity of neuropeptides is tempered by microbiota-dependent autoantibodies. (iv) Peptide signaling between periphery and brain is modified by a regulatory action of the gut microbiota on the blood-brain barrier. (v) Within the brain, gut hormones released under the influence of the gut microbiota turn into neuropeptides that regulate multiple aspects of brain activity. (vi) Cerebral neuropeptides participate in the molecular, behavioral, and autonomic alterations which the brain undergoes in response to signals from the gut microbiota.

Neuropeptides, Microbiota, and Behavior.

The global prevalence of diabesity is on the rise, and the clinical, social and economic health burden arising from this epidemic is aggravated by a significant co-morbidity of diabesity with neuropsychiatric disease, particularly depression. Importantly, not only is the prevalence of mood disorders elevated in patients with type 2 diabetes, depressed patients are also more prone to develop diabetes. This reciprocal relationship calls for a molecular and systemic analysis of diabesity-brain interactions to guide preventive and therapeutic strategies. The analysis we are presenting in this review is modelled on the microbiota-gut-brain axis, which provides the brain with information from the gut not only via the nervous system, but also via a continuous stream of microbial, endocrine, metabolic and immune messages. This communication network offers important clues as to how obesity and diabetes could target the brain to provoke neuropsychiatric disease. There is emerging evidence that the gut microbiota is orchestrating a multiplicity of bodily functions that are intimately related to the immune, metabolic and nervous systems and that gut dysbiosis spoils the homeostasis between these systems. In our article we highlight two groups of molecular links that seem to have a significant bearing on the impact of diabesity on the brain. On the one hand, we focus on microbiota-related metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids, tryptophan metabolites, immune stimulants and endocannabinoids that are likely to play a mediator role. On the other hand, we discuss signalling molecules that operate primarily in the brain, specifically neuropeptide Y, brain-derived neurotrophic factor and γ-amino butyric acid, that are disturbed by microbial factors, obesity and diabetes and are relevant to mental illness. Finally, we address the usefulness of diet-related interventions to suspend the deleterious relationship between diabesity and mood disorders.

Peter Holzer

Department of Pharmacology,
Otto Loewi Research Center,
Department of Pharmacology, Otto Loewi Research Center

Medical University of Graz

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

Peter Holzer

Department of Pharmacology,Otto Loewi Research Center,Department of Pharmacology, Otto Loewi Research Center

Medical University of Graz

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

Department of Pharmacology,
Otto Loewi Research Center,
Department of Pharmacology, Otto Loewi Research Center