real-time-bioluminescence-imaging-notch-signaling-dynamics-during

Real-time Bioluminescence Imaging of Notch Signaling Dynamics during Murine Neurogenesis

Notch signaling regulates the maintenance of neural stem/progenitor cells by cell-cell interactions. The components of Notch signaling exhibit dynamic ...

Kyoto University

Expression of the Notch effector gene Hes1 is required for maintenance of neural progenitors in the embryonic brain, but persistent and high levels of Hes1 expression inhibit proliferation and differentiation of these cells. Here, by using a real-time imaging method, we found that Hes1 expression dynamically oscillates in neural progenitors. Furthermore, sustained overexpression of Hes1 downregulates expression of proneural genes, Notch ligands, and cell cycle regulators, suggesting that their proper expression depends on Hes1 oscillation. Surprisingly, the proneural gene Neurogenin2 (Ngn2) and the Notch ligand Delta-like1 (Dll1) are also expressed in an oscillatory manner by neural progenitors, and inhibition of Notch signaling, a condition known to induce neuronal differentiation, leads to downregulation of Hes1 and sustained upregulation of Ngn2 and Dll1. These results suggest that Hes1 oscillation regulates Ngn2 and Dll1 oscillations, which in turn lead to maintenance of neural progenitors by mutual activation of Notch signaling.

Oscillations in notch signaling regulate maintenance of neural progenitors.

In the developing mammalian nervous system, neural progenitor cells first express the Notch effector Hes1 at variable levels and then proneural genes and Notch ligands in salt-and-pepper patterns. Recent real-time imaging analysis indicates that Hes1 expression in these cells oscillates with a period of about 2-3 h. Furthermore, the proneural gene Neurogenin-2 (Ngn2) and the Notch ligand gene Deltalike-1 (Dll1) are expressed cyclically in neural progenitor cells under the control of Hes1 oscillation but are expressed continuously in postmitotic neurons, which lose Hes1 expression. Hes1-driven Ngn2 and Dll1 oscillations seem to be advantageous for maintenance of a group of cells in an undifferentiated state by mutual activation of Notch signaling. This dynamic mode of gene expression would require a revision of the traditional view of how Notch-mediated lateral inhibition operates in the developing mammalian nervous system.

Dynamic Notch signaling in neural progenitor cells and a revised view of lateral inhibition.

In mouse embryos, somite formation occurs every two hours, and this periodic event is regulated by a biological clock called the segmentation clock, which involves cyclic expression of the basic helix-loop-helix gene Hes7. Hes7 expression oscillates by negative feedback and is cooperatively regulated by Fgf and Notch signaling. Both loss of expression and sustained expression of Hes7 result in severe somite fusion, suggesting that Hes7 oscillation is required for proper somite segmentation. Expression of a related gene, Hes1, also oscillates by negative feedback with a period of about two hours in many cell types such as neural progenitor cells. Hes1 is required for maintenance of neural progenitor cells, but persistent Hes1 expression inhibits proliferation and differentiation of these cells, suggesting that Hes1 oscillation is required for their proper activities. Hes1 oscillation regulates cyclic expression of the proneural gene Neurogenin2 (Ngn2) and the Notch ligand Delta1, which in turn lead to maintenance of neural progenitor cells by mutual activation of Notch signaling. Taken together, these results suggest that oscillatory expression with short periods (ultradian oscillation) plays an important role in many biological events.

Rhythmic gene expression in somite formation and neural development.

In the developing nervous system, differentiating neurons express Delta and activate Notch signaling in their neighboring cells. As a result of Notch activation, neuronal differentiation is inhibited in neighboring cells and they remain neural progenitor cells. Thus, differentiation of neurons and maintenance of neural progenitor cells are well balanced owing to Notch signaling. Recent studies revealed that Notch signaling is under the control of more complex and dynamic regulation than previously thought, such as cell cycle dependent activation and oscillating gene expression. We discuss here recent advances in understanding how Notch signaling is regulated in the developing nervous system and what outcome each type of regulation of Notch signaling leads to. We highlight the role of Notch signaling in proliferation and differentiation of neural progenitor cells.

Dynamic regulation of Notch signaling in neural progenitor cells.

Notch signaling regulates many dynamic processes; accordingly, expression of genes in this pathway is also dynamic. In mouse embryos, one dynamic process regulated by Notch is somite segmentation, which occurs with a 2-h periodicity. This periodic event is regulated by a biological clock called the segmentation clock, which involves cyclic expression of the Notch effector gene Hes7. Loss of Hes7 expression and sustained expression of Hes7 result in identical and severe somite defects, suggesting that Hes7 oscillation is required for proper somite segmentation. Mathematical models of this oscillator have been used to generate and test hypothesis, helping to uncover the role of negative feedback in regulating the oscillator. Oscillations of another Notch effector gene, Hes1, plays an important role in maintenance of neural stem cells. Hes1 expression oscillates with a period of about 2-3h in neural stem cells, whereas sustained Hes1 expression inhibits proliferation and differentiation of these cells, suggesting that Hes1 oscillations are important for their proper activities. Hes1 inhibits its own expression as well as the expression of the proneural gene Neurogenin2 and the Notch ligand Delta1, driving oscillations of these two genes. Delta1 oscillations in turn maintain neural stem cells by mutual activation of Notch signaling, which re-activates Hes1 to close the cycle. Hes1 expression also oscillates in embryonic stem (ES) cells. Cells expressing low and high levels of Hes1 tend to differentiate into neural and mesodermal cells, respectively. Furthermore, Hes1-null ES cells display early and uniform neural differentiation, indicating that Hes1 oscillations act to promote multipotency by generating heterogeneity in both the differentiation timing and the fate choice. Taken together, these results suggest that Notch signaling can drive short-period oscillatory expression of Hes7 and Hes1 (ultradian oscillation) and that ultradian oscillations are important for many biological events.

Ultradian oscillations in Notch signaling regulate dynamic biological events.

Somitogenesis is controlled by cyclic genes such as Notch effectors and by the wave front established by morphogens such as Fgf8, but the precise mechanism of how these factors are coordinated remains to be determined. Here, we show that effectors of Notch and Fgf pathways oscillate in different dynamics and that oscillations in Notch signaling generate alternating phase shift, thereby periodically segregating a group of synchronized cells, whereas oscillations in Fgf signaling released these synchronized cells for somitogenesis at the same time. These results suggest that Notch oscillators define the prospective somite region, while Fgf oscillators regulate the pace of segmentation.

Different types of oscillations in Notch and Fgf signaling regulate the spatiotemporal periodicity of somitogenesis.

In neural stem/progenitor cells, expression of the Notch effector Hes1, a transcriptional repressor, oscillates with a period of 2-3 h by negative feedback, and Hes1 oscillations induce the oscillatory expression of the proneural gene Neurogenin2 (Ngn2) and the Notch ligand gene Delta-like1 (Dll1). Dll1 oscillation leads to the mutual activation of Notch signaling between neighboring cells, thereby maintaining a group of cells in the undifferentiated state. Not all cells express Hes1 in an oscillatory manner: cells in boundary regions such as the isthmus express Hes1 in a sustained manner, and these cells are rather dormant with regard to proliferation and differentiation. Thus, Hes1 allows cell proliferation and differentiation when its expression oscillates but induces dormancy when its expression is sustained. After Hes1 expression is repressed, Ngn2 is expressed in a sustained manner, promoting neuronal differentiation. Thus, Ngn2 leads to the maintenance of neural stem/progenitor cells by inducing Dll1 oscillation when its expression oscillates but to neuronal differentiation when its expression is sustained. These results indicate that the different dynamics of Hes1 and Ngn2 lead to different outcomes.

Dynamic expression of notch signaling genes in neural stem/progenitor cells.

During mammalian brain development, neural stem cells transform from neuroepithelial cells to radial glial cells and finally remain as astrocyte-like cells in the postnatal and adult brain. Neuroepithelial cells divide symmetrically and expand the neural stem cell pool; after the onset of neurogenesis, radial glial cells sequentially produce deep layer neurons and then superficial layer neurons by asymmetric, self-renewing divisions during cortical development. Thereafter, gliogenesis supersedes neurogenesis, while a subset of neural stem cells retain their stemness and lurk in the postnatal and adult brain. Thus, neural stem cells undergo alterations in morphology and the capacity to proliferate or give rise to various types of neural cells in a temporally regulated manner. To shed light on the temporal alterations of embryonic neural stem cells, we sorted the green fluorescent protein-positive cells from the dorsolateral telencephalon (neocortical region) of pHes1-d2EGFP transgenic mouse embryos at different developmental stages and performed gene expression profiling. Among dozens of transcription factors differentially expressed by cells in the ventricular zone during the course of development, several of them exhibited the activity to inhibit neuronal differentiation when overexpressed. Furthermore, knockdown of Tcf3 or Klf15 led to accelerated neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells in the developing cortex, and neurospheres originated from Klf15 knockdown cells mostly lacked neurogenic activities and only retained gliogenic activities. These results suggest that Tcf3 and Klf15 play critical roles in the maintenance of neural stem cells at early and late embryonic stages, respectively.

Gene expression profiling of neural stem cells and identification of regulators of neural differentiation during cortical development.

Notch signaling plays crucial roles in fate determination and the differentiation of neural stem cells in embryonic and adult brains. It is now clear that the notch pathway is under more complex and dynamic regulation than previously thought. To understand the functional details of notch signaling more precisely, it is important to reveal when, where, and how notch signaling is dynamically communicated between cells, for which the visualization of notch signaling is essential. In this review, we introduce recent technical advances in the visualization of notch signaling during neural development and in the adult brain, and we discuss the physiological significance of dynamic regulation of notch signaling.

Genetic visualization of notch signaling in mammalian neurogenesis.

The basic helix-loop-helix factors Hes1 and Hes5 repress the expression of proneural factors such as Ascl1, thereby inhibiting neuronal differentiation and maintaining neural progenitor cells (NPCs). Hes1 expression oscillates by negative feedback with a period of about 2-3 h in proliferating NPCs. Induction of sustained expression of Hes1 in NPCs inhibits their cell-cycle progression, suggesting that the oscillatory expression of Hes1 is important for the proliferation of NPCs. Hes1 oscillation drives the oscillatory expression of proneural factors such as Ascl1 by periodic repression. By contrast, in differentiating neurons, Hes1 expression disappears and the expression of proneural factors is up-regulated and sustained. A new optogenetics approach that induces Ascl1 expression by blue light illumination demonstrated that sustained expression of Ascl1 induces neuronal differentiation, whereas oscillatory expression of Ascl1 activates the proliferation of NPCs. These results together indicate that Hes1 regulates the oscillatory versus sustained expression of the proneural factor Ascl1, which in turn regulates the proliferation of NPCs and the subsequent processes of cell-cycle exit and neuronal fate determination, depending on the expression dynamics.

Dynamic expression and roles of Hes factors in neural development.

Somites, metameric structures, give rise to the vertebral column, ribs, skeletal muscles and subcutaneous tissues. In mouse embryos, a pair of somites is formed every 2h by segmentation of the anterior parts of the presomitic mesoderm. This periodic event is regulated by a biological clock called the segmentation clock, which involves cyclic expression of the basic helix-loop-helix gene Hes7. Hes7 oscillation is regulated by negative feedback with a delayed timing. This process has been mathematically simulated by differential-delay equations, which predict that negative feedback with shorter delays would abolish oscillations or produce dampened but more rapid oscillations. We found that reducing the number of introns within the Hes7 gene shortens the delay and abolishes Hes7 oscillation or results in a more rapid tempo of Hes7 oscillation, increasing the number of somites and vertebrae in the cervical and upper thoracic region. We also found that Hes1, a Hes7-related gene, is expressed in an oscillatory manner by many cell types, including fibroblasts and neural stem cells. In these cells, Hes1 expression oscillates with a period of about 2-3h, and this oscillation is important for cell cycle progression. Furthermore, in neural stem cells, Hes1 oscillation drives cyclic expression of the proneural genes Ascl1 and Neurogenin2 and regulates multipotency. Hes1 expression oscillates more slowly in embryonic stem cells, and Hes1 oscillation regulates their fate preferences. Taken together, these results suggest that oscillatory expression with short periods (ultradian oscillation) is important for many biological events.

The roles and mechanism of ultradian oscillatory expression of the mouse Hes genes.

The Notch signaling effectors Hes1 and Hes7 exhibit oscillatory expression with a period of about 2-3 h during embryogenesis. Hes1 oscillation is important for proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells, whereas Hes7 oscillation regulates periodic formation of somites. Continuous expression of Hes1 and Hes7 inhibits these developmental processes. Thus, expression dynamics are very important for gene functions, but it is difficult to distinguish between oscillatory and persistent expression by conventional methods such as in situ hybridization and immunostaining. Here, we describe time-lapse imaging methods using destabilized luciferase reporters and a highly sensitive cooled charge-coupled device camera, which can monitor dynamic gene expression. Furthermore, the expression of two genes can be examined simultaneously by a dual reporter system using two-color luciferase reporters. Time-lapse imaging analyses reveal how dynamically gene expression changes in many biological events.

Visualization of Notch signaling oscillation in cells and tissues.

Notch signaling regulates tissue morphogenesis through cell-cell interactions. The Notch effectors Hes1 and Hes7 are expressed in an oscillatory manner and regulate developmental processes such as neurogenesis and somitogenesis, respectively. Expression of the mRNA for the mouse Notch ligand Delta-like1 (Dll1) is also oscillatory. However, the dynamics of Dll1 protein expression are controversial, and their functional significance is unknown. Here, we developed a live-imaging system and found that Dll1 protein expression oscillated in neural progenitors and presomitic mesoderm cells. Notably, when Dll1 expression was accelerated or delayed by shortening or elongating the Dll1 gene, Dll1 oscillations became severely dampened or quenched at intermediate levels, as modeled mathematically. Under this condition, Hes1 and Hes7 oscillations were also dampened. In the presomitic mesoderm, steady Dll1 expression led to severe fusion of somites and their derivatives, such as vertebrae and ribs. In the developing brain, steady Dll1 expression inhibited proliferation of neural progenitors and accelerated neurogenesis, whereas optogenetic induction of Dll1 oscillation efficiently maintained neural progenitors. These results indicate that the appropriate timing of Dll1 expression is critical for the oscillatory networks and suggest the functional significance of oscillatory cell-cell interactions in tissue morphogenesis.

Oscillatory control of Delta-like1 in cell interactions regulates dynamic gene expression and tissue morphogenesis.

During somite segmentation, mRNA expression of the mouse Notch ligand Delta-like1 (Dll1) oscillates synchronously in the presomitic mesoderm (PSM). However, the dynamics of Dll1 protein expression were rather controversial, and their functional significance was not known. Recent live-imaging analysis showed that Dll1 protein expression also oscillates synchronously in the PSM. Interestingly, accelerated or delayed Dll1 expression by shortening or elongating the Dll1 gene, respectively, dampens or quenches Dll1 oscillation at intermediate levels, a phenomenon known as "amplitude/oscillation death" of coupled oscillators in mathematical modeling. Under this condition, oscillation of the Notch effector Hes7 is also dampened, leading to severe fusion of somites and their derivatives, such as vertebrae and ribs. Thus, the appropriate timing of Dll1 expression is critical for its oscillatory expression, pointing to the functional significance of Dll1-mediated oscillatory cell-cell interactions in the segmentation clock. In neural stem cells, Dll1 expression is also oscillatory, but non-synchronous, and when Dll1 oscillation is dampened, oscillation of another Notch effector, Hes1, is also dampened, leading to defects of neural development. In this review, we discuss the underlying mechanism for the different oscillatory dynamics (synchronous versus non-synchronous) in the PSM and neural stem cells in a unified manner.

Oscillatory control of Delta-like1 in somitogenesis and neurogenesis: A unified model for different oscillatory dynamics.

A study by Tsiairis and Aulehla (2016), published in Cell, reveals that randomized mixtures of dissociated presomitic mesoderm (PSM) cells reestablish wave-like propagating patterns of oscillatory gene expression by tuning the oscillation dynamics in response to surrounding cells. Thus, PSM cells self-organize the phase-coupled oscillators.

Making Waves toward the Shore by Synchronicity.

The transcription factor Hes family bHLH transcription factor 1 (Hes1) is a downstream effector of Notch signaling and plays a crucial role in orchestrating developmental processes during the embryonic stage. However, its aberrant signaling in adulthood is linked to the pathogenesis of cancer. In the present study, we report the discovery of small organic molecules (JI051 and JI130) that impair the ability of Hes1 to repress transcription. Hes1 interacts with the transcriptional corepressor transducing-like enhancer of split 1 (TLE1) via an interaction domain comprising two tryptophan residues, prompting us to search a chemical library of 1,800 small molecules enriched for indole-like π-electron-rich pharmacophores for a compound that blocks Hes1-mediated transcriptional repression. This screening identified a lead compound whose extensive chemical modification to improve potency yielded JI051, which inhibited HEK293 cell proliferation with an EC50 of 0.3 μM. Unexpectedly, using immunomagnetic isolation and nanoscale LC-MS/MS, we found that JI051 does not bind TLE1 but instead interacts with prohibitin 2 (PHB2), a cancer-associated protein chaperone. We also found that JI051 stabilizes PHB2's interaction with Hes1 outside the nucleus, inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest. Of note, JI051 dose-dependently reduced cell growth of the human pancreatic cancer cell line MIA PaCa-2, and JI130 treatment significantly reduced tumor volume in a murine pancreatic tumor xenograft model. These results suggest a previously unrecognized role for PHB2 in the regulation of Hes1 and may inform potential strategies for managing pancreatic cancer.

Small-molecule screening yields a compound that inhibits the cancer-associated transcription factor Hes1 via the PHB2 chaperone.

The Notch effectors Hes1 and Hes7 and the Notch ligand Delta-like1 (Dll1) are expressed in an oscillatory manner during neurogenesis and somitogenesis. These two biological events exhibit different types of oscillations: anti-/out-of-phase oscillation in neural stem cells during neurogenesis and in-phase oscillation in presomitic mesoderm (PSM) cells during somitogenesis. Accelerated or delayed Dll1 expression by shortening or elongating the size of the Dll1 gene, respectively, dampens or quenches Dll1 oscillation at intermediate levels, a phenomenon known as "amplitude/oscillation death" of coupled oscillators. Under this condition, both Hes1 oscillation in neural stem cells and Hes7 oscillation in PSM cells are also dampened. As a result, maintenance of neural stem cells is impaired, leading to microcephaly, while somite segmentation is impaired, leading to severe fusion of somites and their derivatives, such as vertebrae and ribs. Thus, the appropriate timing of Dll1 expression is critical for the oscillatory expression in Notch signaling and normal processes of neurogenesis and somitogenesis. Optogenetic analysis indicated that Dll1 oscillations transfer the oscillatory information between neighboring cells, which may induce anti-/out-of-phase and in-phase oscillations depending on the delay in signaling transmission. These oscillatory dynamics can be described in a unified manner by mathematical modeling.

Oscillatory Control of Notch Signaling in Development.

During brain development, neural stem cells change their competency to give sequential rise to neurons and glial cells. Expression of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH)-type cell-fate determination factors Ascl1, Olig2, and Hes1 is oscillatory in neural stem cells. Conversely, sustained expression of these factors mediates cell-fate determination. Optogenetic analyses suggest that oscillatory expression regulates maintenance and proliferation of neural stem cells, and that sustained expression induces cell-fate determination. Expression of the Notch ligand Delta-like1 (Dll1), which is controlled by Hes1 and Ascl1, is also oscillatory in neural stem cells. Mathematical modeling showed that if the timing of Dll1 expression is changed, Hes1 oscillations are severely dampened, resulting in impaired maintenance and proliferation of neural stem cells and causing microcephaly. Another bHLH factor, Hes5, also shows oscillatory expression in neural stem cells. Hes5 overexpression and knock-out result in abnormal expression of Hmga1 and Hmga2, which are essential for timing the switching of neural stem-cell competency. These data indicate that oscillatory expression of bHLH factors is important for normal neural stem-cell function in the developing nervous system.

Hiromi Shimojo

Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences

Kyoto University

Real-time Bioluminescence Imaging of Notch Signaling Dynamics during Murine Neurogenesis

Hiromi Shimojo

.css-o250i3{font-size:18px;font-family:Open Sans,sans-serif;line-height:21.6px;}Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences

Kyoto University

Real-time Bioluminescence Imaging of Notch Signaling Dynamics during Murine Neurogenesis

Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences