Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
Across a wide variety of disease indications, more physiologically relevant models are being developed and implemented into drug discovery programs. The new model system described here demonstrates how three-dimensional tumor spheroids can be cultured and screened in a high-throughput 1536-well plate-based system to search for new oncology drugs.
Cancer cells have routinely been cultured in two dimensions (2D) on a plastic surface. This technique, however, lacks the true environment a tumor mass is exposed to in vivo. Solid tumors grow not as a sheet attached to plastic, but instead as a collection of clonal cells in a three-dimensional (3D) space interacting with their neighbors, and with distinct spatial properties such as the disruption of normal cellular polarity. These interactions cause 3D-cultured cells to acquire morphological and cellular characteristics which are more relevant to in vivo tumors. Additionally, a tumor mass is in direct contact with other cell types such as stromal and immune cells, as well as the extracellular matrix from all other cell types. The matrix deposited is comprised of macromolecules such as collagen and fibronectin.
In an attempt to increase the translation of research findings in oncology from bench to bedside, many groups have started to investigate the use of 3D model systems in their drug development strategies. These systems are thought to be more physiologically relevant because they attempt to recapitulate the complex and heterogeneous environment of a tumor. These systems, however, can be quite complex, and, although amenable to growth in 96-well formats, and some now even in 384, they offer few choices for large-scale growth and screening. This observed gap has led to the development of the methods described here in detail to culture tumor spheroids in a high-throughput capacity in 1536-well plates. These methods represent a compromise to the highly complex matrix-based systems, which are difficult to screen, and conventional 2D assays. A variety of cancer cell lines harboring different genetic mutations are successfully screened, examining compound efficacy by using a curated library of compounds targeting the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase or MAPK pathway. The spheroid culture responses are then compared to the response of cells grown in 2D, and differential activities are reported. These methods provide a unique protocol for testing compound activity in a high-throughput 3D setting.
In the past decade, more and more studies have implemented the use of 3D cell culture models to understand concepts that are not fully recapitulated by growing cells in 2D on plastic. Examples of these concepts include the alternations in normal epithelial cell polarity1 where the spatial orientation of apical and basal layers of cells are lost, as well as the role of the extracellular matrix in regulating survival and cell fate. Oncology research, in particular, has used 3D models to understand the basic biology of cancer cells and the differences between 2D and 3D cell culture systems3,4. The development of more sophisticated cell culture techniques and their further adaption to multi-well formats has enabled the search for new drugs in 3D settings. In contrast to cells grown under 2D conditions, 3D models of tumors range in complexity from layered cellular systems5 to single-cell-type spheres of different sizes, to complex multi-cell-type spheres6,7,8. The discovery of novel compounds or biologics that potently induce cell death in these 3D model systems is, therefore, of high interest in drug development campaigns. Endpoints of these assays are often identical to those performed in 2D cultures to assess changes in cell proliferation, but when conducted in a more physiologically relevant setting, they may reveal the true level of dependency of the target gene or pathway being interrogated.
As introduced above, a variety of model systems have been developed to study drug responses in 3D culture systems, but the majority use either 96 or 384-well microtiter plates and are not easily adaptable to the high-throughput screening (HTS) formats often used in drug discovery screening campaigns. Such systems include the use of hanging droplet technologies, spheroid cultures, pulsating cells with magnetic particles to induce levitation, and cultures incorporating natural or synthetic gels such as collagen, Matrigel, or polyethylene glycol (PEG)2. Here, we present the detailed methods of a previously developed technique to produce 3D spheroid cultures from established cancer cell lines in a 1536-well plate format. In this protocol, a highly defined medium is used which prevents the attachment of normally adherent cell lines9. This system has limitations (i.e., it cannot fully recapitulate a complex model system of cancer), but nevertheless, these assays enable a high-throughput screening of large collections of small molecules and crosswise comparisons of drug response between 2D and 3D cultures against a variety of cell lines and compounds.
The cell lines selected to demonstrate the methods in this article all harbor mutations in genes related to the MAPK signaling pathway, a pathway which is highly dysregulated in cancer, and for which many therapeutics are available. Many of the lines have activating oncogenic mutations in the Kirsten Rat Sarcoma virus also referred to as KRAS, the Neuroblastoma RAS or NRAS, the Harvey Rat Sarcoma virus oncogene or HRAS, and the associated kinases Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcomas, also known as RAFs. Recent literature suggests that the inhibitors of different nodes of this pathway are uniquely more efficacious in a subset of the cell lines when grown under 3D conditions9,10. One study found that when cancer cells with active RAS were cultured in 3D, they demonstrated an increased sensitivity to MAPK inhibitors, and further, that this approach could identify pathways and targeted inhibitors that might be missed in the traditional 2D setting. The goal of this study is to present the methods used to culture these cell lines, and further, to demonstrate the differential responses to these inhibitors which can be observed only when using 3D cell culture systems.
1. Culturing of 1536-well 3D Tumor Spheroids
2. Culturing of 1536-well 2D Cancer Lines
NOTE: The 1536-well 2D cancer lines should be cultured 24 h before the addition of the compound to the 3D plates.
3. Compound Addition
4. Detection Reagent Addition and the Acquirement of Raw Data
5. Data Processing
A variety of established cancer cell lines known to grow well under 2D culture conditions were tested using the methods outlined here. Representative images from a variety of MAPK mutant cancer cell lines (Calu-6:KRAS, NCI-H1299:NRAS, SK-MEL-30:NRAS, and KNS-62:HRAS) are seen in Figure 1. These images demonstrate that although the cell lines have various morphologies, each formed 3D structures in the 1536-well assay plates. Figure 2
The methods presented here demonstrate a detailed protocol on how to produce tumor spheroids in 1536-well plates for large-scale compound screenings. These methods were initially adapted from work at the National Cancer Institute where tumor spheroids were grown in low- throughput assays in 6-well and 96-well plates to ask questions about genetic dependencies and compound sensitivity13,14,15. A critical and unique feature of thi...
The authors are employees of Novartis, and some employees are also stockholders.
The authors would like to acknowledge Marc Ferrer at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health for his support and guidance on the initial development of these assays. In addition, we would like to thank Alyson Freeman, Mariela Jaskelioff, Michael Acker, Jacob Haling, and Vesselina Cooke for their scientific input and discussion as project team members.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Reagents | |||
DMEM Dulbecco`s Modified Eagle Media (DMEM)/F12 | ATCC | 30-2006 | Purchased as a prepared solution. This reciepe was found to be preferred compared to other vendors. |
DMEM Dulbecco`s Modified Eagle Media (DMEM)/F12 | Lonza | 12-604F | Purchased as a prepared solution. |
Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) | Lonza | 12-115Q | Purchased as a prepared solution. |
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) | Seradigm | 1500-500 | Purchased as a prepared solution. |
1x 0.25% Trypsin with Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) | Hyclone | SH30042.01 | Purchased as a prepared solution. |
1x Penicillin/Streptomycin | Gibco | 15140 | Purchased as a prepared solution. |
10 ng/mL Human basic Fibrobast Growth Factor (bFGF) | Sigma | F0291 | Resuspend in sterile water. |
20 ng/mL Human Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) | Sigma | E9644 | Resuspend in sterile water. |
0.4% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) | Sigma | A9418 | Resuspend in sterile PBS and filter. |
1x Insulin Transferrin Selenium (ITS) | Gibco | 51500056 | |
1% KnockOut (KO) Serum Replacement | Gibco | 10828-028 | Add fresh right before use. |
100% Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) | Sigma | 276855-100ML | |
CellTiter-Glo | Promega | G7573 | Purchased as a prepared solution. |
Consumables | |||
Small Combi Cassette | ThermoFisher | 24073295 | |
Small Multiflow Cassette | BioTek | 294085 | |
1536-well sterile TC plates (white) | Corning | 3727 | |
1536-well sterile TC plates (black) | Corning | 3893 | |
Scivax Plates | MBL International | NCP-LH384-10 | |
Equipment | |||
Adhesives seals | ThermoFisher | AB0718 | |
Spinning Incubator | LiCONiC | ||
Stainless Steel Lids | The Genomics Institute of Novartis Research Foundation (GNF) | ||
ATS Acoustic Dispensor | EDS Biosystems | ||
Echo Acoustic Dispensor | Labcyte | ||
Luminometer | Envision-Perkin Elmer | ||
Peristaltic Pump- Multidrop Combi | ThermoFisher | ||
Liquid Handler-Multiflow FX | BioTek |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone