Source: Laboratories of Judith Danovitch and Nicholaus Noles—University of Louisville
Human memory is fallible, and people often cannot accurately recall what they have seen or heard. Adults are aware of their limited memory capacity, so they use strategies, such as rehearsal and mnemonic devices, to improve their recall of important information. Because adults understand the limits of memory, they know it makes more sense to write down the items on their shopping list rather than to try to remember the items when they get to the store. This ability to think about one’s own memory is called metamemory. Metamemory is one component of a broader set of cognitive processes that allow humans to think about their own knowledge and thinking, which is called metacognition.
Although young children understand that people have thoughts and a limited amount of knowledge, they often have trouble acknowledging the limits of their own knowledge and cognitive skills. Children’s ability to accurately estimate their own memory capacity and abilities improves over the elementary school years. One common way of measuring metamemory and its development is by giving children an opportunity to predict how well they can remember something, and then observing how well their prediction matches their actual recall.
This experiment demonstrates how to measure children’s metamemory based on the methods developed by Shin, Bjorklund, and Beck.1
Recruit children between ages 6 and 9. For the purposes of this demonstration, only one child is tested. Larger sample sizes (as in the Shin, Bjorklund, and Beck study1) are recommended when conducting any experiments.
Participants should have no history of developmental disorders and have normal hearing and vision.
1. Prepare study materials.
Researchers tested 32 6-year-olds and 32 9-year-olds and found that children’s predictions improved with age (Figure 1). Older children predicted they would remember less items than younger children, yet the total number of items they actually recalled was higher. The average prediction accuracy score for 6-year-olds was 4.19, indicating that they consistently overestimated their memory. The average prediction accuracy score for 9-year-olds was 1.02, indicating that their predictions about their me
Children’s tendency to overestimate their knowledge and abilities, including their memory, has consequences for their behavior in a number of situations. In the classroom, thinking that they remember or know more than they do can make it hard for children to understand the value of studying or rehearsing new information. Even when young children are faced with direct evidence of their limitations (e.g., failing to remember items in a memory test), they often persist in overestimating their abilities.
<Przejdź do...
Filmy z tej kolekcji:
Now Playing
Developmental Psychology
10.4K Wyświetleń
Developmental Psychology
53.5K Wyświetleń
Developmental Psychology
10.1K Wyświetleń
Developmental Psychology
53.9K Wyświetleń
Developmental Psychology
15.0K Wyświetleń
Developmental Psychology
32.6K Wyświetleń
Developmental Psychology
13.0K Wyświetleń
Developmental Psychology
14.8K Wyświetleń
Developmental Psychology
5.2K Wyświetleń
Developmental Psychology
5.1K Wyświetleń
Developmental Psychology
60.1K Wyświetleń
Developmental Psychology
5.6K Wyświetleń
Developmental Psychology
6.3K Wyświetleń
Developmental Psychology
14.2K Wyświetleń
Developmental Psychology
10.7K Wyświetleń
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone