Sign In

The Lemons Problem refers to a market characterized by asymmetric information, where the seller has more knowledge about the quality of the product being sold than the buyer. For example, in the used car market, the sellers have greater knowledge of their car's true quality. While the seller accurately knows the car's history and condition, buyers lack this relevant information about product quality. For instance, a car previously damaged in an accident may have undergone cosmetic repairs to remove visible flaws, such as dents in the fenders and scratches in the paint. This may make the car appear to be high-quality, even though its underlying issues, like engine or suspension damage, persist. This hidden information creates uncertainty for buyers, preventing them from accurately assessing the car's true quality, and hence, its relative market value.

Used cars can be either high-quality "plums" or low-quality "lemons," but their true quality is unobservable to buyers. However, buyers may be aware that consumer studies have shown that 50% of the cars are plums and 50% are lemons. Buyers, therefore, rely on the expected value of any given used car to determine the price they are willing to pay. 

For example, if plums are valued at $20,000 and lemons at $8,000, the expected value is calculated as:

Expected Value = (0.5×$20,000)+(0.5×$8,000)

  = $14,000

This single price of $14,000 is offered by buyers irrespective of whether the car is truly a plum or a lemon. However, this pricing strategy leads to adverse selection. Owners of plums are less motivated to offer their cars for sale at this lower price, and those who do sell their cars cannot receive a price reflecting the true value that their high-quality car represents. Owners of lemons are eager to sell their low-quality cars, and they receive an average sale price that is higher than the underlying value of their cars. A small portion of consumers benefit by receiving a plum and paying a price much less than the value of the car. Most consumers, however, receive a lemon for which they pay a price higher than the underlying value of the car.

From Chapter 17:

article

Now Playing

17.3 : The Lemons Problem: Sellers Have More Information

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

8 Views

article

17.1 : Complete Information and Asymmetric Information: Meaning

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

24 Views

article

17.2 : Observable Quality

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

15 Views

article

17.4 : The Lemons Problem: Adverse Selection in the Market for Used Cars

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

16 Views

article

17.5 : Mitigating Lemons Problem I: Reducing Asymmetric Information

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

11 Views

article

17.6 : Mitigating Lemons Problem II: Increasing the Average Quality in the Market

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

8 Views

article

17.7 : Mitigating Lemons Problem III: Truthful Quality Reporting

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Views

article

17.8 : Adverse Selection When Buyers Have More Information: The Market for Insurance

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Views

article

17.9 : Mitigating Adverse Selection in the Market for Insurance

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Views

article

17.10 : Moral Hazard

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

12 Views

article

17.11 : Moral Hazard in the Market for Insurance

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

10 Views

article

17.12 : Moral Hazard in the Banking Sector

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

7 Views

article

17.13 : Mitigating Moral Hazard

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

10 Views

article

17.14 : Principal-Agent Relationships

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Views

article

17.15 : Incentives in the Principal-Agent Relationship

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Views

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved