A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
This video shows and compares two experimental models to study the development of obliterative airway disease (OAD) in mice, the heterotopic and orthotopic tracheal transplantation model.
Obliterative airway disease (OAD) is the major complication after lung transplantations that limits long term survival (1-7).
To study the pathophysiology, treatment and prevention of OAD, different animal models of tracheal transplantation in rodents have been developed (1-7). Here, we use two established models of trachea transplantation, the heterotopic and orthotopic model and demonstrate their advantages and limitations.
For the heterotopic model, the donor trachea is wrapped into the greater omentum of the recipient, whereas the donor trachea is anastomosed by end-to-end anastomosis in the orthotopic model.
In both models, the development of obliterative lesions histological similar to clinical OAD has been demonstrated (1-7).
This video shows how to perform both, the heterotopic as well as the orthotopic tracheal transplantation technique in mice, and compares the time course of OAD development in both models using histology.
DONOR PREPARATION
RECIPIENT: HETEROTOPIC TRANSPLANTATION
RECIPIENT: ORTHOTOPIC TRANSPLANTATION
Figure 1: Donor trachea.
1A: Donor trachea in situ after preparation.
1B: Excised donor trachea.
1C: Donor trachea after explantation.
Figure 2: Heterotopic Model.
2A: The graft is positioned in the center of the greater omentum.
2B: The graft is fixed on both ends with a single suture.
2C: The graft is wrapped into the greater omentum and fixed with a single suture.
Figure 3: Orthotopic Model.
3A: The graft is interposed between the recipient tracheal defects and the posterior wall is anastomosed in continuous running fashion.
3B: The anterior wall is completed using a single suture.
Figure 4: Histology.
4A: Recovered heterotopic transplanted trachea after 28 days in the H+E staining (15x). Note the 100% luminal obliteration.
4B: Recovered orthotopic transplanted trachea after 60 days in the H+E staining (15x). Maximal achieved luminal obliteration is approximately 45%.
Heterotopic Tracheal Transplantation Model | Orthotopic Tracheal Transplantation Model | |
Advantages | + Easy to perform + Luminal obliteration with complete airway occlusion after 28 days + No physical affection of animals by OAD |
+ Physical ventilation of the graft + Inhaled drug administration possible + Strong immunological reactions such as alloreactive IgM antibody production + Physiological thoracic milieu + Tracheal-tracheal anastomosis imitates the clinical setting |
Disadvantages | - No ventilation of transplanted trachea - No evaluation of inhaled pathogens possible - Inhibition of mucociliary clearance and retained secretions - Peritoneal microenvironment instead of thoracic milieu |
- Surgical training necessary - Luminal obliteration with luminal occlusion app. 45% after 60 days - Animals may develop symptoms of OAD |
Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Heterotopic and Orthotopic Tracheal Transplantation.
Mice are available in different transgeneic and knockout model, and therefore suitable to study mechanistic questions related to OAD (4).
Both models of tracheal transplantation shown in this video can be used as reliable models for studying OAD development.
However, each model demonstrates advantages and limitations.
The heterotopic tracheal transplantation is easy to perform and does not require special surgical training (3, 5). After het...
Sonja Schrepfer has received a research grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (SCHR992/3–1).]
All animals received human care in compliance with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care, experiments on animals were performed in accordance with the guidelines and regulations set forth by the National Society for Medical research and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health (National Institutes of Health publication 85-23, revised 1985).
All animals were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Sulzfeld, Germany) and were maintained in the animal care facilities of the University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf. The animals received standard chow and water ad libitum.
The authors thank Christiane Pahrmann (Lab Manager).
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved