JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This video method describes the synthesis of high surface area, monolithic 3D graphene-based materials derived from polymer precursors as well as single layer graphene oxide.

Abstract

Efforts to assemble graphene into three-dimensional monolithic structures have been hampered by the high cost and poor processability of graphene. Additionally, most reported graphene assemblies are held together through physical interactions (e.g., van der Waals forces) rather than chemical bonds, which limit their mechanical strength and conductivity. This video method details recently developed strategies to fabricate mass-producible, graphene-based bulk materials derived from either polymer foams or single layer graphene oxide. These materials consist primarily of individual graphene sheets connected through covalently bound carbon linkers. They maintain the favorable properties of graphene such as high surface area and high electrical and thermal conductivity, combined with tunable pore morphology and exceptional mechanical strength and elasticity. This flexible synthetic method can be extended to the fabrication of polymer/carbon nanotube (CNT) and polymer/graphene oxide (GO) composite materials. Furthermore, additional post-synthetic functionalization with anthraquinone is described, which enables a dramatic increase in charge storage performance in supercapacitor applications.

Introduction

Since the isolation of graphene in 2004,1 interest in harnessing its unique properties has led to intense effort directed toward assembling graphene into three-dimensional, monolithic structures that retain the properties of individual graphene sheets.2-5 These efforts have been hampered by the fact that graphene itself is expensive and time consuming to produce and tends to aggregate in solution, which limits the scalability of materials based on graphene building blocks. Additionally, graphene assemblies are typically comprised of physical cross-linking interactions (e.g., van der Walls forces) between the individual graphene sheets, which are much less conductive and mechanically robust than chemical bond cross-links. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has been involved in the development of novel porous, low-density carbon materials since the 1980s.6 Several strategies have been identified to fabricate mass-producible graphene-based monolithic bulk materials from both low-cost polymer-derived carbon foams, which are called graphene aerogels (GAs),7 as well as by direct cross-linking of graphene oxide (GO) sheets, which are called graphene macro-assemblies (GMAs).8,9 These ultrahigh surface area bulk materials have high electrical and thermal conductivities, exceptional mechanical strength and elasticity, and tunable pore morphologies. GAs and GMAs have found utility in numerous applications including electrode materials in supercapacitors and rechargeable batteries, advanced catalyst supports, adsorbents, thermal insulation, sensors, and desalinization.10

The synthesis of graphene aerogels begins with sol-gel polymerization of an aqueous solution of resorcinol and formaldehyde to generate highly cross-linked organic gels. These gels are washed with water and acetone, then dried using supercritical CO2 and pyrolyzed in an inert atmosphere to give carbon aerogels with relatively low surface area and pore volume. Carbon aerogels are activated by controlled removal of carbon atoms under mild oxidizing condition (e.g., CO2) to form a cross-linked material composed of both amorphous carbon and graphite nanoplatelets, with higher surface area and open pore morphology.7 A unique advantage of the sol-gel synthesis is that GAs can be fabricated in a variety of forms, including monoliths and thin films, depending on the needs of the application. Carbon nanotubes11 and/or graphene sheets12 can be integrated into GAs by including these additives in the sol-gel precursor solution. This generates composite structures in which the additive becomes a part of the primary carbon network structure. Additionally, the GA framework can be functionalized after carbonization/activation either through modification of the aerogel surface or through the deposition of materials, for example catalyst nanoparticles, onto the framework structure.13

Graphene macro-assemblies (GMAs) are prepared by directly cross-linking suspended graphene oxide (GO) sheets, taking advantage of their inherent chemical functionality.9 GO sheets contain a variety of functional groups, including epoxide and hydroxide moieties, that can serve as chemical cross-linking sites. As in the GA preparation, assembled GMAs are supercritically dried to preserve the porous network, then pyrolized to reduce the chemical cross-links into conductive carbon bridges that provide structural support for the assembly. Due to the covalent carbon bridges between graphene sheets, GMAs have electrical conductivities and mechanical stiffness that are orders of magnitude higher than graphene assemblies formed with physical cross-linking. Additionally, GMAs have surface areas approaching the theoretical value of a single graphene sheet. Post-synthetic thermal treatment at elevated temperatures (>1,050 °C) can significantly improve the crystallinity of GMAs, leading to even higher conductivities and Young’s moduli as well as better thermal oxidation resistance.14 Post-synthetic chemical treatment of GMAs with redox-active organic molecules such as anthraquinone can enhance charge storage capacity in supercapacitor applications.15

The tunable material properties of GAs and GMAs are, in part, a result of carefully varying synthetic conditions such as reagent and catalyst concentrations, cure time and temperature, drying conditions, and carbonization/activation processes.16 This detailed video protocol aims to resolve ambiguities in the published methods, and to guide researchers attempting to reproduce the materials and conditions.

Protocol

1. Resorcinol-formaldehyde (RF) Derived Graphene Aerogels

  1. Na2CO3 catalyzed carbon aerogel (11% solids, cRF)
    1. In a 40 ml scintillation vial, add deionized water (7.1 ml) to resorcinol (0.625 g, 5.68 mmol) and mix on a vortex for 1 min. Crush large resorcinol pieces to powder using a mortar and pestle prior to water addition. Note that they may not completely dissolve until the next step.
    2. Add 37% formaldehyde solution (0.900 g, 11.4 mmol) to the resorcinol slurry and vortex for 1 min.
    3. Add sodium carbonate (0.003 g, 0.028 mmol) to the reaction mixture and vortex for 1 min.
    4. Transfer the reaction mixture to glass molds that can be sealed air tight (e.g., vial or glass slides that are separated by a silicone gasket) which define the shape of the resulting solid part.
    5. Place the sealed molds into an 80 °C oven and cure for 72 hr.
    6. After curing, remove the solid monoliths from the glass mold and wash with water to remove residual unreacted starting materials and catalyst. Typically we perform 3 x 12 hr washes with fresh DI H2O. The material is now ready for drying.
  2. Acetic acid catalyzed carbon aerogel (AARF)17
    1. In a 40 ml scintillation vial, add deionized water (15 ml) to resorcinol (12.3 g, 0.112 mol) and mix on a vortex for 1 min. Crush large resorcinol pieces to powder using a mortar and pestle prior to water addition. Note that they may not completely dissolve until the next step.
    2. Add 37% formaldehyde solution (17.9 g, 0.224 mol) to the resorcinol slurry and vortex for 1 min.
    3. Add glacial acetic acid (0.44 g, 0.007 mol) to the reaction mixture and vortex for 1 min.
    4. Transfer the reaction mixture to glass molds that can be sealed air tight (e.g., vial or glass slides that are separated by a silicone gasket), which define the shape of the resulting solid part.
    5. Place the sealed molds into an 80 °C oven and cure for 72 hr.
    6. After curing, remove the solid monoliths from the glass mold and wash with water to remove residual unreacted starting materials and catalyst. Typically we perform 3 x 12 hr washes with fresh DI H2O. The material is now ready for drying.
  3. Carbon Additives to the RF precursor solution (CNT, GO)
    1. Carbon nanotube/RF composite11
      1. Suspend 1 wt% single-walled carbon nano-tubes in deionized water and thoroughly disperse using an ultrasonic bath (sonic power 90 W, frequency 40 kHz).
      2. Add resorcinol (1.235 g, 11.2 mmol), formaldehyde (1.791 g, 22.1 mmol), and sodium carbonate catalyst (5.95 mg, 0.056 mmol) to 1.5 g of the CNT dispersion.
      3. Transfer the reaction mixture to glass molds that can be sealed air tight (e.g., vial or glass slides that are separated by a silicone gasket), which define the shape of the resulting solid part.
      4. Place the sealed molds into an 80 °C oven and cure for 72 hr.
      5. After curing, remove the solid monoliths from the glass mold and wash with water to remove residual unreacted starting materials and catalyst. Typically perform 3 x 12 hr washes with fresh DI H2O. The material is now ready for drying. 
    2. Graphene oxide/RF composite12
      1. Suspend 1 wt% graphene oxide (GO, 300-800 nm diameter) in deionized water and thoroughly disperse using an ultrasonic bath (sonic power 90 W, frequency 40 kHz).
      2. Add resorcinol (1.235 g, 11.2 mmol), formaldehyde (1.791 g, 22.1 mmol, 37% solution) and sodium carbonate catalyst (5.95 mg, 0.056 mmol) to 1.5 g of the GO dispersion.
      3. Transfer the reaction mixture to glass molds that can be sealed air tight (e.g., vial or glass slides that are separated by a silicone gasket) which define the shape of the resulting solid part.
      4. Place the sealed molds into an 80 °C oven and cure for 72 hr.
      5. After curing, remove the solid monoliths from the glass mold and wash with water to remove residual unreacted starting materials and catalyst. Typically perform 3 x 12 hr washes with fresh DI H2O. The material is now ready for drying. 
  4. Drying
    1. Supercritical CO2
      1. Prepare washed samples for drying with supercritical CO2 by exchanging the H2O solvent with acetone. Remove sample from water bath and place into bath containing clean acetone. Replace with fresh acetone two more times at 12 hr intervals.
      2. Load acetone-exchanged samples into a supercritical drying apparatus, filled with acetone and with circulating coolant at 12-15 °C.
      3. Seal supercritical dryer and exchange with liquid CO2 until no acetone remains (4-24 hr depending on sample size, density, pore morphology, etc.).
      4. Shut off CO2 supply and raise temperature of circulating coolant to 55 °C, while maintaining pressure in the supercritical dryer between 1,200-1,600 psi (80-110 bar). Hold at 55 °C for 1 hr.
      5. Slowly vent CO2 (2-12 hr) while maintaining temperature of circulating coolant at 55 °C. Remove samples. 
    2. Ambient drying (Xerogel)
      1. Prepare washed samples for drying under ambient conditions by exchanging the H2O solvent with acetone. Remove sample from water bath and place into bath containing clean acetone. Replace with fresh acetone two more times at 12 hr intervals.
      2. Place acetone-exchanged samples on a clean surface (e.g., Teflon block). To slow the rate of solvent evaporation to prevent cracking and uneven shrinking, cover the sample with an inverted beaker of sufficient volume to provide plenty of headspace.
      3. Allow solvent to evaporate for (24-72 hr). 
  5. Carbonization
    1. Perform carbonization of the dried foams at 1,050 °C under N2 atmosphere. Ramp from RT at a rate of 5 °C/min, and hold at 1,050 °C for 3 hr. Note that thin samples may need to be placed between two sheets of graphite paper (or other temperature stable, non-reactive material) with weight on top to prevent curling and “potato chipping.”
  6. Activation
    1. Activate an AARF carbon foam part (2 cm × 3 cm × 4 mm, 1.2 g) to generate 3D nanographene (3D-NG) under flowing CO2 (10 sccm) at 950 °C for 5 hr.7

2. Graphene Oxide Derived Graphene Macro Assemblies

  1. NH4OH catalyzed GO assembly
    1. In a 40 ml scintillation vial, add deionized water (20 ml) to 400 mg single layer graphene oxide (GO, 300-800 nm diameter). Thoroughly disperse using an ultrasonic bath (sonic power 90 W, frequency 40 kHz) O/N.
    2. Add concentrated NH4OH solution (0.211 ml per g GO suspension).
    3. Transfer into glass molds that can be sealed airtight (e.g., vial or glass slides that are separated by a silicone gasket which defines the shape of the resulting solid part).
    4. Place the sealed molds into an 80 °C oven and cure for 72 hr.
    5. After curing, remove the solid monoliths from the glass mold and wash with water to remove residual unreacted starting materials and catalyst. Typically perform 3 x 12 hr washes with fresh DI H2O. The material is now ready for drying. 
  2. Drying
    1. Supercritical CO2
      1. Prepare washed samples for drying with supercritical CO2 by exchanging the H2O solvent with acetone. Remove sample from water bath and place into bath containing clean acetone. Replace with fresh acetone two more times at 12 hr intervals.
      2. Load acetone-exchanged samples into a supercritical drying apparatus, filled with acetone and with circulating coolant at 12-15 °C.
      3. Seal supercritical dryer and exchange with liquid CO2 until no acetone remains (4-24 hr depending on sample size, density, pore morphology, etc.). Complete exchange is indicated by cessation of acetone drips at the exhaust valve of the supercritical dryer.
      4. Shut off CO2 supply and raise temperature of circulating coolant to 55 °C, while maintaining pressure in the supercritical dryer between 1,200-1,600 psi (80-110 bar). Hold at 55 °C for 1 hr.
      5. Slowly vent CO2 (2-12 hr) while maintaining temperature of circulating coolant at 55 °C. Remove samples. 
    2. Ambient drying (xerogel)
      Note that thin samples may need to be placed between two sheets of Teflon (or other non-stick material) with weight on top to prevent curling and “potato chipping.”
      1. Prepare washed samples for drying under ambient conditions by exchanging the H2O solvent with acetone. Remove sample from water bath and place into bath containing clean acetone. Replace with fresh acetone two more times at 12 hr intervals.
      2. Place acetone-exchanged samples on a clean surface (e.g., Teflon block). To slow the rate of solvent evaporation to prevent cracking and uneven shrinking, cover the sample with an inverted beaker of sufficient volume to provide plenty of headspace.
      3. Allow solvent to evaporate for (24-72 hr). 
  3. Carbonization
    1. Perform carbonization of the dried foams at 1,050 °C under N2 atmosphere. Ramp from RT at a rate of 5 °C/min, and hold at 1,050 °C for 3 hr. Note that thin samples may need to be placed between two sheets of graphite paper (or other temperature stable, non-reactive material) with weight on top to prevent curling and “potato chipping.”
    2. Thermal anneal for highly crystalline GMA. Perform additional thermal annealing of carbonized foams at temperatures up to 2,500 °C under He atmosphere. Ramp from RT at a rate of 100 °C/min, and hold at elevated temperature for 1 hr. 
  4. Post-carbonization functionalization
    1. Non-covalent anthraquinone functionalization (AQ-GMA)
      1. Prepare a 3 mM solution of anthraquinone (AQ) in dry EtOH. Heat in a sealed vial at 75 °C to ensure complete dissolution.
      2. Add hot AQ solution to GMA sample (~2 ml/mg of sample). Soak in a sealed vial for 2 hr at 75 °C.
      3. Remove excess AQ solution from vial and allow sample to dry at 75 °C O/N (vial cap off). 

Results

The evolution of material composition and morphology during fabrication can be tracked in various ways including X-ray diffraction, Raman and NMR spectroscopy, electron microscopy, and porosimetry. For example, in the synthesis, pyrolysis, and CO2 activation of GAs, the conversion was followed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Figure 1E). The absence of the stacking-related (002) diffraction peak in the XRD pattern after activation (blue trace) indicates the transition from a structure containing gr...

Discussion

It is important to note that the procedures outlined here are only representative. Many adjustments are possible to tune materials for a specific application. For example, varying the starting material concentrations, while keeping resorcinol/formaldehyde (RF) ratio constant, can have an impact on the final material density. Catalyst loading can alter pore morphology, as a higher loading in the RF procedure leads to smaller primary particles and vice-versa. Activation time can play a role as well; at shorter activation t...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. IM release LLNL-JRNL-667016.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Single Layer Graphene OxideCheap Tubesn/a300-800 nm XY dimensions
single wall carbon nano tubes (SWCNTs)Carbon SolutionsP2-SWNT
resorcinolAldrich398047-500G
37% formaldehyde solution in waterAldrich252549
acetic acidAldrich320099
ammonium hydroxide solution 28-30% NH3 basisAldrich320145
sodium carbonateAldrich791768
anthraquinoneAldricha90004
Polaron supercritical dryerElectron Microscopy SciencesEMS 3100this is a representative model, any critical point dryer compatible with acetone should work

References

  1. Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science. 306 (5696), 666-669 (2004).
  2. Geim, A. K., Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene. Nat Mater. 6 (3), 183-191 (2007).
  3. Li, D., Kaner, R. B. Materials science. Graphene-based materials. Science. 320 (5880), 1170-1171 (2008).
  4. Allen, M. J., Tung, V. C., Kaner, R. B. Honeycomb carbon: a review of graphene. Chem. Rev. 110 (1), 132-145 (2010).
  5. Nardecchia, S., Carriazo, D., Ferrer, M. L., Gutiérrez, M. C., del Monte, ., F, Three dimensional macroporous architectures and aerogels built of carbon nanotubes and/or graphene: synthesis and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev.. 42 (2), 794-830 (2013).
  6. Pekala, R. W. Organic aerogels from the polycondensation of resorcinol with formaldehyde. J. Mater. Sci. 24 (9), 3221-3227 (1989).
  7. Biener, J., Dasgupta, S., et al. Macroscopic 3D nanographene with dynamically tunable bulk properties. Adv. Mater. 24 (37), 5083-5087 (2012).
  8. Worsley, M. A., Olson, T. Y., et al. High Surface Area, sp 2-Cross-Linked Three-Dimensional Graphene Monoliths. J Phys. Chem. Lett. 2 (8), 921-925 (2011).
  9. Worsley, M. A., Kucheyev, S. O., et al. Mechanically robust 3D graphene macroassembly with high surface area. Chem Commun. 48 (67), 8428-8430 (2012).
  10. Biener, J., Stadermann, M., et al. Advanced carbon aerogels for energy applications. Energ. Environ. Sci. 4 (3), 656-667 (2011).
  11. Worsley, M. A., Kucheyev, S. O., Satcher, J. H., Hamza, A. V., Baumann, T. F. Mechanically robust and electrically conductive carbon nanotube foams. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 (7), 073115 (2009).
  12. Worsley, M. A., Pauzauskie, P. J., Olson, T. Y., Biener, J., Satcher, J. H., Baumann, T. F. Synthesis of graphene aerogel with high electrical conductivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (40), 14067-14069 (2010).
  13. Fu, R., Baumann, T. F., Cronin, S., Dresselhaus, G., Dresselhaus, M. S., Satcher, J. H. Formation of Graphitic Structures in Cobalt- and Nickel-Doped Carbon Aerogels. Langmuir. 21 (7), 2647-2651 (2005).
  14. Worsley, M. A., Pham, T. T., et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Highly Crystalline Graphene Aerogels. ACS Nano. 8 (10), 11013-11022 (2014).
  15. Campbell, P. G., Merrill, M. D., et al. Battery/supercapacitor hybrid via non-covalent functionalization of graphene macro-assemblies. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2, 17764-17770 (2014).
  16. Worsley, M. A., Charnvanichborikarn, S., et al. Toward Macroscale, Isotropic Carbons with Graphene-Sheet-Like Electrical and Mechanical Properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24 (27), 4259-4264 (2014).
  17. Baumann, T. F., Worsley, M. A., Han, T. Y. -. J., Satcher, J. H. High surface area carbon aerogel monoliths with hierarchical porosity. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 354 (29), 3513-3515 (2008).
  18. Baumann, T. F., Satcher, J. H. Template-directed synthesis of periodic macroporous organic and carbon aerogels. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 350, 120-125 (2004).
  19. Braff, W. A., Bazant, M. Z., Buie, C. R. Membrane-less hydrogen bromine flow battery. Nat. Comms. 4, 1-6 (2013).
  20. Zhu, C., Han, T. Y., Duoss, E. B., Golobic, A. M., Kuntz, J. D., Spadaccini, C. M., Worsley, M. A. Highly compressible 3D periodic graphene aerogel microlattices. Nat Comms. 6, (2015).
  21. Worsley, M. A., Shin, S. J., Merrill, M. D., Lenhardt, J., Nelson, A. J., Woo, L. Y., Gash, A. E., Baumann, T. F., Orme, C. A. Ultra-Low Density, Monolithic WS2, MoS2, and MoS2 Graphene Aerogels. ACS Nano. 9 (5), 4698-4705 (2015).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Graphene AerogelsGraphene Macro Assemblies3D Graphene MaterialsCovalent Graphene AssemblyGraphene based Bulk MaterialsGraphene FoamGraphene OxidePolymer CNT CompositesPolymer GO CompositesGraphene FunctionalizationAnthraquinoneSupercapacitor Applications

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved