A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
This report describes a bioengineering method to design and construct novel Artificial Splicing Factors (ASFs) that specifically modulate the splicing of target genes in mammalian cells. This method can be further expanded to engineer various artificial factors to manipulate other aspects of RNA metabolism.
The processing of most eukaryotic RNAs is mediated by RNA Binding Proteins (RBPs) with modular configurations, including an RNA recognition module, which specifically binds the pre-mRNA target and an effector domain. Previously, we have taken advantage of the unique RNA binding mode of the PUF domain in human Pumilio 1 to generate a programmable RNA binding scaffold, which was used to engineer various artificial RBPs to manipulate RNA metabolism. Here, a detailed protocol is described to construct Engineered Splicing Factors (ESFs) that are specifically designed to modulate the alternative splicing of target genes. The protocol includes how to design and construct a customized PUF scaffold for a specific RNA target, how to construct an ESF expression plasmid by fusing a designer PUF domain and an effector domain, and how to use ESFs to manipulate the splicing of target genes. In the representative results of this method, we have also described the common assays of ESF activities using splicing reporters, the application of ESF in cultured human cells, and the subsequent effect of splicing changes. By following the detailed protocols in this report, it is possible to design and generate ESFs for the regulation of different types of Alternative Splicing (AS), providing a new strategy to study splicing regulation and the function of different splicing isoforms. Moreover, by fusing different functional domains with a designed PUF domain, researchers can engineer artificial factors that target specific RNAs to manipulate various steps of RNA processing.
Most human genes undergo Alternative Splicing (AS) to produce multiple isoforms with distinct activities, which has greatly increased the coding complexity of the genome1,2. AS provides a major mechanism to regulate gene function, and it is tightly regulated through diverse pathways in different cellular and developmental stages3,4. Because splicing misregulation is a common cause of human disease5,6,7,8, targeting splicing regulation is becoming an attractive therapeutic route.
According to a simplified model of splicing regulation, AS is mainly controlled by Splicing Regulatory cis-Elements (SREs) in pre-mRNA that function as splicing enhancers or silencers of alternative exons. These SREs specifically recruit various trans-acting protein factors (i.e. splicing factors) that promote or suppress the splicing reaction3,9. Most trans-acting splicing factors have separate sequence-specific RNA binding domains to recognize their targets and effector domains to control splicing. The best-known examples are the members of the serine/arginine-rich (SR) protein family that contain N-terminal RNA Recognition Motifs (RRMs), which bind exonic splicing enhancers, and C-terminal RS domains, which promote exon inclusion10. Conversely, hnRNP A1 binds to exonic splicing silencers through the RRM domains and inhibits exon inclusion through a C-terminal glycine-rich domain11. Using such modular configurations, researchers should be able to engineer artificial splicing factors by combining a specific RNA-Binding Domain (RBD) with different effector domains that activate or inhibit splicing.
The key of such a design is to use an RBD that recognizes given targets with programmable RNA binding specificity, which is analogous to the DNA-binding mode of the TALE domain. However, most native splicing factors contain RRM or K Homology (KH) domains, which recognize short RNA elements with weak affinity and thus lack a predictive RNA-protein recognition "code"12. The RBD of PUF repeat proteins (i.e. the PUF domain) has a unique RNA recognition mode, allowing for the redesign of PUF domains to specifically recognize different RNA targets13,14. The canonical PUF domain contains eight repeats of three α-helices, each recognizing a single base in an 8-nt RNA target. The side chains of amino acids at certain positions of the second α-helix form specific hydrogen bonds with the Watson-Crick edge of the RNA base, which determines the RNA binding specificity of each repeat (Figure 1A). The code for RNA base recognition of the PUF repeat is surprisingly simple (Figure 1A), allowing for the generation of PUF domains that recognize any possible 8-base combination (reviewed by Wei and Wang15).
This modular design principle allows for the generation of an Engineered Splicing Factor (ESF) that consists of a customized PUF domain and a splicing modulation domain (i.e. an SR domain or a Gly-rich domain). These ESFs can function as either splicing activators or as inhibitors to control various types of splicing events, and they have proven useful as tools to manipulate the splicing of endogenous genes related to human disease16,17. As an example, we have constructed PUF-Gly-type ESFs to specifically alter the splicing of the Bcl-x gene, converting the anti-apoptotic long isoform (Bcl-xL) to the pro-apoptotic short isoform (Bcl-xS). Shifting the ratio of the Bcl-x isoform was sufficient to sensitize several cancer cells to multiple anti-cancer chemotherapy drugs16, suggesting that these artificial factors may be useful as potential therapeutic reagents.
In addition to controlling splicing with known splicing effector domains (e.g., an RS or Gly-rich domain), the engineered PUF factors can also be used to examine the activities of new splicing factors. For example, using this approach, we have demonstrated that the C-terminal domain of several SR proteins can activate or inhibit splicing when binding to different pre-mRNA regions18, that the alanine-rich motif of RBM4 can inhibit splicing19, and that the proline-rich motif of DAZAP1 can enhance splicing20,21. These new functional domains can be used to construct additional types of artificial factors to fine-tune splicing.
1. Construction of a PUF Scaffold with Customized RNA-binding Specificity by Overlapping PCR
2. Construction of a Functional Module of ESFs
3. Construction of ESF Expression Plasmids
4. Construction of the Splicing Reporter
5. Construction of Lentiviral Expression Vectors for ESF
6. Specifically Modulating Exon Inclusion and the Alternative Use of Splice Sites with ESFs
7. Use ESF to Modulate Endogenous Bcl-x Splicing and Measure Its Effects on Apoptosis
8. Measure the Apoptosis of Different Cancer Cells Expressing ESF
This report describes the complete protocol for the design and construction of ESFs and splicing reporters. It also outlines the further application of ESFs in manipulating the AS of endogenous genes16. To illustrate typical results of ESF-mediated splicing changes, we use the data from our previous work as an example. The ESFs with different functional domains can be used to promote or inhibit the inclusion of the target cassette exon (Figure ...
This report provides a detailed description for the design and construction of artificial splicing factors that can specifically manipulate the alternative splicing of a target gene. This method takes advantage of the unique RNA binding mode of PUF repeats to produce an RNA-binding scaffold with customized specificity. It can be used to either activate or repress splicing.
The critical step in this protocol is the generation of the reprogramed PUF domain that defines the specificity of ESFs. A...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by NIH grant R01-CA158283 and NSFC grant 31400726 to Z.W. Y.W. is funded by the Young Thousand Talents Program and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 31471235 and 81422038). X.Y. is funded by the postdoctoral science foundation of China (2015M571612).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
High-fidelity DNA polymerase (Phusion High-Fidelity) with PCR buffer | New England Biolabs | M0530L | |
DNA ligase (T4 DNA ligase) | New England Biolabs | M0202L | |
Liposomal transfection reagent (Lipofectamine 2000) | Invitrogen | 11668-019 | |
Reduced serum medium (Opti-MEM) | Gibco | 31985-062 | |
RNA extraction buffer (TRIzol Reagent) | ambion | 15596018 | TRIzol reagent includes phenol, which can cause burns. Wear gloves when handling |
PBS (1x) | Life Technologies | 10010-031 | |
SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (RT) | Invitrogen | 18080044 | |
Caspase-3 antibody | Cell Signaling Technology | 9668 | |
PARP antibody | Cell Signaling Technology | 9542 | |
Bcl-x antibody | BD Bioscience | 610211 | |
beta-actin antibody | Sigma-Aldrich | A5441 | |
alpha-tubulin antibody | Sigma-Aldrich | T5168 | |
FLAG antibody | Sigma-Aldrich | F4042 | |
Nitrocellulose membrane | Amersham-Pharmacia | RPN203D | |
ECL Western Blotting detection reagents | Invitrogen | WP20005 | |
Cy5-dCTP | GE Healthcare | PA55021 | |
Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorter (FACS) | BD Bioscience | FACSCalibur | |
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) | GE Healthcare | SH30243.01 | |
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) | Invitrogen | 26140079 | |
Propidium iodide (PI) | Sigma | P4170 | |
Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) | Sigma | A7638-5G | |
Triton-X100 | Promega | H5142 | |
Poly-L-Lysine | Sigma | P-4832 | Filter-sterilize and store at 4 °C |
Vector pWPXLd | Addgene | 12258 | |
Vector pMD2.G | Addgene | 12259 | |
Vector psPAX2 | Addgene | 12260 | |
DNase I (RNase-free) | New England Biolabs | M0303S | |
Oligo(dT)18 Primer | Thermo Scientific | SO131 | |
Anti-mouse secondary antibody (Anti-mouse IgG, HRP-linked Antibody) | Cell Signaling Technology | 7076S |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved