A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
This protocol describes a scalable individual grooming assay technique in Drosophila that yields robust, quantitative data to measure grooming behavior. The method is based on comparing the difference in dye accumulation on the bodies of un-groomed versus groomed animals over a set period of time.
Drosophila grooming behavior is a complex multi-step locomotor program that requires coordinated movement of both forelegs and hindlegs. Here we present a grooming assay protocol and novel chamber design that is cost-efficient and scalable for either small or large-scale studies of Drosophila grooming. Flies are dusted all over their body with Brilliant Yellow dye and given time to remove the dye from their bodies within the chamber. Flies are then deposited in a set volume of ethanol to solubilize the dye. The relative spectral absorbance of dye-ethanol samples for groomed versus ungroomed animals are measured and recorded. The protocol yields quantitative data of dye accumulation for individual flies, which can be easily averaged and compared across samples. This allows experimental designs to easily evaluate grooming ability for mutant animal studies or circuit manipulations. This efficient procedure is both versatile and scalable. We show work-flow of the protocol and comparative data between WT animals and mutant animals for the Drosophila type I Dopamine Receptor (DopR).
Grooming in Drosophila melanogaster (D. melanogaster ) is a robust innate behavior that involves the coordination of multiple independent motor programs1. Fruit flies clean their bodies of dust, microbes, and other pathogens which could inhibit normal physiological function such as vision and flight, or lead to significant immune challenges. In sensing and responding to both mechanical2 and immune activation3, flies repetitively rub their legs together or on a targeted body region until it is sufficiently clean and grooming progresses to another part of the body. Flies perform grooming movements in distinct bouts that largely occur in stereotyped patterns1,4. A behavioral hierarchy becomes apparent as grooming signals are prioritized. Circuits and patterns of activity have been identified in support of a model that grooming programs at the top of the hierarchy occur first and suppress parallel signals from areas of the body that are groomed subsequently5. Highest priority is given to the head, then the abdomen, wings, and finally the thorax5.
The grooming program in D. melanogaster is an ideal system for studying neural circuits, modulatory molecular signals, and neurotransmitters. For instance, compromise of neurofibromin function6, loss of Drosophila fragile X mental retardation protein (dfmr1)7, and exposure to bisphenol A (BPA)8 all cause excessive grooming and other behaviors that are analogous to discrete human symptoms of neurofibromatosis, fragile X syndrome, and aspects of autism spectrum disorders and Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), respectively. Grooming behavior can also be habituated differentially across mutant strains2, lending this motor program to studies of behavioral plasticity. The breadth of neurological phenomena that can be modeled by Drosophila demands a novel comparative approach to measure the ability of flies to groom themselves.
The combined action of vesicular monoamine transporters and the relative abundance of dopamine and other biogenic amines in the body have been shown to mediate fruit fly grooming behavior 9,10. Octopamine and dopamine stimulate comparable hindleg grooming activity in decapitated flies, while tyramine, the precursor of octopamine, also triggers grooming to a lesser extent7. Four dopamine receptors have been identified in D. melanogaster11,12,13,14. By using the grooming assay method described in this protocol, we determined a role for the Type I family Dopamine Receptor DopR (DopR, dDA1, dumb) in hindleg grooming behavior15.
Grooming can be indirectly quantified by looking at the extent of cleanliness by which an animal can fully groom after dusting the entire body with a marker dye or fluorescent dust5,16. The remainder of dust left on the body can be used as a relative marker for the overall behavior. Dusty flies after being given sufficient time to groom may be manifesting a specific deficit in grooming behavior. As grooming investigations have become more extensive, protocols have incorporated such practices as decapitation to add pharmacological treatments onto the neck connective nerves10, tactile stimulation of bristles to elicit the grooming response2 , and video recording of behavior15. Direct observation of grooming can be easily studied by using visual observation and manually recording the frequency and duration of specific grooming events4.
We designed a fifteen-well grooming chamber that can be constructed with a 3D printer or laser cutter, and the blueprint designs are available for reproduction15. The design uses two joined central plates with openings matched and separated by mesh and two additional sliding top and bottom plates, from which flies and/or dye is loaded, respectively. After allowing dusted flies time to groom, we deposit them in ethanol to solubilize the dye and measure the absorbance of this solution at the wavelength of the dye. A plate reader can be used for multiple parallel samples or a single-read spectrophotometer can be used for individual samples. This method minimizes the error induced by handling and allows for grooming assays to be run on a smaller, cost-efficient scale. This method is derived and modified from the methods pioneered by Julie Simpson and Andrew Seeds, who use larger grooming chambers with heating elements for temperature sensitive circuit manipulations5. The following protocol showcases the quantification of grooming of the whole body as well as showing alternate methods for quantitation of dye accumulation on individual body parts. We also present sample comparison data between WT and DopR mutants, as well as methods for calculating a simple performance index for grooming behavior.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
1. Preparation
2. Fly-dusting and Grooming
3. Preparation of Samples and Absorbance Analysis
4. Quantification of Results
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The grooming assay yields quantitative data to assess behavioral performance based on the relative remainder of accumulated dye left on the bodies of flies after a set time of measurement for grooming (30 min). Sample images of the sliding grooming chamber design and major steps of the assay are highlighted in Figure 1. Flies aggregate a significant amount of dye from immediate dusting by vortexing in the presence of dye (Figure 2d, 2e). Dusted flies can ...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The grooming assay is relatively straightforward, but we would caution experimenters to pay special attention to the following issues. Maintaining a tight seal by tightening the screws on the top and bottom plates after introducing flies and dye is essential for reproducible results. The Brilliant Yellow dye is very fine and loose joints will allow losses of dye from the edges of the chamber. The irregularity in dye content for each well could easily throw off grooming quantification as non-uniform dusting will increase ...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
We wish to thank Brian Shepherd, Tat Udomritthiruj, Aaron Willey, Ruby Froom, Elise Pitmon, and Rose Hedreen for early work in testing and establishing this methodology and chamber designs. We thank Kelly Tellez and Graham Buchan for reading and editing the manuscript. We thank Andrew Seeds and Julie Simpson for their pioneering work and their advice and support in suggesting the use of Brilliant Yellow Dye (Sigma). This work is supported in part by the Mary E. Groff Surgical and Medical Research and Education Charitable Trust, the Bronfman Science Center, and the Hellman Fellows Program.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
High-Flex Tygon PVC Clear Tubing | McMaster-Carr | 5229K54 | ID 1/8", OD 1/4", used with micropipettor tips and mesh to construct mouth aspirators |
Micropipette tips (1 mL and 200 μL) | Genesee Scientific | 24-165, 24-150R | |
Nylon Mesh Screen, 2 x 2.6" | McMaster-Carr | 9318T44 | Used to construct grooming chamber and mouth aspirators |
Dumont #5 Forceps | Roboz Surgical Instrument | RS-5050 | |
Brilliant Yellow Dye | Sigma-Aldrich | 201375-25G | we recommend use of nitrile gloves while handling this product |
Vortexer | Fisher Scientific | 12-812 | set to "touch" |
Ethanol | Carolina Biological Supply | 86-1282 | |
1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes | VWR International | 10025-726 | |
0.65 mL microcentrifuge tubes | VWR International | 20170-293 | tubes can be reused with successive assays |
UV 96-well plate | Corning | 26014017 | |
BioTek Synergy HTX Platereader | BioTek | need to download catalog to access product number | http://www.biotek.com/products/microplate_detection/synergy_htx_multimode_microplate_reader.html?tab=overview |
Gen5 Microplate Reader and Imager Software | BioTek | ||
Microsoft Excel | Microsoft | https://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msusa/en_US/pdp/Excel-2016/productID.323021400?tduid=(65d098c0e83b86c952bdff5b0719c83f)(256380)(2459594)(SRi0yYDlqd0-LI..ql4M2LoZBEhcBljvIA)() | |
Drosophila Incubator | Tritech | DT2-CIRC-TK | |
1/4" acrylic plastic | McMaster-Carr | 8473K341 | |
8 - 32 nuts | McMaster-Carr | 90257A009 | |
8 - 32 x 1" hex cap screws | McMaster-Carr | 92185A199 | the bottom plate needs to be tapped for this size screw |
8 - 32 x 1/2" hex cap screws | McMaster-Carr | 92185A194 | the second plate from the top needs to be tapped |
2 - 56 3/8" flat head phillips machine screws | McMaster-Carr | 91500A088 | these hold the two middle plates together |
0.175" ID, 1/4" OD, 0.34" aluminum pipe | McMaster-Carr | 92510A044 | Manufactured in-house; product listed is approximately the same dimensions and should work for size 8 screws. These act as sheaths for the 1" screws and set the hex cap up slightly from the surface of the top plate |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved