JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This study describes the successful generation of a new chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) animal model by repeatedly exposing mice to high concentrations of ozone.

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent airflow limitation and lung parenchymal destruction. It has a very high incidence in aging populations. The current conventional therapies for COPD focus mainly on symptom-modifying drugs; thus, the development of new therapies is urgently needed. Qualified animal models of COPD could help to characterize the underlying mechanisms and can be used for new drug screening. Current COPD models, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or the porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE)-induced emphysema model, generate COPD-like lesions in the lungs and airways but do not otherwise resemble the pathogenesis of human COPD. A cigarette smoke (CS)-induced model remains one of the most popular because it not only simulates COPD-like lesions in the respiratory system, but it is also based on one of the main hazardous materials that causes COPD in humans. However, the time-consuming and labor-intensive aspects of the CS-induced model dramatically limit its application in new drug screening. In this study, we successfully generated a new COPD model by exposing mice to high levels of ozone. This model demonstrated the following: 1) decreased forced expiratory volume 25, 50, and 75/forced vital capacity (FEV25/FVC, FEV50/FVC, and FEV75/FVC), indicating the deterioration of lung function; 2) enlarged lung alveoli, with lung parenchymal destruction; 3) reduced fatigue time and distance; and 4) increased inflammation. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the ozone exposure (OE) model is a reliable animal model that is similar to humans because ozone overexposure is one of the etiological factors of COPD. Additionally, it only took 6 - 8 weeks, based on our previous work, to create an OE model, whereas it requires 3 - 12 months to induce the cigarette smoke model, indicating that the OE model might be a good choice for COPD research.

Introduction

It has been estimated that COPD, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis, might be the third leading cause of death in the world in 20201,2. The potential incidence of COPD in a population over 40 years old is estimated to be 12.7% in males and 8.3% in females within the next 40 years3. No medications are currently available to reverse the progressive deterioration in COPD patients4. Reliable animal models of COPD not only demand the imitation of the disease pathological process but also require a short generation period. Current COPD models, including the LPS or a PPE-induced model, can induce emphysema-like symptoms5,6. A single administration or a week-long challenge of LPS or PPE to mice or rats results in marked neutrophilia in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), increases pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g., TNF-α and IL-1β) in the BALF or serum, produces lung parenchymal destruction-enlarged air spaces, and limits airflow5,6,7,8,9,10. However, LPS or PPE are not causes of human COPD and thus do not mimic the pathological process11. A CS-induced model produced a persistent airflow limitation, lung parenchymal destruction, and reduced functional exercise capacity. However, a traditional CS protocol requires at least 3 months to generate a COPD model12,13,14,15. Thus, it is important to generate a new, more efficient animal model that meets the two requirements.

Recently, in addition to cigarette smoking, air pollution and occupational exposure have become more common causes of COPD16,17,18. Ozone, as one of the major pollutants (though not the major component of air pollution), can directly react with the respiratory tract and damage the lung tissue of both children and young adults19,20,21,22,23,24,25. Ozone, as well as other stimulators including LPS, PPE, and CS, are involved in a serious of biochemical pathways of pulmonary oxidative stress and DNA damage and are linked to the initiation and promotion of COPD26,27. Another factor is that the symptoms of some COPD patients deteriorate after being exposed to ozone, indicating that ozone can disrupt lung function18,28,29. Therefore, we generated a new COPD model by repeatedly exposing mice to high concentrations of ozone for 7 weeks; this resulted in airflow defects and lung parenchymal damage similar to those of previous investigations30,31,32. We extended the OE protocol to female mice in this study and successfully reproduced the emphysema observed in male mice in our previous studies30,31,32. Because COPD mortality has decreased in men but increased in women in many countries33, a COPD model in females is needed to study the mechanisms and to develop therapeutic methods for female COPD patients. The applicability of the OE model to all genders lends further support to its use as a COPD model.

Protocol

NOTE: The OE model has been generated and used in previously reported research30,31,32. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Shanghai Jiaotong University.

1. Mice

  1. House pathogen-free, 7- to 9-week-old female BALB/c mice in individual ventilated cages in an animal facility under controlled temperature (20 °C) and humidity (40 - 60%). Provide a 12 h light and 12 h dark cycle in the facility. Provide food and water ad libitum.

2. Ozone or Air Exposure

  1. Generate ozone with an electric generator in a sealing acrylic (e.g. Perspex) box. Blow the air out of the box using a small air blower through an air vent pipe that is connected on the inside and outside of the box. Monitor the concentration of ozone in the box using an ozone probe. Wait until the concentration of ozone in the box reaches 2.5 parts per million (ppm).
    NOTE: The ozone probe can automatically switch the ozone generator on or off and can maintain the ozone level in the box at 2.5 ppm.
  2. Place the mice into the box when the level of ozone reaches 2.5 ppm. Keep the mice in the box for 3 h each time to expose them to ozone.
    NOTE: The box can maintain an ozone level of 2.5 ppm during the 3 h by automatically switching the ozone generator on or off and blowing the CO2 that is produced by the mice out of the box.
  3. Give two ozone exposures (each exposure lasting 3 h) per week (once every 3 days) for 7 weeks; expose the control mice to air at the same time and for the same period.

3. Micro-computed Tomography

  1. At the end of week 7, anesthetize the mice with an intraperitoneal injection of pelltobarbitalum natricum (1%, 0.6 - 0.8 ml/100 g) adjust the dose according to individual situations to see that the mouse does not respond to a toe pinch. Monitor and keep the mouse at a steady breathing frequency; and make sure no voluntary motions exist during the procedures.
  2. Place the anesthetized mice in the chamber of a micro-computed tomography (µCT).
  3. Calibrate the µCT using the standard protocol and the manufacturer's instructions. Set the X-ray tube at 50 kV and the current at 450 µA.
    NOTE: Both the X-ray and the detector rotate around the mice.
  4. Perform the µCT analysis by acquiring 515 projections with an effective pixel size of 0.092 mm, an exposure time of 300 ms for one slice, and a slice thickness of 0.093 mm.
  5. Reconstruct the lung with the acquired images using a software. Adjust the grayscale image brightness by setting the minimum and maximum of the grayscale at -750 and -550 Hounsfield units, respectively.
    NOTE: The software will automatically calculate the volumes of the lung parenchyma and the low-attenuation area (LAA)34,35.
  6. Calculate the percentage of LAA (LAA%) by dividing the LAA volume by the total lung volume.

4. Treadmill Test

  1. Give the mice an adaptation test at a speed of 10 m/min for 10 min on a running treadmill machine.  Note: The electricity is always off when the procedure is being conducted. 
  2. Administer a fatigue test to the mice.
    1. Warm up the mice at a speed of 10 m/min for 5 min.
    2. Increase the speed to 15 m/min for 10 min.
    3. Increase the exercise intensity: increasing the speed by 5 m/min, starting at 20 m/min, every 30 min until mice cannot continue to run36.
  3. Record the total running distance and running time as fatigue distance and fatigue time, respectively.

5. Pulmonary Function Measurements

  1. Anesthetize the mice with an intraperitoneal injection of pelltobarbitalum natricum (1%, 0.6 - 0.8 ml/100 g) adjust the dose according to individual situations to see that the mouse does not respond to a toe pinch and wait until the mice have maintained spontaneous breathing. Monitor and keep the mouse at a steady breathing frequency; and make sure no voluntary motions exist during the procedures.
  2. Carefully tracheostomize the mice and place them in a body plethysmograph that is connected to a computer-controlled ventilator.
    NOTE: Ventilation is controlled via a valve located proximally to the endotracheal tube. The setup provides different semi-automatic maneuvers, including the maneuver of the quasi-static pressure volume and the maneuver of the fast flow volume.
  3. Impose an average breathing frequency of 150 breaths/min to the anesthetized mouse via pressure-controlled ventilation until a regular breathing pattern and complete expiration at each breathing cycle is obtained.
  4. Perform the quasi-static pressure-volume maneuver with the device by using the negative pressures generated in the plethysmograph.
  5. Perform the fast flow volume maneuver within the quasi-static pressure-volume loops to record the FVC and the FEV. Inflate the lung to +30 cm H2O and immediately afterwards connect it to a highly negative pressure to enforce expiration until the residual volume is at -30 cm H2O. Record the FEV in the first 25, 50, and 75 ms of exhalation (FEV25, FEV50, and FEV75, respectively). Reject the suboptimal maneuvers. For each test with every single mouse, conduct a minimum of three acceptable maneuvers to obtain a reliable mean for all numerical parameters.

6. BALF Collection

  1. Following terminal anesthesia with pelltobarbitalum natricum ((1%, 1.8-2.4 ml/100 g) adjust the dose according to individual situations to see that the mouse does not respond to a toe pinch and lose breath), lavage the mice with 2 mL of PBS via a 1 mm-diameter endotracheal tube and then retrieve the BALF10.
  2. Pool the retrieved lavage aliquots and centrifuge them at 4 °C and 250 x g for 10 min.
  3. Collect the supernatant for immediate use and store the remainder at -80 °C or liquid nitrogen.
  4. Count the total number of cells using a hemocytometer.
  5. Resuspend the cell pellet in PBS and then spin (1,400 x g, 6 min) 250 µL of resuspended cells onto slides using a slide spinner centrifuge.
  6. Apply Wright staining to cells on the slides according to the manufacturer's protocol.
  7. Count 200 cells per mouse; identify the cells as macrophages or neutrophils, according to standard morphology, under 400X magnification; and count their numbers.

7. Cardiac Blood Sampling

  1. Collect blood via cardiac puncture, load it into 1.5-mL tubes, and keep it on ice for 30 min.
  2. Centrifuge the blood samples for 5 min at 2,000 x g and 4 °C.
  3. Transfer the supernatant (serum) to a new tube and store it at -80 °C or liquid nitrogen.
  4. Prepare the serum for IL-1β, IL-10, and TNF-α detection tests using the respective ELISA kits.

8. Lung Morphometric Analysis

  1. Dissect the lungs and tracheas from the mice.
    1. Position each euthanized mouse onto a surgical board immediately after sacrifice.
    2. Dissect away the platysma and anterior tracheal muscles to visualize and access the tracheal rings.
    3. Open up the thoracic cavity. Dissect the lungs and the trachea, but do not separate the heart from the lungs.
  2. Connect the endotracheal catheter to a syringe containing 4% paraformaldehyde through a PE90 polyethylene tube.
    Caution: Paraformaldehyde is toxic. Wear gloves and safety glasses and use the solution inside a fume hood.
  3. Inflate the lung completely using 4% paraformaldehyde (10 drops, ~200 µL) through the endotracheal catheter. Remove the heart after the completion of inflation.
  4. Maintain the lung in a 15 mL tube containing 10 mL of 4% paraformaldehyde for at least 4 h.
  5. Embed the lung in paraffin. Obtain 5-µm sections by paraffin block sectioning with a rotary microtome. During the sectioning, expose the maximum surface area of lung tissue within the bronchial tree area.
  6. For morphometric analysis, perform hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining on the sections.
  7. Image the sections with a bright-field upright microscope (objective lens, 20X; exposure time, 1.667 ms).
  8. Have two investigators blinded to the treatment protocol independently count the histological sections. Use the mean linear intercept (Lm) as a parameter for measuring the distance of the inter-alveolar septal wall. Determine the Lm using the following steps:
    1. Open the images of the sections in Photoshop and draw a reticule-grid on the image with five 550 µm long lines.
    2. Count the number of alveoli across the grid line.
    3. Calculate the Lm by dividing the length of the grid line by the number of alveoli. For quantification, image five sections per mouse. Acquire ten images of each section (one image per field) and assess randomly. During field selection, avoid fields of airways and vessels by moving one field ahead or in another direction.
      Note: The data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. An un-paired t-test was carried out for comparison between air-exposed mice and ozone-exposed mice. Three animals of each group were used to calculate the significant difference. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Examples of 3D µCT images of each group are displayed in Figure 1a. The ozone-exposed mice had a significantly larger total lung volume (Figure 1a and b) and LAA% (Figure 1c) than did the air-exposed control mice. The lung volume and LAA% remained elevated after six weeks of ozone exposure31,3...

Discussion

In this study, we present a reliable method for generating a new COPD model. Compared to other models (i.e., LPS or PPE models), this OE model recapitulates the pathological process of COPD patients. Because cigarette smoke is the main hazardous material that causes COPD in human patients40, the CS model remains the most popular COPD model41,42. However, the CS model requires a 3- to 12-month R&D period for new drugs. Compared...

Disclosures

Z.W.S. and W.W. are current employees and stock option holders of the Cellular Biomedicine Group (NASDAQ: CBMG). The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express gratitude to Mr. Boyin Qin (Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center) for the technical assistance with the µCT evaluation in this protocol.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
BALB/c miceSlac Laboratory Animal,Shanghai, ChinaN/A7-to-9-week-old female BALB/c mice were used in this study.
Individual ventilated cagesSuhang, Shanghai, ChinaModel Number: MU64S7The cages were used for housing mice in the animal facility.
Sealing perspex-boxSuhang, Shanghai, ChinaN/AThe box was used  to contain the ozone generator. Mice were exposed to ozone within the box.
Electric generatorSander Ozoniser, Uetze-Eltze, GermanyModel 500 The device was used for generating ozone.
Ozone probeATi Technologies, Ashton-U-Lyne, Greater Manchester, UKOzone 300The device was used for monitoring and controlling the generation of ozone.
Pelltobarbitalum natricumSigma, St. Louis, MO, USAP3761Mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of pelltobarbitalum natricum.
Micro-Computed TomographyGE Healthcare, London, ON, CanadaRS0800639-0075This device was used for acquiring images of the lung.
Micro-view 2.01 ABA softwareGE Healthcare, London, ON, CanadaMicro-view 2.01 This device was used for reconstruct the lung and analyze volume, LAA of the lung.
Treadmill machine Duanshi, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, ChinaDSPT-208This machine was usd for fatigue test.
Body plethysmographeSpira™ Forced Manoeuvres System, EMMS, Edinburgh, UKForced Manoeuvres SystemThis device was used to test spirometry pulmonary function.
VentilatoreSpira™ Forced Manoeuvres System, EMMS, Edinburgh, UKForced Manoeuvres SystemThis device was used to test spirometry pulmonary function.
Slide spinner centrifugeDenville Scientific, Holliston, MA, USAC1183 It was used to spin BALF cells onto slides.
Wright StainingHanhong, Shanghai, ChinaRE04000054 It was used to staining macrophages, neutrophils in the suspended BALF.
HemocytometerHausser Scientific, Horsham, PA, USA4000It was used to count cells.
IL-1βAbcam, Cambridge, MA, USAab100704They were used to test the respective factors in serum.
IL-10Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USAab46103They were used to test the respective factors in serum.
TNF-αAbcam, Cambridge, MA, USAab100747They were used to test the respective factors in serum.
Paraformaldehyde Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USAP6148The lung was inflated by 4% paraformaldehyde.
ParaffinHualing, Shanghai, China56#It was used to embed the lung.
Rotary MicrotomeLeica, Wetzlar,  Hesse, GermanyRM2255It was used for sectioning the lung.
Hgaematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining solutionSolarbio, Beijing, ChinaG1120H&E staining was done for morphometric analysis.
Upright bright field microscopeOlympus, Center Valley, PA, USACX41It was used to image the H&E staining slides.
Adobe Photoshop 12Adobe, San Jose, CA, USAAdobe Photoshop 12It was used to count the number of alveoli on the H&E stained images.
GraphPad prism 5Graphpad Software Inc., San Diego, CAGraphPad prism 5It was used for data analysis and production of figures.

References

  1. Lozano, R., et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 380, 2095-2128 (2012).
  2. Chapman, K. R., et al. Epidemiology and costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 27, 188-207 (2006).
  3. Afonso, A. S., Verhamme, K. M., Sturkenboom, M. C., Brusselle, G. G. COPD in the general population: prevalence, incidence and survival. Respir Med. 105, 1872-1884 (2011).
  4. Rabe, K. F., et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 176, 532-555 (2007).
  5. Ogata-Suetsugu, S., et al. Amphiregulin suppresses epithelial cell apoptosis in lipopolysaccharide-induced lung injury in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Communi. 484, 422-428 (2017).
  6. Oliveira, M. V., et al. Characterization of a Mouse Model of Emphysema Induced by Multiple Instillations of Low-Dose Elastase. Front Physiol. 7, 457 (2016).
  7. Vernooy, J. H., Dentener, M. A., van Suylen, R. J., Buurman, W. A., Wouters, E. F. Long-term intratracheal lipopolysaccharide exposure in mice results in chronic lung inflammation and persistent pathology. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 26, 152-159 (2002).
  8. Birrell, M. A., et al. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in the inflammatory response in human airway cell-based assays and in rodent models of airway disease. J Pharm Exp Ther. 318, 741-750 (2006).
  9. Gamze, K., et al. Effect of bosentan on the production of proinflammatory cytokines in a rat model of emphysema. Exp Mol Med. 39, 614-620 (2007).
  10. Vanoirbeek, J. A., et al. Noninvasive and invasive pulmonary function in mouse models of obstructive and restrictive respiratory diseases. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 42, 96-104 (2010).
  11. Wright, J. L., Cosio, M., Churg, A. Animal models of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 295, 1-15 (2008).
  12. Huh, J. W., et al. Bone marrow cells repair cigarette smoke-induced emphysema in rats. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 301, 255-266 (2011).
  13. Schweitzer, K. S., et al. Adipose stem cell treatment in mice attenuates lung and systemic injury induced by cigarette smoking. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 183, 215-225 (2011).
  14. Guan, X. J., et al. Mesenchymal stem cells protect cigarette smoke-damaged lung and pulmonary function partly via VEGF-VEGF receptors. J Cell Biochem. 114, 323-335 (2013).
  15. Gu, W., et al. Mesenchymal stem cells alleviate airway inflammation and emphysema in COPD through down-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 via p38 and ERK MAPK pathways. Sci Rep. 5, 8733 (2015).
  16. Cordasco, E. M., VanOrdstrand, H. S. Air pollution and COPD. Postgrad Med. 62, 124-127 (1977).
  17. Berend, N. Contribution of air pollution to COPD and small airway dysfunction. Respirology. 21, 237-244 (2016).
  18. DeVries, R., Kriebel, D., Sama, S. Outdoor Air Pollution and COPD-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospital Admissions, and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis. COPD. 14 (1), 113-121 (2016).
  19. Penha, P. D., Amaral, L., Werthamer, S. Ozone air pollutants and lung damage. IMS Ind Med Surg. 41, 17-20 (1972).
  20. Stern, B. R., et al. Air pollution and childhood respiratory health: exposure to sulfate and ozone in 10 Canadian rural communities. Environ Res. 66, 125-142 (1994).
  21. Tager, I. B., et al. Chronic exposure to ambient ozone and lung function in young adults. Epidemiology. 16, 751-759 (2005).
  22. Romieu, I., Castro-Giner, F., Kunzli, N., Sunyer, J. Air pollution, oxidative stress and dietary supplementation: a review. Eur Respir J. 31, 179-197 (2008).
  23. Hemming, J. M., et al. Environmental Pollutant Ozone Causes Damage to Lung Surfactant Protein B (SP-B). Biochemistry. 54, 5185-5197 (2015).
  24. Chu, H., et al. Comparison of lung damage in mice exposed to black carbon particles and ozone-oxidized black carbon particles. Sci Total Environ. 573, 303-312 (2016).
  25. Jin, M., et al. MAP4K4 deficiency in CD4(+) T cells aggravates lung damage induced by ozone-oxidized black carbon particles. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 46, 246-254 (2016).
  26. Brusselle, G. G., Joos, G. F., Bracke, K. R. New insights into the immunology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. 378, 1015-1026 (2011).
  27. Valavanidis, A., Vlachogianni, T., Fiotakis, K., Loridas, S. Pulmonary oxidative stress, inflammation and cancer: respirable particulate matter, fibrous dusts and ozone as major causes of lung carcinogenesis through reactive oxygen species mechanisms. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 10, 3886-3907 (2013).
  28. Medina-Ramon, M., Zanobetti, A., Schwartz, J. The effect of ozone and PM10 on hospital admissions for pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a national multicity study. Am J Epidemiol. 163, 579-588 (2006).
  29. Lee, I. M., Tsai, S. S., Chang, C. C., Ho, C. K., Yang, C. Y. Air pollution and hospital admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a tropical city: Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Inha Toxicol. 19, 393-398 (2007).
  30. Triantaphyllopoulos, K., et al. A model of chronic inflammation and pulmonary emphysema after multiple ozone exposures in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 300, 691-700 (2011).
  31. Li, F., et al. Effects of N-acetylcysteine in ozone-induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease model. PLoS ONE. 8, e80782 (2013).
  32. Li, F., et al. Hydrogen Sulfide Prevents and Partially Reverses Ozone-Induced Features of Lung Inflammation and Emphysema in Mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 55, 72-81 (2016).
  33. Rycroft, C. E., Heyes, A., Lanza, L., Becker, K. Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a literature review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 7, 457-494 (2012).
  34. Washko, G. R., et al. Airway wall attenuation: a biomarker of airway disease in subjects with COPD. J Appl Physiol. 107, 185-191 (2009).
  35. Yamashiro, T., et al. Quantitative assessment of bronchial wall attenuation with thin-section CT: An indicator of airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 195, 363-369 (2010).
  36. Tang, X., et al. Arctigenin efficiently enhanced sedentary mice treadmill endurance. PLoS ONE. 6, e24224 (2011).
  37. Schmidt, G. A., et al. Official Executive Summary of an American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline: Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 195, 115-119 (2017).
  38. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 166, 111-117 (2002).
  39. Shigemura, N., et al. Autologous transplantation of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells ameliorates pulmonary emphysema. Am J Transplant. 6, 2592-2600 (2006).
  40. Bchir, S., et al. Concomitant elevations of MMP-9, NGAL, proMMP-9/NGAL and neutrophil elastase in serum of smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cell Mol Med. , 1-12 (2016).
  41. Fricker, M., Deane, A., Hansbro, P. M. Animal models of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 9, 629-645 (2014).
  42. Perez-Rial, S., Giron-Martinez, A., Peces-Barba, G. Animal models of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Bronconeumol. 51, 121-127 (2015).
  43. Antunes, M. A., et al. Effects of different mesenchymal stromal cell sources and delivery routes in experimental emphysema. Respir Res. 15, 118 (2014).
  44. Celli, B. R., MacNee, W., Force, A. E. T. Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper. Eur Respir J. 23, 932-946 (2004).
  45. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using spirometry: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 148, 529-534 (2008).
  46. Ward, R. E., et al. Design considerations of CareWindows, a Windows 3.0-based graphical front end to a Medical Information Management System using a pass-through-requester architecture. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. , 564-568 (1991).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

COPD ModelOzone ExposureMiceLung FunctionMicro CT ImagingTreadmill TestBronchoalveolar Lavage

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved