JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

The present report highlights chronological requirements for extracellular vesicle (EV) isolation from microglia or blood macrophages. Microglia-derived EVs were evaluated as regulators of the neurite outgrowth while blood macrophage-derived EVs were studied in the control of C6 glioma cell invasion in in vitro assays. The goal is to better understand these EV functions as immune mediators in specific microenvironments.

Abstract

The neuroinflammatory state of the central nervous system (CNS) plays a key role in physiological and pathological conditions. Microglia, the resident immune cells in the brain, and sometimes the infiltrating bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs), regulate the inflammatory profile of their microenvironment in the CNS. It is now accepted that the extracellular vesicle (EV) populations from immune cells act as immune mediators. Thus, their collection and isolation are important to identify their contents but also evaluate their biological effects on recipient cells. The present data highlight chronological requirements for EV isolation from microglia cells or blood macrophages including the ultracentrifugation and size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) steps. A non-targeted proteomic analysis permitted the validation of protein signatures as EV markers and characterized the biologically active EV contents. Microglia-derived EVs were also functionally used on primary culture of neurons to assess their importance as immune mediators in the neurite outgrowth. The results showed that microglia-derived EVs contribute to facilitate the neurite outgrowth in vitro. In parallel, blood macrophage-derived EVs were functionally used as immune mediators in spheroid cultures of C6 glioma cells, the results showing that these EVs control the glioma cell invasion in vitro. This report highlights the possibility to evaluate the EV-mediated immune cell functions but also understand the molecular bases of such a communication. This deciphering could promote the use of natural vesicles and/or the in vitro preparation of therapeutic vesicles in order to mimic immune properties in the microenvironment of CNS pathologies.

Introduction

Many neuropathologies are related to the neuro-inflammatory state which is a complex mechanism that is increasingly considered, but still poorly understood because the immune processes are diverse and depend upon the cell environment. Indeed, the CNS disorders do not systematically involve the same activation signals and immune cell populations and thus the pro- or anti-inflammatory responses are difficult to evaluate as causes or consequences of pathologies. The brain resident macrophages called “microglia” appear to be at the interface between the nervous and immune systems1. Microglia have a myeloid origin and are derived from the yolk sac during primitive hematopoiesis to colonize the brain, whereas peripheral macrophages are derived from the fetal liver during definitive hematopoiesis to become peripheral macrophages2. The microglia cells communicate with neurons and neuron-derived glial cells such as astrocytes and oligodendrocytes3. Several recent studies have demonstrated that microglia are involved in neuronal plasticity during CNS development and adult tissue homeostasis, and also in the inflammatory state associated with neurodegenerative diseases4,5. Otherwise, the integrity of the blood brain barrier can be compromised in other CNS pathologies. The immune responses, especially in the glioblastoma multiforme cancer, are not supported only by microglia cells as the blood brain barrier is reorganized through angiogenic processes and the presence of lymphatic vessels6,7. Therefore, a large bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) infiltration occurs in the brain tumor throughout tumor-dependent angiogenesis mechanisms8. The cancer cells exert a significant influence on infiltrated BMDMs leading to immunosuppressive properties and tumor growth9. Thus the communication between the immune cells and their brain microenvironment is difficult to understand as the cell origin and activation signals are diverse10,11. It is thus interesting to apprehend the functions of immune cell-associated molecular signatures in physiological conditions. In this regard, the cell-cell communication between immune cells and cell microenvironment can be studied through the release of extracellular vesicles (EVs).

The EVs are being studied more and more in the regulation of immune functions in healthy as well as pathological conditions12,13. Two populations, exosomes and microvesicles, can be taken into account. They present different biogenesis and size ranges. The exosomes are vesicles of ~30–150 nm diameter and are generated from the endosomal system and secreted during fusion of multivesicular bodies (MVBs) with the plasma membrane. The microvesicles are about 100–1,000 nm in diameter and are generated by an outward budding from the cell plasma membrane14. Because the exosome versus microvesicle discrimination is still difficult to realize according to the size and molecular patterns, we will only use the term EVs in the present report. The EV-associated communication in the CNS represents an ancestral mechanism since studies showed their involvement in invertebrate species including nematodes, insects or annelids15,16. Moreover, the results showing that EVs can communicate with cells from different species demonstrate this mechanism to be a key-lock system, based first on surface-molecule recognition between vesicles and recipient cells and then allowing the uptake of mediators16,17. Indeed, the EVs contain many molecules like proteins (e.g., enzymes, signal transduction, biogenesis factor), lipids (e.g., ceramide, cholesterol) or nucleic acids (e.g., DNA, mRNA or miRNAs) acting as direct or indirect regulators of the recipient cell activities14. That is why methodological studies were also performed on immune cells to isolate EVs and fully characterize their protein signatures18,19.

The earliest studies demonstrated the release of exosomes from primary cultured rat microglia as an inducible mechanism following a Wnt3a- or serotonin-dependent activation20,21. Functionally in the CNS, microglia-derived EVs regulate the synaptic vesicle release by presynaptic terminals in neurons contributing to the control of the neuronal excitability22,23. Microglia-derived EVs could also propagate cytokines-mediated inflammatory response in large brain regions24,25. Importantly, the diverse ligands for toll-like receptor family might activate specific productions of EVs in the microglia26. For example, in vitro studies show that LPS-activated microglia BV2 cell lines produce differential EV contents including pro-inflammatory cytokines27. Therefore, the functional diversity of immune cell subpopulations in the CNS, microglia and infiltrating BMDMs, might be evaluated through their own EV populations including the EV impact on recipient cells and the identification of EV contents.

We previously described methods to evaluate the functional properties of microglia- and BMDM-derived EVs after their isolation16,19. In the present report, we propose to independently evaluate the effect of microglia-derived EVs on neurite outgrowth, and the effect of macrophage-derived EVs on the control of glioma cell aggregates. This study also proposes a wide proteomic analysis of the EV fractions in order to validate the EV isolation procedure as well as identify the biologically active protein signatures. The beneficial effects and the molecular deciphering of EV contents could help their possible manipulation and use as therapeutic agents in brain disorders.

Protocol

1. Primary Culture of Microglia/Macrophages

  1. Primary culture of microglia
    1. Culture commercial rat primary microglia (2 x 106 cells) (see the Table of Materials) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% exosome-free serum, 100 U/mL of penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 9.0 g/L glucose at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
    2. Collect the conditioned medium after a 48 h culture and proceed to the isolation of EVs.
  2. Primary culture of macrophages
    1. Culture commercial rat primary macrophages (1 x 106 cells) in the medium provided by the manufacturer (see the Table of Materials) at 37 °C and 5% CO2, with exosome-free serum.
    2. Collect the conditioned medium after a 24 h culture and proceed to the isolation of EVs.

2. Isolation of EVs

  1. Pre-isolation of EVs from conditioned medium
    1. Transfer the conditioned culture medium from microglia or macrophage cultures (steps 1.1.2 or 1.2.2) into a conical tube.
    2. Centrifuge at 1,200 x g for 10 min at room temperature (RT) to pellet the cells.
    3. Transfer the supernatant into a new conical tube. Centrifuge at 1,200 x g for 20 min at RT to eliminate apoptotic bodies.
    4. Transfer the supernatant into a 10.4 mL polycarbonate tube and transfer the tube into a 70.1 Ti rotor. Ultracentrifuge at 100,000 x g for 90 min at 4 °C to pellet the EVs.
    5. Discard the supernatant and resuspend the pellet containing EVs in 200 µL of 0.20 µm filtered phosphate buffer saline (PBS).
  2. Isolation of EVs
    1. Preparation of the home-made size exclusion chromatography column (SEC)
      1. Empty a glass chromatography column (length: 26 cm; diameter: 0.6 cm) (see the Table of Materials), wash and sterilize it.
      2. Place a 60 µm filter at the bottom of the column.
      3. Stack the column with cross-linked agarose gel filtration base matrix to create a stationary phase of a 0.6 cm diameter and a 20 cm height.
      4. Rinse the phase with 50 mL of 0.20 µm filtered PBS. Store at 4 °C to be used later if necessary.
    2. Place the resuspended EV pellet on top of the stationary phase of the SEC column.
    3. Collect 20 sequential fractions of 250 µL while continuing to add 0.20 µm filtered PBS on the top of stationary phase to prevent drying of the column. Store the fractions at -20 °C if necessary.
      NOTE: A longer storage than one week can be performed at -80 °C to maintain the EV integrity for molecular analysis.
  3. Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry analysis of the SEC fractions
    1. Proceed to the EV isolation as described in section 2.2.
    2. Resuspend the EV pellet with 200 µL of peptide calibration mix solution (see the Table of Materials).
    3. Proceed to EV collection as described in sections 2.2.1 to 2.2.3.
    4. Completely dry the fraction with a vacuum concentrator.
    5. Reconstitute the fractions with 10 µL of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA).
    6. Mix 1 µL of reconstituted fraction with 1 µL of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA) matrix on a MALDI polished steel target plate.
    7. Analyze all fractions with a MALDI mass spectrometer.
    8. Analyze generated spectra with dedicated software (see Table of Materials).

3. Characterization of EVs

  1. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA)
    NOTE:
    The NTA analysis is performed with a nanoparticle tracking analysis instrument (see the Table of Materials) and an automated syringe pump.
    1. Make a dilution (range of 1:50 to 1:500) of each SEC fraction from step 2.2.3 with 0.20 µm filtered PBS.
    2. Vortex the solution to eliminate EV aggregates.
    3. Put the diluted solution in a 1 mL syringe and place it in the automated syringe pump.
    4. Adjust Camera setting to screen gain level (3) and camera level (13).
    5. Click on Run and launch the following script.
      1. Load the sample in analysis chamber (infusion rate: 1,000 for 15 s).
      2. Decrease and stabilize speed flow for video recording (infusion rate: 25 for 15 s). Capture three consecutive 60 s videos of the particle flow.
      3. Adjust the camera level (13) and the detection threshold (3) before videos analysis. Click on Settings| Ok to start the analysis and click on Export when the analysis is done.
    6. Between each fraction analysis, wash with 1 mL of 0.20 µm filtered PBS.
  2. Electron microscopy (EM) analysis
    1. Isolate EVs as described in section 2.
      NOTE: Sterile conditions are not required.
    2. Repeat section 3.1 to quantify EVs.
      NOTE: Only positive fractions will be used for EM analysis.
    3. Use a 50 kDa centrifugal filter (see Table of Materials) to concentrate EV-containing SEC fractions.
    4. Resuspend concentrated EVs in 30 µL of 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA).
    5. Load 10 µL of the sample onto a carbon-coated copper grid.
    6. Incubate for 20 min in a wet environment.
    7. Repeat steps 3.2.5 and 3.2.6 for a good absorption of the sample on the grid.
    8. Transfer the grid into a drop of 1% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 5 min at RT.
    9. Wash the sample with ultrapure water several times.
    10. Contrast the sample for 10 min on ice with a mixture of 4% uranyl acetate and 2% methylcellulose (1:9, v/v). Remove excess of the mixture using a filter paper.
    11. Dry the sample and observe it under a transmission electron microscope at 200 kV (see the Table of Materials).
  3. Western blot analysis
    1. Protein extraction
      1. Repeat the steps 3.2.1 to 3.2.3 to isolate and concentrate EVs.
      2. Mix 50 µL of RIPA buffer (150 mM sodium chloride [NaCl], 50 mM Tris, 5 mM Ethylene glycol-bis(2-aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid [EGTA], 2 mM Ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid [EDTA], 100 mM sodium fluoride [NaF], 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM Phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], 1x protease inhibitor) with the EV sample (25 µL resulting from the EV concentration on filter) for 5 min on ice to extract proteins.
      3. Sonicate for 5 s (amplitude: 500 W; frequency: 20 kHz), 3 times on ice.
      4. Remove vesicular debris by centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 10 min, at 4 °C.
      5. Collect the supernatant and measure the protein concentration with Bradford protein assay method.
    2. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blotting
      1. Mix protein extracts (30 µg) with 5c Laemmli sample buffer (v/v).
      2. Load the protein mix on a 12% polyacrylamide gel.
      3. Migrate the proteins in the gel with TGS buffer (25 mM Tris pH 8.5, 192 mM Glycine, and 0.1% SDS), at 70 V for 15 min and 120 V for 45 min.
      4. Transfer the proteins onto nitrocellulose membrane with semi-dry system at 230 V for 30 min.
      5. Saturate the membrane for 1 h at RT with blocking buffer (0.05% Tween 20 w/v, 5% milk powder w/v in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4).
      6. Incubate the membrane overnight at 4 °C with mouse monoclonal anti-human heat-shock protein 90 (HSP90) antibody diluted in blocking buffer (1:100).
      7. Wash the membrane three times with PBS-Tween (PBS, 0.05% Tween 20 w/v) for 15 min.
      8. Incubate the membrane for 1 h at RT with goat horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody diluted in blocking buffer (1:10,000).
        NOTE: A negative control is performed using secondary antibody alone.
      9. Repeat the washing step (step 3.3.2.7).
      10. Reveal the membrane with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) western blotting substrate kit (see Table of Materials).
  4. Proteomic analysis
    1. Protein extraction and in-gel digestion
      1. Repeat the steps 3.2.1 to 3.2.3 to isolate and concentrate the EVs. Repeat step 3.3.1 for EV protein extraction.
      2. Perform protein migration in the stacking gel of a 12% polyacrylamide gel.
      3. Fix the proteins in the gel with coomassie blue for 20 min at RT.
      4. Excise each colored gel piece and cut it into small pieces of 1 mm3.
      5. Wash the gel pieces successively with 300 µL of each solutions: ultrapure water for 15 min, 100% acetonitrile (ACN) for 15 min, 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate (NH4HCO3) for 15 min, ACN:100 mM NH4HCO3 (1:1, v/v) for 15 min, and 100% ACN for 5 min with continuous stirring.
      6. Dry completely gel pieces with vacuum concentrator.
      7. Perform protein reduction with 100 µL of 100 mM NH4HCO3 containing 10 mM dithiothreitol for 1 h at 56°C.
      8. Perform protein alkylation with 100 µL of 100 mM NH4HCO3 containing 50 mM iodoacetamide for 45 min in the dark at RT.
      9. Wash the gel pieces successively with 300 µL of each solution: 100 mM of NH4HCO3 for 15 min, ACN:20 mM NH4HCO3 (1:1, v/v) for 15 min, and 100% ACN for 5 min with a continuous stirring.
      10. Completely dry the gel pieces with a vacuum concentrator.
      11. Perform protein digestion with 50 µL of trypsin (12.5 µg/mL) in 20 mM NH4HCO3 overnight at 37 °C.
      12. Extract the digested proteins from the gel with 50 µL of 100% ACN for 30 min at 37 °C and then 15 min at RT with continuous stirring.
      13. Repeat the following extraction procedures twice: 50 µL of 5% TFA in 20 mM NH4HCO3 solution for 20 min with continuous stirring.
      14. Add 100 µL of 100% ACN for 10 min with continuous stirring.
      15. Dry digested proteins with a vacuum concentrator and resuspend in 20 µL of 0.1% TFA.
      16. Desalt the sample using a 10 µL pipette tip with C18 reverse phase media for desalting and concentrating peptides (see the Table of Materials) and elute peptides with ACN:0.1% formic acid (FA) (80:20, v/v).
      17. Completely dry the sample with a vacuum concentrator and resuspend in 20 µL of ACN:0.1% FA (2:98, v/v) for liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
    2. LC-MS/MS Analysis
      1. Load the digested peptide into the LC-MS/MS instrument and perform sample and data analysis according to parameters described in detail elsewhere42.
    3. Raw data analysis
      1. Process mass spectrometry data to identify proteins and compare identified proteins of each sample with a quantitative proteomics software package using standard parameters.
      2. Export, using standard parameters, the list of exclusive and over-represented proteins from EV positive samples in a software predicting protein networks and biological processes.
      3. Compare the list of identified proteins in the fractions with the top 100 EV markers from the Exocarta open access database (see the Table of Materials).

4. Functional EVs Effects Assay

  1. Neurite outgrowth assay on PC-12 cell line
    1. Culture PC12 cell line in complete DMEM medium (2 mM L-glutamine, 10% fetal horse serum (FHS), 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 UI/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin).
      NOTE: The sera are exosome free in the whole procedure.
    2. Add a cover glass (all wells) to a 24-well plate; coat the plate with poly-D-lysine (0.1 mg/mL) and seed 260,000 cells/well.
    3. Incubate the cells at 37 °C under 5% CO2.
    4. After 24 h of incubation, change the medium to DMEM differentiation medium (DMEM with 2 mM L-glutamine, 0.1% FHS, 100 UI/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin) with 1 x 106 microglia EVs (from step 1.1.2).
      NOTE: Control condition is performed without microglia EVs in the differentiation medium.
    5. At day 4 after seeding, load all wells with 100 µL of complete DMEM medium.
    6. At day 7 after seeding, fix the cells with 4% PFA for 20 min at RT and rinse three times (10 min each) with PBS.
    7. Stain the cells with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin for 30 min at 4 °C and rinse 3 times (10 min each) with PBS.
    8. Stain the cells with diluted Hoechst 33342 (1:10,000) for 30 min at RT and rinse 3 times (10 min each) with PBS.
    9. Mount the cover glass on a slide with fluorescent mounting medium (see Table of Materials).
    10. Analyze the slide with a confocal microscope, take 5 random images of each slide.
    11. Measure neurite outgrowth using an automated quantification software (total neurite length) as described in detail elsewhere43.
  2. Neurite outgrowth on rat primary neurons
    1. Coat an 8-well glass slide with poly-D-lysine (0.1 mg/mL) and laminin (20 µg/mL).
    2. Culture rat commercial primary neurons in appropriate culture medium (see Table of Materials) by plating 50,000 cells per well and incubating the cells at 37 °C under 5% CO2 for 48 h.
      NOTE: The sera are exosome-free in the whole procedure.
    3. Add 1 x 106 microglia EVs to neuron culture medium and incubate at 37 °C under 5% CO2 for 48 h more.
      NOTE: Control condition is performed without microglia EVs in neuron culture medium.
    4. Follow steps 4.1.6 to 4.1.9 to fix and stain the cells.
    5. Follow steps 4.1.10 and 4.1.11 to analyze the slide.
  3. Glioma cell invasion
    1. Resuspend C6 rat glioma cells in complete DMEM medium (DMEM with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1x antibiotics) containing 5% collagen at a final concentration of 8,000 cells in 20 µL.
      NOTE: The sera are exosome-free in the whole procedure.
    2. Place 5 mL of PBS AT the bottom of a 60 mm tissue culture dish. Invert the lid and deposit drops of 20 µL (8,000 cells) of cell suspension onto the bottom of the lid.
    3. Invert the lid onto the PBS-filled bottom chamber and incubate the plate at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 72 h until cell spheroids are formed.
    4. Add 1 x 108 macrophage EVs (from step 1.2.2) to a 2.2 mg/mL collagen mixture (2 mL of bovine collagen type I solution [3 mg/mL] with 250 µL of 10x minimum essential medium (MEM) and 500 µL of 0.1 M sodium hydroxide).
      NOTE: Control condition is performed without macrophage EVs in the collagen mixture.
    5. Distribute the collagen mixture containing EVs in a 24-well plate for embedding cell spheroids.
    6. Implant the newly formed cell spheroids at the center of each well.
    7. Incubate the plate for 30 min at 37°C and 5% CO2 to solidify the gel.
    8. Thereafter, overlay 400 µL of complete DMEM medium on the collagen matrix in each well.
    9. Incubate the complete system for a total of 6 days at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
      NOTE: Cell invasion out of the spheroid is monitored by digital photography using an inverted light microscope using a 4x/0.10 N.A. objective.
    10. Acquire images of each well every day.
    11. Process images and quantify invasion of cell spheroid areas using the software as previously described in detail42.
      NOTE: Invasion and spheroid areas were normalized for each day to the invasion and spheroid areas measured on day 0.

Results

One of the main challenges to attributing biologicals effects to extracellular vesicles (EVs) is the ability to isolate the EVs from the whole culture medium. In this report, we present a method using ultracentrifugation (UC) and size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) which is coupled to the large-scale analysis of protein signatures to validate EV markers and identify bioactive compounds. The macrophage- or microglia-derived EVs were isolated from the conditioned medium after a 24 h or 48 h culture respectively (

Discussion

The central nervous system (CNS) is a complex tissue in which cell-to-cell communication regulates normal neuronal functions necessary for homeostasis30. EVs are now widely studied and described as important molecular cargos for cell-to-cell communication31. They specifically deliver a cocktail of mediators to recipient cells thereby affecting their functions in healthy and pathological conditions32. Recent studies indicate that EVs play a crucial ro...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The presented work was supported by the Ministère de L’Education Nationale, de L’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche and INSERM. We gratefully acknowledge the BICeL- Campus Scientific City Facility for access to instruments and technical advices. We gratefully acknowledge Jean-Pascal Gimeno, Soulaimane Aboulouard and Isabelle Fournier for the Mass spectrometry assistance. We gratefully acknowledge Tanina Arab, Christelle van Camp, Francoise le Marrec-Croq, Jacopo Vizioli and Pierre-Eric Sautière for their strong contribution to the scientific and technical developments.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
12% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Precast Protein GelsBio-rad4561045EDU 
AcetonitrileFisher ChemicalsA955-1 
Amicon 50 kDa centrifugal filterMerckUFC505024 
Ammonium bicarbonateSigma-Aldrich9830 
HSP90 α/β antibody (RRID: AB_675659)Santa-cruzsc-13119 
B27 Plus supplementGibcoA3582801 
BenchMixer V2 Vortex MixerBenchmark ScientificBV1003 
Bio-Rad Protein Assay Dye Reagent Concentrate (Bradford)Bio-Rad5000006 
C18 ZipTipsMerck MilliporeZTC18S096 
C6 rat glioma cellATCCATCC CCL-107 
Canonical tubesSarstedt62.554.002 
CentrifugeEppendorf5804000010 
CO2 IncubatorThermoFisher  
Confocal microscope LSM880Carl ZeissLSM880 
Cover glassMarienfeld111580 
Culture Dish (60 mm)Sarstedt82.1473 
DithiothreitolSigma-Aldrich43819 
DMEMGibco41966029 
EASY-nLC 1000 Liquid ChromatographThermoFisher  
Electron microscope JEM-2100JEOL  
Ethylene glycol-bis(2-aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acidSigma-Aldrich03777-10G 
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acidSigma-AldrichED-100G 
Exo-FBSOzymeEXO-FBS-50A-1Exosome depleted FBS
ExoCarta database (top 100 proteins of Evs)  http://www.exocarta.org/
Fetal Bovine SerumGibco16140071 
Fetal Horse SerumBiowestS0960-500 
Filtropur S 0.2Sarstedt83.1826.001 
Fisherbrand Q500 Sonicator with ProbeFisherbrand12893543 
FlexAnalysisBrucker  
Fluorescence mounting mediumAgilentS3023 
Formic AcidSigma-Aldrich695076 
Formvar-carbon coated copper gridsAgar scientific LtdAGS162-3 
GlucoseSigma-AldrichG8769 
GlutaraldehydeSigma-Aldrich340855 
Hoechst 33342Euromedex17535-AAT 
IdoacetamideSigma-AldrichI1149 
InstantBlue Coomassie Protein StainExpedeonISB1L 
Invert light microscope CKX53Olympus  
L-glutamineGibco25030-024 
LabTek II 8 wells Nunc154534 
Laemmli 2xBio-Rad1610737 
LamininCorning354232 
MaxQuant software (proteins identification software)  https://maxquant.net/maxquant/
MBT Polish stellBrucker8268711 
MEM 10xGibco21090-022 
MethylcelluloseSigma-AldrichM6385-100G 
MiliQ waterMerck Millipore  
MilkRegilaitREGILAIT300 
Mini PROTEAN Vertical Electrophoresis CellBio-Rad1658000FC 
MonoP FPLC columnGE Healthcare no longer available
Nanosight NS300Malvern PanalyticalNS300 
NanoSight NTA software v3.2Malvern Panalytical  
NanoSight syringe pumpMalvern Panalytical  
NeurobasalGibco21103-049 
Nitrocellulose membraneGE Healthcare10600007 
Nonidet P-40Fluka56741 
Nunc multidish 24 wellsThermoFisher82.1473 
ParaformaldehydeElectro microscopy Science15713 
PC-12 cell lineATCCATCC CRL-1721 
Penicillin-StreptomycinGibco15140-122 
Peptide calibration mixLaserBio LabsC101 
Peroxidase AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)Jackson ImmunoResearch115-035-003 
Perseus software (Processing of identified proteins)  https://maxquant.net/perseus/
Phalloidin-tetramethylrhodamine conjugateSanta-cruzsc-362065 
Phenylmethanesulfonyl fluorideSigma-Aldrich78830 
Phosphate Buffer SalineInvitrogen14190094no calcium, no magnesium
pluriStrainer M/ 60 µmpluriSelect43-50060 
Poly-D-lysineSigma-AldrichP6407 
Polycarbonate centrifuge tubesBeckman Coulter355651 
Protease InhibitorSigma-AldrichS8830-20TAB 
PureColCell Systems5005 
Q-Exactive mass spectrometerThermoFisher  
rapifleX mass spectrometerBrucker  
Rat cortical neuronsCell ApplicationsR882N-20Cell origin : Derived from cerebral cortices of day 18 embryonic Sprague Dawley rat brains
Rat Macrophage & Microglia Culture MediumCell ApplicationsR620K-100Cell orgin : Normal healthy Rat bone marrow
Rat primary macrophagesCell ApplicationsR8818-10a 
Rat primary microgliaLonzaRG535 
Sepharose CL-2BGE Healthcare17014001 
Sequencing Grade Modified TrypsinPromegaV5111 
SlideDustsher100204 
Sodium ChlorideScharlauSO0227 
Sodium Dodecyl SulfateSigma-AldrichL3771 
Sodium FluorideSigma-AldrichS7920-100G 
Sodium hydroxideScharlabSO0420005P 
Sodium pyrophosphateSigma-AldrichS6422-100G 
SpeedVac Vacuum ConcentratorThermoFisher  
String software (functional protein association networks)  https://string-db.org/
SuperSignal West Dura extended Duration SubstrateThermoFisher34075 
Syringe 1.0 mLTerumo8SS01H1 
Trans-Blot SD Semi-Dry Transfer cellBio-Rad1703940 
Trifluoroacetic acidSigma-AldrichT6508 
TrisInterchimUP031657 
Tris-GlycineEuromedexEU0550 
Tween 20Sigma-AldrichP2287 
UltracentrifugeBeckman CoulterA95765 
Ultracentrifuge Rotor 70.1 TiBeckman Coulter342184 
Uranyl acetateAgar Scientific LtdAGR1260A 
Whatman filter paperSigma-AldrichWHA10347510 
α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acidSigma-AldrichC2020-25G 

References

  1. Thion, M. S., Ginhoux, F., Garel, S. Microglia and early brain development: An intimate journey. Science. 362 (6411), 185-189 (2018).
  2. Ginhoux, F., et al. Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages. Science. 330 (6005), 841-845 (2010).
  3. Sankowski, R., Mader, S., Valdes-Ferrer, S. I. Systemic Inflammation and the Brain: Novel Roles of Genetic, Molecular, and Environmental Cues as Drivers of Neurodegeneration. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 9, (2015).
  4. Chakrabarty, S., Kabekkodu, S. P., Singh, R. P., Thangaraj, K., Singh, K. K., Satyamoorthy, K. Microglia in health and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 43 (3), 25-29 (2015).
  5. Sankowski, R., Mader, S., Valdés-Ferrer, S. I. Systemic inflammation and the brain: novel roles of genetic, molecular, and environmental cues as drivers of neurodegeneration. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience. 9, 28 (2015).
  6. Engelhardt, B., Vajkoczy, P., Weller, R. O. The movers and shapers in immune privilege of the CNS. Nature Immunology. 18 (2), 123-131 (2017).
  7. Louveau, A., et al. Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature. 523 (7560), 337-341 (2015).
  8. Domingues, P., et al. Tumor infiltrating immune cells in gliomas and meningiomas. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 53, 1-15 (2016).
  9. Hambardzumyan, D., Gutmann, D. H., Kettenmann, H. The role of microglia and macrophages in glioma maintenance and progression. Nature Neuroscience. 19 (1), 20-27 (2016).
  10. Thion, M. S., et al. Microbiome Influences Prenatal and Adult Microglia in a Sex-Specific Manner. Cell. 172 (3), 500-516 (2018).
  11. Hammond, T. R., et al. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Microglia throughout the Mouse Lifespan and in the Injured Brain Reveals Complex Cell-State Changes. Immunity. 50 (1), 253-271 (2019).
  12. Rajendran, L., et al. Emerging Roles of Extracellular Vesicles in the Nervous System. The Journal of Neuroscience. 34 (46), 15482-15489 (2014).
  13. Gupta, A., Pulliam, L. Exosomes as mediators of neuroinflammation. Journal of Neuroinflammation. 11 (1), 68 (2014).
  14. van Niel, G., D'Angelo, G., Raposo, G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 19 (4), 213-228 (2018).
  15. Budnik, V., Ruiz-cañada, C., Wendler, F. Extracellular vesicles round off communication in the nervous system. Nature Reviews Neurosciences. 17, 160-172 (2016).
  16. Raffo-Romero, A., et al. Medicinal Leech CNS as a Model for Exosome Studies in the Crosstalk between Microglia and Neurons. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 19 (12), 4124 (2018).
  17. Zhou, Y., et al. Exosomes Transfer Among Different Species Cells and Mediating miRNAs Delivery. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 118 (12), 4267-4274 (2017).
  18. Arab, T., et al. Proteomic characterisation of leech microglia extracellular vesicles (EVs): comparison between differential ultracentrifugation and OptiprepTM density gradient isolation. Journal of extracellular vesicles. 8 (1), 1603048 (2019).
  19. Murgoci, A. -. N., et al. Brain-Cortex Microglia-Derived Exosomes: Nanoparticles for Glioma Therapy. ChemPhysChem. 19 (10), 1205-1214 (2018).
  20. Glebov, K., et al. Serotonin stimulates secretion of exosomes from microglia cells. Glia. 63 (4), 626-634 (2015).
  21. Hooper, C., et al. Wnt3a induces exosome secretion from primary cultured rat microglia. BMC Neuroscience. 13 (1), 144 (2012).
  22. Gabrielli, M., et al. Active endocannabinoids are secreted on extracellular membrane vesicles. EMBO reports. 16 (2), 213-220 (2015).
  23. Antonucci, F., et al. Microvesicles released from microglia stimulate synaptic activity via enhanced sphingolipid metabolism. The EMBO Journal. 31 (5), 1231-1240 (2012).
  24. Frühbeis, C., Fröhlich, D., Kuo, W. P., Krämer-Albers, E. -. M. Extracellular vesicles as mediators of neuron-glia communication. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 7, 182 (2013).
  25. Prada, I., et al. Glia-to-neuron transfer of miRNAs via extracellular vesicles: a new mechanism underlying inflammation-induced synaptic alterations. Acta neuropathologica. 135 (4), 529-550 (2018).
  26. Takenouchi, T., et al. Extracellular ATP induces unconventional release of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from microglial cells. Immunology Letters. 167 (2), 116-124 (2015).
  27. Yang, Y., Boza-Serrano, A., Dunning, C. J. R., Clausen, B. H., Lambertsen, K. L., Deierborg, T. Inflammation leads to distinct populations of extracellular vesicles from microglia. Journal of Neuroinflammation. 15 (1), 168 (2018).
  28. Duhamel, M., et al. Paclitaxel Treatment and Proprotein Convertase 1/3 (PC1/3) Knockdown in Macrophages is a Promising Antiglioma Strategy as Revealed by Proteomics and Cytotoxicity Studies. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 17 (6), 1126-1143 (2018).
  29. Pool, M., Thiemann, J., Bar-Or, A., Fournier, A. E. NeuriteTracer: A novel ImageJ plugin for automated quantification of neurite outgrowth. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 168 (1), 134-139 (2008).
  30. Domingues, H. S., Portugal, C. C., Socodato, R., Relvas, J. B. Oligodendrocyte, Astrocyte, and Microglia Crosstalk in Myelin Development, Damage, and Repair. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 4, 71 (2016).
  31. Rashed, M. H., et al. Exosomes: From Garbage Bins to Promising Therapeutic Targets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18 (18), (2017).
  32. Yuana, Y., Sturk, A., Nieuwland, R. Extracellular vesicles in physiological and pathological conditions. Blood Reviews. 27 (1), 31-39 (2013).
  33. Frohlich, D., et al. Multifaceted effects of oligodendroglial exosomes on neurons: impact on neuronal firing rate, signal transduction and gene regulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 369 (1652), (2014).
  34. Krämer-Albers, E. -. M., et al. Oligodendrocytes secrete exosomes containing major myelin and stress-protective proteins: Trophic support for axons. Proteomics. Clinical applications. 1 (11), 1446-1461 (2007).
  35. Verderio, C., et al. Myeloid microvesicles are a marker and therapeutic target for neuroinflammation. Annals of Neurology. 72 (4), 610-624 (2012).
  36. Prada, I., Furlan, R., Matteoli, M., Verderio, C. Classical and Unconventional Pathways of Vesicular Release in Microglia. GLIA. 61, 1003-1017 (2013).
  37. Prinz, M., Priller, J. The role of peripheral immune cells in the CNS in steady state and disease. Nature Neuroscience. 20 (2), 136-144 (2017).
  38. Li, Q., Barres, B. A. Microglia and macrophages in brain homeostasis and disease. Nature Reviews Immunology. , (2017).
  39. Kennedy, B. C., et al. Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Glioma: Friend or Foe. Journal of Oncology. 2013, 1-11 (2013).
  40. Potolicchio, I., Carven, G. J., Xu, X., Stipp, C., Riese, R. J., Stern, L. J., Santambroggio, L. Proteomic Analysis of Microglia-Derived Exosomes: Metabolic Role of the Aminopeptidase CD13 in Neuropeptide Catabolism1. The Journal of Immunology. 175, 2237-2243 (2005).
  41. Turola, E., Furlan, R., Bianco, F., Matteoli, M., Verderio, C. Microglial microvesicle secretion and intercellular signaling. Frontiers in Physiology. 3, (2012).
  42. Cocucci, E., Meldolesi, J. Ectosomes and exosomes : shedding the confusion between extracellular vesicles. Trends in Cell Biology. 25 (6), 364-372 (2015).
  43. Théry, C., et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. 7 (1), 1535750 (2018).
  44. de Vrij, J., et al. Glioblastoma-derived extracellular vesicles modify the phenotype of monocytic cells. International Journal of Cancer. 137 (7), 1630-1642 (2015).
  45. van der Vos, K. E., et al. Directly visualized glioblastoma-derived extracellular vesicles transfer RNA to microglia/macrophages in the brain. Neuro-Oncology. 18 (1), 58-69 (2016).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Extracellular VesiclesImmune Cell derived EVsIsolation TechniqueEBDF ProteinsFunctional ImpactLC liquid ChromatographyBiological EthicsMicrogliaMacrophage CulturesSize Exclusion ChromatographyNanoparticle Tracking AnalysisUltra CentrifugationPBS phosphate buffered SalineAntonella Raffo RomeroGlass Chromatography Column

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved