A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Zebrafish xenograft models allow for high-throughput drug screening and fluorescent imaging of human cancer cells in an in vivo microenvironment. We developed a workflow for large scale, automated drug screening on patient-derived leukemia samples in zebrafish using an automated fluorescence microscope equipped imaging unit.
Patient derived xenograft models are critical in defining how different cancers respond to drug treatment in an in vivo system. Mouse models are the standard in the field, but zebrafish have emerged as an alternative model with several advantages, including the ability for high-throughput and low-cost drug screening. Zebrafish also allow for in vivo drug screening with large replicate numbers that were previously only obtainable with in vitro systems. The ability to rapidly perform large scale drug screens may open up the possibility for personalized medicine with rapid translation of results back to clinic. Zebrafish xenograft models could also be used to rapidly screen for actionable mutations based on tumor response to targeted therapies or to identify new anti-cancer compounds from large libraries. The current major limitation in the field has been quantifying and automating the process so that drug screens can be done on a larger scale and be less labor-intensive. We have developed a workflow for xenografting primary patient samples into zebrafish larvae and performing large scale drug screens using a fluorescence microscope equipped imaging unit and automated sampler unit. This method allows for standardization and quantification of engrafted tumor area and response to drug treatment across large numbers of zebrafish larvae. Overall, this method is advantageous over traditional cell culture drug screening as it allows for growth of tumor cells in an in vivo environment throughout drug treatment, and is more practical and cost-effective than mice for large scale in vivo drug screens.
Xenografting of primary patient cancers or human cancer cell lines into model organisms is a widely used technique to study tumor progression and behavior in vivo, tumor response to drug treatment, and cancer cell interaction with the microenvironment, among others. Traditionally, cells are xenografted into immune-compromised mice, and this remains the standard in the field. However, this model system has several limitations, such as high cost, low replicate numbers, difficulties in accurately quantifying tumor burden in vivo, and the extended time that it takes for tumors to engraft and drug testing to be completed. In recent years, zebrafish have emerged as an alter....
All procedures described in this protocol have been approved by the University of Kentucky’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol 2015-2225). Patient samples were collected under University of Kentucky’s Institutional Review Board (protocol 44672). All animal experiments performed following this protocol must be approved by the user’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
1. Thawing Primary Patient Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cells
Following the protocol described above, zebrafish were xenografted in the yolk and pericardium with primary patient PBMCs that were originally isolated from a T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) patient at diagnosis and banked as a viable, frozen sample. At 48 hpi, xenografted fish were screened for fluorescently labeled tumor cells (Figure 2C,D) and treated with chemotherapy (dexamethasone or vincristine) or DMSO. Fish were imaged at 7 dpi, after 3 days on drug trea.......
In this study, we demonstrated a standardized method for thawing and injection of primary patient leukemia cells into zebrafish as a xenograft model. We also established a protocol for high-throughput drug screening of xenografted zebrafish using a fluorescence microscope equipped imaging unit and automated sampler unit. Previously, xenografts have been reported with human cell lines, and quantification of xenografted tumors in a high-throughput manner has been a challenge in the field. This method serves as a basis for .......
This research was supported by a V Foundation V Scholar Award and NIH Grants DP2CA228043, R01CA227656 (to J.S. Blackburn) and NIH Training Grant T32CA165990 (to M.G. Haney).
....Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
10x TBE Liquid Concentrate | VWR | 0658-5L | |
96-well plate, flat bottom | CELLTREAT | 229195 | VAST is compatible with a variety of standard or deep well 24, 48, or 96 well plates |
Agarose | Fisher Scientific | BP160-500 | |
Borosilicate Glass Capillary without Filament | Sutter Instrument Company | B100-50-10 | |
Dexamethasone | Enzo Life Sciences | BML-EI126-0001 | |
DMSO | Sigma-Aldrich | D2438-5X10ML | |
E3 media | N/A | 5 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM MgSO4 | |
Femtotips Microloader Tips | Eppendorf | 930001007 | |
Fetal Bovine Serum (Premium Heat Inactivated) | Atlanta Biologicals | S11150H | |
ImageJ | FIJI | N/A | https://imagej.net/Fiji |
Iscove's Modified Dulbecco's Medium | STEMCELL Technologies | 36150 | |
Large Particle (LP) Sampler | Union Biometrica | N/A | automated sampler unit http://www.unionbio.com/copas/features.aspx?id=8 |
Methotrexate | Sigma-Aldrich | A6770-10MG | |
Mineral Oil | Fisher Scientific | BP26291 | |
Phosphate Buffered Saline (1x) | Caisson labs | PBL06-6X500ML | |
Stage Micrometer (400-Stage) | Hausser Scientific | 400-S | |
Tricaine-S | Pentair Aquatic | TRS1 | |
Trypan Blue | Thermo Fisher | T10282 | |
VAST Bioimager | Union Biometrica | N/A | fluorescent equipped microscope imaging unit https://www.unionbio.com/vast/ |
Vincristine Sulfate | Enzo Life Sciences | BML-T117-0005 | |
Vybrant DiI Stain | Thermo Fisher | V22885 |
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
ABOUT JoVE
Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved