A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Summary

This work presents a bottom-up approach to the engineering of local magnetic forces for control of neuronal organization. Neuron-like cells loaded with magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) are plated atop and controlled by a micro-patterned platform with perpendicular magnetization. Also described are magnetic characterization, MNP cellular uptake, cell viability, and statistical analysis.

Abstract

The ability to direct neurons into organized neural networks has great implications for regenerative medicine, tissue engineering, and bio-interfacing. Many studies have aimed at directing neurons using chemical and topographical cues. However, reports of organizational control on a micron-scale over large areas are scarce. Here, an effective method has been described for placing neurons in preset sites and guiding neuronal outgrowth with micron-scale resolution, using magnetic platforms embedded with micro-patterned, magnetic elements. It has been demonstrated that loading neurons with magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) converts them into sensitive magnetic units that can be influenced by magnetic gradients. Following this approach, a unique magnetic platform has been fabricated on which PC12 cells, a common neuron-like model, were plated and loaded with superparamagnetic nanoparticles. Thin films of ferromagnetic (FM) multilayers with stable perpendicular magnetization were deposited to provide effective attraction forces toward the magnetic patterns. These MNP-loaded PC12 cells, plated and differentiated atop the magnetic platforms, were preferentially attached to the magnetic patterns, and the neurite outgrowth was well aligned with the pattern shape, forming oriented networks. Quantitative characterization methods of the magnetic properties, cellular MNP uptake, cell viability, and statistical analysis of the results are presented. This approach enables the control of neural network formation and improves neuron-to-electrode interface through the manipulation of magnetic forces, which can be an effective tool for in vitro studies of networks and may offer novel therapeutic biointerfacing directions.

Introduction

Micropatterning of neurons holds great potential for tissue regeneration1,2,3,4,5 and the development of neuro-electronic devices6,7,8. However, the micron-scaled positioning of neurons at high spatial resolution, as in biological tissues, poses a significant challenge. Forming predesigned structures at this scale requires the guidance of nerve cell processes by locally controlling soma motility and axonal outgrowth. Previous studies have suggested the use of chemical and physical cues9,10,11,12 for guiding neuronal growth. Here, a novel approach focuses on controlling cell positioning by magnetic field gradients13,14,15,16,17, turning cells loaded with MNPs into magnetic-sensitive units, which can be remotely manipulated.

Kunze et al., who characterized the force needed to induce cellular responses using magnetic chip- and MNP-loaded cells, proved that early axonal elongation can be triggered by mechanical tension inside cells18. Tay et al. confirmed that micro-fabricated substrates with enhanced magnetic field gradients allow for wireless stimulation of neural circuits dosed with MNPs using calcium indicator dyes19. Moreover, Tseng et al. coalesced nanoparticles inside cells, resulting in localized nanoparticle-mediated forces that approached cellular tension20. This led to the fabrication of defined patterns of micromagnetic substrates that helped to study cellular response to mechanical forces. Cellular tension arising from the application of localized nanoparticle-mediated forces was achieved by coalescing nanoparticles within cells20. A complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS)-microfluidic hybrid system was developed by Lee et al. who embedded an array of micro-electromagnets in the CMOS chip to control the motion of individual cells tagged with magnetic beads21.

Alon et al. used micro-scale, pre-programmed, magnetic pads as magnetic "hot spots" to locate cells22. Specific activity could also be stimulated within cells using micro-patterned magnetic arrays to localize nanoparticles at specific subcellular locations23. Cellular MNP uptake has been successfully demonstrated in leech, rat, and mouse primary neurons24,25,26. Here, this has been demonstrated on a rat PC12 pheochromocytoma cell line, which has been previously reported to show high uptake of MNPs27. In recent years, there have been various medical applications of MNPs, including drug delivery and thermotherapy in cancer treatments28,29,30,31. Specifically, studies deal with the application of MNPs and neuron networks32,33,34,35. However, the magnetic organization of neurons using MNPs at a single-cell level deserves further investigation.

In this work, a bottom-up approach has been described to engineer local magnetic forces via predesigned platforms for controlling neuronal arrangement. The fabrication of micron-scale patterns of FM multilayers has been presented. This unique, FM multilayered structure creates stable perpendicular magnetization that results in effective attraction forces toward all the magnetic patterns. Via incubation, MNPs were loaded into PC12 cells, transforming them into magnetic sensitive units. MNP-loaded cells, plated and differentiated atop the magnetic platforms, were preferentially attached to the magnetic patterns, and the neurite outgrowth was well-aligned with the pattern shape, forming oriented networks. Several methods have been described to characterize the magnetic properties of the FM multilayers and the MNPs, and techniques for cellular MNP uptake and cell viability assays have also been presented. Additionally, morphometric parameters of neuronal growth and statistical analysis of the results are detailed.

Protocol

NOTE: Perform all biological reactions in a biosafety cabinet.

1. Magnetic platform fabrication

  1. Lithography
    1. Cut glass slides into 2 x 2 cm2 using a scriber pen. Clean the glass slides in acetone and then isopropanol for 5 min each in an ultra-sonication bath. Dry with ultra-high purity (UHP) nitrogen.
    2. Coat the glass with photoresist using spin-coating at 6,000 rpm for 60 s, to attain 1.5 µm thickness, and bake at 100 °C for 60 s. Expose the sample to a light source, using an appropriate wavelength for photoresist, with a desired pattern, using a photomask or mask-less lithography.
    3. Develop for 40 s in a developer, diluted in distilled water (DW) according to the manufacturer's instructions; wash in DW for 45 s, and dry with UHP nitrogen gas. Inspect the pattern under an optical microscope.
  2. Sputter deposition
    1. Insert the sample into the main chamber of the deposition system and wait for base pressure (~5 × 10-8 Torr). Open the gas flow; set the argon flow for standard sputtering (28 sccm [standard cubic cm per min) herein. Ignite the sputter targets, then set the sputter pressure to 3 mTorr.
    2. Increase the power on each target until the desired rate is achieved.
      ​NOTE: Pd Rate: 0.62 A/s = 1.0 nm in 16 s; Co80Fe20 Rate: 0.32 A/s, 0.2 nm in 6.25 s.
    3. Turn on rotation. Deposit the FM multilayer, alternating between the Co80Fe20 and Pd targets, by opening and closing the target shutters, respectively. Deposit 14 bilayers of Co80Fe20 (0.2 nm)/Pd (1.0 nm), and finish with an additional 2 nm Pd capping layer.
    4. Lift-off: Soak the sample in acetone for 30 min, and rinse with isopropanol. Then, dry with UHP nitrogen, and keep the sample in a clean and dry environment until use.

2. Characterization of magnetic device via transport measurements

  1. Use a Si substrate or glass slide with a cross-shaped magnetic bar of 100 µm width, deposited with FM multilayers (see Figure 1C inset). Attach the sample to the holder using double-sided tape.
  2. Using a wire bonder, bond 4 wires to the sample, one on each leg of the cross electrode. Set the sample-holder and sample inside the transport measurement system with a magnetic field so that the magnetic field is perpendicular to the sample. Perform measurements at room temperature.
  3. Perform transverse voltage (VT) measurement of the device; follow the markings in Figure 1C (inset): apply a current of 1 mA between contacts 1 and 3; measure the VT between contacts 2 and 4; then, apply a current between 2 and 4, and measure the voltage between 1 and 3. Finally, calculate the difference between the voltages of both the measurements and divide by 2 to obtain VT. Use a switching system to automatically change between the two measurement configurations.
  4. Sweep the magnetic field between 0.4 T to -0.4 T in steps of 5 mT and measure the VT as a function of the field. Plot the transverse resistance (VT/I) vs. the magnetic field to determine the anomalous Hall signal, which is proportional to the perpendicular magnetization in the film.

3. Characterization of MNPs and magnetic multilayers by magnetometry measurements

  1. Magnetometric measurement for FM multilayers
    1. Deposit the FM multilayer on the Si substrate (see section 1.2). Cut the sample into 6 squares of 4 x 4 mm2 size. Stack the samples one on top of the other and arrange them in the capsule perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field (see Figure 1D inset).
    2. Insert the capsule into the magnetometer and measure the magnetization at room temperature. Sweep the magnetic field between -0.4 T and 0.4 T.
    3. Calculate the total volume of the magnetic material, considering the thickness of the magnetic layer, the size of the samples, and the number of substrates. Divide the magnetization by the total volume of the magnetic material.
    4. Plot the magnetization (per unit volume) vs. the magnetic field. Subtract the diamagnetic background of the substrate from the high magnetic field response and extrapolate the saturation magnetization of the FM from the graph.
  2. Magnetometric measurement for MNPs
    1. Insert a designated mass of MNPs into a synthetic polymer capsule. Consider a larger volume if measuring small magnetization saturation values.
    2. If the MNPs are suspended in a solvent, dry the MNPs by leaving the capsule open overnight. Insert the capsule into the magnetometer and measure the magnetization at room temperature. Sweep the magnetic field between -0.2 T and 0.2 T.
    3. Calculate the total mass of the MNPs by multiplying the designated volume by the particle concentration. Normalize the results to 1 g.
    4. Plot the normalized magnetization (per gram) vs. the magnetic field. Extrapolate the magnetization saturation of the MNPs from the graph.

4. Collagen-coating protocol

  1. Coating plastic dishes
    1. Prepare 0.01 M HCl by adding 490 µL of HCl to 500 mL of autoclaved double-distilled water (DDW).
      NOTE: Perform this step only in the chemical hood.
    2. Dilute collagen type 1 (solution from rat tail) 1:60-1:80 in 0.01 M HCl to obtain the final working concentration of 50 µg/mL. Place 1.5 mL of the diluted solution in a 35 mm culture dish. Leave the dish in the hood for 1 h, covered.
    3. Remove the solution, and wash 3x in sterile 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The dish is ready for cell seeding.
  2. Coating glass slides
    1. Dilute collagen type 1 (solution from rat tail) 1:50 in 30% v/v ethanol. For coating a 35 mm dish, add 20 µL of collagen to 1 mL of 30% ethanol.
    2. Cover the dish with the solution, and wait until all the solution evaporates, leaving the dish uncovered for a few hours. Wash 3x in sterile 1x PBS; the glass slide is ready for cell seeding.

5. Cellular MNP uptake and viability

  1. Cellular MNP uptake
    1. Prepare basic growth medium for PC12 cell culture by adding 10% horse serum (HS), 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% L-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 0.2% amphotericin to Roswell Park Medical Institute (RPMI) medium, and filter using a 0.22 µm nylon filter.
    2. Add 1% horse serum (HS), 1% L-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 0.2% amphotericin to RPMI medium to prepare PC12 differentiation medium, and filter using a 0.22 µm nylon filter.
    3. Grow cells in a non-treated culture flask with 10 mL of basic growth medium; add 10 mL of basic growth medium to the flask every 2-3 days, and sub-culture the cells after 8 days.
    4. For cellular uptake, centrifuge the cell suspension in a centrifuge tube for 8 min at 200 × g and room temperature, and discard the supernatant.
    5. Resuspend the cells in 3 mL of fresh basic growth medium. Again, centrifuge the cell suspension for 5 min at 200 × g and room temperature, and discard the supernatant. Resuspend the cells in 3 mL of fresh differentiation medium.
    6. Aspirate the cells 10x using a syringe and a needle to break up cell clusters. Count the cells using a hemocytometer, and seed 106 cells in a regular uncoated 35 mm dish.
    7. Add to the dish the calculated volume of MNP suspension and volume of differentiation medium to achieve the desired MNP concentration and total volume. Mix the cells, MNPs, and differentiation medium; incubate the dish in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator at 37 °C for 24 h.
    8. Centrifuge the cell suspension for 5 min at 200 × g at room temperature, and discard the supernatant. Resuspend the cells in 1 mL of fresh differentiation medium, and count the cells using a hemocytometer.
  2. MNP-loaded cell differentiation
    1. Perform uptake protocol (section 5.1). Seed 8 × 104 MNP-loaded cells on a 35 mm, collagen type l-coated dish in the presence of differentiation medium (see collagen coating protocol in section 4.1). After 24 h, add 1:100 fresh murine beta-nerve growth factor (β-NGF) (final concentration 50 ng/mL).
    2. Renew the differentiation medium and add fresh murine β-NGF every 2 days. Image the cells every 2 days using optical microscopy. After network formation (6-8 days for PC12 cells), image the cells using confocal microscopy, and observe the fluorescence of the particles.
  3. Viability assay for MNP-loaded cells: 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide (XTT) cell viability test.
    1. Prepare the basic growth medium according to step 5.1.1. Cultivate the PC12 cells with MNPs at different concentrations (0.1 mg/mL, 0.25 mg/mL, and 0.5 mg/mL in basic growth medium) and also without MNPs for the control in triplicate in a flat 96-well plate (total volume of 100 µL/well). Incubate the cells for 24 h in a 5% CO2, humidified incubator at 37 °C.
    2. Prepare blank wells containing medium without cells for background correction. Thaw the XTT reagent solution, and the reaction solution containing N-methyl dibenzopyrazine methyl sulfate) in a 37 °C bath immediately prior to use. Swirl gently until clear solutions are obtained.
    3. For one 96-well plate, mix 0.1 mL of activation solution with 5 mL of XTT reagent. Add 50 µL of the reaction solution to each well, slightly shake the plate for an even distribution of the dye in the wells, and then incubate the plate in an incubator for 5 h.
    4. Measure the absorbance of the sample against the blank wells using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader at a wavelength of 450 nm. Measure the reference absorbance using a wavelength of 630 nm and subtract it from the 450 nm measurement.
    5. As slight spontaneous absorbance occurs in the culture medium incubated with the XTT reagent at 450 nm, subtract the average absorbance of the blank wells from that of the other wells. Subtract signal values from parallel samples of MNPs at the same tested concentrations as the cell samples.
  4. Viability assay for MNP-loaded cells: resazurin-based cell viability test
    1. Prepare basic growth medium according to step 5.1.1. Cultivate the PC12 cells with MNPs at different concentrations (0.1 mg/mL, 0.25 mg/mL, and 0.5 mg/mL in basic growth medium) and without MNPs as control in triplicate in a flat 96-well plate for 24 h. Incubate the cells for 24 h in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. Prepare blank wells containing medium without cells.
    2. Wash the cells with 1x PBS. Add the resazurin-based reagent (10% w/v) to the medium and incubate for 2 h in a 37 °C incubator.
    3. Place 150 µL aliquots of the samples in the ELISA reader, and measure the absorbance at an excitation wavelength of 560 nm and emission wavelength of 590 nm. Subtract the signal values from the parallel samples of MNPs at the same tested concentrations as the cell samples.

6. Characterization of MNP concentration inside the cells using inductively coupled plasma (ICP)

  1. Prepare basic growth medium according to step 5.1.1. Cultivate the PC12 cells with MNPs at different concentrations (0.1 mg/mL, 0.25 mg/mL, and 0.5 mg/mL in basic growth medium) and without MNPs as control in triplicate in a flat 96-well plate (total volume of 100 µL/well). Incubate in a 5% CO2, humidified incubator at 37 °C for 24 h.
  2. Transfer the suspension to a centrifuge tube (from each well separately), centrifuge cells at 200 × g for 5 min at room temperature and discard the supernatant. Resuspend the cells in 1 mL of fresh differentiation medium, and count the cells using a hemocytometer.
  3. Lyse the cells by treatment with 100 µL of 70% nitric acid to each well separately for at least 15 min. Add 5 mL of DDW to the lysed cells and filter the solutions.
  4. Measure the iron concentration using ICP and use the cell count to record Fe concentration per cell.

7. Cell differentiation and growth on magnetic platform

  1. Clean the patterned substrate with 70% v/v/ ethanol and place the substrate in a 35 mm culture dish in the hood. Place a large magnet (~1500 Oe) below the patterned substrate for 1 min and remove the magnet by first moving the dish up and away from the magnet, and then take the magnet out of the hood. Turn on the ultraviolet light for 15 min.
  2. Coat the substrate with collagen type 1 according to section 4.2. Suspend the cells after cellular MNP uptake (section 5.1), seed 105 cells in a 35 mm culture dish, and add 2 mL of differentiation medium. Incubate the culture in a 5% CO2, humidified incubator at 37 °C.
  3. After 24 h, add 1:100 fresh murine β-NGF (final concentration of 50 ng/mL). Renew the differentiation medium and add fresh murine β-NGF every 2 days. Image the cells every 2 days using light microscopy, and after network formation, perform immunostaining on the cells (section 8.1).

8. MNP-loaded cell staining

  1. Tubulin immunostaining
    1. Prepare 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution by mixing 10 mL of 16% w/v PFA solution, 4 mL of 10x PBS, and 26 mL of DDW. Prepare 50 mL of 1% PBT by adding 500 µL of a non-ionic surfactant to 50 mL of 1x PBS. Prepare 50 mL of 0.5% PBT by mixing 25 mL of 1% PBT with 25 mL of 1x PBS. Prepare blocking solution by mixing 1% bovine serum albumin and 1% normal donkey serum in 0.25% PBT.
      ​NOTE: Use PFA only inside the chemical hood.
    2. Remove the supernatant medium from the cells. Fix the MNP-loaded cells in 4% PFA for 15 min at room temperature inside a chemical hood. Wash the MNP-loaded cells 3x in 1x PBS, 5 min each wash, inside a chemical hood.
    3. Permeabilize the MNP-loaded cells with 0.5% PBT for 10 min. Incubate the MNP-loaded cells first in blocking solution for 45 min at room temperature and then with rabbit anti- α-tubulin antibody in blocking solution overnight at 4 °C. Wash MNP-loaded cells 3x in 1x PBS, 5 min each wash.
    4. Incubate the MNP-loaded cells with Cy2-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody for 45 min in darkness and at room temperature. Wash the MNP-loaded cells 3x in 1x PBS, 5 min each wash.
    5. Perform confocal imaging. For tubulin, use an excitation wavelength of 492 nm and an emission wavelength of 510 nm. For the MNPs (rhodamine), use an excitation wavelength of 578 nm and an emission wavelength of 613 nm.
  2. Nuclear staining with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)
    1. Wash the MNP-loaded cells 3x in 1x PBS, 5 min each wash. Remove excess liquid around the sample, add 1 drop (~50 µL) of mounting medium containing DAPI to cover an area of 22 mm x 22 mm, and incubate for 5 min in darkness and at room temperature.
    2. Wash the MNP-loaded cells 3x in 1x PBS, 5 min each wash. Perform confocal imaging. For DAPI, use an excitation wavelength of 358 nm and an emission wavelength of 461 nm. For the MNPs (rhodamine), use an excitation wavelength of 578 nm and an emission wavelength of 613 nm.

9. Measurements and statistical analysis

  1. Morphometric analysis of MNP-loaded cell differentiation
    1. To measure the number of intersections at various distances from the cell body, acquire phase images of cultured cells up to 3 days after treatment with NGF.
      ​NOTE: If done later, the cells may develop networks, preventing single-cell resolution measurements.
      1. Open the images in the image processing program, ImageJ, and use the NeuronJ plug-in, which enables a semi-automatic neurite tracing and length measurement36. Using the neurite tracer plug-in, trace the neurites and convert the data to binary images. Define the center of the soma.
      2. Perform Sholl analysis, available in the NeuronJ plug-in. Define the maximal radius. Repeat the experiment three times. Analyze more than 100 cells in each experiment.
  2. Cell localization analysis
    1. To determine the percentage of cells localized on the magnetic area after 3 days of incubation, acquire confocal microscopic images of cells with and without MNP uptake. Use DAPI staining (section 8.2).
    2. Manually count the cells atop or partially atop the pattern (touching cells) and the cells that are not. Repeat for three experiments. Analyze more than 400 cells with MNP and without uptake.
    3. Calculate the relative proportion of the cells that are atop the magnetic patterns out of the total number of cells, with and without MNPs. Additionally, calculate the percentage of the magnetic pattern's effective area by adding the cell body diameter to the pattern width to determine the random probability of cells landing on a magnetic pattern.
    4. Perform a single sample Z-test to analyze whether the cell distribution is a result of isotropic cell landing, or if there is a preferred bias to the magnetic pattern.
  3. Growth directionality analysis
    1. To quantify the effect on neurite outgrowth directionality, acquire confocal microscopic images of the cells with and without MNP treatment after 8 days of incubation. Perform immuno-staining (section 8.1).
    2. Using ImageJ software, measure the angle between the cell neurite and the magnetic stripes in both conditions.
      ​NOTE: Analyze only neurites that originate from somas located on the magnetic stripes.
    3. Plot the distribution of the neurites' angles relative to the direction of the stripes (Δθ). Perform a Chi-squared test of the distribution of Δθ to demonstrate that the distribution is not normal or uniform.

Results

Magnetic platforms with different geometric shapes were fabricated (Figure 1A). Magnetic patterns were deposited by sputtering: 14 multilayers of Co80Fe20 and Pd, 0.2 nm and 1 nm, respectively. Electron microscopy revealed the total height of the magnetic patterns to be ~18 nm (Figure 1B). This unique FM multilayer deposition creates a stable platform with perpendicular magnetization anisotropy (PMA) relativ...

Discussion

The representative results demonstrate the effectiveness of the presented methodology for controlling and organizing neuronal network formation at the micron-scale. The MNP-loaded PC12 cells remained viable and were transformed into magnetic sensitive units that were attracted by the magnetic forces from the FM electrodes to specific sites. This is best demonstrated in Figure 5C, where the cells preferentially adhered to the larger vertices of the hexagons and not the thin lines. Moreover, b...

Disclosures

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science & Technology, Israel, and by the Israeli Science Foundation (569/16).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
16% Paraformaldehyde (formaldehyde) aqueous solutionELECTRON MICROSCOPY SCIENCES15710
6-well cell culture plateFALCON353846
96-well cell culture plateSPL life sciences30096
Amphotericin B solutionBiological Industries03-028-1B
AZ 1514H photoresistMicroChemicals GmbH
AZ 351 B developerMicroChemicals GmbH
Bovine serum albumin (BSA)Biological Industries03-010-1B
Cell and Tissue cultur flaskBiofilTCF00225075.0 cm^2 250 mL Vent cap, Non-treated
Cell culture dishGreiner Bio-One627-16035 mm
Cell Proliferation Kit (XTT-based)Biological Industries20-300-1000
Centrifuge tubeBiofilCFT02150050 mL
Co80Fe20 at% sputter targetACI Alloys99.95%
Collagen type ICorning Inc.354236Rat Tail, concentration range 3-4 mg/mL
Confocal microscopeLeicaTCS SP5
Cy2-conjugated AffiniPure Donkey Anti-rabbit secondary antibodyJackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.711-165-152
DAPI fluoromount-GSouthernBiotech0100-20
Disposable needleKDL23 G
Disposable  syringeMedispo116022764010 mL
Donor horse serumBiological Industries04-124-1A
ELISA readerMerk MilliporeBioTek synergy 4 hybrid microplate reader
Ethanol 70%ROMICAL LTD19-009102-80
Ethanol absolute (Dehydrated)Biolab-chemicals52505
Fetal bovine serum (FBS)Biological Industries04-127-1A
Fresh murine β-NGFPeprotech450-34
GMW C-frame electromagnet .Buckley systems LTD3470, 45 mm
Hydrochloric acid 32%DAEJUNG CHEMICAL & METALS4170-4100
ImageJUS National Institutes of Health, BethesdaNeuronJ plugin
Inductively coupled plasma (ICP)Ametek SpectroSPECTRO ARCOS ICP-OES, FHX22 MultiView plasma
Keithley source-measureKeithley2400
Keithley switching systemKeithley3700
L-glutamineBiological Industries03-020-1B
Light microscopeLeicaDMIL LED
Maskless photolithographyHeidelberg Inst.MLA150
Microscope SlidesBAR-NAORBN1042000C
Nitric acid 70%Sigma-Aldrich438073
Normal donkey serum (NDS)SigmaD9663
PBS 10xhylabsBP507/1LD
PC12 cell lineATCCCRL-1721
Pd sputter targetACI Alloys99.95%
Penicillin-streptomycin nystatin solutionBiological Industries03-032-1B
PrestoBlue cell viability reagentMolecular probesA-13261resazurin-based
Rabbit antibody to α-tubulinSanta Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.
RF magnetron sputtering systemOrion AJA Int.Orion 8
RPMI 1640 with l-glutamineBiological Industries01-100-1A
Sonication bathKUDOSSK3210HPFrequency: 53 kHz. Ultrasonic power: 135 W
SQUID magnetometerQuantum Design, CA
Triton X-100CHEM-IMPEX INTERNATIONAL1279non-ionic surfactant
XTT cell viability reagent

References

  1. Schmidt, C. E., Leach, J. B. Neural tissue engineering: strategies for repair and regeneration. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 5 (1), 293-347 (2003).
  2. Kim, Y., Haftel, V. K., Kumar, S., Bellamkonda, R. V. The role of aligned polymer fiber-based constructs in the bridging of long peripheral nerve gaps. Biomaterials. 29 (21), 3117-3127 (2008).
  3. Dvir, T., Timko, B. P., Kohane, D. S., Langer, R. Nanotechnological strategies for engineering complex tissues. Nature Nanotechnology. 6 (1), 13-22 (2011).
  4. Antman-Passig, M., Shefi, O. Remote Magnetic orientation of 3D collagen hydrogels for directed neuronal regeneration. Nano Letters. 16 (4), 2567-2573 (2016).
  5. Hardelauf, H., et al. Micropatterning neuronal networks. Royal Society of Chemistry. 139 (1), 3256-3264 (2014).
  6. Spira, M. E., Hai, A. Multi-electrode array technologies for neuroscience and cardiology. Nature Nanotechnology. 8 (2), 83-94 (2013).
  7. Sahyouni, R., et al. Interfacing with the nervous system: a review of current bioelectric technologies. Neurosurgical Review. 42 (2), 227-241 (2019).
  8. Mcguire, A. F., Santoro, F., Cui, B. Interfacing cells with vertical nanoscale devices: applications and characterization. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry. 111226 (1), 1-12 (2018).
  9. Marcus, M., et al. Interactions of neurons with physical environments. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 6 (15), (2017).
  10. Lim, J. Y., Donahue, H. J. Cell sensing and response to micro- and nanostructured surfaces produced by chemical and topographic patterning. Tissue Engineering. 13 (8), 1879-1891 (2007).
  11. Park, M., et al. Control over neurite directionality and neurite elongation on anisotropic micropillar arrays. Small. 12 (9), 1148-1152 (2016).
  12. Rutten, W. L. C., Ruardij, T. G., Marani, E., Roelofsen, B. H. Neural networks on chemically patterned electrode arrays: towards a cultured probe. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement. 97 (2), 547-554 (2007).
  13. Bongaerts, M., et al. Parallelized manipulation of adherent living cells by magnetic nanoparticles-mediated forces. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 21 (18), 6560 (2020).
  14. Kilgus, C., et al. Local gene targeting and cell positioning using magnetic nanoparticles and magnetic tips: comparison of mathematical simulations with experiments. Pharmaceutical Research. 29 (5), 1380-1391 (2012).
  15. Sensenig, R., Sapir, Y., MacDonald, C., Cohen, S., Polyak, B. Magnetic nanoparticle-based approaches to locally target therapy and enhance tissue regeneration in vivo. Nanomedicine. 7 (9), 1425-1442 (2012).
  16. Gahl, T. J., Kunze, A. Force-mediating magnetic nanoparticles to engineer neuronal cell function. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 12, 299 (2018).
  17. Goranov, V., et al. 3D Patterning of cells in magnetic scaffolds for tissue engineering. Scientific Reports. 10 (1), 1-8 (2020).
  18. Kunze, A., et al. Engineering cortical neuron polarity with nanomagnets on a chip. ACS Nano. 9 (4), 3664-3676 (2015).
  19. Tay, A., Di Carlo, D. Magnetic nanoparticle-based mechanical stimulation for restoration of mechano-sensitive ion channel equilibrium in neural networks. Nano Letters. 17 (2), 886-892 (2017).
  20. Tseng, P., Judy, J. W., Di Carlo, D. Magnetic nanoparticle-mediated massively parallel mechanical modulation of single-cell behavior. Nature Methods. 9 (11), 1113-1119 (2012).
  21. Lee, H., Liu, Y., Ham, D., Westervelt, R. M. Integrated cell manipulation system - CMOS/microfluidic hybrid. Lab on a Chip. 7 (3), 331-337 (2007).
  22. Alon, N., et al. Magnetic micro-device for manipulating PC12 cell migration and organization. Lab on a Chip. 15 (9), 2030 (2015).
  23. Tseng, P., Di Carlo, D., Judy, J. W. Rapid and dynamic intracellular patterning of cell-internalized magnetic fluorescent nanoparticles. Nano Letters. 9 (8), 3053-3059 (2009).
  24. Marcus, M., et al. Iron oxide nanoparticles for neuronal cell applications: uptake study and magnetic manipulations. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 14, 37 (2016).
  25. Petters, C., Dringen, R. Accumulation of iron oxide nanoparticles by cultured primary neurons. Neurochemistry International. 81, 1-9 (2015).
  26. Sun, Z., et al. Characterization of cellular uptake and toxicity of aminosilane-coated iron oxide nanoparticles with different charges in central nervous system-relevant cell culture models. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 8, 961-970 (2013).
  27. Pinkernelle, J., Calatayud, P., Goya, G. F., Fansa, H., Keilhoff, G. Magnetic nanoparticles in primary neural cell cultures are mainly taken up by microglia. BMC Neuroscience. 13 (1), 32 (2012).
  28. Shubayev, V. I., Pisanic, T. R., Jin, S. Magnetic nanoparticles for theragnostics. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 61 (6), 467-477 (2009).
  29. Pankhurst, Q. A., Connolly, J., Jones, S. K., Dobson, J. Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 36 (13), 167-181 (2003).
  30. Krishnan, K. M. Biomedical nanomagnetics: a spin through possibilities in imaging, diagnostics, and therapy. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 46 (7), 2523-2558 (2010).
  31. Johannsen, M., et al. Thermotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic nanoparticles: feasibility, imaging, and three-dimensional temperature distribution. European Urology. 52 (6), 1653-1662 (2007).
  32. Roet, M., et al. Progress in neuromodulation of the brain: A role for magnetic nanoparticles. Progress in Neurobiology. 177, 1-14 (2019).
  33. Polak, P., Shefi, O. Nanometric agents in the service of neuroscience: Manipulation of neuronal growth and activity using nanoparticles. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine. 11 (6), 1467-1479 (2015).
  34. Holt, L. M., Olsen, M. L. Novel applications of magnetic cell sorting to analyze cell-type specific gene and protein expression in the central nervous system. PloS One. 11 (2), 0150290 (2016).
  35. Riggio, C., et al. The orientation of the neuronal growth process can be directed via magnetic nanoparticles under an applied magnetic field. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 10 (7), 1549-1558 (2014).
  36. Abramoff, M. D., Magalhaes, P. J., Ram, S. J. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International. 11 (7), 36-42 (2004).
  37. Marcus, M., et al. Magnetic organization of neural networks via micro-patterned devices. Advanced Materials Interfaces. 7 (19), 2000055 (2020).
  38. Kachlon, Y., Kurzweil, N., Sharoni, A. Extracting magnetic anisotropy energies in Co/Pd multilayers via refinement analysis of the full magnetoresistance curves. Journal of Applied Physics. 115 (17), 173911 (2014).
  39. Gura, S., Margel, S. Nucleation and growth of magnetic metal oxide nanoparticles and its use. European Patent Office Publ of Application with search report. , (1999).
  40. Baranes, K., Kollmar, D., Chejanovsky, N., Sharoni, A., Shefi, O. Interactions of neurons with topographic nano cues affect branching morphology mimicking neuron-neuron interactions. Journal of Molecular Histology. 43 (4), 437-447 (2012).
  41. Baranes, K., Chejanovsky, N., Alon, N., Sharoni, A., Shefi, O. Topographic cues of nano-scale height direct neuronal growth pattern. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 109 (7), 1791-1797 (2012).
  42. David-Pur, M., Bareket-Keren, L., Beit-Yaakov, G., Raz-Prag, D., Hanein, Y. All-carbon-nanotube flexible multi-electrode array for neuronal recording and stimulation. Biomed Microdevices. 16 (1), 43-53 (2014).
  43. Walia, S., et al. Flexible metasurfaces and metamaterials: A review of materials and fabrication processes at micro-and nano-scales. Applied Physics Reviews. 2, 11303 (2015).
  44. Ngo, D. T., et al. Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and the magnetization process in CoFeB/Pd multilayer films. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 47 (44), (2014).
  45. Barsukov, I., et al. Field-dependent perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in CoFeB thin films. Applied Physics Letters. 105 (15), 152403 (2014).
  46. Zhang, S., Gao, H., Bao, G. Physical principles of nanoparticle cellular endocytosis. ACS Nano. 9 (9), 8655-8671 (2015).
  47. Marcus, M., Skaat, H., Alon, N., Margel, S., Shefi, O. NGF-conjugated iron oxide nanoparticles promote differentiation and outgrowth of PC12 cells. Nanoscale. 7 (3), 1058-1066 (2015).
  48. Marcus, M., et al. Magnetic targeting of growth factors using iron oxide nanoparticles. Nanomaterials. 8 (9), 707 (2018).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website.

By continuing to use our website or clicking “Continue”, you are agreeing to accept our cookies.

Learn More