A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

The protocol presented here enables automated fabrication of micropatterns that standardizes cell shape to study cytoskeletal structures within mammalian cells. This user-friendly technique can be set up with commercially available imaging systems and does not require specialized equipment inaccessible to standard cell biology laboratories.

Abstract

Micropatterning is an established technique in the cell biology community used to study connections between the morphology and function of cellular compartments while circumventing complications arising from natural cell-to-cell variations. To standardize cell shape, cells are either confined in 3D molds or controlled for adhesive geometry through adhesive islands. However, traditional micropatterning techniques based on photolithography and deep UV etching heavily depend on clean rooms or specialized equipment. Here we present an infrared laser assisted micropatterning technique (microphotopatterning) modified from Doyle et al. that can be conveniently set up with commercially available imaging systems. In this protocol, we use a Nikon A1R MP+ imaging system to generate micropatterns with micron precision through an infrared (IR) laser that ablates preset regions on poly-vinyl alcohol coated coverslips. We employ a custom script to enable automated pattern fabrication with high efficiency and accuracy in systems not equipped with a hardware autofocus. We show that this IR laser assisted micropatterning (microphotopatterning) protocol results in defined patterns to which cells attach exclusively and take on the desired shape. Furthermore, data from a large number of cells can be averaged due to the standardization of cell shape. Patterns generated with this protocol, combined with high resolution imaging and quantitative analysis, can be used for relatively high throughput screens to identify molecular players mediating the link between form and function.

Introduction

Cell shape is a key determinant of fundamental biological processes such as tissue morphogenesis1, cell migration2, cell proliferation3, and gene expression4. Changes in cell shape are driven by an intricate balance between dynamic rearrangements of the cytoskeleton that deforms the plasma membrane and extrinsic factors such as external forces exerted on the cell and the geometry of cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesions5. Migrating mesenchymal cells, for instance, polymerize a dense actin network at the leading edge that pushes the plasma membrane forward and creates a wide lamellipodia6, while actomyosin contractility retracts the cell's narrow trailing edge to detach the cell from its current position7,8. Disrupting signaling events that give rise to such specialized cytoskeletal structures perturbs shape and polarity and slows cell migration9. In addition, epithelial sheet bending during gastrulation requires actomyosin-based apical constriction that causes cells and their neighbors to become wedge-shaped10. Although these studies highlight the importance of cell shape, the inherent heterogeneity in cell shape has encumbered efforts to identify mechanisms that connect morphology to function.

To this end, numerous approaches to manipulate cell shape have been developed over the past three decades. These approaches achieve their goal by either constraining the cell with a three-dimensional mold or controlling cellular adhesion geometry through patterned deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins onto an antifouling surface, a technique termed micropatterning11. Here we will review a number of techniques that have gained popularity throughout the years.

Originally pioneered as an approach for microelectronic applications, soft lithography-based microcontact printing has unequivocally become a cult favorite12. A master wafer is first fabricated by selectively exposing areas of a photoresist-coated silicon substrate to photoirradiation, leaving behind a patterned surface13. An elastomer, such as PDMS, is then poured onto the master wafer to generate a soft "stamp" that transfers ECM proteins to a desired substrate11,14. Once fabricated, a master wafer can be used to cast many PDMS stamps that give rise to highly reproducible micropatterns12. However, the patterns cannot be readily adjusted due to the lengthy photolithography process. This process also requires highly specialized equipment and cleanrooms that are not typically available in Biology departments.

More recently, direct printing using deep UV has been reported to circumvent limitations posed by traditional lithography-based approaches. Deep UV light is directed through a photomask to selective areas of a glass coverslip coated with poly-L-lysine-grafted-polyethylene glycol. Chemical groups exposed to deep UV are photoconverted without the use of photosensitive linkers to enable binding of ECM proteins15. The lack of photosensitive linkers enables patterned coverslips to remain stable at room temperature for over seven months15. This method avoids the use of cleanrooms and photolithography equipment and requires less specialized training. However, the requirement for photomasks still poses a substantial hurdle for experiments that require readily available changes in patterns.

In addition to methods that manipulate cell geometry through controlled deposition of ECM proteins on a 2D surface, other seek to control cell shape by confining cells in 3D microstructures. Many studies have adapted the soft lithography-based approach described above to generate 3D, rather than 2D, PDMS chambers to investigate shape-dependent biological processes in embryos, bacteria, yeast and plants16,17,18,19. Two-photon polymerization (2PP) has also taken the lead as a microfabrication technique that can create complex 3D hydrogel scaffolds with nanometer resolution20. 2PP relies on the principles of two-photon adsorption, where two photons delivered in femtosecond pulses are absorbed simultaneously by a molecule - photoinitiator in this case - that enables local polymerization of photopolymers21. This technique has been heavily employed to print 3D scaffolds that mimic the native ECM structures of human tissue and has been shown to induce low photochemical damage to cells22.

The debut of microphotopatterning 10 years ago gave researchers the opportunity to fabricate micropatterns while avoiding inaccessible and specialized equipment. Microphotopatterning creates patterns on the micron scale by thermally removing selective regions of poly-vinyl alcohol (PVA) coated on activated glass surfaces using an infrared laser23,24. ECM proteins that attach only the underlying glass surface and not PVA then serve as biochemical cues to enable controlled spreading dynamics and cell shape. This method also offers superior flexibility since patterns can be readily changed in real time. Here, we provide a step-by-step protocol of microphotopatterning by using a commercial multi-photon imaging system. The described protocol is designed for rapid and automated fabrication of large patterns. We demonstrated that these patterns efficiently control cell shape by constraining the geometry of cell-ECM adhesions. Finally, we demonstrate that the described patterning technique modulates the organization and dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton.

Protocol

1. Coverslip preprocessing

  1. Prepare squeaky-clean coverslips as described in Waterman-Storer, 199825.
  2. Prepare 1% (3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane (APTMS) solution and incubate the coverslips in the solution for 10 min with gentle agitation. Make sure that coverslips move freely in the solution.
  3. Wash coverslips twice with dH2O for 5 min each.
  4. Prepare 0.5% glutaraldehyde (GA) solution and incubate the coverslips in the solution for 30 min on a shaker. For 25 coverslips, use 50 mL of glutaraldehyde solution. Make sure that coverslips move freely in the solution.
  5. Wash coverslips three times with dH2O for 10 min each.
  6. Spin dry coverslips for 30 s using a custom-built coverslip spinner. A detailed description of the coverslip spinner has been published26 and is available online (https://mullinslab.ucsf.edu/home-built-coverslip-drierspinner/). Activated coverslips can be stored for up to one month at +4 °C in a box with dividers so that they stand apart from each other.

2. PVA coating

  1. Mix PVA (98% hydrolyzed PVA, MW 98000) with dH2O to make a 5.6% solution.
  2. Solubilize the mixture in a 90 °C water bath and immediately filter through a 0.2 µm filter in a biosafety cabinet while hot. Filter the stock solution again if it precipitates. PVA solution can be stored at room temperature for 3 months.
  3. In a 15 mL tube, add one part HCl to eight parts PVA. Invert the tube carefully a few times to mix.
  4. Pour 2 mL of the mixed solution into a 35 mm Petri dish and submerge a clean, preprocessed coverslip into the liquid, taking care that the coverslips do not stick to the bottom. Incubate at room temperature for 5 min on a shaker.
  5. Carefully remove the coverslips from the solution. Use the coverslip spinner to spin coat for 40 s. In the meantime, clean the tweezers. Transfer the coverslip to a box and dry at +4 °C overnight. PVA-coated coverslips can be stored at +4 °C for up to two weeks.

3. Configuring the Multiphoton Microscope

NOTE: The described protocol is tuned up to create cell adhesive micropatterns of desired shape and size on upright or inverted multi-photon imaging systems, especially the ones that are not equipped with a hardware autofocus. Thus, for every field of view (FOV), the patterning script ablates a small area to create a fiduciary marker on the coverslip, uses a software autofocus to focus the microscope on the coverslip surface, and ablates the desired pattern. Running this script in a loop for adjacent FOVs robustly creates a large array of micropatterns (5 x 5 mm or larger) that constrain cell shape and modulate the activity of intracellular biological processes. The described protocol was developed for Nikon A1R MP+ imaging system controlled by NIS-Elements software. If an imaging system from another vendor is used for patterning, the optical configurations and patterning script should be adjusted according to the manufacturer's instructions.

  1. Turn on the microscope software. Ensure that the "Apo LWD 25X/1.10W DIC N2" objective is mounted on the microscope.
    NOTE: The protocol described here is optimized for a 25x/1.1 NA water immersion objective, but other objectives can also be used for patterning. Readers should be aware that pattering with a high-magnification objective (e.g., 40x and 60x) takes longer time as it significantly decreases the number of patterns ablated in each FOV. Low magnification objectives can be used for patterning as long as they provide uniform illumination across the FOV and laser power sufficient to ablate the PVA layer.
  2. In the A1plus MP GUI window, set the laser line to 750 nm.
  3. Setting up the "Image" optical configuration
    NOTE: NIS-Elements provides users with several tools (graphical interface, an acquisition workflow builder JOBS, optical configurations, and macros) to control the microscope hardware. In this protocol, most of the hardware control is achieved through various optical configurations as well as ND Acquisition and ND Stimulation modules.
    1. In the Calibration tab, click on New Optical Configuration. Name the optical configuration "Image". This is the baseline optical configuration that allows imaging of the coverslip through reflectance. Leave all other options as default and select the appropriate objective.
    2. In the A1plus MP GUI window, click on the Settings button to configure the hardware settings under this optical configuration. Set the Stimulation Laser to IR stim, place the Beam Splitter (BS 20/80) in the light path, set the Scanner Unit to Galvano and select the appropriate descanned detector.
    3. In the A1plus Compact GUI window, select a scan size and dwell time that is sufficient to capture small features on the coverslip(1.1 ms and 1024 pixels on our system, respectively). Click on the Normal button so no line averaging or line integration is performed. Make sure the Use IR Laser box is checked. Set up unidirectional scanning for simplicity.
      NOTE: If scan speed is of concern, bidirectional scanning can be used.
    4. In the same window, adjust laser power and detector sensitivity to obtain bright but not saturated image of the coverslip surface. Setting laser power to 3 - 5% of the maximum power and detector sensitivity ("HV" slider) to 15 V is a good starting point.
    5. In the A1plus Scan Area window, set Zoom to 1 to capture the entire FOV.
    6. Save the optical configuration.
  4. Setting up the "Print_Fudiciary_Marker" optical configuration
    1. Duplicate the "Image" optical configuration and rename it "Print_Fudiciary_Marker".
    2. In the A1plus Compact GUI window, select the smallest scan size and dwell time (64 pixels and 80.2 ms on our system, respectively).
    3. Since no imaging is required in this step, set detector sensitivity to 0 and increase laser power to 30%. Higher laser power will thermally remove the PVA layer on the coverslip in the desired regions.
    4. In the A1plus Scan Area window, set Zoom to maximum (15.87 for our system) and place the scan area in the middle of the FOV.
    5. In the ND Acquisition window, set up a Z-stack experiment. Set movement in the Z position to Relative and select the appropriate Z device. Set the step size to 2 µm and the stack depth to 10 µm above and below to account for any unevenness in the microscope stage or the PVA surface between adjacent FOVs.
  5. Setting up the "Autofocus" optical configuration
    1. Duplicate the "Image" optical configuration and rename it "Autofocus".
    2. In the A1plus Scan Area window, decrease the Zoom factor so the FOV is slightly larger than the fiduciary marker. This ensures that other small features on the coverslip will not interfere with autofocusing.
    3. In the Devices menu, select Autofocus Set Up. Set the scan thickness to that of the Z-stack in the Z-stack experiment (see step 3.5.5). The microscope will scan through this range and find the best focal plane using the fiduciary marker. Leave the step size as default.
  6. Setting up the "Load_ROI" optical configuration
    1. Duplicate the "Image" optical configuration and rename it "Load_ROI".
    2. In the A1plus Compact GUI window, set scan size identical to that of the ROI mask. This optical configuration will be used to capture an image onto which the ROI mask will be loaded. We used 2048 pixels to achieve an optimal balance between resolution and speed.
      NOTE: It is essential that this captured image is identical in size to the ROI mask.
  7. Setting up the "Micropattern" optical configuration
    1. Duplicate the "Print_Fiduciary_Marker" optical configuration and rename it "Micropattern".
    2. Set the Zoom factor to one.
    3. In the A1plus MP GUI window, increase the stimulation laser power to ablate PVA and select an appropriate scan speed (40% and 32 s/frame in our experiments, respectively).
    4. In the ND Stimulation window, set up a ND stimulation experiment. Add a few phases to the Time Schedule and set each as Stimulation. Ensure stimulation area and duration are correct.
      NOTE: The number of phases can be adjusted according to the thickness and smoothness of the PVA layer as well as the laser power used in this optical configuration.
    5. In the same window, enable the the StgMoveMainZ(-1.000,1) function before each phase. This again accounts for any deviations in the Z-direction.
      NOTE: The distance and direction in which the objective moves can be adjusted according to the thickness and smoothness of the PVA layer.
  8. Setting up the "Label_Surface" optical configuration
    1. Duplicate the "Print_Fudiciary_Marker" optical configuration and rename it "Label_Surface".
    2. In the A1plus Compact GUI window, increase laser power significantly and set Zoom to one. High laser power used here will physically damage the glass coverslip and produce a label visible to the naked eye. This aids in locating the patterns in further experiments.

4. Generating the ROI mask and Setting up the macro

  1. Generating the ROI mask
    1. Use Adobe Photoshop or other available software to generate a 2048 × 2048 RGB image. The image corresponds to a FOV under the microscope (i.e., 532.48 × 532.48 µm, 0.26 µm per pixel). The image should have a black (0, 0, 0) background.
      ​NOTE: A number of commercial and free image editors can be used to generate ROI masks for laser assisted micropatterning. Although we use Adobe Photoshop to generate the masks, GIMP and ImageJ/Fiji are also available as alternative free options.
    2. Draw 8 - 12 white (255,255,255) patterns on the black background. Pattern size varies depending on cell type (~200 pixels in diameter). Leave a 500 × 500 blank area in the center of the image for autofocusing. Leave sufficient space between adjacent patterns (>200 pixels) and at the boarder of the FOV for optimal ablation and cell attachment. Patterns presented in this protocol are available on Github (https://github.com/PlotnikovLab/Micropatterning).
  2. Setting up the macro
    1. Click on the Macro menu and select New Macro.
    2. Import the "Pattern_Stimulation" code available on Github (https://github.com/PlotnikovLab/Micropatterning) into the New Macro window. Save this piece of code to an appropriate folder.
    3. Open another New Macro window and import the "Stage_Movement" code available on Github (http://github.com/PlotnikovLab/Micropatterning). Ensure that the Stage_Movement working directory in this code is identical to that in step 4.2.2. Save the Stage_Movement code to the same folder in step 4.2.2.

5. Generating micropatterns using photo ablation

  1. Turn on the microscope and its accessories. Ensure that the IR laser has warmed up sufficiently prior to this.
  2. Transfer the PVA-coated coverslip onto a holder. For an upright microscope, ensure the PVA surface to be ablated faces down.
  3. Add water to the corners to stabilize the coverslip and mount the holder onto the microscope stage.
  4. Lower the objective and add water onto the coverslip.
    NOTE: The protocol described here is optimized for a 25x/1.1 NA water immersion objective. If a dry or oil immersion objective is used, water should be replaced with an appropriate immersion medium. When a water immersion objective is used to generate a large micropattern array, evaporation might become an issue. If this is the case, water should be replaced with GenTeal, an over-the-counter eye lubricant available from pharmacies.
  5. In the microscope software, turn on the IR laser shutter in the A1plus MP GUI window. Click on the Autoalignment button to align the laser prior to patterning.
    NOTE: It is crucial to perform laser autoalignment at the beginning of each patterning session as small deviations in the laser path will significantly affect the quality of the patterns.
  6. Switch to the "Image" optical configuration. In the A1plus Compact GUI window, click Scan to scan the FOV while slowly moving the objective closer to the coverslip.
  7. Carefully monitor the image. At first, the image will appear extremely dim. Move the objective closer to the coverslip until the image brightness increases. This is the coverslip surface that is facing the objective. Continue to move the objective until the brightness decreases and increases again. This is the PVA surface to be patterned. Focus on any small feature (coverslip imperfections, dust, etc.) on this surface and set zero on the Z drive. Always set zero after focusing.
    NOTE: Although both surfaces of the coverslip are coated with PVA, the optical properties of glass are not significantly altered by PVA coating. We routinely image such coverslips with dry, water- and oil-immersion objectives and did not find the non-patterned PVA surface to interfere with imaging.
  8. Switch to the "Label_Surface" optical configuration. Click on Capture. Return to the "imaging" optical configuration and scan. The glass surface should be damaged and appear amorphous. The damaged area is visible to the naked eye, indicating the location of patterns in further experiments.
    NOTE: To increase the size of the visible label, repeat step 5.8 in multiple adjacent FOVs.
  9. Check again that the objective is roughly in the center of the coverslip. Ensure that there is sufficient water between the objective and the coverslip. Move the stage by 1 to 2 FOVs to avoid glass particles and scan to confirm.
  10. In the Devices menu, open the Stage_Movement macro. Check that the Pattern_Stimulation working directory is correct; if not, stimulation will not occur. Set the variables "PatternLength" and "PatternHeight" to the desired number of FOVs that will be patterned. Save and run the macro.
  11. After patterning is complete, switch to the "Imaging" optical configuration. Again, check that the IR laser shutter is open in the A1plus MP GUI window.
  12. Move the stage to view the patterns. Scan through the patterns to check their quality.
  13. Transfer the coverslip to the grid box, with patterns facing up.
  14. Store patterned coverslips at +4 °C for up to one week before use.

6. Fibronectin adsorption

  1. Make fresh 1 M NaBH4 in 1 M NaOH solution. Add at a 1:100 ratio to pH 8.0 phosphate buffer containing 0.2 M ethanolamine.
  2. Transfer patterned coverslips to a 35 mm tissue culture dish. Incubate each coverslip with 1 mL of the solution above for 8 min to quench autofluorescence, and then rinse 3 times with PBS.
  3. Dilute fibronectin (FN) in PBS to a final concentration of 10 μg/mL. Incubate the coverslip in FN for 1 h at +37 °C.
    NOTE: If substantial nonspecific binding of ECM protein to the substrate is observed, FN can be diluted in PBS containing 0.1% Pluronic F-12724.
  4. Wash the coverslip 2 times with PBS. If not immediately used, store in PBS at +4 °C overnight.

7. Cell attachment

NOTE: The following protocol is optimized for primary human gingival fibroblasts.

  1. Culture a 10 cm dish of cells to 70% confluency.
  2. Warm up cell culture media, PBS and 0.05% trypsin in a +37 °C water bath.
    NOTE: For cells that adhere weakly to the substrate, non-proteolytic dissociation with versene (0.48 mM EDTA) or a proprietary enzyme-free buffer may increase cell attachment to the patterns and should be considered.
  3. Prior to seeding cells, relocate the patterned coverslip to a clean 35 mm tissue culture dish containing 1 mL warm PBS.
  4. Aspirate the cell culture media from the 10 cm tissue culture dish and wash once with PBS.
  5. Add 700 µL of 0.05% trypsin/EDTA to the dish and incubate cells in a +37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for 1 min.
  6. In the meantime, aspirate the PBS covering the patterned coverslip and add 1 mL of cell culture media.
  7. Confirm that cells have detached. Then resuspend the trypsinized cells with 10 mL of cell culture media and add 1 mL to the patterned coverslip.
  8. Culture cells in the incubator for 2 - 3 h and check if a sufficient number of cells have attached to the patterns. If so, change media once to remove unattached cells. This minimizes the chance of multiple cells landing on the same pattern.
    NOTE: Attachment time may vary depending on cell type.
  9. After another 3-4 h, or when a sufficient number of cells have spread on patterns, cells are ready for further experiments. Do not wait for too long to avoid cell division.

8. Data acquisition

  1. Fix cells with 4% PFA in cytoskeleton buffer27 for 10 min at room temperature.
  2. Follow immunofluorescence protocols established for the proteins of interest. PVA-coated coverslips work well with any immunofluorescence protocol.
  3. Acquire images of cells using an appropriate microscope. Depending on the goal of the experiment, image either one or multiple cells per FOV.

9. Image analysis

NOTE: The following protocol allows users to obtain the average fluorescence signal of the protein of interest over a large number of cells from Z-stacks of microscope images.

  1. Open the acquired images in NIS Elements and crop the images. Ensure that each image contains only one well-spread cell. Detailed instructions on image processing can be found in the script below.
  2. Install Anaconda and launch Spyder through Anaconda Navigator.
    NOTE: The .py scripts can be run in any environment with the appropriate packages identified in the requirements.txt. We recommend Anaconda because it contains most of the required packages for the codes below.
  3. Download the script from Github (https://github.com/PlotnikovLab/Micropatterning) and open in Spyder (Pattern_Averaging_3Channels.py or Pattern_Averaging_4Channels.py for images with 3 Channels or 4 Channels, respectively).
  4. Set parameters based on the acquired images. See the script for detailed descriptions.
  5. Press F5 to run the script. The progress can be tracked in the Console panel.
  6. Retrieve the output files saved in the same folder. The output images are the average of each channel for all samples. The excel sheet shows the mean intensity of each channel within a sample cell, which enables further quantitative analysis.

Results

The quality of the experimental data obtained through micropatterning is largely dependent on the quality of the patterns. To determine the quality of patterns generated with the method above, we first used reflectance microscopy to assess the shape and size of the photo ablated areas of the coverslip. We found that each individual pattern looked very similar to the ablation mask and displayed clear boarders and a surface that reflected light uniformly (Figure 2B). A variety of shapes a...

Discussion

The results above demonstrate that the described IR laser assisted micropatterning (microphotopatterning) protocol provides reproducible adherent patterns of various shapes that enables the manipulation of cell shape and cytoskeletal architecture. Although numerous micropatterning methods have been developed both prior to and after the debut of microphotopatterning, this method possesses several advantages. First, it does not require specialized equipment and cleanrooms that are usually only found within Engineering depa...

Disclosures

The authors disclose no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Connaught Fund New Investigator Award to S.P., Canada Foundation for Innovation, NSERC Discovery Grant Program (grants RGPIN-2015-05114 and RGPIN-2020-05881), University of Manchester and University of Toronto Joint Research Fund, and University of Toronto XSeed Program. C.T. was supported by NSERC USRA fellowship.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
(3-Aminopropyl)trimethoxysilaneAldrich281778
10 cm Cell Culture DishVWR10062-880Polysterene, TC treated, vented
25X Apo LWD Water Dipping ObjectiveNikonMRD77225
3.5 cm Cell Culture DishVWR10861-586Polysterene, TC treated, vented
4',6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole (DAPI)Thermo622481mg/mL dihydrochloride solution
Bovine Serine AlbuminBioShopALB005
Dulbecco's Phosphate-Buffered SalineWisent311-425-CL
EthanolamineSigma-AldrichE9508
FibronectinSigma-AldrichFC0101mg/mL in pH 7.5 buffer
Fibronectin AntibodyBD610077Mouse
FijiImageJVersion 1.53c
Fluorescent PhalloidinInvitrogenA12380568nm
Glass CoverslipVWR16004-30222 × 22 mm
GlutaraldehydeElectron Microscopy Sciences1622025% aqueous solution
Hydrochloric AcidCaledon6025-1-2937% aqueous solution
IR LaserCoherentChameleon Vision
Minimal Essential Medium αGibco12561-056
Mounting MediumSigmaF4680
Mouse Secondary AntibodyCell Signaling Technology4408SGoat, 488nm
Multi-Photon MicroscopeNikonA1R MP+
Myosin Light Chain AntibodyCell Signaling Technology3672SRabbit
NIS ElementsNikonVersion 5.21.03
Nitric AcidCaledon7525-1-2970% aqueous solution
PhotoshopAdobeVersion 21.2.1
Pluronic F-127SigmaP2443Powder
Poly(vinyl alchohol)Aldrich341584MW 89000-98000, 98% hydrolyzed
Rabbit Secondary AntibodyCell Signaling Technology4412SGoat, 488nm
ShakerVWR10127-876Alsoknown as analog rocker
Sodium BorohydrideAldrich452882Powder
Sodium HydroxideSigma-AldrichS8045
Sodium Phosphate DibasicSigmaS5136Powder
Sodium Phosphate MonobasicSigmaS5011Powder
SpyderAnaconda4.1.4
TrypsinWisent325-042-CL0.05% aqueous solution with 0.53mM EDTA

References

  1. Harris, T. J. C., Sawyer, J. K., Peifer, M. How the Cytoskeleton Helps Build the Embryonic Body Plan Models of Morphogenesis from Drosophila. Current Topics in Developmental Biology. 89, 55-85 (2009).
  2. Keren, K., et al. Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells. Nature. 453 (7194), 475-480 (2008).
  3. Castor, L. N. Control of Division by Cell Contact and Serum Concentration in Cultures of 3T3 Cells. Experimental Cell Research. 68 (1), 17-24 (1971).
  4. Jain, N., Iyer, K. V., Kumar, A., Shivashankar, G. V. Cell geometric constraints induce modular gene-expression patterns via redistribution of HDAC3 regulated by actomyosin contractility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 (28), 11349-11354 (2013).
  5. Paluch, E., Heisenberg, C. -. P. Biology and Physics of Cell Shape Changes in Development. Current Biology. 19 (17), 790-799 (2009).
  6. Pollard, T. D., Borisy, G. G. Cellular Motility Driven by Assembly and Disassembly of Actin Filaments. Cell. 112 (4), 453-465 (2003).
  7. Ridley, A. J., et al. Cell Migration: Integrating Signals from Front to Back. Science. 302 (5651), 1704-1709 (2003).
  8. Cramer, L. P. Mechanism of cell rear retraction in migrating cells. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 25 (5), 591-599 (2013).
  9. Lee, J., Ishihara, A., Oxford, G., Johnson, B., Jacobson, K. Regulation of cell movement is mediated by stretch-activated calcium channels. Nature. 400 (6742), 382-386 (1999).
  10. Leptin, M. Gastrulation Movements: the Logic and the Nuts and Bolts. Developmental Cell. 8 (3), 305-320 (2005).
  11. Chen, C. S., Mrksich, M., Huang, S., Whitesides, G. M., Ingber, D. E. Geometric Control of Cell Life and Death. Science. 276 (5317), 1425-1428 (1997).
  12. Whitesides, G. M., Ostuni, E., Takayama, S., Jiang, X., Ingber, D. E. Soft Lithography in Biology and Biochemistry. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 3, 335-373 (2001).
  13. Cirelli, R. A., Watson, G. P., Nalamasu, O. Techniques and Processing: Surface, Micro-, and Nanoscale Processing. Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology. , 6441-6448 (2001).
  14. Stricker, J., Aratyn-Schaus, Y., Oakes, P. W., Gardel, M. L. Spatiotemporal Constraints on the Force-Dependent Growth of Focal Adhesions. Biophysical Journal. 100 (12), 2883-2893 (2011).
  15. Azioune, A., Storch, M., Bornens, M., Théry, M., Piel, M. Simple and rapid process for single cell micro-patterning. Lab on a Chip. 9 (11), 1640-1642 (2009).
  16. Chang, F., Atilgan, E., Burgess, D., Minc, N. Manipulating Cell Shape by Placing Cells into Microfabricated Chambers. Methods in Molecular Biology. 1136, 281-290 (2014).
  17. Takeuchi, S., DiLuzio, W. R., Weibel, D. B., Whitesides, G. M. Controlling the Shape of Filamentous Cells of Escherichia Coli. Nano Letters. 5 (9), 1819-1823 (2005).
  18. Minc, N., Boudaoud, A., Chang, F. Mechanical Forces of Fission Yeast Growth. Current Biology. 19 (13), 1096-1101 (2009).
  19. Durand-Smet, P., Spelman, T. A., Meyerowitz, E. M., Jönsson, H. Cytoskeletal organization in isolated plant cells under geometry control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (29), 17399-17408 (2020).
  20. Haske, W., et al. 65 nm feature sizes using visible wavelength 3-D multiphoton lithography.pdf. Optics Express. 15 (6), 3426-3436 (2007).
  21. Song, J., Michas, C., Chen, C. S., White, A. E., Grinstaff, M. W. From Simple to Architecturally Complex Hydrogel Scaffolds for Cell and Tissue Engineering Applications: Opportunities Presented by Two-Photon Polymerization. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 9 (1), 1901217 (2020).
  22. Torgersen, J., Qin, X., Li, Z., Ovsianikov, A., Liska, R., Stampfl, J. Hydrogels for Two-Photon Polymerization: A Toolbox for Mimicking the Extracellular Matrix. Advanced Functional Materials. 23 (36), 4542-4554 (2013).
  23. Doyle, A. D., Wang, F. W., Matsumoto, K., Yamada, K. M. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. The Journal of Cell Biology. 184 (4), 481-490 (2009).
  24. Doyle, A. D. Generation of Micropatterned Substrates Using Micro Photopatterning. Current Protocols in Cell Biology. 45 (1), 1-35 (2009).
  25. Waterman-Storer, C. M. Microtubule/Organelle Motility Assays. Current Protocols in Cell Biology. 00 (1), 1-21 (1998).
  26. Inoué, S., Spring, K. R. . Video Microscopy: The Fundamentals. , (1997).
  27. Schneider, I. C., Hays, C. K., Waterman, C. M. Epidermal Growth Factor-induced Contraction Regulates Paxillin Phosphorylation to Temporally Separate Traction Generation from De-adhesion. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 20 (13), 3155-3167 (2009).
  28. Helmchen, F., Denk, W. Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nature Methods. 2 (12), 932-940 (2005).
  29. Xing, J., Cao, Y., Yu, Y., Li, H., Song, Z., Yu, H. In Vitro Micropatterned Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Test (µP-hPST) for Morphometric-Based Teratogen Screening. Scientific Reports. 7 (1), 8491 (2017).
  30. Ankam, S., Teo, B. K., Kukumberg, M., Yim, E. K. High throughput screening to investigate the interaction of stem cells with their extracellular microenvironment. Organogenesis. 9 (3), 0 (2013).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

MicropatterningCell GeometryInfrared LaserCell ShapeIntercellular MachinesAutomated WorkflowImage ProcessingPVA SolutionMicroscope SetupOptical ConfigurationLaser LineCoverslipGalvano ScannerProtein Distribution

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved