A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This protocol presents a comparison between two different induction protocols for differentiating human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) toward pancreatic lineages in vitro: the integrative protocol and the non-integrative protocol. The integrative protocol generates more insulin producing cells (IPCs).

Abstract

As of 2000, the success of pancreatic islet transplantation using the Edmonton protocol to treat type I diabetes mellitus still faced some obstacles. These include the limited number of cadaveric pancreas donors and the long-term use of immunosuppressants. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been considered to be a potential candidate as an alternative source of islet-like cell generation. Our previous reports have successfully illustrated the establishment of induction protocols for differentiating human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) to insulin-producing cells (IPCs). However, the induction efficiency varied greatly. In this paper, we demonstrate the comparison of hDPSCs pancreatic induction efficiency via integrative (microenvironmental and genetic manipulation) and non-integrative (microenvironmental manipulation) induction protocols for delivering hDPSC-derived IPCs (hDPSC-IPCs). The results suggest distinct induction efficiency for both the induction approaches in terms of 3-dimensional colony structure, yield, pancreatic mRNA markers, and functional property upon multi-dosage glucose challenge. These findings will support the future establishment of a clinically applicable IPCs and pancreatic lineage production platform.

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus is an ongoing global concern. An International Diabetes Federation (IDF) report estimated that the global prevalence of diabetes would increase from 151 million in 2000 to 415 million in 20151,2. The latest epidemiology-based study has predicted that the estimated worldwide diabetes prevalence will increase from 451 million in 2017 to 693 million in 20451. The success of pancreatic islet transplantation using the Edmonton protocol was first demonstrated in 2000, when it was shown to maintain endogenous insulin production and stabilize the normoglycemic condition in type I diabetic patients3. However, the application of the Edmonton protocol still faces a bottleneck problem. The limited number of cadaveric pancreas donors is the main issue since each patient with type I diabetes requires at least 2-4 islet donors. Furthermore, the long-term use of immunosuppressive agents may cause life-threatening side effects4,5. To address this, the development of a potential therapy for diabetes in the past decade has mainly focused on the generation of effective insulin-producing cells (IPCs) from various sources of stem cells6.

Stem cells became an alternative treatment in many diseases, including diabetes type I, which is caused by the loss of beta-cells. Transplantation of IPCs is the new promising method for controlling blood glucose in these patients7. Two approaches for generating IPCs, integrative and non-integrative induction protocols, are presented in this article. The induction protocol mimicked the natural pancreatic developmental process to get the matured and functional IPCs8,9.

For this study, hDPSCs were characterized by flow cytometry for MSC surface marker detection, multilineage differentiation potential, and RT-qPCR to determine the expression of stemness property and proliferative gene markers (data not shown)8,9,10. hDPSCs were induced toward definitive endoderm, pancreatic endoderm, pancreatic endocrine, and pancreatic beta-cells or IPCs (Figure 1), respectively7. To induce the cells, a three-step induction approach was used as a backbone protocol. This protocol was called a non-integrative protocol. In the case of integrative protocol, the essential pancreatic transcription factor, PDX1, was overexpressed in hDPSCs followed by the induction of overexpressed PDX1 in hDPSCs using a three-step differentiation protocol. The difference between non-integrative and integrative protocol is the overexpression of PDX1 in integrative protocol and not in the non-integrative protocol. The pancreatic differentiation was compared between the integrative and non-integrative protocols in this study.

Protocol

This work was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University. Human DPSCs (hDPSCs) were isolated from human dental pulp tissues extracted from both premolars and molars due to wisdom teeth issues. Informed consent was obtained from the patients under an approved protocol (HREC-DCU 2018/054).

1. Integrative induction protocol

  1. Preparation of lentiviral vector carrying PDX1
    1. Use human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293FT cells for viral packaging. Culture and maintain these cells in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% L-glutamine, and 1% Antibiotic-Antimycotic.
    2. Generate PDX1-lentivirus vectors by co-transfection of 10 µg each of the packaging and envelope plasmids and 20 µg of the targeted gene plasmid into HEK293FT cells using calcium phosphate transfection system, e.g., psPAX2, pMD2.G, and human pWPT-PDX111. Ensure that the cells are 80%-90% confluent during the time of infection.
    3. Collect the medium containing lentiviral particles at 48 and 72 h after transfection.
    4. Filter the collected medium through a 0.45 µm filter; concentrate the viruses with a centrifugal filter at 100 kDa nominal molecular weight cut-off (NMWCO).
  2. PDX1 overexpression
    1. Use passage 3-5 hDPSC that are 70-80% confluent. Trypsinize and count the cells using a cell counter. Seed 1 x 106 hDPSCs onto a 60 mm tissue culture-treated dish and incubate overnight.
    2. 24 h later, add fresh virus particles obtained from step 1.1.4 to transduce polybrene pre-treated cells (4 µg/mL polybrene, 30 min under 37 °C and 5% CO2) at the desired multiplicity of infection (MOI). For example, in this case, MOI used is 20. Maintain the cells in the cell culture incubator for 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
    3. After the 24 h infection period, discard the medium containing viral particles. Add fresh culture media and continue growing the cells for 48 h. All cultures are maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
    4. Check the aggregated morphology of the transfected cells before proceeding to the induction step. PDX1 transduction is confirmed by gene expression analysis (Supplemental Figure 1).
      NOTE: Check the cell morphology under a microscope before proceeding to the next steps.
    5. Harvest and proceed to a three-step induction protocol (step 1.3) as a microenvironmental induction approach.
  3. Three-step induction protocol
    NOTE: The three-step induction protocol resulted in the series of pancreatic differentiation of hDPSCs to definitive endoderm, pancreatic endoderm/endocrine, and pancreatic beta-cells/IPCs using serum-free medium (SFM)-A, SFM-B, and SFM-C, respectively.
    1. Discard the culture medium, and then wash the transduced-hDPSCs with 1x phosphate-buffered solution (PBS).
    2. Add 0.25% trypsin-EDTA solution to the cells and incubate for 1 min at 37 °C, 5% CO2.
    3. Add the culture medium to stop the trypsin activity and gently flush the cells to get the single cell suspension. Count the cells and aliquot 1 x 106 cells into each collecting tube.
    4. Centrifuge the cell suspension at 468 x g (Relative Centrifugal Force: RCF), 4 °C, for 5 min. Discard the supernatant and save the cell pellet.
    5. Resuspend the pellet in 3 mL of first pancreatic induction medium, i.e., serum-free medium (SFM)-A. Seed the cells on a low attachment culture plate (60 mm). Maintain the cells at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 3 days.
      NOTE: Observe cells morphology under an inverted microscope before proceeding to the next step.
    6. Remove SFM-A and add 3 mL of the second induction medium, i.e., SFM-B. Maintain the cells for the next 2 days at 37 °C, 5% CO2.
      NOTE: Observe cells morphology under an inverted microscope before proceeding to the next step.
    7. Remove SFM-B and add 3 mL of the third induction medium, i.e., SFM-C. Maintain the cells for the next 5 days in a cell culture incubator maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Change the medium every 48 h. Observe their morphology after 5 days.
      NOTE: Each induction medium is supplemented with different reagents as described; SFM-A: 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 1x insulin-transferrin-selenium (ITS), 4 nM of activin A, 1 nM of sodium butyrate, and 50 µM of beta-mercaptoethanol; SFM-B: 1% BSA, 1x ITS, and 0.3 mM taurine; and SFM C: 1.5% BSA, 1x ITS, 3 mM taurine, 100 nM of glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1, 1 mM nicotinamide, and 1x non-essential amino acids (NEAAs).
    8. Make sure to check the cell morphology under an inverted microscope after each step. The cells will become more aggregated and float as colonies.
    9. Collect cell colonies for further analysis. Check for colony morphology and size. Perform pancreatic gene marker expression analysis and functional analysis (Glucose stimulated C-peptide secretion assay).

2. Non-integrative induction protocol

NOTE: The non-integrative protocol is the backbone protocol for delivering the IPCs with the three-step induction process as a microenvironmental induction approach8,9.

  1. Use passage 3-5 hDPSCs at 70%-80% confluency.
  2. Discard the culture medium and wash hDPSCs with 1x PBS.
  3. Add 0.25% trypsin-EDTA solution onto the cells and incubate for 1 min at 37 °C, 5% CO2.
  4. Add the culture medium to stop the trypsin activity and gently pipette the cells to obtain the single cell suspension. Count cells and aliquot 1 x 106 cells into each collection tube.
    1. Centrifuge the cell suspension at 468 x g (RCF), 4 °C, 5 min. Discard the supernatant.
    2. Resuspend the pellet in SFM-A and seed onto a low attachment culture plate (60 mm). Culture the cells at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 3 days. Check the cell morphology under an inverted microscope.
    3. Remove SFM-A, add SFM-B (Day 3) and then maintain the cells for the next 2 days under 37 °C, 5% CO2.
    4. Remove SFM-B, add SFM-C (Day 5) and then maintain the cells for the next 5 days under 37 °C, 5% CO2. SFM-C is changed every 48 h.
      NOTE: Each induction medium is supplemented with different reagents as described; SFM-A: 1% BSA, 1x ITS, 4 nM of activin A, 1 nM of sodium butyrate, and 50 µM of beta-mercaptoethanol; SFM-B: 1% BSA, 1x ITS, and 0.3 mM taurine; and SFM C: 1.5% BSA, 1x ITS, 3 mM taurine, 100 nM of GLP-1, 1 mM nicotinamide, and 1x NEAAs.
    5. Make sure to check the cell morphology under the inverted microscope after each step and at Day 10.
      NOTE: The cells will become more aggregated and will float as colonies.
    6. Collect cell colonies for further analysis. Check for colony morphology and size. Perform pancreatic gene marker expression analysis and functional analysis (Glucose stimulated C-peptide secretion assay).

Results

In this article, the outcomes of both the induction protocols were compared. The diagrams of both induction protocols are illustrated in Figure 2A,C. In both the protocols, the evaluation was performed under a light microscope, and images were analyzed with ImageJ. hDPSCs were able to form colony-like structures from the first day of induction in both induction protocols. The colony's morphology was round and dense, and all colonies floated in the culture vessels through...

Discussion

Achieving higher IPCs production from MSCs plays an essential role in diabetes therapy. The critical steps of the integrative protocol rely on the quality of cells to be used for the transduction and the quality of transduced cells. Some cell requirements that should be checked for successful transduction are ensuring cell healthiness, cell banking management, and cells are in a mitotically active state. Further, monitoring the viability of transduced cells also plays an important role. Less successful transduction is ca...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

SK, WR, and QDL were supported by the Veterinary Stem Cell and Bioengineering Research Unit, Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund, Chulalongkorn University. TO and PP were supported by Chulalongkorn Academic Advancement into Its 2nd Century Project. CS was supported by a research supporting grant of the Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn Academic Advancement into Its 2nd Century Project, Veterinary Stem Cell and Bioengineering Research Unit, Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund, Chulalongkorn University, and Government Research Fund.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Cell Culture
Antibiotic-AntimycoticThermo Fisher Scientific Corporation, USA15240062
Corning® 60 mm TC-treated Culture DishCorning®430166
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM)Thermo Fisher Scientific Corporation12800017
Fetal bovine serum (FBS)Thermo Fisher Scientific Corporation10270106
GlutaMAX™Thermo Fisher Scientific Corporation35050061
Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) powder, pH 7.4Sigma-AldrichP3813-10PAKOne pack is used for preparing 1 L of PBS solution with sterile DDI
Trypsin-EDTA (0.25%)Thermo Fisher Scientific Corporation25200072
Lentiviral Vector Carrying PDX1 Preparation
Amicon® Ultra-15 Centrifugal FilterMerck Millipore, USAUFC910024
Human pWPT-PDX1 plasmidAddgene12256Gift from Didier Trono; http://n2t.net/addgene:12256; RRID: Addgene_12256
Millex-HV Syringe Filter Unit, 0.45 µmMerck MilliporeSLHV033RB
pMD2.G plasmidAddgene12259Gift from Didier Trono; http://n2t.net/addgene:12259; RRID: Addgene_12259
Polybrene Infection / Transfection ReagentMerck MilliporeTR-1003-G
psPAX2 plasmidAddgene12260Gift from Didier Trono; http://n2t.net/addgene:12260; RRID: Addgene_12260
Three-step Induction Protocol
Activin A Recombinant Human ProteinMerck MilliporeGF300
Beta-mercaptoethanolThermo Fisher Scientific Corporation21985-023
Bovine serum albumin (BSA, Cohn fraction V, fatty acid free)Sigma-AldrichA6003
Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1Sigma-AldrichG3265
Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium (ITS)Invitrogen41400-045
NicotinamideSigma-AldrichN0636
Non-Essential Amino Acids (NEAAs)Thermo Fisher Scientific Corporation11140-050
Non-treated cell culture dish, 60mmEppendorf30701011
Sodium butyrateSigma-AldrichB5887
TaurineSigma-AldrichT0625

References

  1. Cho, N. H., et al. IDF diabetes atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 138, 271-281 (2018).
  2. Danaei, G., et al. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet. 378 (9785), 31-40 (2011).
  3. Diabetes Care. Minimizing hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 38 (8), 1583 (2015).
  4. Health Quality Ontario. Islet transplantation: an evidence-based analysis. Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series. 3 (4), 1-45 (2003).
  5. Brennan, D. C., et al. Long-term follow-up of the Edmonton protocol of islet transplantation in the United States. American Journal of Transplantation. 16 (2), 509-517 (2016).
  6. Korsgren, O. Islet encapsulation: Physiological possibilities and limitations. Diabetes. 66 (7), 1748-1754 (2017).
  7. Kuncorojakti, S., Srisuwatanasagul, S., Kradangnga, K., Sawangmake, C. Insulin-Producing Cell Transplantation Platform for Veterinary Practice. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 7, 4 (2020).
  8. Sawangmake, C., Nowwarote, N., Pavasant, P., Chansiripornchai, P., Osathanon, T. A feasibility study of an in vitro differentiation potential toward insulin-producing cells by dental tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 452 (3), 581-587 (2014).
  9. Sawangmake, C., Rodprasert, W., Osathanon, T., Pavasant, P. Integrative protocols for an in vitro generation of pancreatic progenitors from human dental pulp stem cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 530 (1), 222-229 (2020).
  10. Kuncorojakti, S., et al. Alginate/Pluronic F127-based encapsulation supports viability and functionality of human dental pulp stem cell-derived insulin-producing cells. Journal of Biological Engineering. 14, 23 (2020).
  11. Ritz-Laser, B., et al. Ectopic expression of the beta-cell specific transcription factor Pdx1 inhibits glucagon gene transcription. Diabetologia. 46 (6), 810-821 (2003).
  12. Pampusch, M. S., Skinner, P. J. Transduction and expansion of primary T cells in nine days with maintenance of central memory phenotype. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (157), (2020).
  13. Fraga, M., et al. Factors influencing transfection efficiency of pIDUA/nanoemulsion complexes in a mucopolysaccharidosis type I murine model. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 12, 2061-2067 (2017).
  14. Balak, J. R. A., et al. Highly efficient ex vivo lentiviral transduction of primary human pancreatic exocrine cells. Scientific Reports. 9 (1), 15870 (2019).
  15. Balaji, S., Zhou, Y., Opara, E. C., Soker, S. Combinations of Activin A or nicotinamide with the pancreatic transcription factor PDX1 support differentiation of human amnion epithelial cells toward a pancreatic lineage. Cellular Reprogramming. 19 (4), 255-262 (2017).
  16. Spaeth, J. M., et al. Defining a novel role for the Pdx1 transcription factor in islet β-Cell maturation and proliferation during weaning. Diabetes. 66 (11), 2830-2839 (2017).
  17. Bastidas-Ponce, A., et al. Foxa2 and Pdx1 cooperatively regulate postnatal maturation of pancreatic β-cells. Molecular Metabolism. 6 (6), 524-534 (2017).
  18. Zhu, Y., Liu, Q., Zhou, Z., Ikeda, Y. PDX1, Neurogenin-3, and MAFA: critical transcription regulators for beta cell development and regeneration. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 8 (1), 240 (2017).
  19. Ma, D., et al. Culturing and transcriptome profiling of progenitor-like colonies derived from adult mouse pancreas. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 8 (1), 172 (2017).
  20. Tiedemann, H. B., Schneltzer, E., Beckers, J., Przemeck, G. K. H. Hrabe de Angelis, M. Modeling coexistence of oscillation and Delta/Notch-mediated lateral inhibition in pancreas development and neurogenesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 430, 32-44 (2017).
  21. Xu, B., et al. Three-dimensional culture promotes the differentiation of human dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells into insulin-producing cells for improving the diabetes therapy. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 10, 1576 (2019).
  22. Grimm, D., et al. Tissue engineering under microgravity conditions-use of stem cells and specialized cells. Stem Cells and Development. 27 (12), 787-804 (2018).
  23. Tran, R., Moraes, C., Hoesli, C. A. Controlled clustering enhances PDX1 and NKX6.1 expression in pancreatic endoderm cells derived from pluripotent stem cells. Scientific Reports. 10 (1), 1190 (2020).
  24. Li, X. Y., Zhai, W. J., Teng, C. B. Notch signaling in pancreatic development. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 17 (1), 48 (2015).
  25. Motoyama, H., et al. Treatment with specific soluble factors promotes the functional maturation of transcription factor-mediated, pancreatic transdifferentiated cells. PLoS One. 13 (5), 0197175 (2018).
  26. Baldan, J., Houbracken, I., Rooman, I., Bouwens, L. Adult human pancreatic acinar cells dedifferentiate into an embryonic progenitor-like state in 3D suspension culture. Scientific Reports. 9 (1), 4040 (2019).
  27. Wedeken, L., et al. Adult murine pancreatic progenitors require epidermal growth factor and nicotinamide for self-renewal and differentiation in a serum- and conditioned medium-free culture. Stem Cells and Development. 26 (8), 599-607 (2017).
  28. Trott, J., et al. Long-term culture of self-renewing pancreatic progenitors derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports. 8 (6), 1675-1688 (2017).
  29. Kim, J. S., et al. Construction of EMSC-islet co-localizing composites for xenogeneic porcine islet transplantation. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 497 (2), 506-512 (2018).
  30. Gauthaman, K., et al. Extra-embryonic human Wharton's jelly stem cells do not induce tumorigenesis, unlike human embryonic stem cells. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 24 (2), 235-246 (2012).
  31. Schiesser, J. V., Wells, J. M. Generation of beta cells from human pluripotent stem cells: are we there yet. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1311, 124-137 (2014).
  32. Chmielowiec, J., Borowiak, M. In vitro differentiation and expansion of human pluripotent stem cell-derived pancreatic progenitors. The Review of Diabetic Studies. 11 (1), 19-34 (2014).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Human Dental Pulp Stem CellsIn Vitro InductionPancreatic LineagesInsulin Producing CellsDiabetes Type IIntegrative ProtocolNon integrative ProtocolPDX 1 OverexpressionMesenchymal Stem CellsDifferentiation PotentialTransductionTransplantationThree Step Induction ApproachEthical Approval

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved