Method Article
Here we describe a new method to help elucidate the mechanisms of cellular immunity to Plasmodium during the blood stage of infection. This is an in vitro assay that measures infected red blood cell killing by cytotoxic lymphocytes.
Malaria is a major public health concern, presenting more than 200 million cases per year worldwide. Despite years of scientific efforts, protective immunity to malaria is still poorly understood, mainly due to methodological limitations of long-term Plasmodium culture, especially for Plasmodium vivax. Most studies have focused on adaptive immunity protection against malaria by antibodies, which play a key role in controlling malaria. However, the sterile protection induced by attenuated Plasmodium sporozoites vaccines is related to cellular response, mainly to cytotoxic T lymphocytes, such as CD8+ and gamma delta T cells (γδ T). Hence, new methodologies must be developed to better comprehend the functions of the cellular immune response and thus support future therapy and vaccine development. To find a new strategy to analyze this cell-mediated immunity to Plasmodium blood-stage infection, our group established an in vitro assay that measures infected red blood cell (iRBC) killing by cytotoxic lymphocytes. This assay can be used to study cellular immune response mechanisms against different Plasmodium spp. in the blood stage. Innate and adaptative cytotoxic immune cells can directly eliminate iRBCs and the intracellular parasite in an effector:target mechanism. Target iRBCs are labeled to evaluate cell viability, and cocultured with effector cells (CD8+ T, γδ T, NK cells, etc.). The lysis percentage is calculated based on tested conditions, compared to a spontaneous lysis control in a flow cytometry-based assay. Ultimately, this killing assay methodology is a major advance in understanding cell-mediated immunity to blood-stage malaria, helping uncover new potential therapeutic targets and accelerate the development of malaria vaccines.
Malaria remains a global health crisis, with more than 240 million cases and 627,000 malaria-related deaths reported in 20201. There are currently five parasitic species that can cause malaria in humans, out of which Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax are the two most prevalent species. During Plasmodium infection, the liver or pre-erythrocytic stage is asymptomatic, and symptoms only occur during the parasite's asexual cycle in the erythrocytic stage. At this infection stage, thousands of merozoites derived from the liver stage are released into the bloodstream and infect red blood cells (RBCs). In the RBC, the parasites differentiate into trophozoites and schizonts by schizogony, until schizonts rupture the erythrocyte, releasing newly formed merozoites, repeating this blood cycle. Repeated cycles of invasion, replication, and merozoite release result in an exponential growth of the parasite population and ultimately trigger disease symptoms2.
An important challenge in studying the immune response to malaria is that the Plasmodium spp. that infects humans does not infect laboratory animal models. Thus, Plasmodium-infected patient samples must be collected fresh and immediately processed and analyzed. However, in malaria-endemic areas, resources to access immunological and molecular mechanisms are limited. Due to these limitations, rodents are widely used as experimental models to investigate the immune response against Plasmodium infection. While P. berghei and P. chabaudi are often used as surrogates for P. falciparum infection, the non-lethal strain of P. yoelii 17XNL also has many features in common with P. vivax, such as reticulocyte restricted infection3,4. The development of Plasmodium in vitro assays, that can be used for human or animal model-derived samples, is valuable in gaining a better understanding of the pathogenesis of malaria and comparing the immunological response elicited by different species of the parasite.
Protective antimalarial immunity is not completely understood either at the pre-erythrocytic stage nor the blood stage. It is known that exposure to repeated infections results in partial acquired immunity, but sterile immunity is rarely developed5. For decades, anti-Plasmodium protective immunity was mainly associated with the induction of neutralizing or opsonizing antibodies that prevent parasite invasion of host cells or lead to phagocytosis by antigen-presenting cells, respectively6. As a result, most efforts to produce antimalarial vaccines thus far have relied on inducing protective and long-lasting antibodies7,8. However, the sterile protection induced by vaccination with an attenuated sporozoite directly correlates with the activation and expansion of cytotoxic T lymphocytes8,9.
Recently, some studies of freshly isolated patient samples and in vitro cultures have demonstrated that innate or adaptative cytotoxic immune cells like CD8+ T10, γδ T11, and NK cells12 can directly eliminate Plasmodium-infected RBCs and its intracellular parasite in an effector:target ratio manner. These seminal findings defined an entirely new immune effector mechanism in the context of malaria. To dissect this novel antimalarial immunity, it is essential to explore cytotoxic effector mechanisms of killer cells against infected-RBCs (iRBCs) in natural infection or vaccination.
Here we present an in vitro assay that measures the cytotoxic activity of lymphocytes against malaria in the blood stage. This assay can then help elucidate the mechanisms of the cellular immune response against the Plasmodium erythrocyte stage. The target cells, iRBCs, are labeled with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) to evaluate cell viability, and are then cocultured with effector cells like cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTL). This coculture is then evaluated by flow cytometry, using fluorescent markers for specific cell types. Finally, the percentage of iRBC lysis by CTL is calculated by dividing the experimental condition by the spontaneous rupture of RBCs and spontaneous lysis control, which occurs during incubation without the effector cell. Overall, this killing assay methodology can contribute to a better understanding of cell-mediated malaria immunity.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
All procedures were conducted following the policies of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation and the National Ethical Council (CAAE: 59902816.7.0000.5091). The human protocols were developed in collaboration with the clinical research group from the Research Center for Tropical Medicine of Rondônia (CEPEM), which was in charge of enrolling patients in the study. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients.
For the animal study, procedures were performed following the principles of conduct of the Brazilian Practice Guide for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific and Didactic Purposes of the National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA). The protocols were approved by the Fiocruz Animal Experimentation Council (CEUA protocol LW15/20-2).
1. Collection of human blood samples and PBMC isolation

2. Human RBC isolation
NOTE: For human-infected RBC isolation, it is recommended to start with blood samples that have a minimum of 2% parasitemia, preferentially with more in the trophozoite/early schizont parasite stage.
3. Experimental malaria infection in mouse
4. Obtaining fresh whole mouse splenocytes
5. Cytotoxic effector cell purification (CD8a+ T cell negative selection)
NOTE: There are many positive and negative selection reagents that can purify cytotoxic effector cells (CD8+ T, γδ T, NK, iNKT, MAIT cells). In this protocol, we use a negative selection of splenic CD8a+ T cells and follow manufacturer instructions.
6. P. yoelii infected RBC isolation
7. CFSE labeling of RBCs and preparation for flow cytometry
NOTE: Start the RBC labeling protocol with twice the number of cells that will be used for the experiment, since ~50% of the cells are typically lost in the washing steps following the CFSE labeling step. To establish the autofluorescence of the RBCs/iRBCs, include a control sample of unlabeled cells.
8. Cytotoxic lymphocyte/RBC coculture and preparation for flow cytometry
NOTE: If the involvement of specific receptors or molecules will be measured, incubate the specific blocking and isotype control antibodies (10 mg/mL) with the effector cells for 30 min before coculture.
9. Flow cytometry
10. Calculation and statistics

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Here, the applied methodology for isolation of CFSE-labeled Plasmodium-infected RBCs in a coculture assay with cytotoxic lymphocytes is described. First, we provide a schematic representation of how to perform the protocol, employing human samples infected with P. vivax (Figure 1). Then, an illustrated flowchart on how to proceed with the protocol in a malaria experimental model using a C57BL/6 mouse infected with P. yoelii (Figure 2)....
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Here we describe an in vitro assay to measure Plasmodium-infected red blood cell killing by cytotoxic lymphocytes. This assay can help elucidate the mechanisms of cellular protective immunity to the malaria parasite's erythrocytic stage. The major advantage of this methodology is that it provides a quantitative assay of the cell-mediated killing of iRBCs that can be used to address many questions about how immune cells interact with different Plasmodium spp.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors declare no competing interests.
We thank Dr. Dhelio Pereira and the members of Research Center for Tropical Medicine of Rondônia (CEPEM) for malaria patient enrollment and blood collection and Felicia Ho for helping with manuscript revision. The following reagent was obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: Plasmodium yoelii subsp. yoelii, Strain 17XNL:PyGFP, MRA- 817, contributed by Ana Rodriguez. This research was supported by Lemann Brazil Research Fund, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) - 437851/2018-4, fellowships (CJ, GC, CG), and Fundação de Amparo do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) - APQ-00653-16, APQ-02962-18; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) - fellowship (LL).
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 μM cell strainer | Corning | 431752 | |
| 96 Well Round (U) Bottom Plate | Thermo Scientific | 12-565-65 | |
| Anti-human CD235a (Glycophorin A) Antibody | Biolegend | 349114 | Used - APC anti-human CD235, dilution 1:100 |
| Anti-human CD3 Antibody | Biolegend | 317314 | Used - PB anti-human CD3, dilution 1:200 |
| Anti-human CD8 Antibody | Biolegend | 344714 | Used - APC/Cy7 anti-human CD8, dilution 1:200 |
| Anti-human TCR Vδ2 Antibody | Biolegend | 331408 | Used - PE anti-human TCR Vδ2, dilution 1:200 |
| Anti-mouse CD8a Antibody | Biolegend | 100733 | Used- PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse CD8a, dilution 1:200 |
| Anti-mouse TER-119/Erythroid Cells Antibody | Biolegend | 116223 | Used - APC/Cyanine7 anti-mouse TER-119, dilution 1:200 |
| CellTrace CFSE Cell Proliferation Kit | Invitrogen | C34554 | |
| Fetal Bovine Serum, qualified | Gibco | 26140079 | |
| Ficoll-Paque Plus | Cytiva | 17144003 | Lymphocyte Separation Medium (LSM) |
| Heparin Sodium Injection, USP | meithel pharma | 71228-400-003 | Used - 2000 USP units/2mL |
| Isoflurane | Piramal critical care | 66794-0013-25 | |
| LS MACS Column | Miltenyi Biotec | 130-042-401 | |
| LSRFortessa Cell Analyzer | BD Bioscience | ||
| Percoll | Cytiva | 17089101 | Density Gradient Separation Medium (DGSM) |
| QuadroMACS Separator | Miltenyi Biotec | 130-090-976 | |
| RPMI 1640 Medium | Gibco | 11875093 | |
| Sodium bicarbonate, powder, BioReagent | Sigma-Aldrich | S5761 | |
| Syringe With Sub-Q needle - 1mL, 26 gauge; | BD | 14-829-10F | |
| Vacutainer Heparin Tube Glass Green 10 ml | BD | 366480 |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission