JoVE Logo
Faculty Resource Center

Sign In

Summary

Abstract

Introduction

Protocol

Representative Results

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Materials

References

Medicine

Performing Repeated Intraoperative Impedance Telemetry Measurements during Cochlear Implantation

Published: August 4th, 2023

DOI:

10.3791/65600

1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum, 2Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 3International Graduate School of Neuroscience (IGSN), Ruhr-University Bochum, 4Technical University of Munich, 5Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, 6MED-EL, 7Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, 8Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck

Here we present a protocol to conduct repeated impedance telemetry measurements during cochlear implantation (CI). They may allow conclusions on the electrode's and implant's function. Repeated impedance measurements enable objective feedback on whether the electrode is positioned inside the perilymph or outside the inner ear.

Impedance measurements are routinely performed during cochlear implantation (CI) after finalized electrode insertion. They may allow conclusions on the electrode's and implant's function. In the postoperative setting, the analysis of impedance changes enables the identification of scarring or inflammation processes around the electrode. Recent studies report associations between impedance telemetry and the site of stimulation. Consequently, repeated impedance measurements during cochlear implant electrode insertion may enable objective feedback on whether the electrode is positioned inside the perilymph or outside the inner ear. With the presented novel method, impedances can be measured in real-time during cochlear implantation. This protocol systematically explains how to perform repeated impedance recordings during CI surgery. These repeated measurements are challenging since they depend on multiple intraoperative methodological factors starting with the draping of the patient. Thus, for successful recordings, a standardized procedure is mandatory. In this article, we comprehensively illustrate the system setup and procedure of performing intraoperative measurements during CI surgery.

Preserving residual hearing is an increasing topic of interest in cochlear implantation (CI) surgery, and the indication has changed towards candidates with functional residual hearing. Thus, measurements that may objectify the position of the electrode array and the resulting potential intracochlear damage during surgery are becoming increasingly important. CI-users with successfully preserved hearing have been shown to have superior hearing performance with the implant after surgery, even when stimulated electrically-only1. Some of them may additionally benefit from acoustic stimulation (electro-acoustic stimulation; EAS). Perioperative heari....

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

This protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration (Ruhr-University Bochum: Reg.-No.: 21-7373; Medical University Innsbruck Reg.-No.: 1060/2021). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

1. Preparation for the surgery

  1. Make sure to obtain audiological testing reports, including pure-tone audiometry, objective testing (e.g., brainstem evoked response audiometry, speech testing), and vestibular diagnostics .......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

For repeated impedance measurements during cochlear implantation, a standardized procedure is mandatory to achieve the highest possible reproducibility. The major aspects that have been considered to play an important role are the video quality as well as the insertion angle. Both may impede the visualization of the electrode contacts entering the round window and thus, the interpretation of the video for future analyses. Further, the placement of the receiver coil is crucial to prevent interruptions during insertion and.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Repeated impedance measurements are a promising approach to gain real-time feedback from the cochlea during the insertion process. They indicate which electrode contacts are positioned inside the perilymph or not. With the here presented novel method for flexible lateral wall electrodes (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria)7, impedances may be measured in real-time during cochlear implantation utilizing the inserting electrode array. However, for reliable measurements, a standardized procedure is cruc.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

None.

....

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
AudacityOpen sourcehttps://www.audacityteam.org/Audio editor software
Coil cableAny appropriate brandImplant interface
ComputerAny appropriate brand
Electrode arrayMED-ELhttps://s3.medel.com/pdf/21617.pdfStandard, FlexSoft, Flex28
IM SoftwareMED-ELhttps://www.medel.com/
MaestroMED-ELhttps://www.medel.com/
MAX Interface USBAny appropriate brandInterface connection
OcteniseptSCHÜLKE & MAYR GmbHN/A
Open Broadcaster SoftwareOpen sourcehttps://obsproject.com/Video recording software
Spongostan EthiconN/AResorbable sponge
Ultracain 1% Suprarenin, SanofiN/ALocal anesthesia

  1. Dalbert, A., et al. Hearing preservation after cochlear implantation may improve long-term word perception in the electric-only condition. Otology & Neurotology. 37 (9), 1314-1319 (2016).
  2. Thompson, N. J., et al. Electrode array type and its impact on impedance fluctuations and loss of residual hearing in cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology. 41 (2), 186-191 (2020).
  3. Aebischer, P., Meyer, S., Caversaccio, M., Wimmer, W. Intraoperative impedance-based estimation of cochlear implant electrode array insertion depth. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 68 (2), 545-555 (2021).
  4. Choi, J., et al. Electrode impedance fluctuations as a biomarker for inner ear pathology after cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology. 38 (10), 1433-1439 (2017).
  5. Shaul, C., et al. Electrical impedance as a biomarker for inner ear pathology following lateral wall and peri-modiolar cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology. 40 (5), e518-e526 (2019).
  6. Bester, C., et al. Four-point impedance as a biomarker for bleeding during cochlear implantation. Scientific Reports. 10 (1), 2777 (2020).
  7. . . MED-EL. , (2023).
  8. Lenarz, T. Cochlear implant - state of the art. GMS Current Topics in Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. 16, Doc04 (2018).
  9. Gawęcki, W., et al. Robot-assisted electrode insertion in cochlear implantation controlled by intraoperative electrocochleography-A pilot study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 11 (23), 7045 (2022).
  10. Jia, H., et al. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of loss of residual hearing after cochlear implantation. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology. 122 (1), 33-39 (2013).
  11. Eshraghi, A. A., Van de Water, T. R. Cochlear implantation trauma and noise-induced hearing loss: Apoptosis and therapeutic strategies. The Anatomical Record. Part A, Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology. 288 (4), 473-481 (2006).
  12. Van De Water, T. R., et al. Caspases, the enemy within, and their role in oxidative stress-induced apoptosis of inner ear sensory cells. Otology & Neurotology. 25 (4), 627-632 (2004).
  13. Roland, P. S., Wright, C. G. Surgical aspects of cochlear implantation: mechanisms of insertional trauma. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 64, 11-30 (2006).
  14. Tien, H. -. C., Linthicum, F. H. J. Histopathologic changes in the vestibule after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngology-- Head and Neck Surgery. 127 (4), 260-264 (2002).
  15. Lenarz, T., et al. Relationship between intraoperative electrocochleography and hearing preservation. Otology & Neurotology. 43 (1), e72-e78 (2022).
  16. Bester, C., et al. Electrocochleography triggered intervention successfully preserves residual hearing during cochlear implantation: Results of a randomised clinical trial. Hearing Research. 426, 108353 (2022).
  17. O'Leary, S., et al. Intraoperative observational real-time electrocochleography as a predictor of hearing loss after cochlear implantation: 3 and 12 month outcomes. Otology & Neurotology. 41 (9), 1222-1229 (2020).
  18. Dong, Y., Briaire, J. J., Siebrecht, M., Stronks, H. C., Frijns, J. H. M. Detection of translocation of cochlear implant electrode arrays by intracochlear impedance measurements. Ear and Hearing. 42 (5), 1397-1404 (2021).
  19. Giardina, C. K., Krause, E. S., Koka, K., Fitzpatrick, D. C. Impedance measures during in vitro cochlear implantation predict array positioning. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 65 (2), 327-335 (2018).
  20. Sijgers, L., et al. Predicting cochlear implant electrode placement using monopolar, three-point and four-point impedance measurements. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 69 (8), 2533-2544 (2022).
  21. Salkim, E., Zamani, M., Jiang, D., Saeed, S. R., Demosthenous, A. Insertion guidance based on impedance measurements of a cochlear electrode array. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 16, 862126 (2022).

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved