JoVE Logo
Faculty Resource Center

Sign In

Summary

Abstract

Introduction

Protocol

Representative Results

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Materials

References

Chemistry

Synthesis of Triazole and Tetrazole-Functionalized Zr-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks Through Post-Synthetic Ligand Exchange

Published: June 23rd, 2023

DOI:

10.3791/65619

1Department of Chemistry, Chungbuk National University, 2Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University
* These authors contributed equally

Post-synthetic ligand exchange (PSE) is a versatile and powerful tool for installing functional groups into metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Exposing MOFs to solutions containing triazole- and tetrazole-functionalized ligands can incorporate these heterocyclic moieties into Zr-MOFs through PSE processes.

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of porous materials that are formed through coordination bonds between metal clusters and organic ligands. Given their coordinative nature, the organic ligands and strut framework can be readily removed from the MOF and/or exchanged with other coordinative molecules. By introducing target ligands to MOF-containing solutions, functionalized MOFs can be obtained with new chemical tags via a process called post-synthetic ligand exchange (PSE). PSE is a straightforward and practical approach that enables the preparation of a wide range of MOFs with new chemical tags via a solid-solution equilibrium process. Furthermore, PSE can be performed at room temperature, allowing the incorporation of thermally unstable ligands into MOFs. In this work, we demonstrate the practicality of PSE by using heterocyclic triazole- and tetrazole-containing ligands to functionalize a Zr-based MOF (UiO-66; UiO = University of Oslo). After digestion, the functionalized MOFs are characterized via various techniques, including powder X-ray diffraction and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are three-dimensional porous materials that are formed through coordination bonds between metal clusters and multi-topic organic ligands. MOFs have garnered significant attention due to their permanent porosity, low density, and ability to associate organic and inorganic components, which enables diverse applications1,2. Moreover, the vast range of metal nodes and strut organic linkers offer MOFs theoretically unlimited structural combinations. Even with identical framework structures, MOFs' physical and chemical properties can be modified through ligand functionalization wi....

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

The reagents required to prepare MOFs and the ligands are listed in the Table of Materials.

1. Setting up the post-synthetic ligand exchange (PSE) process

  1. Completely dry the pre-synthesized UiO-66 MOFs under vacuum to remove any unreacted metal-salts and ligands in the pores, and remaining solvent residues overnight.
    NOTE: See Supplementary File 1 for the synthesis procedure of UiO-66 MOFs.
  2. Prepare functionalized l.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

The successful synthesis of exchanged UiO-66 MOFs, UiO-66-Triazole, and UiO-66-Tetrazole produced colorless microcrystalline solids. Both H2BDC-Triazole and H2BDC-Tetrazole ligands also exhibited a colorless solid state. The standard method used to determine the success of the exchange involved measuring the PXRD patterns and comparing the crystallinity of the sample with pristine UiO-66 MOF. Figure 2 displays the PXRD patterns of exchanged UiO-66-Triazole and UiO-66-Te.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

The PSE process with functionalized BDC ligands toward Zr-based UiO-66 MOFs is a simple and versatile method to obtain MOFs with chemical tags. The PSE process is best conducted in aqueous media, requiring the initial step of solvating the ligand in an aqueous medium. When using pre-synthesized BDC with functional groups, direct dissolution in a basic solvent, such as a 4% KOH aqueous solution, is recommended. Alternatively, sodium or potassium salt of benzene-1,4-dicarboxylate may be used. Neutralization to pH 7 is crit.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2022R1A2C1009706).

....

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
2-Bromoterephthalic acid BLD Pharm BD5695 reagent for BDC-Triazole
Azidotrimethylsilane Simga Aldrich 155071 reagent for BDC-Triazole
Bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride TCI B1667 reagent for BDC-Triazole
Copper(I) cyanide Alfa-Aesar 12135 reagent for BDC-Tetrazole
Copper(I) iodide Acros organics 20150 reagent for BDC-Triazole
Digital Orbital Shaker Daihan Scientific SHO-1D PSE
Formic Acid Daejung chemical F0195 reagent for BDC-Tetrazole
Hybrid LC/Q-TOF system Bruker BioSciences maXis 4G HR-MS
Lithum hydroxide monohydrate Daejung chemical 5087-4405 reagent for BDC-Triazole
Magnesium sulfate Samchun chemical M1807 reagent for BDC-Triazole
Methyl alcohol Daejung chemical M0584 reagent for BDC-Tetrazole
N,N-Dimethylformamide Daejung chemical D0552 reagent for BDC-Tetrazole
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrometer-500 MHz Bruker AVANCE 500MHz NMR
Polypropylene cap (22 mm, Cork-Backed Foil Lined) Sungho Korea 22-200 material for digestion
Potassium cyanide Alfa-Aesar L13273 reagent for BDC-Tetrazole
PVDF Synringe filter (13 mm, 0.45 µm) LK Lab Korea F14-61-363 material for digestion
Scintillation vial (20 mL, borosilicate glass) Sungho Korea 74504-20 material for digestion
Sodium azide  TCI S0489 reagent for BDC-Tetrazole
Sodium bicarbonate Samchun chemical S0343 reagent for BDC-Triazole
Tetrabutylammonium fluoride (1 M THF solution) Acros organics 20195 reagent for BDC-Triazole
Triethylamine TCI T0424 reagent for BDC-Triazole
Triethylamine hydrochloride Daejung chemical 8628-4405 reagent for BDC-Tetrazole
Trimethylsilyl-acetylene Alfa-Aesar A12856 reagent for BDC-Triazole
Triphenylphosphine TCI T0519 reagent for BDC-Triazole
X RAY DIFFRACTOMETER SYSTEM Rigaku MiniFlex 600 PXRD
Zirconium(IV) chloride Alfa-Aesar 12104 reagent for BDC-Tetrazole

  1. Zhou, H. -. C., Long, J. R., Yaghi, O. M. Introduction to metal-organic frameworks. Chemical Reviews. 112 (2), 673-674 (2012).
  2. Furukawa, H., Cordova, K. E., O'Keefe, M., Yaghi, O. M. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science. 341 (6149), 1230444 (2013).
  3. Razavi, S. A. A., Morsali, A. Linker functionalized metal-organic frameworks. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 399, 213023 (2019).
  4. Kim, D., Kang, M., Ha, H., Hong, C. S., Kim, M. Multiple functional groups in metal-organic frameworks and their positional regioisomerism. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 438, 213892 (2021).
  5. Lu, W., et al. Tuning the structure and function of metal-organic frameworks via linker design. Chemical Society Reviews. 43 (16), 5561-5593 (2014).
  6. Xie, L. -. H., Liu, X. -. M., He, T., Li, J. -. R. Metal-organic frameworks for the capture of trace aromatic volatile organic compounds. Chem. 4 (8), 1911-1927 (2018).
  7. Lv, X. -. L., et al. Ligand rigidification for enhancing the stability of metal-organic frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 141 (26), 10283-10293 (2019).
  8. Robison, L., et al. Transient catenation in a zirconium-based metal-organic framework and its effect on mechanical stability and sorption properties. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 143 (3), 1503-1512 (2021).
  9. He, T., Kong, X. -. J., Li, J. -. R. Chemically stable metal-organic frameworks: rational construction and application expansion. Accounts of Chemical Research. 54 (15), 3083-3094 (2021).
  10. Kalaj, M., Cohen, S. M. Postsynthetic modification: an enabling technology for the advancement of metal-organic frameworks. ACS Central Science. 6 (7), 1046-1057 (2020).
  11. Mandal, S., Natarajan, S., Mani, P., Pankajakshan, A. Post-synthetic modification of metal-organic frameworks toward applications. Advanced Functional Materials. 31 (4), 2006291 (2021).
  12. Wang, Z., Cohen, S. M. Postsynthetic modification of metal-organic frameworks. Chemical Society Reviews. 38 (5), 1315-1329 (2009).
  13. Tanabe, K. K., Cohen, S. M. Postsynthetic modification of metal-organic frameworks-a progress report. Chemical Society Reviews. 40 (2), 498-519 (2011).
  14. Cohen, S. M. Postsynthetic methods for the functionalization of metal-organic frameworks. Chemical Reviews. 112 (2), 970-1000 (2012).
  15. Wang, Z., Cohen, S. M. Postsynthetic covalent modification of a neutral metal−organic framework. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 129 (41), 12368-12369 (2007).
  16. Garibay, S. J., Cohen, S. M. Isoreticular synthesis and modification of frameworks with the UiO-66 topology. Chemical Communications. 46 (41), 7700-7702 (2010).
  17. Kim, M., Cahill, J. F., Fei, H., Prather, K. A., Cohen, S. M. Postsynthetic ligand and cation exchange in robust metal-organic frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 134 (43), 18082-18088 (2012).
  18. Kim, M., Cahill, J. F., Su, Y., Prather, K. A., Cohen, S. M. Postsynthetic ligand exchange as a route to functionalization of 'inert' metal-organic frameworks. Chemical Science. 3 (1), 126-130 (2012).
  19. Taddei, M., Wakeham, R. J., Koutsianos, A., Andreoli, E., Barron, A. R. Post-synthetic ligand exchange in zirconium-based metal-organic frameworks: beware of the defects. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 57 (36), 11706-11710 (2018).
  20. Park, H., et al. Defect engineering into metal-organic frameworks for the rapid and sequential installation of functionalities. Inorganic Chemistry. 57 (3), 1040-1047 (2018).
  21. Kim, S., Lee, J., Jeoung, S., Moon, H. R., Kim, M. Surface-deactivated core-shell metal-organic framework by simple ligand exchange for enhanced size discrimination in aerobic oxidation of alcohols. Chemistry-A European Journal. 26 (34), 7568-7572 (2020).
  22. Lee, J., et al. Pore engineering of covalently connected metal-organic framework nanoparticle-mixed-matrix membrane composites for molecular separation. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 3 (9), 9356-9362 (2020).
  23. Karagiaridi, O., Bury, W., Mondloch, J. E., Hupp, J. T., Farha, O. K. Solvent-assisted linker exchange: an alternative to the de synthesis of unattainable metal-organic frameworks. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 53 (18), 4530-4540 (2014).
  24. Yu, D., et al. A solvent-assisted ligand exchange approach enables metal-organic frameworks with diverse and complex architectures. Nature Communications. 11, 927 (2020).
  25. Lee, S. Y., et al. Design of ultra-thin nanosheet bimetallic NiCo MOF with binary ligand via solvent-assisted ligand exchange (SALE) reaction for high performance supercapacitors. Electrochimica Acta. 451, 142291 (2023).
  26. Liao, W. -. M., et al. Post-synthetic exchange (PSE) of UiO-67 frameworks with Ru/Rh half-sandwich units for visible-light-driven H2 evolution and CO2 reduction. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 6 (24), 11337-11345 (2018).
  27. Islamoglu, T., et al. Postsynthetic tuning of metal-organic frameworks for targeted applications. Accounts of Chemical Research. 50 (4), 805-813 (2017).
  28. Lee, J., et al. Strategies in metal-organic framework-based catalysts for the aerobic oxidation of alcohols and recent progress. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society. 42 (3), 359-368 (2021).
  29. Kalaj, M., Prosser, K. E., Cohen, S. M. Room temperature aqueous synthesis of UiO-66 derivatives via postsynthetic exchange. Dalton Transactions. 49 (26), 8841-8845 (2020).
  30. Deria, P., et al. Beyond post-synthesis modification: evolution of metal-organic frameworks via building block replacement. Chemical Society Reviews. 43 (16), 5896-5912 (2014).
  31. Han, Y., Li, J. -. R., Xie, Y., Guo, G. Substitution reactions in metal-organic frameworks and metal-organic polyhedral. Chemical Society Reviews. 43 (16), 5952-5981 (2014).
  32. Xu, M. -. M., Chen, Q., Xie, L. -. H., Li, J. -. R. Exchange reactions in metal-organic frameworks: New advances. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 421, 213421 (2020).
  33. Lee, D., et al. Uncoordinated tetrazole ligands in metal-organic frameworks for proton-conductivity studies. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society. 43 (7), 912-917 (2022).
  34. Han, B. -. X., Jiang, Y. -. F., Sun, X. -. R., Li, Z. -. F., Li, G. Proton conductive N-heterocyclic metal-organic frameworks. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 432, 213754 (2021).
  35. Han, Z., Zhao, Y., Peng, J., Gómez-García, C. J. Unusual oxidation of an N-heterocycle ligand in a metal−organic framework. Inorganic Chemistry. 46 (14), 5453-5455 (2007).
  36. Wu, S., et al. Linker engineering toward full-color emission of UiO-68 type metal-organic frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 143 (28), 10547-10552 (2021).
  37. Hamzah, H. A., et al. Post-synthetic mannich chemistry on metal-organic frameworks: system-specific reactivity and functionality-triggered dissolution. Chemistry-A European Journal. 24 (43), 11094-11102 (2018).
  38. Oozeerally, R., et al. Systematic modification of UiO-66 metal-organic frameworks for glucose conversion into 5-hydroxymethyl furfural in water. ChemCatChem. 13 (10), 2517-2529 (2021).
  39. Hamzah, H. A., Crickmore, T. S., Rixason, D., Burrows, A. D. Post-synthetic modification of zirconium metal-organic frameworks by catalyst-free aza-Michael additions. Dalton Transactions. 47 (41), 14491-14496 (2018).

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved