A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Researchers new to the epigenetic field will find CUT&Tag a significantly easier alternative to ChIP assays. CUT&Tag has tremendously benefited the epigenetic studies on rare and primary cell populations, generating high-quality data from very few cells. This protocol describes performing H3K4me1 CUT&Tag assays on mouse myoblasts isolated from mouse hindlimb muscles.
This protocol paper aims to provide the new researchers with the full details of using Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) to profile the genomic locations of chromatin binding factors, histone marks, and histone variants. CUT&Tag protocols function very well with mouse myoblasts and freshly isolated muscle stem cells (MuSCs). They can easily be applied to many other cell types as long as the cells can be immobilized by Concanavalin-A beads. Compared to CUT&Tag, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays are time-consuming experiments. ChIP assays require the pre-treatment of chromatin before the chromatic material can be used for immunoprecipitation. In cross-linking ChIP (X-ChIP), pre-treatment of chromatin involves cross-linking and sonication to fragment the chromatin. In the case of native ChIP (N-ChIP), the fragmented chromatins are normally achieved by Micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion. Both sonication and MNase digestion introduce some bias to the ChIP experiments. CUT&Tag assays can be finished within fewer steps and require much fewer cells compared to ChIPs but provide more unbiased information on transcription factors or histone marks at various genomic locations. CUT&Tag can function with as few as 5,000 cells. Due to its higher sensitivity and lower background signal than ChIPs, researchers can expect to obtain reliable peak data from merely several millions of reads after sequencing.
CUT&Tag assay was invented to compensate for some overt flaws of ChIPs1. The two major disadvantages of ChIPs are 1) the bias introduced when fragmenting chromatin and 2) the incompetence to work with low cell numbers. X-ChIP assays rely on either sonication or MNase digestion to get chromatin fragments, whereas N-ChIP mostly uses MNase digestion to get nucleosomes. Sonication shows a bias towards relaxed chromatin locations such as promoter regions2, and apparently, MNase digestion also works more efficiently on relaxed chromatin fibers. Moreover, some reported that MNase digestion also shows a DNA sequence-dependen....
The methods presented in this manuscript are all approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Guangzhou Laboratory. Mice used to generate this manuscript's representative results were housed and maintained in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Guangzhou Laboratory.
1. Myoblast isolation from mouse hindlimb muscles (Example of using 1 mouse)
Before binding cells to Concanavalin-A beads, check the cell suspension under the microscope. Accordingly, after incubating the cells with Concanavalin-A beads, put the sample tubes on the magnetic rack, and the supernatant should be again observed using a microscope. This is to assess how efficiently the cells have been captured by Concanavalin-A beads. Wash buffer containing 7 x 105 cells/mL should look like Figure 1A under the microscope. In contrast, Figur.......
The specific cell number required in a certain CUT&Tag reaction completely relies on the enrichment of the histone marks/variants or chromatin-binding proteins that are to be tested. Normally for very enriched histone marks such as H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K27ac etc., 25,000-50,000 myoblasts are quite sufficient for one CUT&Tag reaction. However, some rare chromatin-binding proteins might require up to 250,000 cells. The cell number used in CUT&Tag assays is critical, which, if not handled well normally causes.......
This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Science (XDA16020400 to PH); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170804 to PH).
....Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
bFGF | R&D Systems | 233-FB-025 | |
Collagen | Corning | 354236 | |
Collagenase II | Worthington | LS004177 | |
Concanavalin-A | Sigma-Aldrich | C5275 | |
Concanavalin-A beads | Bangs Laboratories | BP531 | |
Digitonin | Sigma-Aldrich | 300410 | |
Dispase II | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 17105041 | |
Fetal bovine serum | Hyclone | SH30396.03 | |
H3K4me1 antibody | abcam | ab8895 | |
Ham's F10 media | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 11550043 | |
Hyperactive Universal CUT&Tag Assay Kit for Illumina | Vazyme | TD903 | This kit has been tested by us to function well |
Magnetic rack for 1.5 mL EP tubes | Qualityard | QYM06 | |
Magnetic rack for 8-PCR tube stripes | Anosun Magnetic | CLJ16/21-021 | |
NEBNext High-Fidelity 2x PCR Master Mix | NEB | M0541L | For library-making PCR reaction |
pA-Tn5 | Vazyme | S603-01 | Needs to be mounted with adaptors before use |
Protease inhibitor cocktail | Sigma-Aldrich | 5056489001 | |
Proteinase K | Beyotime | ST535-100mg | |
RPMI-1640 media | Thermo Fisher Scientific | C11875500BT | |
Secondary antibody (Guinea Pig anti-rabbit IgG) | Antibodies-online | ABIN101961 | |
Spermidine | Sigma-Aldrich | S2626 | |
TruePrep Index Kit V2 for Illumina | Vazyme | TD202 | This kit provide Illumina N7XX and N5XX primers |
VAHTS DNA Clean Beads | Vazyme | N411 | Can substitute Ampure XP beads. Can purify CUT&Tag libraries and select DNA fragments by size |
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
ABOUT JoVE
Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved