Sign In

Asymmetric information is a situation where one party in a transaction possesses more information than the other. However, several strategies can help mitigate this issue by enhancing transparency and reducing information gaps.

Sometimes, buyers have less information than the sellers. In markets where product quality is not immediately apparent to the buyers, buyers can use the service provided by third-party experts to assess the condition of the used products before completing a transaction. These professionals act as information middlemen and use their expertise to evaluate key characteristics, identify potential defects, and verify claims made by the seller. They are able to receive modest payments from each of the many buyers in exchange for the value they bring to these potential buyers. This way, buyers gain access to critical information that may not be readily observable, reducing the risks associated with asymmetric information and fostering more informed decision-making in the market.

Other methods involve verification through available records, which is a widely used method to reduce information asymmetry in transactions. Buyers can examine documentation that provides a detailed history of the product available for sale. These records may include information on past usage, maintenance, or ownership, offering evidence of consistent care or proper handling. Such records are also sometimes available through independent verification services or databases that can provide further insights. Access to these comprehensive reports helps buyers assess the reliability of the used product. It helps to detect potential discrepancies and make more informed decisions.

These methods can be applied across various markets to mitigate the challenges associated with the lemons problem, where buyers have less information than sellers. In industries such as the market for used cars and real estate, assessment by third-party experts and verification through available records can promote informed decision-making.

From Chapter 17:

article

Now Playing

17.5 : Mitigating Lemons Problem I: Reducing Asymmetric Information

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

11 Views

article

17.1 : Complete Information and Asymmetric Information: Meaning

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

24 Views

article

17.2 : Observable Quality

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

15 Views

article

17.3 : The Lemons Problem: Sellers Have More Information

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

8 Views

article

17.4 : The Lemons Problem: Adverse Selection in the Market for Used Cars

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

16 Views

article

17.6 : Mitigating Lemons Problem II: Increasing the Average Quality in the Market

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

8 Views

article

17.7 : Mitigating Lemons Problem III: Truthful Quality Reporting

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Views

article

17.8 : Adverse Selection When Buyers Have More Information: The Market for Insurance

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Views

article

17.9 : Mitigating Adverse Selection in the Market for Insurance

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Views

article

17.10 : Moral Hazard

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

12 Views

article

17.11 : Moral Hazard in the Market for Insurance

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

10 Views

article

17.12 : Moral Hazard in the Banking Sector

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

7 Views

article

17.13 : Mitigating Moral Hazard

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

10 Views

article

17.14 : Principal-Agent Relationships

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Views

article

17.15 : Incentives in the Principal-Agent Relationship

Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

9 Views

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved