The molecular ion peak of a molecule in the mass spectrum provides vital information for molecular identification. However, conventional electron impact ionization can lead to the rapid dissociation of some molecular ions before they reach the detector. A milder ionization method is required to increase the lifetime of such ionized analyte molecules. Chemical ionization (CI) is a gas-phase protonation reaction useful for mass-analyzing analyte molecules that are easily protonated to yield the corresponding conjugate acid. In this process, the sample is mixed with an excess reagent gas, which ensures the electron impact occurs primarily on the reagent gas. The charged species formed from the reagent protonates the analyte molecule, producing a relatively stable protonated analyte (conjugate acid) compared to the molecular ion. This results in an M+1 peak in the mass spectrum. The conjugate acid may then undergo fragmentation that generates additional signals.
For example, the CI of di-sec-butyl ether in methane gas illustrates this process. When the ether is mixed with excess methane gas as a reagent, electron impact occurs on methane rather than the ether. The resulting methane radical cation can react with another methane molecule to generate a methane radical and a methanium ion. The methanium ion is a source of gas-phase protons, which can protonate the ether to form its conjugate acid. The sequential reactions during the chemical ionization of di-sec-butyl ether are depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Chemical ionization of di-sec-butyl ether methane mixture.
This conjugate acid of the ether (m/z = 131) is relatively more stable than the molecular ion (m/z = 130) of ether formed via the conventional electron impact ionization. In the traditional route, the molecular ion undergoes fragmentation via α cleavage, giving a signal at m/z = 101. Figure 2 illustrates the reactions that occur during electron impact ionization directly on di-sec-butyl ether.
Figure 2: Electron impact ionization of di-sec-butyl ether and fragmentation of the molecular ion.
So, the mass spectra of di-sec-butyl ether ionized via CI feature an M+1 peak at m/z = 131. On the other hand, mass spectra of di-sec-butyl ether ionized via electron impact ionization do not show any peak at the m/z value of its molecular weight. Figures 3a and 3b show the mass spectra of di-sec-butyl ether ionized via the electron impact and chemical ionization methods, respectively.
Figure 3:a) No m/z = 130 peak is visible in the mass spectrum obtained via electron impact ionization of di-sec-butyl ether. b) The m/z = 131 peak is clearly visible in the mass spectrum obtained via chemical ionization of di-sec-butyl ether.
From Chapter 15:
Now Playing
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
449 Views
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
1.1K Views
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
585 Views
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
743 Views
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
2.0K Views
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
760 Views
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
1.1K Views
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
2.7K Views
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
1.2K Views
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
1.2K Views
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
781 Views
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
2.2K Views
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
650 Views
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
483 Views
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Methods
92 Views
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved