A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Not Published
Here, we present a protocol for custom diolistic labeling. The customization of this fluorescent neuronal labeling method provides a modifiable technique that can be adapted to a wide variety of research goals and applications in the analysis of neuronal morphology.
Diolistic labeling is increasingly utilized in neuroscience as a highly efficient and reproducible method for the visualization and analysis of neuronal morphology. The use of lipophilic carbocyanine dyes, combined with particle-mediated biolistic delivery, allows for the non-toxic fluorescent labeling of multiple neurons, including their dendritic arbors and spines, in both living and fixed tissue. Since first described, this novel labeling method has been modified and adapted to fit a variety of research goals and laboratory settings. Diolistic labeling has traditionally relied on the use of a commercially available, hand-held gene gun for the propulsion of coated micro-particles into tissue sections. Recently, laboratory-built biolistic devices have been developed and allow for the increased availability and customization of this method. Here, we discuss one such custom biolistic device and provide a detailed protocol for its use in diolistic labeling. In addition to decreasing the associated costs, the laboratory-built device also overcomes many of the obstacles normally experienced with traditional diolistics, allowing for reliable and reproducible neuronal labeling. The versatility of this method allows for its adaptation to a variety of laboratory settings and neuroscience-related research goals.
Three-dimensional morphological reconstructions of individual neurons and their dendritic arbors have served as the bases for analyzing the structure-function relationships within the nervous system1,2,3. For over a century, the main method for these studies consisted of various modifications of the famed Golgi staining procedure4, which has proved invaluable in developing our modern understanding of the nervous system1,2. However, this method and the various modifications of the silver impregnation of a percentage of the neuronal population are not without drawbacks. In particular, the small population of stained cells, while an advantage in morphological studies, elicits the lingering concern of selection bias2,5. The Golgi method also suffers from a limited compatibility with modern immunolabeling techniques and confocal microscopy. Additionally, data analysis following the Golgi method of staining may be negatively influenced by inconsistent neuronal impregnation, sectioning artifacts, and the overlapping of fine dendritic processes that leads to an indistinguishable morphology.
More recently, the use of neuronal transfection and electroporation methods have allowed for neuronal morphological labeling that circumvent the limitations experienced with Golgi staining6,7. While the administration of dye into individual cells through microinjection using intracellular or patch pipettes generates excellent single-cell labeling, the technique is technically demanding and may be vulnerable to sampling bias6,8,9,10. Neuronal transfection relies on the introduction of DNA constructs into target cells and tissues through a variety of methods. One such method of DNA transfer is known as "Biolistic" delivery, in which a gene gun utilizes a pressurized release of gas to propel DNA-coated micro-particles into tissue, crossing the plasma membrane to target the cells3. This method does not require the same level of technical expertise needed for conventional intracellular injections11. Furthermore, the random sampling used in biolistic delivery is ideal for full-scale quantitative analysis. However, the reliance on DNA transfection for fluorescence expression limits the method to use on living tissues in prepared cultures.
A more recent advancement from the biolistic approach to the morphological labeling of live or fixed neurons was first reported by Gan et al. in 200012 and is known as diolistic labeling. Diolistic labeling utilizes the lipophilic fluorescent dye dialkylcarbocyanine (DiI). While DiI has traditionally been used in anterograde and retrograde neuronal tracing, it has also proven to be effective in the fluorescent labeling of the neuronal cell membrane. Utilizing a diolistic approach13, the ballistic delivery of DiI-coated micro-carriers to fixed or cultured tissue slices allows the DiI to be incorporated into the cellular membrane. This occurs through lateral diffusion in living or fixed tissue, illuminating the cellular morphology. When ballistically delivered to tissue sections through a single pulse of high-purity gas (i.e., helium or nitrogen), individual DiI-coated tungsten particles are embedded in various neurons of the tissue. The micro-carriers pass into the soma of the neuron, while the DiI is captured in the neuronal membrane. Thus, the DiI is allowed to diffuse along the cellular membrane of a single neuron, fluorescently labeling the fine neuronal architecture of dendritic branches and spines13. DiI-labeled neurons can be observed through high-resolution imaging, such as confocal or two-photon microscopy, and can be digitally reconstructed in precise detail. The quantification and classification of dendritic branching and dendritic spines can be accomplished with appropriate software packages14,15.
Since its development, diolistic labeling has relied on the use of a commercially available gene gun, designed for biolistic transfection, for the propulsion of dye-coated micro-particles into tissue. However, these handheld devices have several drawbacks in the proposed staining method. First, the handheld nature of the device can alter the exact angle of delivery of the particles, causing inconsistent dye patterning in the tissue. Next, the standard tubular barrel of the gun causes increased particle density in the middle of the field and produces a burst of gas strong enough to damage the superficial layer of fixed tissue. Finally, the cost of commercially available devices and the associated materials may preclude some laboratories from using this type of methodology. In an effort to circumvent the aforementioned obstacles, Bridgman et al.11 designed and constructed a custom-built device for use in biolistic applications (Figure 1). With protocol modifications, the device has been optimized for the diolistic labeling of fixed tissues. The device consists of a solenoid valve triggered by a relay switch to fire for 50 ms and is a modification of an original model constructed by Dr. David Kirk at Washington University in Saint Louis. The main features of the device that contributes to its reliability and reproducibility include a precisely timed trigger for the solenoid valve, a precise height adjustment system, a narrow baffled barrel, and a small pore size filter11. Since the gun is mounted on a fixed base, the angle of delivery remains the same throughout all procedures, while the baffled barrel (constructed based on the design described by O'Brien)14 limits the amount of pressurized gas that contacts the tissue. Particle carriers (cartridges) are supported by a plastic ring that fits inside a modified filter holder (cartridge holder)11. The particle carriers are cut-off yellow (200 µL) pipette tips. The device components listed here allow for a similar device to be constructed and operated with commercially available materials for a lower cost than traditional gene gun systems.
All protocols using live animals must first be reviewed and approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and must follow officially approved procedures for the care and use of laboratory animals. This protocol has been approved by the IACUC at Missouri State University.
NOTE: The following protocol will detail the methods used in the diolistic labeling of fixed brain tissue obtained from rats prepared using transcardial perfusion. Previous studies16 have utilized similar methods of labeling but without the transcardial perfusion and from various animal species.
1. DiI/Tungsten-Coated Bead Preparation
NOTE: The DiI (1-1'-Dioctadecyl- 3,3,3',3'-tetra methylindo carbocyanine perchlorate)-coated beads should be prepared at least 72 h in advance of tissue preparation to allow for adequate drying and optimal labeling. Prior reports1 have shown increased success using CM-DiI when performing additional immunolabeling.
2. Cartridge Preparation
NOTE: Cartridges are made using standard 200-µL yellow pipette tips. Low-retention pipette tips should not be used in this protocol, as they may interfere with particle adherence to the inner wall of the tip. The protocol outlined here utilizes standard polypropylene research-grade pipette tips throughout the testing.
3. Tissue Preparation
NOTE: Through repeated trials, it has been found that tissue fixation by the transcardial perfusion of a low-concentration (1.5%) aldehyde prepared with 25 mM PBS greatly enhances the results of neuronal labeling. Higher concentrations (4%) were determined to over-fixate the tissues and result in incomplete labeling. Lower fixative levels resulted in excessive dye leakage from cellular membranes.
4. Diolistic Cellular Labeling
5. Confocal Microscopy and Analysis
Using the procedure presented here, custom diolistic labeling has been used to characterize alterations in neuronal morphology of the lateral/dentate nucleus of the cerebellum. Here, we show representative labeling results from developing rat pups exposed to abnormally high levels of the serotonergic agonist 5-methyloxytryptamine (5-MT), both pre-and postnatally18. With the aid of quantitative software, dendritic branching morphology (Figure 2), architecture (Figur...
Here, we demonstrate a method of custom diolistic labeling to quantitatively analyze neuronal morphology and synaptic connectivity. The versatility of this method allows for its adaptation to a variety of laboratory settings and research goals. While the results presented here exhibit its use in rat neural tissue, other studies have used diolistic labeling to investigate diverse species through various neuroscience-related applications16. The method is relatively fast, as it takes 1-2 days from ti...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors are grateful for the technical assistance provided by Dr. Paul Bridgman of Washington University School of Medicine. Appreciation is also given to Dr. David Kirk and Dr. Michael Nonet of Washington University School of Medicine, who have made custom biolistic devices for their respective laboratories.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Granular Paraformaldehyde | Sigma-Aldrich | P6148-5KG | |
Sodium Phosphate Monobasic Anhydrous | Sigma-Aldrich | S2554-500G | |
Sodium Phosphate Dibasic Anhydrous | Sigma-Aldrich | 71640-1KG | |
Type 1-A, Low EEO Gel Agarose, | Sigma Aldrich | A0169-250G | |
Polyvinylpyrrolidone | Sigma Aldrich | 77627-100G | |
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) | Sigma Aldrich | D65100-1L | |
Yellow Pipet tips 1000pk | Fisher Scientific | 2681151 | |
Corning Transwell Multiple Well Plate with Permeable Polyester Membrane Inserts | Fisher Scientific | 07-200-155 | |
Carbocyanine fluorescent DiI 100mg | Invitrogen | D-282 | |
ProLong Gold Antifade | Invitrogen | P36930 | |
1.3-µm Tungsten particles 6G | BioRad | 165-2269 | |
Millipore Swinnex Filter Holder | EDMmillipore | SX0001300 | |
Neurolucida Neuron Tracing Software | MicroBrightField | n/a |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionExplore More Articles
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved