seconds-administration-guidelines-fast-tool-to-assess-consciousness

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Establishing an accurate diagnosis is crucial for patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) following a severe brain injury. The Coma Recovery ...

University of Liège

University Hospital of Liège

The Nociception Coma Scale-Revised (NCS-R) was developed to help assess pain in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC). Several studies have shown its sensitivity in assessing response to acute noxious stimuli. However, they failed to determine a reliable cut-off score that could be used to infer pain processing in these patients. This retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to determine a NCS-R cut-off score supporting preserved neural basis for pain experience, based on brain metabolism preservation as measured by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). We included patients in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) confirmed by the FDG-PET and examined the NCS-R total scores. As the highest score was 4, we defined the cut-off to be 5 and compared the brain metabolism of these patients to matched patients with DOC and a NCS-R cut-off score ≥5 (ie, potential pain), as well as healthy subjects. We found a higher global cerebral metabolism in healthy subjects compared to both patient groups and also in patients with potential pain compared with FDG-PET confirmed UWS. We observed a preserved metabolism in the left insula in patients with potential pain compared with FDG-PET confirmed UWS. PERSPECTIVES: Our data suggest that using the cut-off score of 5 could be helpful to improve pain management in patients with DOC. Future studies should focus on patients showing scores below this cut-off to better characterize their profile and improve care.

Nociception Coma Scale-Revised Allows to Identify Patients With Preserved Neural Basis for Pain Experience.

Memories of near-death experiences (NDEs) are recalled as "realer" than memories of other real or imagined events. Given their rich phenomenology, emotionality and consequentiality, it was hypothesized that they could meet some aspects of the definition of flashbulb memories. We aimed to identify and compare the episodic and non-episodic information provided in verbal recollections of NDE, flashbulb, and control autobiographical memories. The phenomenological characteristics and centrality of the memories were also compared. Twenty-five participants who had lived a NDE in a life-threatening situation were interviewed and completed the Memory Characteristics Questionnaires as well as the Centrality of Event Scale for their NDE, a flashbulb and another autobiographical memory used as control. Overall, transcribed NDE verbal recollections included a higher overall amount of details and more internal/episodic information than control autobiographical and flashbulb memories. Moreover, flashbulb memories were associated to a lower intensity of feelings while remembering and a lower personal importance, and are less reactivated and less susceptible to be remembered from a first person perspective compared to NDE and control autobiographical memories. Finally, NDE memories are the most central memories to experiencers' identity, followed by control autobiographical and then by flashbulb memories. These findings corroborate previous studies highlighting the impact and uniqueness of NDE memories.

Near-Death Experience Memories Include More Episodic Components Than Flashbulb Memories.

The evaluation of the level of consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) is primarily based on behavioural assessments. Patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) do not show any sign of awareness of their environment, while minimally conscious state (MCS) patients show reproducible but fluctuating signs of awareness. Some patients, although with remaining cognitive abilities, are not able to exhibit overt voluntary responses at the bedside and may be misdiagnosed as UWS. Several studies investigated functional neuroimaging and neurophysiology as an additional tool to evaluate the level of consciousness and to detect covert command following in DOC. Most of these studies are based on auditory stimulation, neglecting patients suffering from decreased or absent hearing abilities. In the present study, we aim to assess the response to a P3-based paradigm in 40 patients with DOC and 12 healthy participants using auditory (AEP) and vibrotactile (VTP) stimulation. To this end, an EEG-based brain-computer interface was used at DOC patient's bedside. We compared the significance of the P3 performance (i.e., the interpretation of significance of the evoked P3 response) as obtained by 'direct processing' (i.e., theoretical-based significance threshold) and 'offline processing' (i.e., permutation-based single subject level threshold). We evaluated whether the P3 performances were dependent on clinical variables such as diagnosis (UWS and MCS), aetiology and time since injury. Last we tested the dependency of AEP and VTP performances at the single subject level. Direct processing tends to overestimate P3 performance. We did not find any difference in the presence of a P3 performance according to the level of consciousness (UWS vs. MCS) or the aetiology (traumatic vs. non-traumatic brain injury). The performance achieved at the AEP paradigm was independent from what was achieved at the VTP paradigm, indicating that some patients performed better on the AEP task while others performed better on the VTP task. Our results support the importance of using multimodal approaches in the assessment of DOC patients in order to optimise the evaluation of patient's abilities.

Estelle A. C. Bonin

Coma Science Group,
GIGA-Consciousness,
GIGA Research Center,
Coma Science Group, GIGA-Consciousness, GIGA research center

University of Liège

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Estelle A. C. Bonin

.css-o250i3{font-size:18px;font-family:Open Sans,sans-serif;line-height:21.6px;}Coma Science Group,GIGA-Consciousness,GIGA Research Center,Coma Science Group, GIGA-Consciousness, GIGA research center

University of Liège

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Coma Science Group,
GIGA-Consciousness,
GIGA Research Center,
Coma Science Group, GIGA-Consciousness, GIGA research center