An Instrumented Pull Test to Characterize Postural Responses

Impairment of postural reflexes, termed postural instability, is a common and disabling deficit in Parkinson's disease. To assess postural reflexes, ...

The University of Melbourne

The Royal Melbourne Hospital

The Bionics Institute

Tremor is characterized commonly through subjective clinical rating scales. Accelerometer-based techniques for objective tremor measurement have been developed in the past, yet these measures are usually presented as an unintuitive dimensionless index without measurement units. Here we have developed a tool (TREMBAL) to provide quantifiable and objective measures of tremor severity using electromagnetic motion tracking. We aimed to compare TREMBAL's objective measures with clinical tremor ratings and determine the test-retest reliability of our technique. Eight participants with ET receiving deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy were consented. Tremor was simultaneously recorded using TREMBAL and video during DBS adjustment. After each adjustment, participants performed a hands-outstretched task (for postural tremor) and a finger-nose task (for kinetic tremor). Video recordings were de-identified, randomized, and shown to a panel of movement disorder specialists to obtain their ratings. Regression analysis and Pearson's correlations were used to determine agreement between datasets. Subsets of the trial were repeated to assess test-retest reliability. Tremor amplitude and velocity measures were in close agreement with mean clinical ratings (r  >  0.90) for both postural and kinetic tremors. Test-retest reliability for both translational and rotational components of tremor showed intra-class correlations  >0.80. TREMBAL assessments showed that tremor gradually improved with increasing DBS therapy-this was also supported by clinical observation. TREMBAL measurements are a sensitive, objective and reliable assessment of tremor severity. This tool may have application in clinical trials and in aiding automated optimization of deep brain stimulation.

Clinical validation of a precision electromagnetic tremor measurement system in participants receiving deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.

Postural reflexes are impaired in conditions such as Parkinson's disease, leading to difficulty walking and falls. In clinical practice, postural responses are assessed using the "pull test," where an examiner tugs the prewarned standing patient backward at the shoulders and grades the response. However, validity of the pull test is debated, with issues including scaling and variability in administration and interpretation. It is unclear whether to assess the first trial or only subsequent repeated trials. The ecological relevance of a forewarned backward challenge is also debated. We therefore developed an instrumented version of the pull test to characterize responses and clarify how the test should be performed and interpreted. In 33 healthy participants, "pulls" were manually administered and pull force measured. Trunk and step responses were assessed with motion tracking. We probed for the StartReact phenomenon (where preprepared responses are released early by a startling stimulus) by delivering concurrent normal or "startling" auditory stimuli. We found that the first pull triggers a different response, including a larger step size suggesting more destabilization. This is consistent with "first trial effects," reported by platform translation studies, where movement execution appears confounded by startle reflex-like activity. Thus, first pull test trials have clinical relevance and should not be discarded as practice. Supportive of ecological relevance, responses to repeated pulls exhibited StartReact, as previously reported with a variety of other postural challenges, including those delivered with unexpected timing and direction. Examiner pull force significantly affected the postural response, particularly the size of stepping. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We characterized postural responses elicited by the clinical "pull test" using instrumentation. The first pull triggers a different response, including a larger step size suggesting more destabilization. Thus, first trials likely have important clinical and ecological relevance and should not be discarded as practice. Responses to repeated pulls can be accelerated with a startling stimulus, as reported with a variety of other challenges. Examiner pull force was a significant factor influencing the postural response.

Neurophysiological analysis of the clinical pull test.

Impaired balance is a major contributor to falls and diminished quality of life in Parkinson's disease, yet the pathophysiology is poorly understood. Here, we assessed if patients with Parkinson's disease and severe clinical balance impairment have deficits in the intermittent and continuous control systems proposed to maintain upright stance, and furthermore, whether such deficits are potentially reversible, with the experimental therapy of pedunculopontine nucleus deep brain stimulation. Two subject groups were assessed: (i) 13 patients with Parkinson's disease and severe clinical balance impairment, implanted with pedunculopontine nucleus deep brain stimulators; and (ii) 13 healthy control subjects. Patients were assessed in the OFF medication state and blinded to two conditions; off and on pedunculopontine nucleus stimulation. Postural sway data (deviations in centre of pressure) were collected during quiet stance using posturography. Intermittent control of sway was assessed by calculating the frequency of intermittent switching behaviour (discontinuities), derived using a wavelet-based transformation of the sway time series. Continuous control of sway was assessed with a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller model using ballistic reaction time as a measure of feedback delay. Clinical balance impairment was assessed using the 'pull test' to rate postural reflexes and by rating attempts to arise from sitting to standing. Patients with Parkinson's disease demonstrated reduced intermittent switching of postural sway compared with healthy controls. Patients also had abnormal feedback gains in postural sway according to the PID model. Pedunculopontine nucleus stimulation improved intermittent switching of postural sway, feedback gains in the PID model and clinical balance impairment. Clinical balance impairment correlated with intermittent switching of postural sway (rho = - 0.705, P < 0.001) and feedback gains in the PID model (rho = 0.619, P = 0.011). These results suggest that dysfunctional intermittent and continuous control systems may contribute to the pathophysiology of clinical balance impairment in Parkinson's disease. Clinical balance impairment and their related control system deficits are potentially reversible, as demonstrated by their improvement with pedunculopontine nucleus deep brain stimulation.

Joy Tan

Department of Medical Bionics

The University of Melbourne

An Instrumented Pull Test to Characterize Postural Responses

Joy Tan

.css-o250i3{font-size:18px;font-family:Open Sans,sans-serif;line-height:21.6px;}Department of Medical Bionics

The University of Melbourne

An Instrumented Pull Test to Characterize Postural Responses

Department of Medical Bionics